| Literature DB >> 24788838 |
Elżbieta Jekatierynczuk-Rudczyk1, Piotr Zieliński, Magdalena Grabowska, Jolanta Ejsmont-Karabin, Maciej Karpowicz, Adam Więcko.
Abstract
This study describes changes in the trophic status of 12 lakes within Suwałki Landscape Park (SLP). All of the trophic classifications of the lakes were based on the trophic continuum division. Trophic status was determined by means of multiparameter indices using several diverse criteria. In this study, the assessment of the trophic status of lakes included water quality; abundance and biomass of bacterioplankton, phytoplankton, and zooplankton; and primary production of phytoplankton. The Carlson trophic state index (TSI) describes the level of water fertility and indicated the dominance of moderately eutrophic waters. Lakes Perty, Jeglówek, and Hańcza have a trophic status that indicates mesotrophy (TSI <50). The trophic status of the studied lakes was determined based on the bacterial abundance and clearly showed a lack of oligotrophic lakes in SLP. Based on the number of bacteria, only Lake Szurpiły can be classified as β-mesotrophic, whereas Lake Linówek can be characterized as hypertrophic with some features typical for humic waters. The greatest value of gross primary production was observed in Lake Linówek (126.4 mg C/m(3)/h). The phytoplankton trophy index varied from 1.59 to 2.28, and its highest value, which indicated eutrophy, was determined for Lake Udziejek. In the case of Lakes Hańcza, Szurpiły, Perty, Jeglówek, and Kojle, the index ranged from 1.25 to 1.74, which indicated mesotrophy. The majority of the lakes were classified as mesoeutrophic (1.75-2.24). The highest trophic status was assessed for lakes with a marked dominance of cyanobacteria (Lake Przechodnie, Lake Krajwelek, Lake Udziejek, and Lake Pogorzałek), which is commonly recognized as an indicator of high trophic status. Considering all of the indices of trophic status, the analysis of rotifer community structure indicates that the studied group of lakes is mesoeutrophic or eutrophic. The values of crustacean zooplankton indices indicated that the trophic status of the studied lakes was close to that determined using a TSI. The parameters of zooplankton abundance and species structure allowed for the observance of changes in the tropic levels of lakes, which are difficult to detect by a chemical assay alone.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24788838 PMCID: PMC4064123 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-014-3763-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Monit Assess ISSN: 0167-6369 Impact factor: 2.513
Fig. 1Localization of studied lakes in Suwałki Landscape Park. 1 Lake Hańcza, 2 Lake Szurpiły, 3 Lake Kamenduł, 4 Lake Przechodnie, 5 Lake Perty, 6 Lake Jeglówek, 7 Lake Kojle, 8 Lake Krajwelek, 9 Lake Okrągłe, 10 Lake Udziejek, 11 Lake Postawelek, 12 Lake Linówek
Morphometric characteristics of the Suwałki Landscape Park lakes
