Literature DB >> 28673124

The choice of methods in determining the optimal cut-off value for quantitative diagnostic test evaluation.

Karimolla Hajian-Tilaki1.   

Abstract

Introduction The choice of criteria in determining optimal cut-off value is a matter of concern in quantitative diagnostic tests. Several indexes such as Youden's index, Euclidean index, product of sensitivity and specificity in receiver operator characteristic space and diagnostic odds ratio have been used in clinical practices but their advantages and limitations are not well understood by clinicians. This study aimed to compare these methods in determining optimal cut-off values for quantitative diagnostic test. Methods The different configurations of binormal and bilogistic distributions with equal and unequal variances for nondiseased and diseased subjects were examined. The cut-off values with increment of 0.1 in Z-scale were varied. Then, the Youden's index, Euclidean index, product of sensitivity and specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated over various cut-off values under distributional assumptions with confirmed parameters. Results According to the obtained data from binormal model and equal variances, the optimal cut-off values derived from Youden's index, Euclidean index, and product method were similar but the diagnostic odds ratio yielded either extremely low or extremely high optimal cut-off value. For bilogistic pair distributions with equal variances, the Youden's, Euclidean indexes and product method resulted in an identical cut-off value but the diagnostic odds ratio was constant over various cut-points. By both binormal and bilogistic data with more variations in nondiseased population, the Youden's index produced a higher sensitive optimal cut-off value; but with more variation for diseased distribution, the Euclidean index showed a more sensitive optimal cut-off. For bilogistic data with unequal variance, the log(diagnostic odds ratio) had a straight line relationship over cut-off values with either positive or negative slope. Conclusion As a measure of association, diagnostic odds ratio cannot be informative in determining an optimal cut-off value. The advantage of receiver operator characteristic analysis to obtain the optimal cut-off value is to use Youden's index, Euclidean index, or product index which is recommended. The choice between them depends on variability of test results in diseased and nondiseased subjects and the desired sensitivity.

Keywords:  Euclidean index; ROC analysis; Youden’s index; diagnostic odds ratio; optimal cut-off; product index

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28673124     DOI: 10.1177/0962280216680383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  27 in total

1.  Ahead of the (ROC) Curve: A Statistical Approach to Utilizing Ex-Gaussian Parameters of Reaction Time in Diagnosing ADHD Across Three Developmental Periods.

Authors:  Hilary Galloway-Long; Cynthia Huang-Pollock; Kristina Neely
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.114

2.  Development of COVID-19 severity assessment score in adults presenting with COVID-19 to the emergency department.

Authors:  Faysal Subhani; Abdul Ahad Chhotani; Shahan Waheed; Rana Osama Zahid; Kiran Azizi; Ahmed Raheem Buksh
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.667

3.  Prognostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in predicting risk of ICU admission for COVID-19: application of time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves.

Authors:  Zahra Geraili; Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki; Masomeh Bayani; Seyed Reza Hosseini; Soraya Khafri; Soheil Ebrahimpour; Mostafa Javanian; Arefeh Babazadeh; Mehran Shokri
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 1.573

4.  Oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) assesses cerebral oxygen metabolism of deep gray matter in patients with pre-eclampsia.

Authors:  Linfeng Yang; Junghun Cho; Tao Chen; Kelly M Gillen; Jing Li; Qihao Zhang; Lingfei Guo; Yi Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 7.034

5.  Evaluation of unsupervised 30-second chair stand test performance assessed by wearable sensors to predict fall status in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Lindsey J Tulipani; Brett Meyer; Dakota Allen; Andrew J Solomon; Ryan S McGinnis
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.746

6.  Kinematics observed during ACL injury are associated with large early peak knee abduction moments during a change of direction task in healthy adolescents.

Authors:  Haraldur B Sigurðsson; Jón Karlsson; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Kristín Briem
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Analysis of gut microbiota alteration and application as an auxiliary prognostic marker for sepsis in children: a pilot study.

Authors:  Bailu Du; Nan Shen; Yue Tao; Sijuan Sun; Fang Zhang; Hong Ren; Qing Cao; Xi Mo
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2021-06

8.  Foundational Considerations for Artificial Intelligence Using Ophthalmic Images.

Authors:  Michael D Abràmoff; Brad Cunningham; Bakul Patel; Malvina B Eydelman; Theodore Leng; Taiji Sakamoto; Barbara Blodi; S Marlene Grenon; Risa M Wolf; Arjun K Manrai; Justin M Ko; Michael F Chiang; Danton Char
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 14.277

9.  Oral Fludrocortisone Test for Salt-Sensitive Screening in Hypertensive Patients: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Andrea Pio-Abreu; Isac de Castro; Giovanio Vieira da Silva; Katia Coelho Ortega; Decio Mion
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.420

10.  Comparison of the performance of five screening methods for sarcopenia.

Authors:  Médéa Locquet; Charlotte Beaudart; Jean-Yves Reginster; Jean Petermans; Olivier Bruyère
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 4.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.