Literature DB >> 35237364

Comparison of different versions of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for predicting in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients: A retrospective observational study.

Hai Hu1,2, Jing-Yuan Jiang2,3,4, Ni Yao2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) is recommended to identify sepsis and predict sepsis mortality. However, some studies have recently shown its poor performance in sepsis mortality prediction. To enhance its effectiveness, researchers have developed various revised versions of the qSOFA by adding other parameters, such as the lactate-enhanced qSOFA (LqSOFA), the procalcitonin-enhanced qSOFA (PqSOFA), and the modified qSOFA (MqSOFA). This study aimed to compare the performance of these versions of the qSOFA in predicting sepsis mortality in the emergency department (ED).
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data obtained from an electronic register system of adult patients with sepsis between January 1 and December 31, 2019. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to determine the area under the curve (AUC), with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values calculated for the various scores.
RESULTS: Among the 936 enrolled cases, there were 835 survivors and 101 deaths. The AUCs of the LqSOFA, MqSOFA, PqSOFA, and qSOFA were 0.740, 0.731, 0.712, and 0.705, respectively. The sensitivity of the LqSOFA, MqSOFA, PqSOFA, and qSOFA were 64.36%, 51.40%, 71.29%, and 39.60%, respectively. The specificity of the four scores were 70.78%, 80.96%, 61.68%, and 91.62%, respectively. The LqSOFA and MqSOFA were superior to the qSOFA in predicting in-hospital mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with sepsis in the ED, the performance of the PqSOFA was similar to that of the qSOFA and the values of the LqSOFA and MqSOFA in predicting in-hospital mortality were greater compared to qSOFA. As the added parameter of the MqSOFA was more convenient compared to the LqSOFA, the MqSOFA could be used as a candidate for the revised qSOFA to increase the performance of the early prediction of sepsis mortality. Copyright: © World Journal of Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In-hospital mortality; Lactate- enhanced qSOFA; Modified qSOFA; Quick sequential organ failure assessment; Sepsis

Year:  2022        PMID: 35237364      PMCID: PMC8861336          DOI: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Emerg Med        ISSN: 1920-8642


  35 in total

1.  Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna; E Wesley Ely; Dylan M Smith; Kenneth M Langa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Prognostic Accuracy of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Mortality in Patients With Suspected Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shannon M Fernando; Alexandre Tran; Monica Taljaard; Wei Cheng; Bram Rochwerg; Andrew J E Seely; Jeffrey J Perry
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Combining qSOFA criteria with initial lactate levels: Improved screening of septic patients for critical illness.

Authors:  Brigitte M Baumann; John C Greenwood; Kristin Lewis; Thomas J Nuckton; Bryan Darger; Frances S Shofer; Dawn Troeger; Soo Y Jung; J Hope Kilgannon; Robert M Rodriguez
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 2.469

5.  Prognostic accuracy of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA)-lactate criteria for mortality in adults with suspected bacterial infection in the emergency department of a hospital with limited resources.

Authors:  Robert Sinto; Suhendro Suwarto; Khie Chen Lie; Kuntjoro Harimurti; Djoko Widodo; Herdiman T Pohan
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment as a prognostic factor for infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan-Cun Liu; Yuan-Yuan Luo; Xingyu Zhang; Song-Tao Shou; Yu-Lei Gao; Bin Lu; Chen Li; Yan-Fen Chai
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.397

7.  Predictive Value of 5 Early Warning Scores for Critical COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Hai Hu; Ni Yao; Yanru Qiu
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 1.385

8.  Comparison of the SpO2/FIO2 ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS.

Authors:  Todd W Rice; Arthur P Wheeler; Gordon R Bernard; Douglas L Hayden; David A Schoenfeld; Lorraine B Ware
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; John C Marshall; Silvio A Namendys-Silva; Bruno François; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Jeffrey Lipman; Konrad Reinhart; Massimo Antonelli; Peter Pickkers; Hassane Njimi; Edgar Jimenez; Yasser Sakr
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 30.700

10.  Poor performance of quick-SOFA (qSOFA) score in predicting severe sepsis and mortality - a prospective study of patients admitted with infection to the emergency department.

Authors:  Åsa Askim; Florentin Moser; Lise T Gustad; Helga Stene; Maren Gundersen; Bjørn Olav Åsvold; Jostein Dale; Lars Petter Bjørnsen; Jan Kristian Damås; Erik Solligård
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.