| Lakes | Latitude | Longitude | Surface of the lake [ha] | Volume of the lake [tys m3] | Maximum depth [m] | Average depth [m] | Length of coastline [m] | Shoreline development | Rate unveiling lake |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stratified lakes | |||||||||
| Hańcza | 54° 15.9′ | 22° 48.9′ | 311.4 | 120,364.1 | 108.5 | 38.7 | 11,750 | 1.88 | 8.1 |
| Szurpiły | 54° 13.8′ | 22° 53.5′ | 80.9 | 8,168.0 | 46.0 | 10.0 | 7,000 | 2.19 | 8.1 |
| Kamenduł | 54° 16.0′ | 22° 52.0′ | 25.5 | 1,730.7 | 24.5 | 6.8 | 2,300 | 1.28 | 3.8 |
| Perty | 54° 16.5′ | 22° 53.9′ | 20.4 | 1,019.1 | 31.0 | 5.0 | 2,750 | 1.72 | 4.1 |
| Jeglówek | 54° 14.3′ | 22° 53.2′ | 19.2 | 1,444.0 | 18.1 | 7.5 | 2,585 | 1.66 | 2.6 |
| Kojle | 54° 16.8′ | 22° 53.3′ | 16.1 | 1,754.9 | 27.5 | 10.9 | 1,900 | 1.34 | 1.5 |
| Polymictic lakes | |||||||||
| Przechodnie | 54° 16.8′ | 22° 55.6′ | 25.4 | 848.6 | 6.3 | 3.3 | 2,150 | 1.20 | 7.7 |
| Okrągłe | 54° 16.1′ | 22° 54.4′ | 15.7 | 715.5 | 8.0 | 4.6 | 1,500 | 1.07 | 3.4 |
| Krajwelek | 54° 16.2′ | 22° 55.9′ | 15.8 | 474.0 | 6.0 | 3.3 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| Udziejek | 54° 15.1′ | 22° 53.2′ | 6.1 | 229.0 | 7.2 | 3.8 | 996 | 1.14 | n.d. |
| Pogorzałek | 54° 16.3′ | 22° 50.2′ | 3.5 | 92.0 | 5.4 | 2.6 | n.d. | 1.08 | n.d. |
| Linówek | 54° 13.5′ | 22° 50.3′ | 2.6a | 70.0 | 5.6 | 2.7 | 625 | n.d. | n.d. |
n.d. no data
aWithout heat
Fig. 2Vertical changes of water temperature in the lakes of Suwałki Landscape Park
Fig. 3The hydroizohypse map of the first aquifer in Suwałki Landscape Park including areas susceptible to degradation
The vertical variation of physicochemical parameters in the lakes of Suwałki Landscape Park in July 2009 (mean values ± standard deviation)
| Nutrients | Stratified lakes | Polymictic lakes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epilimnion | Metalimnion | Hypolimnion | Surface layer | Near-bottom layer | ||
|
| °C | 22.48 ± 0.89 | 12.95 ± 1.52 | 5.33 ± 1.67 | 22.07 ± 3.15 | 13.97 ± 4.19 |
| pH | 8.28 ± 0.34 | 7.83 ± 1.17 | 7.63 ± 0.26 | 8.24 ± 0.43 | 7.59 ± 0.30 | |
| Eh | mV | 229 ± 58 | 229 ± 58 | 232 ± 59 | 213 ± 72 | 219 ± 59 |
| EC | μS/cm | 319 ± 46 | 354 ± 59 | 359 ± 59 | 305 ± 128 | 365 ± 138 |
| Oksygen | mg/l | 9.36 ± 0.39 | 8.75 ± 3.27 | 2.62 ± 2.88 | 8.64 ± 3.12 | 2.25 ± 2.67 |
| Saturation | % | 109 ± 3 | 89 ± 32 | 21 ± 24 | 102 ± 42 | 25 ± 32 |
| Chl a | μg/l | 1.44 ± 0.52 | 3.27 ± 2.78 | 1.59 ± 1.79 | 6.02 ± 2.71 | 20.17 ± 8.63 |
| TOC | mg/l | 14.59 ± 6.52 | 13.93 ± 5.54 | 12.95 ± 5.84 | 19.28 ± 3.46 | 19.16 ± 4.21 |
| DOC | mg/l | 12.3 ± 5.15 | 11.85 ± 4.27 | 10.73 ± 3.32 | 16.92 ± 2.82 | 15.93 ± 3.39 |
| POC | mg/l | 2.27 ± 1.86 | 2.09 ± 2.44 | 2.22 ± 2.65 | 2.35 ± 1.69 | 3.23 ± 3.11 |
| N-NH4 + | μg N/l | 175 ± 81 | 183 ± 129 | 442 ± 297 | 200 ± 147 | 313 ± 272 |
| N-NO2 − | μg N/l | 4 ± 2 | 6 ± 5 | 4 ± 2 | 4 ± 4 | 6 ± 5 |
| N-NO3 − | μg N/l | 56 ± 24 | 51 ± 13 | 116 ± 94 | 51 ± 14 | 58 ± 20 |
