Ryusaburo Mori1, Saigen Naruse2, Hiroyuki Shimada3. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Nihon University Hospital, 1-6 Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyodaku, Tokyo, 101-8309, Japan. 2. Miyahara Ophthalmological Clinic, Saitama City, Saitama, Japan. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Nihon University Hospital, 1-6 Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyodaku, Tokyo, 101-8309, Japan. sshimada@olive.ocn.ne.jp.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare postoperative outcomes of 27-gauge (G) and 25-G vitrectomy conducted as day surgery. METHODS: In total, 200 consecutive eyes that underwent primary vitrectomy (27-G in 100 eyes, 25-G in 100 eyes) were analyzed. 27-G vitrectomy was performed using a cut rate of 7500 cpm and 25-G vitrectomy using a cut rate of 5000 cpm. RESULTS: The 27-G and 25-G groups did not differ significantly in underlying diseases and preoperative Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score. The time required for vitrectomy was significantly longer in the 27-G group (35.3 vs. 29.8 min, P = 0.0013). Postoperative hypotony was observed in 0 and 3 patients, and ocular hypertension in 10 and 14 patients in the 27-G and 25-G groups, respectively, showing more stabilized postoperative ocular pressure in the 27-G group. Gain in ETDRS score was significantly better in the 27-G group (12.1 ± 20.2 letters) compared to the 25-G group (10.0 ± 21.3 letters) (P = 0.0323) at 1 month post-vitrectomy, but not significantly different at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.0686 and 0.0543). Rates of postoperative retinal detachment (1 vs. 1%) and vitreous hemorrhage (2 vs. 3%) were not different between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: 27-G vitrectomy requires longer operative time than 25-G, but using the 27-G system results in earlier visual improvement and stabilized ocular pressure.
PURPOSE: To compare postoperative outcomes of 27-gauge (G) and 25-G vitrectomy conducted as day surgery. METHODS: In total, 200 consecutive eyes that underwent primary vitrectomy (27-G in 100 eyes, 25-G in 100 eyes) were analyzed. 27-G vitrectomy was performed using a cut rate of 7500 cpm and 25-G vitrectomy using a cut rate of 5000 cpm. RESULTS: The 27-G and 25-G groups did not differ significantly in underlying diseases and preoperative Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score. The time required for vitrectomy was significantly longer in the 27-G group (35.3 vs. 29.8 min, P = 0.0013). Postoperative hypotony was observed in 0 and 3 patients, and ocular hypertension in 10 and 14 patients in the 27-G and 25-G groups, respectively, showing more stabilized postoperative ocular pressure in the 27-G group. Gain in ETDRS score was significantly better in the 27-G group (12.1 ± 20.2 letters) compared to the 25-G group (10.0 ± 21.3 letters) (P = 0.0323) at 1 month post-vitrectomy, but not significantly different at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.0686 and 0.0543). Rates of postoperative retinal detachment (1 vs. 1%) and vitreous hemorrhage (2 vs. 3%) were not different between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: 27-G vitrectomy requires longer operative time than 25-G, but using the 27-G system results in earlier visual improvement and stabilized ocular pressure.
Authors: M Ali Khan; Abtin Shahlaee; Brian Toussaint; Jason Hsu; Arunan Sivalingam; Pravin U Dugel; Rohit R Lakhanpal; Christopher D Riemann; Maria H Berrocal; Carl D Regillo; Allen C Ho Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Bruno Diniz; Ramiro M Ribeiro; Rodrigo B Fernandes; Jaw-Chyng Lue; Anderson G Teixeira; Mauricio Maia; Mark S Humayun Journal: Ophthalmologica Date: 2012-10-27 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Harvey S Uy; Vicente Lorenzo O Cabahug; Jose Carlo M Artiaga; Pik Sha Chan; Jordan T Famadico Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 2.209