| Literature DB >> 28668991 |
Maciej Karpowicz1, Jolanta Ejsmont-Karabin2.
Abstract
Theory predicts and recent study revealed that depth of the thermocline can strongly influence the nutrient availability and composition of plankton communities. We are focused on the effect of metalimnetic gradients on water chemistry and plankton communities in three stratified lakes with different trophic conditions. Vertical changes in water chemistry revealed significant increase of macroelement concentrations in the metalimnion of all studied lakes. However, there was no significant increase of nutrient concentrations in the thermocline of lakes with smoother metalimnetic gradient, whereas sharp and deep thermocline zone caused higher concentration of orthophosphates and dissolved inorganic nitrogen in the metalimnion. The maximum concentrations of phytoplankton were observed just below the thermocline and were caused mostly by the abundance of diatoms and cryptophytes. Vertical distribution of the crustacean zooplankton was similar to the distribution of phytoplankton. Especially, Daphnia cucullata was strongly related with the phytoplankton distribution and reached maximum densities in deep layers with high chlorophyll concentrations, and, conversely, smaller crustacean species and rotifers were not affected by the vertical distribution of phytoplankton.Entities:
Keywords: Deep chlorophyll layer; Nutrients; Thermocline; Unpolluted lakes; Vertical distribution of plankton
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28668991 PMCID: PMC5494035 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-017-6055-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Monit Assess ISSN: 0167-6369 Impact factor: 2.513
Morphometric and trophic characteristics of the studied lakes in Suwałki Landscape Park. Trophic status of lakes based on the present study and by Jekatierynczuk-Rudczyk et al. 2014
| Lake | Latitude | Longitude | Surface of the lake (ha) | Maximum depth (m) | Average depth (m) | Length of coastline (m) | Shoreline development | SD visibility (m) | Trophic status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hańcza | 54o 15, 9′ | 22o 51, 1′ | 311.4 | 108.5 | 38.7 | 11,750 | 1.88 | 4.2 | mesotrophic |
| Szurpiły | 54o 14, 3′ | 22o 53, 5′ | 80.9 | 40 | 10 | 7000 | 2.19 | 2.9 | meso-eutrophic |
| Jaczno | 54o 17, 0′ | 22o 52, 3′ | 41.0 | 29.6 | 11.7 | 4840 | 2.13 | 2.9 | eutrophic |
The vertical variation of hydrochemical parameters in the studied lakes (mean values ± standard deviation)
| Hańcza | Szurpiły | Jaczno | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E | M | H | E | M | H | E | M | H | |
| Na+(mg l−1) | 3.69 ± 0.63 |
| 3.46 | 3.59 ± 1.86 | 3.98 ± 0.71 |
| 5.51 ± 0.09 | 5.6 ± 0.15 | 5.45 |
| K+ (mg l−1) | 2.11 ± 0.35 | 1.6 ± 0.79 | 2.23 | 1.40 ± 0.74 |
| 1.71 | 1.60 ± 0.09 | 1.74 ± 0.08 | 1.75 |
| Ca2+ (mg l−1) | 44.6 ± 5.08 |
| 40.09 | 44.6 ± 5.08 | 43.45 ± 1.5 |
| 56.6 ± 0.26 | 59.3 ± 2.2 |
|
| Mg2+ (mg l−1) | 11.1 ± 3.37 |
| 8.47 | 10.39 ± 5.7 | 12.38 ± 3.5 | 14.2 | 17.9 ± 0.06 | 17.8 ± 0.11 | 17.58 |
| SO4 2− (mg l−1) | 10.95 ± 0.72 |
| 10.42 | 5.8 ± 4.33 |
| 11.05 | 12.28 ± 0.11 | 12.06 ± 0.21 | 9.53 |
| Cl− (mg l−1) | 3.42 ± 0.25 | 3.27 ± 0.44 |
| 2.83 ± 0.87 |
| 3.03 | 3.65 ± 0.06 |
| 3.7 |
| F− (mg l−1) | 0.18 ± 0.07 |
| 0.14 | 0.17 ± 0.096 | 0.21 ± 0.06 | 0.239 | 0.31 ± 0.02 |
| 0.31 |
| N-NH4 + (mg l−1) | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.034 ± 0.028 | 0.18 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.034 ± 0.05 | 0.0187 |
| 0.012 ± 0.004 | 0.008 |
| N-NO3 − (mg l−1) | 0.044 ± 0.07 | 0.01 ± 0.003 | 0.04 | 0.006 ± 0.002 |
| 0.0048 | 0.009 ± 0.003 | 0.013 ± 0.004 |
|
| N-NO2 − (mg l−1) | 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0.001 ± 0.0005 | 0.00 | 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.0015 ± 0.0004 | 0.0004 | 0.001 ± 0.0002 | 0.001 ± 0.0002 | 0.001 |