| TON | μg N/l | 443 ± 395 | 688 ± 457 | 340 ± 265 | 370 ± 138 | 830 ± 536 |
| TN | μg N/l | 678 ± 372 | 927 ± 366 | 786 ± 388 | 624 ± 177 | 1,206 ± 710 |
| DP | μg P/l | 73 ± 42 | 86 ± 59 | 81 ± 39 | 96 ± 48 | 112 ± 56 |
| SRP | μg P/l | 29 ± 32 | 34 ± 32 | 22 ± 15 | 29 ± 15 | 34 ± 12 |
| ORP | μg P/l | 44 ± 28 | 52 ± 62 | 58 ± 36 | 68 ± 44 | 78 ± 48 |
| PP | μg P/l | 52 ± 47 | 24 ± 15 | 69 ± 29 | 27 ± 28 | 37 ± 20 |
| TP | μg P/l | 125 ± 85 | 110 ± 64 | 150 ± 64 | 123 ± 56 | 149 ± 66 |
| N/P | 11 | 14 | 6 | 6 | 9 | |
Fig. 4Vertical changes of the oxygen concentration in pelagial waters in the lakes of Suwałki Landscape Park
Trophic indices in the lakes of Suwałki Landscape Park (1983/1985—Hillbricht-Ilkowska and Wiśniewski 1994; 2003—Górniak et al. 2007; 2009—own research)
| Lakes | TSISD | TSIChl | TSITP | TSI | TSITN | N/P | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1983/1985 | 2003 | 2009 | 1983/1985 | 2003 | 2009 | 1983/1985 | 2003 | 2009 | 1983/1985 | 2003 | 2009 | 2009 | ||
| Hańcza | 29 | 34 | 38 | 8 | 21 | 35 | 55 | 71 | 69 | 31 | 42 | 47 | 54 | 12 |
| Szurpiły | 38 | 49 | 47 | 32 | 38 | 36 | 54 | 90 | 79 | 41 | 59 | 54 | 35 | 3 |
| Kamenduł | 46 | 47 | 48 | 36 | 42 | 69 | 78 | 77 | 58 | 54 | 56 | 55 | 7 | |
| Perty | 39 | 42 | 38 | 27 | 21 | 23 | 44 | 66 | 58 | 37 | 43 | 40 | 42 | 8 |
| Jeglówek | 34 | 43 | 37 | 32 | 32 | 31 | 50 | 81 | 65 | 39 | 52 | 44 | 55 | 26 |
| Kojle | 36 | 47 | 45 | 41 | 30 | 38 | 54 | 78 | 80 | 44 | 52 | 54 | 41 | 12 |
| Przechodnie | 54 | n.a. | 55 | 62 | n.a. | 49 | 60 | n.a. | 75 | 59 | n.a. | 60 | 40 | 2 |
| Okrągłe | 52 | n.a. | 50 | n.a. | n.a. | 55 | 61 | n.a. | 77 | 57 | n.a. | 61 | 50 | 7 |
| Krajwelek | 53 | 59 | 53 | 68 | 45 | 55 | 63 | 80 | 78 | 61 | 61 | 62 | 53 | 10 |
| Udziejek | 51 | 58 | 52 | 66 | 56 | 55 | 60 | 78 | 82 | 59 | 64 | 63 | 47 | 3 |
| Pogorzałek | n.a. | 55 | 54 | n.a. | 43 | 69 | n.a. | 81 | 75 | n.a. | 60 | 66 | 45 | 7 |
| Linówek | n.a. | 45 | 45 | n.a. | 37 | 41 | n.a. | 79 | 68 | n.a. | 53 | 51 | 42 | 7 |
n.a. not analyzed
Fig. 5Comparison of the trophic state index values in the lakes of Suwałki Landscape Park: a TSITP-TSISD, b TSITP-TSIChl, c TSITP-TSITN, d TSIChl-TSISD, e TSITN-TSIChl, and f TSITN-TSISD
Fig. 6Diagram of the differences between trophic state indices in the lakes of the Suwałki Landscape Park. a relation TSIChl-TSISD and TSIChl-TSITP b relation TSIChl-TSISD and TSIChl-TSITN
Bacterial numbers (BN) and bacterial biomass (BB) in the lakes of Suwałki Landscape Park (July 2009)
| Lakes | Depth [m] | BN [million cells/ml] | Average BN [million cells/ml] | Average BB [μg C/l] | BN (2003) Zieliński et al. ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hańcza | 2 | 3.4 | 2.45 | 85.6 | 3.56 |
| 7 | 2.1 | ||||
| 30 | 1.9 | ||||
| Szurpiły | 0.5 | 1.9 | 1.65 | 65.7 | 3.7 |
| 6 | 0.8 | ||||
| 22 | 2.3 | ||||
| Kameduł | 0.5 | 3.3 | 3.37 | 96.5 | 5.02 |
| 6 | 2.4 | ||||
| 26 | 4.4 | ||||
| Perty | 0.5 | 2.1 | 2.38 | 83.3 | 4.24 |
| 6 | 3.5 | ||||
| 20 | 1.6 | ||||
