| Literature DB >> 28670887 |
Sakkarn Sangkhamanon1, Piangpen Jongpairat, Aumkhae Sookprasert, Kosin Wirasorn, Attapol Titapun, Ake Pugkhem, Piti Ungareevittaya, Jarin Chindaprasirt.
Abstract
Background: Effective treatments for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are still lacking. There are promising results of checkpoint inhibitor programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) activities in early phase trials. This study aimed to investigate the expression of PD-L1 and its relation to possible treatments for CCA.Entities:
Keywords: Biliary tract cancer; cholangiocarcinoma; immune studies; neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; PD-L1
Year: 2017 PMID: 28670887 PMCID: PMC6373788 DOI: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.6.1671
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
Figure 1PD-L1 Expression in FFPE Samples Stained with Anti-PD-L1 Antibody (Clone 5H1) in Cholangiocarcinoma. Positive brown fine granular staining is present in tumor cells with moderate signal intensity in the cytoplasm (a). In panel (b), tumor cells are negative for PD-L1.
Baseline Characteristics of the CCA Patients (N=46)
| Variables | Number (%) |
|---|---|
| Age (median; range) | (57.5; 45-76) |
| < 60 years | 25 (54.3) |
| ≥ 60 years | 21 (45.7) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 33 (71.7) |
| Female | 13 (28.3) |
| Tumor location | |
| Intrahepatic | 33 (71.7) |
| Extrahepatic | 13 (28.3) |
| Tumor grading | |
| Well differentiated | 8 (17.4) |
| Moderately differentiated | 31 (67.4) |
| Poorly differentiated | 7 (15.2) |
| TNM staging | |
| I | 4 (8.7) |
| II | 10 (21.7) |
| III | 12 (26.1) |
| IV | 20 (43.5) |
| Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio | |
| < 3 | 24 (52.2) |
| ≥ 3 | 22 (47.8) |
| Nodal status | |
| Negative | 28 (60.9) |
| Positive | 18 (39.1) |
| Metastatic status | |
| Negative | 39 (84.8) |
| Positive | 7 (15.2) |
Correlation between Clinical Variables and PDL1 Status
| Variables | PDL1 status | Odds ratio | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Positive | |||
| N (%) | N (%) | |||
| Lymph node status | ||||
| Negative | 10 (71.4) | 18 (56.2) | 2.2 | 0.246 |
| Positive | 4 (28.6) | 14 (43.8) | ||
| Tumor grade | ||||
| Well/moderately differentiated | 12 (85.7) | 27 (84.4) | 0.014 | 0.642 |
| Poorly differentiated | 2 (14.3) | 5 (15.6) | ||
| Staging | ||||
| I-III | 11 (78.6) | 15 (46.9) | 3.98 | 0.046* |
| IV | 3 (21.4) | 17 (53.1) | ||
| Serum albumin | ||||
| < 3 g/dL | 1 (7.1) | 7 (22.6) | 0.26 | 0.402 |
| ≥ 3 g/dL | 13 (92.9) | 24 (77.4) | ||
| Serum CA 19-9 | ||||
| < 100 U/ml | 6 (46.2) | 14 (51.9) | 0.8 | 0.736 |
| ≥ 100 U/ml | 7 (53.8) | 13 (48.1) | ||
| Serum CEA | ||||
| < 2.5 ng/ml | 3 (23.1) | 4 (13.8) | 1.87 | 0.657 |
| ≥ 2.5 ng/ml | 10 (76.9) | 25 (86.2) | ||
| NLR | ||||
| <3 | 11 (78.6) | 13 (40.6) | 5.36 | 0.018* |
| >3 | 3 (21.4) | 19 (59.4) | ||
CA 19-9, Cancer antigen 19-9; CEA, Carcinoembryonic antigen; NLR, Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio
Figure 2Kaplan Meier Analysis of Survival. According to PD-L1 (<1% vs > 1%), the median survival were 7.97 vs 7.23 months, respectively. The hazard ratio was 1.39 (95% CI 0.72-2.68).