Literature DB >> 28671551

3D printing for sizing left atrial appendage closure device: head-to-head comparison with computed tomography and transoesophageal echocardiography.

Michaela Monika Hell1, Stephan Achenbach, In Seong Yoo, Joerg Franke, Florian Blachutzik, Jens Roether, Verena Graf, Dorette Raaz-Schrauder, Mohamed Marwan, Christian Schlundt.   

Abstract

AIMS: Device sizing for LAA closure using transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) can be challenging due to complex LAA anatomy. We investigated whether the use of 3D-printed left atrial appendage (LAA) models based on preprocedural computed tomography (CT) permits accurate device sizing. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty-two (22) patients (73±8 years, 55% male) with atrial fibrillation requiring anticoagulation at high bleeding risk underwent LAA closure (WATCHMAN device). Preprocedurally, LAA was sized by TEE and third-generation dual-source CT. Based on CT, 3D printing models of LAA anatomy were created for simulation of device implantation. Device compression was assessed in a CT scan of the 3D model with the implanted device. Implantation was successful in all patients. Mean LAA ostium diameter based on TEE was 22±4 mm and based on CT 25±3 mm (p=0.014). Predicted device size based on simulated implantation in the 3D model was equal to the device finally implanted in 21/22 patients (95%). TEE would have undersized the device in 10/22 patients (45%). Device compression determined in the 3D-CT model corresponded closely with compression upon implantation (16±3% vs. 18±5%, r=0.622, p=0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific CT-based 3D printing models may assist device selection and prediction of device compression in the context of interventional LAA closure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28671551     DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  10 in total

1.  The value of the left atrial appendage orifice perimeter of 3D model based on 3D TEE data in the choice of device size of LAmbre™ occluder.

Authors:  Dan Jia; Qing Zhou; Hong-Ning Song; Lan Zhang; Jin-Ling Chen; Yu Liu; Bin Kong; Fa-Zhi He; Yi-Jia Wang; Yuan-Ting Yang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  3D-printed heart model to guide LAA closure: useful in clinical practice?

Authors:  Anne-Lise Hachulla; Stéphane Noble; Gabriel Guglielmi; Daniel Agulleiro; Hajo Müller; Jean-Paul Vallée
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the TrueFusion™ fusion-imaging technology.

Authors:  Dominik Nelles; Jan Wilko Schrickel; Georg Nickenig; Alexander Sedaghat
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 4.  Three-dimensional printing in structural heart disease and intervention.

Authors:  Yiting Fan; Randolph H L Wong; Alex Pui-Wai Lee
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

Review 5.  3D Printing for Cardiovascular Applications: From End-to-End Processes to Emerging Developments.

Authors:  Ramtin Gharleghi; Claire A Dessalles; Ronil Lal; Sinead McCraith; Kiran Sarathy; Nigel Jepson; James Otton; Abdul I Barakat; Susann Beier
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Computed Tomography-Derived Three-Dimensional Printed Models versus Two-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device Planning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Garly Saint Croix; Syed Imran Zaidi; Viky S Loescher; Christos G Mihos
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2020-12-31

Review 7.  From ideas to long-term studies: 3D printing clinical trials review.

Authors:  Jan Witowski; Mateusz Sitkowski; Tomasz Zuzak; Jasamine Coles-Black; Jason Chuen; Piotr Major; Michał Pdziwiatr
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 8.  Accuracy of Commonly-Used Imaging Modalities in Assessing Left Atrial Appendage for Interventional Closure: Review Article.

Authors:  Ramez Morcos; Haider Al Taii; Priya Bansal; Joel Casale; Rupesh Manam; Vikram Patel; Anthony Cioci; Michael Kucharik; Arjun Malhotra; Brijeshwar Maini
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Three-dimensional printing for cardiovascular diseases: from anatomical modeling to dynamic functionality.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Hongning Song; Yuanting Yang; Quan Cao; Yugang Hu; Jinling Chen; Juan Guo; Yijia Wang; Dan Jia; Sheng Cao; Qing Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 10.  The Role of 3D Printing in Planning Complex Medical Procedures and Training of Medical Professionals-Cross-Sectional Multispecialty Review.

Authors:  Jarosław Meyer-Szary; Marlon Souza Luis; Szymon Mikulski; Agastya Patel; Finn Schulz; Dmitry Tretiakow; Justyna Fercho; Kinga Jaguszewska; Mikołaj Frankiewicz; Ewa Pawłowska; Radosław Targoński; Łukasz Szarpak; Katarzyna Dądela; Robert Sabiniewicz; Joanna Kwiatkowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.