Literature DB >> 24920618

Parallel midbrain microcircuits perform independent temporal transformations.

C Alex Goddard1, John Huguenard2, Eric Knudsen3.   

Abstract

The capacity to select the most important information and suppress distracting information is crucial for survival. The midbrain contains a network critical for the selection of the strongest stimulus for gaze and attention. In avians, the optic tectum (OT; called the superior colliculus in mammals) and the GABAergic nucleus isthmi pars magnocellularis (Imc) cooperate in the selection process. In the chicken, OT layer 10, located in intermediate layers, responds to afferent input with gamma periodicity (25-75 Hz), measured at the level of individual neurons and the local field potential. In contrast, Imc neurons, which receive excitatory input from layer 10 neurons, respond with tonic, unusually high discharge rates (>150 spikes/s). In this study, we reveal the source of this high-rate inhibitory activity: layer 10 neurons that project to the Imc possess specialized biophysical properties that enable them to transform afferent drive into high firing rates (~130 spikes/s), whereas neighboring layer 10 neurons, which project elsewhere, transform afferent drive into lower-frequency, periodic discharge patterns. Thus, the intermediate layers of the OT contain parallel, intercalated microcircuits that generate different temporal patterns of activity linked to the functions of their respective downstream targets.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/348130-09$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; colliculus; decision; inhibition; tectum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24920618      PMCID: PMC4051971          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4399-13.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  28 in total

Review 1.  The recognition memory of imprinting: biochemistry and electrophysiology.

Authors:  B J McCabe; A U Nicol
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Role of the basal ganglia in the control of purposive saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  O Hikosaka; Y Takikawa; R Kawagoe
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Morphology and connections of nucleus isthmi pars magnocellularis in chicks (Gallus gallus).

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Daniel E Major; Harvey J Karten
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 4.  The thalamic reticular nucleus: structure, function and concept.

Authors:  Didier Pinault
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2004-08

Review 5.  Action potential repolarization and a fast after-hyperpolarization in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells.

Authors:  J F Storm
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The development of the chick optic tectum. I. Normal morphology and cytoarchitectonic development.

Authors:  J H LaVail; W M Cowan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-05-21       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Pyramidal neurons in layer 5 of the rat visual cortex. I. Correlation among cell morphology, intrinsic electrophysiological properties, and axon targets.

Authors:  E M Kasper; A U Larkman; J Lübke; C Blakemore
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1994-01-22       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Visual and oculomotor functions of monkey substantia nigra pars reticulata. II. Visual responses related to fixation of gaze.

Authors:  O Hikosaka; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis.

Authors:  F Crick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Cortical circuits for the control of attention.

Authors:  Earl K Miller; Timothy J Buschman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cholinergic control of gamma power in the midbrain spatial attention network.

Authors:  Astra S Bryant; C Alex Goddard; John R Huguenard; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  "Shepherd's crook" neurons drive and synchronize the enhancing and suppressive mechanisms of the midbrain stimulus selection network.

Authors:  Florencia Garrido-Charad; Tomas Vega-Zuniga; Cristián Gutiérrez-Ibáñez; Pedro Fernandez; Luciana López-Jury; Cristian González-Cabrera; Harvey J Karten; Harald Luksch; Gonzalo J Marín
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Space-Specific Deficits in Visual Orientation Discrimination Caused by Lesions in the Midbrain Stimulus Selection Network.

Authors:  Eric I Knudsen; Jason S Schwarz; Phyllis F Knudsen; Devarajan Sridharan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Directional Preference in Avian Midbrain Saliency Computing Nucleus Reflects a Well-Designed Receptive Field Structure.

Authors:  Jiangtao Wang; Longlong Qian; Songwei Wang; Li Shi; Zhizhong Wang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 5.  Neural Circuits That Mediate Selective Attention: A Comparative Perspective.

Authors:  Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Spatially precise visual gain control mediated by a cholinergic circuit in the midbrain attention network.

Authors:  Ali Asadollahi; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Combinatorial Neural Inhibition for Stimulus Selection across Space.

Authors:  Nagaraj R Mahajan; Shreesh P Mysore
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 9.423

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.