| Jeglówek | 0.5 | 3.8 | 3.07 | 107.7 | 3.17 |
| 6 | 3.0 | ||||
| 20 | 2.5 | ||||
| Kojle | 0.5 | 2.4 | 3.30 | 115.4 | 2.18 |
| 6 | 3.4 | ||||
| 32 | 4.0 | ||||
| Przechodnie | 0.5 | 3.2 | 3.06 | 107.1 | n.a. |
| 4 | 3.0 | ||||
| Krajwelek | 0.5 | 3.8 | 3.46 | 121.1 | 5.65 |
| 6 | 3.1 | ||||
| Okrągłe | 0.5 | 2.2 | 3.34 | 116.9 | n.a. |
| 6 | 4.5 | ||||
| Udziejek | 0.5 | 3.5 | 3.10 | 107.0 | 5.75 |
| 5 | 2.7 | ||||
| Pogorzałek | 0.5 | 1.9 | 2.79 | 97.6 | 5.97 |
| 4 | 2.8 | ||||
| 7 | 3.7 | ||||
| Linówek | 0.5 | 5.2 | 4.80 | 168.0 | 4.94 |
| 4.5 | 4.4 |
n.a. not analyzed
Fig. 7Variation of the bacterial numbers in the lakes of Suwałki Landscape Park (1 epilimnion, 2 metalimnion, 3 hypolimnion, 4 surface layer, 5 bottom layer of water)
Phytoplankton parameters in the studied lakes’ epilimnion of Suwałki Landscape Park in 2009 compared with summer total phytoplankton biomass in 10 lakes from the years 2003 (Grabowska et al. 2006)
| Lakes | The most important taxa in phytoplankton biomass with theircontribution (%) | Biomass in this study [mg/l] | Biomass in 2003 [mg/l] | TIPB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stratified lakes | ||||
| Hańcza |
| 0.73 | 0.17 | 1.67 |
| Szurpiły |
| 0.35 | 1.99 | 1.59 |
| Kamenduł |
| 0.64 | 1.33 | 2.01 |
| Perty |
| 0.23 | 0.84 | 1.68 |
| Jeglówek |
| 0.21 | 2.99 | 1.71 |
| Kojle |
| 0.54 | 1.79 | 1.68 |
| Polymictic lakes | ||||
| Przechodnie |
| 4.48 | n.a. | 2.15 |
| Okrągłe |
| 0.73 | n.a. | 2.03 |
| Krajwelek |
| 3.83 | 4.43 | 2.15 |
| Udziejek |
| 8.15 | n.d. | 2.28 |
| Pogorzałek |
| 2.53 | 2.33 | 2.11 |
| Linówek |
| 0.17 | n.a. | 2.09 |
n.a. not analyzed
Lists of rotifer species in the lakes of Suwałki Landscape Park
| Lakes | Species | Number |
|---|---|---|
| Hańcza |
| 7 |
| Szurpiły |
| 16 |
| Kamenduł |
| 16 |
| Perty |
| 14 |
| Jeglówek |
| 13 |
| Kojle |
| 10 |
| Okrągłe |
| 21 |
| Krajwelek |
| 25 |
| Udziejek |
| 19 |
| Pogorzałek |
| 20 |
| Linówek |
| 10 |
Share (percent) of low and high trophy indicatory species in the total numbers of Rotifera
| Hańcza | Szurpiły | Kamenduł | Perty | Jeglówek | Kojle | Okrągłe | Krajwelek | Udziejek | Pogorzałek | Linówek | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicatory species of low trophic status | |||||||||||
|
| 2.6 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 0.7 | ||||
|
| 28.2 | ||||||||||
|
| 0.4 | 7.0 | 6.9 | 2.4 | 14.2 | 12.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 12.5 | |
|
| 2.6 | 0.2 | |||||||||
| Total | 28.6 | 11.6 | 9.7 | 4.2 | 14.9 | 15.2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 13.2 |
| Indicatory species of high trophic status | |||||||||||
|
| 1.6 | ||||||||||
|
| 0.8 | ||||||||||
|
| 1.7 | 15.3 | 21.9 | 30.3 | 12.0 | 1.6 | |||||
|
| 25.0 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.9 | ||||||
|
| 0.2 | 3.6 | |||||||||
|
| 4.7 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 17.4 | ||||||
|
| 0.6 | 1.0 | |||||||||
