| Literature DB >> 28670189 |
Gordana Dmitrašinović1, Vesna Pešić2, Dušanka Stanić2, Bosiljka Plećaš-Solarović2, Marijana Dajak3, Svetlana Ignjatović1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physical exercise activates the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and induces the body's inflammatory response. Due to contemporary dietary habits and increased energy expenditure, athletes are susceptible to depletion of magnesium ions. The aim of our study was to investigate, through assessment of plasma ACTH, serum IL-6, and salivary/serum cortisol levels, if chronic magnesium supplementation might reduce damaging stress effects in amateur rugby players.Entities:
Keywords: ACTH; IL-6; amateur rugby; magnesium supplementation; serum/saliva cortisol
Year: 2016 PMID: 28670189 PMCID: PMC5471632 DOI: 10.1515/jomb-2016-0021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Biochem ISSN: 1452-8266 Impact factor: 3.402
Basic anthropometric data for control and intervention (Mg supplemented) group.
| Control group | Intervention group | |
|---|---|---|
| n | 10 | 13 |
| Age (years) | 22.9 (1.18) | 23.6 (1.40) |
| Height (cm) | 182.0 (2.13) | 180.7 (1.65) |
| Body weight (kg) | 84.7 (1.87) | 85.1 (3.66) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.58 (0.430) | 25.97 (0.806) |
Values are shown as mean (SEM).
Figure 1Algorithm of the study. Before intervention, basal blood and saliva samples were collected on the day before the match. Players were randomly assigned to intervention (N=13) and control (N=10) group. Those allocated to the intervention group received during the next 28 days 500 mg Mg/day, divided in two equal doses, twice a day with a 12 h time interval between doses. On the first day after 4 weeks of supplementation (29th day of experiment) which was a day before match (Day-1), blood and saliva were collected. Biological fluid sampling was also done on the day of the competition (Game), on the next day (Day1), the third day (Day3) and the sixth day after the game (Day6).
Figure 2Mg influences ACTH pattern of change during post-competition period. Changes in ACTH level across sample points, control (black bars) and Mg supplemented group (grey bars), with basal values (white bar).
Figure 3The change in serum and salivary cortisol levels. Changes in cortisol levels across sample points, the control group (black bars) and Mg supplemented group (grey bars), with basal values (white bar). (A) Changes in serum cortisol levels: **p < 0.01 values for corresponding time points for control group vs. Mg supplemented. ##p < 0.01 values for level of serum cortisol in Mg supplemented rugby players on the day before the match (Day-1) vs. basal cortisol level. (B) Changes in salivary cortisol levels: **p < 0.01 the main effect of time showed statistically significant difference in mean salivary cortisol concentration between Day6 and Day-1. (C) Changes in calculated Csal/Cser index: *p < 0.05 the main effect of time showed statistically significant difference in mean Csal/Cser index between Day6 and Day-1.
White blood cells in the control group and Mg supplemented group of amateur rugby players.
| Variable | Basal (both groups) | Day-1 | Day1 | Day6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Mg supplemented | Control | Mg supplemented | Control | Mg supplemented | ||
| Total WBC, × 109 L-1 | 7.45 (0.26) | 7.60 (0.27) | 6.42 (0.34) | 6.73 (0.22) | 6.29 (0.28) | 6.65 (0.28) | 6.94 (0.26) |
| Neutrophils, % | 51.56 (1.61) | 51.83 (1.79) | 52.55 (1.28) | 56.81 (1.64) | 50.49 (1.38) | 52.77 (1.70) | 53.70 (1.72) |
| Lymphocytes, % | 34.37 (1.54) | 33.85 (1.86) | 33.75 (1.19) | 29.72 (1.15) | 35.98 (1.21) | 32.76 (1. 23) | 35.72 (1.66) |
| Monocytes, % | 10.18 (0.41) | 10.47 (0.65) | 8.98 (0.48) | 10.35 (0.91) | 9.38 (0.48) | 10.32 (0.92) | 6.83 (0.43) |
| Basophils, % | 0.83 (0.08) | 0.73 (0.06) | 0.43 (0.08) | 0.47 (0.06) | 0.45 (0.04) | 0.81 (0.04) | 0.37 (0.06) |
| Eosinophils, % | 3.07 (0.34) | 3.12 (0.47) | 4.29 (0.78) | 2.65(0.39) | 3.71 (0.66) | 3.13 (0.52) | 3.38 (0.64) |
Values are shown as mean (SEM). Changes in total WBC and WBC differential are determined on the day before the competition (Day-1), 24 hours after the competition (Day1) and on the sixth day of post-competition period (Day6).
p < 0.05 compared to the same point of time in the control group
p < 0.05 compared to Day-1 in the control group
p < 0.05 compared to Day1 in the control group