BACKGROUND: High neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with poor overall survival (OS) in gastric cancer. This study evaluates whether NLR, in addition to other parameters including absolute neutrophil count (ANC), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), absolute eosinophil count (AEC), absolute monocyte count (AMC), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are associated with distant metastases, a common and poor prognostic feature of gastric cancer. METHODS: Clinical data from 502 gastric cancer patients treated at King Hussein Cancer Center (Amman, Jordan) have been retrospectively reviewed. We examined the association between ANC, ALC, AEC, AMC, NLR, MLR and PLR with the baseline distant metastases and OS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was utilized to determine the optimal NLR cutoff value for association with distant metastases. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that patients with high baseline NLR (≥3.9) had more distant metastases on presentation than patients with low NLR (<3.9), (P value: 0.0001 and 0.0005, respectively). Furthermore, patients with high baseline ANC (≥6,015/µL), AEC (≥215/µL), PLR (≥0.15) had more distant metastases in comparison to patients with low baseline ANC (<6,015/µL), AEC (<215/µL), PLR (<0.15) (P value: 0.024, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively). High ANC, NLR, MLR and PLR are associated with poor OS (P value: 0.046, 0.0003, 0.027, and <0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: High ANC, AEC, NLR, and PLR are associated with distant metastases on presentation in gastric cancer. In the era of cancer immunotherapy, whether these immune phenomena predict the response of gastric cancer to immunotherapy is unknown.
BACKGROUND: High neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with poor overall survival (OS) in gastric cancer. This study evaluates whether NLR, in addition to other parameters including absolute neutrophil count (ANC), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), absolute eosinophil count (AEC), absolute monocyte count (AMC), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are associated with distant metastases, a common and poor prognostic feature of gastric cancer. METHODS: Clinical data from 502 gastric cancer patients treated at King Hussein Cancer Center (Amman, Jordan) have been retrospectively reviewed. We examined the association between ANC, ALC, AEC, AMC, NLR, MLR and PLR with the baseline distant metastases and OS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was utilized to determine the optimal NLR cutoff value for association with distant metastases. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that patients with high baseline NLR (≥3.9) had more distant metastases on presentation than patients with low NLR (<3.9), (P value: 0.0001 and 0.0005, respectively). Furthermore, patients with high baseline ANC (≥6,015/µL), AEC (≥215/µL), PLR (≥0.15) had more distant metastases in comparison to patients with low baseline ANC (<6,015/µL), AEC (<215/µL), PLR (<0.15) (P value: 0.024, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively). High ANC, NLR, MLR and PLR are associated with poor OS (P value: 0.046, 0.0003, 0.027, and <0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: High ANC, AEC, NLR, and PLR are associated with distant metastases on presentation in gastric cancer. In the era of cancer immunotherapy, whether these immune phenomena predict the response of gastric cancer to immunotherapy is unknown.
Entities:
Keywords:
Gastric cancer; distant metastases; neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)
Authors: Dongyun Yang; Andrew Hendifar; Cosima Lenz; Kayo Togawa; Felicitas Lenz; Georg Lurje; Alexandra Pohl; Thomas Winder; Yan Ning; Susan Groshen; Heinz-Josef Lenz Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2011-06
Authors: Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: M Stotz; A Gerger; F Eisner; J Szkandera; H Loibner; A L Ress; P Kornprat; W AlZoughbi; W A Zoughbi; F S Seggewies; C Lackner; T Stojakovic; H Samonigg; G Hoefler; M Pichler Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 9.075
Authors: I Abuelbeh; O Abu-Shawer; M Abu-Shawer; M Alkderat; M Safi; A Alwazani; A Alkhatib; B Abu-Hussain; M Aladawi; S Ismail; T Altamimi; Taher Abu Hejleh Journal: Avicenna J Med Date: 2022-07-03
Authors: Chang Ik Yoon; Soeun Park; Yoon Jin Cha; Hye Sun Lee; Soong June Bae; Chihwan Cha; Da Young Lee; Sung Gwe Ahn; Joon Jeong Journal: Breast Date: 2019-10-03 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Shu Wen; Nan Chen; Ying Hu; Litao Huang; Jin Peng; Meina Yang; Xiaoyang Shen; Yang Song; Liangzhi Xu Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 4.452