Literature DB >> 28669551

Low Accuracy of Positive qSOFA Criteria for Predicting 28-Day Mortality in Critically Ill Septic Patients During the Early Period After Emergency Department Presentation.

Sung Yeon Hwang1, Ik Joon Jo2, Se Uk Lee2, Tae Rim Lee1, Hee Yoon1, Won Chul Cha2, Min Seob Sim2, Tae Gun Shin3.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We determine the diagnostic performance of positive Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores for predicting 28-day mortality among critically ill septic patients during the early period after emergency department (ED) presentation.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care academic center. We reviewed a registry of adult (≥18 years) patients who received a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock during an ED stay from August 2008 through September 2014. We identified the point at which patients met 2 or more of the 3 qSOFA criteria (indicating a positive qSOFA score) simultaneously during the initial 24 hours. The diagnostic performance of positive qSOFA score for predicting 28-day mortality was assessed (on ED arrival and within 3, 6, and 24 hours after ED presentation).
RESULTS: A total of 1,395 patients were included, and the overall 28-day mortality was 15%. For patients with positive qSOFA score, 28-day mortality was 23% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19% to 28%) on ED arrival, 20% (95% CI 17% to 23%) at 3 hours, 20% (95% CI 17% to 22%) at 6 hours, and 17% (95% CI 15% to 20%) at 24 hours. Positive qSOFA score for predicting 28-day mortality had a sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve, respectively, of 39% (95% CI 32% to 46%), 77% (95% CI 75% to 80%), and 0.58 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.62) on ED arrival; 68% (95% CI 62% to 75%), 52% (95% CI 49% to 55%), and 0.60 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.63) within 3 hours; 82% (95% CI 76% to 87%), 41% (95% CI 38% to 44%), and 0.61 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.64) within 6 hours; and 91% (95% CI 86% to 94%), 23% (95% CI 21% to 25%), and 0.57 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.59) within 24 hours.
CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of positive qSOFA score for predicting 28-day mortality was low in critically ill septic patients, particularly during the early period after ED presentation. The study requires further prospective validation because of limitations with its retrospective design and use of single-center data.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28669551     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  33 in total

1.  Prognostic Performance of SOFA, qSOFA, and SIRS in Kidney Transplant Recipients Suffering from Infection: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Yun-Xia Chen; Ran Li; Li Gu; Kai-Yi Xu; Yong-Zhe Liu; Ren-Wen Zhang
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Mortality outcomes based on ED qSOFA score and HIV status in a developing low income country.

Authors:  Adam R Aluisio; Stephanie Garbern; Tess Wiskel; Zeta A Mutabazi; Olivier Umuhire; Chin Chin Ch'ng; Kristina E Rudd; Jeanne D'Arc Nyinawankusi; Jean Claude Byiringiro; Adam C Levine
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment as a prognostic factor for infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan-Cun Liu; Yuan-Yuan Luo; Xingyu Zhang; Song-Tao Shou; Yu-Lei Gao; Bin Lu; Chen Li; Yan-Fen Chai
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Comparison of different versions of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for predicting in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Hai Hu; Jing-Yuan Jiang; Ni Yao
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2022

5.  Predictive validity of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score for the mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units.

Authors:  Son Ngoc Do; Chinh Quoc Luong; My Ha Nguyen; Dung Thi Pham; Nga Thi Nguyen; Dai Quang Huynh; Quoc Trong Ai Hoang; Co Xuan Dao; Thang Dinh Vu; Ha Nhat Bui; Hung Tan Nguyen; Hai Bui Hoang; Thuy Thi Phuong Le; Lien Thi Bao Nguyen; Phuoc Thien Duong; Tuan Dang Nguyen; Vuong Hung Le; Giang Thi Tra Pham; Tam Van Bui; Giang Thi Huong Bui; Jason Phua; Andrew Li; Thao Thi Ngoc Pham; Chi Van Nguyen; Anh Dat Nguyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 6.  Sepsis 2019: What Surgeons Need to Know.

Authors:  Vanessa P Ho; Haytham Kaafarani; Rishi Rattan; Nicholas Namias; Heather Evans; Tanya L Zakrison
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.150

7.  Failure of vital sign normalization is more strongly associated than single measures with mortality and outcomes.

Authors:  Nicholas Levin; Devin Horton; Matthew Sanford; Benjamin Horne; Mahima Saseendran; Kencee Graves; Michael White; Joseph E Tonna
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 2.469

8.  Associations between mean arterial pressure and 28-day mortality according to the presence of hypertension or previous blood pressure level in critically ill sepsis patients.

Authors:  Gun Tak Lee; Sung Yeon Hwang; Ik Joon Jo; Tae Rim Kim; Hee Yoon; Joo Hyun Park; Won Chul Cha; Min Seob Sim; Tae Gun Shin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Quick sequential organ failure assessment versus systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria for emergency department patients with suspected infection.

Authors:  Atsushi Shiraishi; Satoshi Gando; Toshikazu Abe; Shigeki Kushimoto; Toshihiko Mayumi; Seitaro Fujishima; Akiyoshi Hagiwara; Yasukazu Shiino; Shin-Ichiro Shiraishi; Toru Hifumi; Yasuhiro Otomo; Kohji Okamoto; Junichi Sasaki; Kiyotsugu Takuma; Kazuma Yamakawa; Yoshihiro Hanaki; Masahiro Harada; Kazuma Morino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Monocyte distribution width (MDW) performance as an early sepsis indicator in the emergency department: comparison with CRP and procalcitonin in a multicenter international European prospective study.

Authors:  Pierre Hausfater; Neus Robert Boter; Cristian Morales Indiano; Marta Cancella de Abreu; Adria Mendoza Marin; Julie Pernet; Dolores Quesada; Iris Castro; Diana Careaga; Michel Arock; Liliana Tejidor; Laetitia Velly
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.