| Total | 0 | 1.7 | 40.3 | 4.7 | 0 | 2.5 | 27.9 | 32.0 | 20.9 | 20.6 | 1.9 |
Fig. 8Values of TSIROT in the selected lakes of Suwałki Landscape Park
Crustacea trophic state index (TSICRU) according to Karabin (1985) and selected characteristics of the crustacean zooplankton structure in the lakes of Suwałki Landscape Park
| Lakes | TSICCB | TSIBR | TSIIS | TSICRU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hańcza | 45.5 | 44.0 | 40.6 | 43.4 | 73 | 62 | 0.051 | 7.50 | 1.0 | 2.7 |
| Szurpiły | 38.4 | 38.9 | 40.9 | 39.4 | 89 | 35 | 0.041 | 0.74 | 1.5 | 1.1 |
| Kamenduł | 55.5 | 58.2 | 44.4 | 52.7 | 72 | 22 | 0.023 | 1.57 | 0.13 | 0.2 |
| Perty | 42.7 | 51.3 | 51.0 | 48.3 | 77 | 124 | 0.023 | 0.22 | 0.33 | 2.46 |
| Jeglówek | 49.1 | 59.5 | 47.7 | 52.1 | 64,6 | 41 | 0.015 | 1.31 | 2.16 | 0.49 |
| Kojle | 46.8 | 49.1 | 52.4 | 49.4 | 53 | 55 | 0.034 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 1.6 |
| Okrągłe | 46.0 | 45.3 | 45.1 | 45.5 | 67 | 117 | 0.029 | 1.84 | 0.69 | 0.6 |
| Krajwelek | 66.4 | 64.2 | 60.1 | 63.6 | 0 | 20 | 0.016 | 41.00 | 0.51 | 0.07 |
| Udziejek | 59.4 | 58.3 | 47.5 | 55.1 | 61 | 157 | 0.013 | 0 | 0.26 | 0.25 |
| Pogorzałek | 47.0 | 45.5 | 50.8 | 47.8 | 58 | 59 | 0.018 | 6,6 | 0.61 | – |
| Linówek | 57.0 | 59.0 | 57.1 | 57.5 | 35 | 101 | 0.021 | 2.16 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
A percentage of herbivorous in total Crustacea biomass (percent), N number of Crustacea (individuals per liter), B biomass of Crustacea (milligrams per liter), W individual mean biomass in the whole zooplankton community (milligrams), B /B biomass of Cyclopoida to biomass of Calanoida, N /N numbers of Cladocera to numbers of Copepoda, B /B biomass of crustacean zooplankton to biomass of phytoplankton
Mean value for the selected parameters of crustacean zooplankton community in the lakes of different trophic statuses
| Characteristics of crustacean zooplankton communities | Mesotrophic lakes | Mesoeutrophic lakes | Eutrophic lakes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of biomass herbivorous Crustacea | 81 | 65 | 32 |
| Numbers ( | 49 | 70 | 93 |
| Biomass ( | 2.33 | 1.75 | 1.56 |
| Individual mean biomass in the whole zooplankton community, | 0.046 | 0.024 | 0.017 |
|
| 1.25 | 0.73 | 0.31 |
|
| 1.9 | 1.07 | 0.39 |
| Number of species | 14.5 | 10.5 | 8 |
Trophic status in the lakes of Suwałki Landscape Park according to different indices
| Lakes | TSI | BN | TIPB | TSIROT | TSICRU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hańcza | M | E | M | M/E | M |
| Szurpiły | E | M | M | M/E | M |
| Kamenduł | E | E | M/E | M/E | M/E |
| Perty | M | E | M | M/E | M/E |
| Jeglówek | M | E | M | M/E | M/E |
| Kojle | E | E | M | M/E | M/E |
| Przechodnie | E | E | M/E | – | – |
| Okrągłe | E | E | M | E | M/E |
| Krajwelek | E | E | M/E | E | E |
| Udziejek | E | E | E | E | E |
| Pogorzałek | E | E | M/E | M/E | E |
| Linówek | E | H | M/E | M/E | E |
M mesotrophic lake, E eutrophic lake, H hypertrophic lake