| Literature DB >> 28672792 |
Jordina Fornell1, Jorge Soriano2, Miguel Guerrero3, Juan de Dios Sirvent4, Marta Ferran-Marqués5, Elena Ibáñez6, Leonardo Barrios7, Maria Dolors Baró8, Santiago Suriñach9, Carme Nogués10, Jordi Sort11,12, Eva Pellicer13.
Abstract
PureEntities:
Keywords: biodegradable material; drug delivery; hybrid material; porous membrane
Year: 2017 PMID: 28672792 PMCID: PMC5535221 DOI: 10.3390/nano7070155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Summary of the different procedures (in chronological order) followed to incorporate Tf-AF488 in the FeMnSi-coated PP membranes for three different cases (denoted as Samples 1, 2 and 3).
| Steps (# of Times) | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading with Tf-AF488 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Cleaning with HBSS | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Drying under vacuum | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Stopper | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Drying under vacuum | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Figure 1SEM image of PP membranes coated with (a) Fe and (b) Fe-14Mn-4Si alloy. The insets are higher magnification images.
Figure 2Cross-section TEM image of the FeMnSi-coated PP membrane (a) showing the outer and inner FeMnSi coating (b) higher magnification image taken inside the membrane; and (c) the FeMnSi layer grown on top of the membrane of ~40 nm in thickness. The inset belongs to the corresponding SAED pattern.
Figure 3Room-temperature hysteresis loops of Fe- and FeMnSi-coated PP membranes.
Concentration of Fe and Mn released from the Fe- and FeMnSi-coated PP membranes after immersion in HBSS solution for 15 days at 37 °C.
| Membrane Type | [Fe] (μg L−1) | [Mn] (μg L−1) |
|---|---|---|
| PP membrane | <10 | <10 |
| Fe | <10 | <10 |
| Fe-14Mn-4Si | 19 ± 6 | 17 ± 2 |
Figure 4Cell viability measured with MTT cell proliferation assay protocol for the control, Fe- and FeMnSi-coated membranes.
Figure 5Schematic picture of the functionalization of the PP membranes process.
Figure 6Fluorescence and reflectance images of (a) Sample 1; (d) Sample 2; and (g) Sample 3. Transferrin kinetic cumulative release of (b) Sample 1; (e) Sample 2 and (h) Sample 3. SKBR-3 cells observed under differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy and fluorescence microscopy at 24 h of incubation for (c) Sample 1; (f) Sample 2, and (i) Sample 3.
Figure 73D reconstruction obtained from CSLM images showing the distribution of Tf-AF488, in green, and the structural image of the PP membrane, in red (Sample 3).