Literature DB >> 28670694

Medical and non-medical expenditure for breast cancer diagnosis and treatment in China: a multicenter cross-sectional study.

Xian-Zhen Liao1, Ju-Fang Shi2, Jing-Shi Liu1, Hui-Yao Huang2, Lan-Wei Guo3, Xin-Yu Zhu2,4, Hai-Fan Xiao1, Le Wang2, Ya-Na Bai4, Guo-Xiang Liu5, A-Yan Mao6, Jian-Song Ren2, Xiao-Jie Sun7, Ling Mai3, Yu-Qin Liu8, Bing-Bing Song9, Ji-Yong Gong10, Jin-Yi Zhou11, Ling-Bing Du12, Qi Zhou13, Rong Cao14, Lin Zhu15, Ying Ren16, Pei-An Lou17, Li Lan18, Xiao-Hua Sun19, Xiao Qi20, Yuan-Zheng Wang21, Kai Zhang2, Jie He2, Min Dai2.   

Abstract

AIM: We aimed to assess economic burden of breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and treatment in China through a multicenter cross-sectional study, and to obtain theoretical evidence for policy-making.
METHODS: This survey was conducted in 37 hospital centers across 13 provinces in China from September 2012 to December 2014. We collected information on the subject characteristics. We then assessed the medical and non-medical expenditure for BC diagnosis and treatment, factors influencing the average case expense, variations between medical and non-medical expenditure at different clinical stages, economic impact of overall expenditure in newly diagnosed course after reimbursement to the patient's family, composition of non-medical expenditure and time loss for the patient and family.
RESULTS: Among 2746 women with BC (72.6% were admitted to specialized hospitals), the overall average expenditure was US $8450 (medical expenditure: $7527; non-medical expenditure: $922). Significant differences were found among the overall expenditure in the four clinical stages (P < 0.0001); the expenditure was higher in stages III and IV than that in stages I and II, whereas the stage IV was the highest (P < 0.0001). Moreover, a higher self-reported predicted reimbursement ratio was associated with a less economic impact on the patient's family, and the average time lost was estimated as $1529.
CONCLUSIONS: Early detection and treatment of breast cancer might be effective for decreasing the economic burden, because costs escalate as the degree of malignancy increases.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; medical expenditure; multicenter; non-medical expenditure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28670694     DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1743-7555            Impact factor:   2.601


  12 in total

1.  No expenditure difference among patients with liver cancer at stage I-IV: Findings from a multicenter cross-sectional study in China.

Authors:  Haike Lei; Lin Lei; Jufang Shi; Yongzhong Wu; Ling Liang; Huiyao Huang; Mei He; Fangzhou Bai; Maomao Cao; Hui Qiu; Yuting Wang; Chengcheng Liu; Jia Du; Hong Wang; Yan Zhang; Mengdi Cao; Ji Peng; Ni Li; Chunfeng Qu; Min Dai; Wanqing Chen; Jie He
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.026

Review 2.  A systematic review of financial toxicity among cancer patients in China.

Authors:  Binbin Xu; Li Hu; Qinqin Cheng; Winnie K W So
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2022-04-27

Review 3.  The Out-of-Pocket Cost Burden of Cancer Care-A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Nicolas Iragorri; Claire de Oliveira; Natalie Fitzgerald; Beverley Essue
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Cost of breast cancer care in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Parsa Erfani; Kayleigh Bhangdia; Jean Claude Mugunga; Lydia E Pace; Temidayo Fadelu
Journal:  JBI Evid Synth       Date:  2021-02-19

5.  Global treatment costs of breast cancer by stage: A systematic review.

Authors:  Li Sun; Rosa Legood; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Shivani Mathur Gaiha; Zia Sadique
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Costs of breast cancer treatment incurred by women in Vietnam.

Authors:  Tran Thu Ngan; Nguyen Bao Ngoc; Hoang Van Minh; Michael Donnelly; Ciaran O'Neill
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Financial toxicity of cancer care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Donkor; Vivian Della Atuwo-Ampoh; Frederick Yakanu; Eric Torgbenu; Edward Kwabena Ameyaw; Doris Kitson-Mills; Verna Vanderpuye; Kofi Adesi Kyei; Samuel Anim-Sampong; Omar Khader; Jamal Khader
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.359

8.  Cost-effectiveness of risk-based breast cancer screening programme, China.

Authors:  Li Sun; Rosa Legood; Zia Sadique; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Li Yang
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 9.408

9.  Half-dose fulvestrant plus anastrozole as a first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoting Huang; Xiuhua Weng; Shen Lin; Yiwei Liu; Shaohong Luo; Hang Wang; Wai-Kit Ming; Pinfang Huang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Expenditure and Financial Burden for Stomach Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment in China: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Jian Yin; Huiyao Huang; Le Wang; Lanwei Guo; Jufang Shi; Min Dai
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.