| DIN (mg l−1) |
| 0.045 ± 0.026 | 0.04 | 0.037 ± 0.03 |
| 0.024 | 0.049 ± 0.022 | 0.026 ± 0.006 |
|
| DON (mg l−1) | 0.26 ± 0.06 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 0.36 |
| 0.29 ± 0.06 | 0.306 | 0.12 ± 0.02 |
| 0.028 |
| DN (mg l−1) | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.39 ± 0.02 | 0.40 |
| 0.35 ± 0.004 | 0.33 | 0.16 ± 0.006 | 0.19 ± 0.015 | 0.20 |
| PN (mg l−1) | 0.079 ± 0.055 | 0.072 ± 0.03 | 0.09 |
| 0.06 ± 0.004 | 0.056 | 0.005 ± 0.002 |
| 0.01 |
| TN (mg l−1) | 0.41 ± 0.06 | 0.47 ± 0.05 | 0.48 |
| 0.40 ± 0.008 | 0.387 | 0.17 ± 0.006 | 0.21 ± 0.014 | 0.21 |
| PO4 3− (mg l−1) | 0.023 ± 0.01 |
| 0.02 | 0.019 ± 0.013 | 0.02 ± 0.003 | 0.0072 | 0.022 ± 0.008 | 0.017 ± 0.007 | 0.029 |
| TOC (mg l−1) |
| 4.83 ± 0.1 | 4.53 | 4.4 ± 0.1 |
| 3.73 | 2.62 ± 0.1 |
| 2.81 |
| DOC (mg l−1) |
| 4.6 ± 0.14 | 4.32 | 4.08 ± 0.04 |
| 3.55 | 2.55 ± 0.04 |
| 2.46 |
| POC (mg l−1) |
| 0.22 ± 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.32 ± 0.1 |
| 0.18 |
| 0.052 ± 0.05 | 0.34 |
| IC (mg l−1) | 17.4 ± 0.44 | 17.97 ± 0.59 |
| 22.58 ± 0.49 | 23.57 ± 0.68 |
| 28.98 ± 0.87 | 31.27 ± 1.32 |
|
| TC (mg l−1) | 22.52 ± 0.41 | 22.8 ± 0.53 | 23.17 | 26.98 ± 0.44 | 28.17 ± 0.44 |
| 31.6 ± 0.88 | 34.2 ± 1.54 |
|
Values in italics are the highest values in the lakes’ profiles at p < 0.05
Fig. 1Vertical profiles of temperature and oxygen concentration (a), electrical conductivity (b), biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton (c) in the studied lakes
Fig. 2The Bray-Curtis similarity matrix of hydrochemical parameters in vertical profiles of Lake Hańcza (H), Lake Szurpiły (S), and Lake Jaczno (J) based on the agglomerative hierarchical cluster (AHC). The numbers behind the symbol of the lake is depth (m) of hydrochemical samples
Fig. 3Vertical distribution of dominant phytoplankton groups (a), crustacean species (b), and Rotifera species (c) in the studied lakes
Fig. 4Relations between abundance of dominant zooplankton species to the vertical environmental variables (hydrochemistry and phytoplankton) in Lake Hańcza (a), Szurpiły (b), Jaczno (c) visualize by the Canonical Correspondence Analysis map. The taxa shown are Dap.cuc. – Daphnia cucullata, Dap.lon – Daphnia longispina, Dia.bra – Diaphanosoma brachyurum, bos.spp. – Bosmina species, Eud.spp. – Eudiaptomus species, Eur.lac – Eurytemora lacustris, The.oit – Thermocyclops oithonoides, Mes.leu – Mesocyclops leuckarti, Asp.pri – Asplanchna priodonta, Col.mut – Collotheca mutabilis, Con.hip – Conochilus hippocrepis, Con.uni – Conochilus unicornis, Gas.sty – Gastropus stylifer, Ker.coc – Keratella cochlearis, Ker.qua – Keratella quadrata, Pol.rem – Polyarthra remata, Pol.vul – Polyarthra vulgaris, Syn.kit – Synchaeta kitina
Correlation values of environmental variables and sites (depth) with the first axes of CCA analysis (Fig. 4)
| Environmental variables | Hańcza | Szurpiły | Jaczno | Sites (depth) | Hańcza | Szurpiły | Jaczno |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-NH4 + | −0.14 | 0.45 | −0.58 | 1 | −0.48 | −0.30 | −0.57 |
| N-NO3 − | −0.51 | 0.15 | −0.25 | 2 | −0.35 | −0.33 | −0.50 |
| N-NO2 − | 0.13 | 0.34 | −0.20 | 3 | −0.25 | −0.63 | −0.49 |
| DON | 0.44 | −0.50 | 0.72 | 4 | −0.47 | 0.33 | −0.10 |
| DN | 0.27 | −0.41 | 0.54 | 5 | −0.02 | 0.21 | 0.39 |
| PN | −0.35 | −0.46 | 0.63 | 6 | 0.01 | −0.39 | 0.92 |
| PO4 3− | 0.50 | −0.18 | −0.31 | 7 | 0.55 | 0.96 | 0.83 |
| DOC | −0.01 | 0.03 | 0.72 | 8 | 0.42 | 0.61 | |
| POC | 0.13 | −0.01 | −0.39 | 9 | 0.65 | −0.10 | |
| Green algae | −0.63 | −0.16 | 0.76 | 10 | 0.06 | 0.14 | |
| Cyanobacteria | −0.66 | −0.16 | −0.53 | 11 | 0.30 | −0.45 | |
| Diatoms | 0.53 | 0.27 | 0.93 | 25 | −0.41 | −0.49 | |
| Cryptophytes | 0.58 | 0.58 | −0.29 |