Literature DB >> 28668538

Community Practice Implementation of a Self-administered Version of PREMM1,2,6 to Assess Risk for Lynch Syndrome.

Daniel G Luba1, James A DiSario1, Colleen Rock2, Devki Saraiya2, Kelsey Moyes2, Krystal Brown2, Kristen Rushton2, Maydeen M Ogara1, Mona Raphael1, Dayna Zimmerman1, Kimmie Garrido1, Evelyn Silguero1, Jonathan Nelson2, Matthew B Yurgelun3, Fay Kastrinos4, Richard J Wenstrup2, Sapna Syngal5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lynch syndrome is a genetic disorder that greatly increases risk for colorectal and other cancers, although it is underdiagnosed. Prediction of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 (PREMM1,2,6) is a web-based tool that analyzes individuals' personal/family histories of cancer to quantify their likelihood of carrying a germline mutation associated with Lynch syndrome. We investigated the feasibility of systematic risk assessment for Lynch syndrome in a community gastroenterology practice using a patient-completed version of PREMM1,2,6.
METHODS: PREMM1,2,6 was adapted into a computer tablet version designed for self-administration by patients. Individuals presenting to a community gastroenterology office and endoscopy facility in California completed the PREMM1,2,6 assessment before their visit (n = 3134). The total study duration (8 months) comprised a 2-month initiation period (May 1-June 30, 2013) and a 6-month study period (July 1-December 31, 2013). Genetic counseling and germline analysis for mutations in genes associated with Lynch syndrome (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM) were offered to individuals with PREMM1,2,6 scores of 5% or higher. Patients and providers completed surveys to evaluate the feasibility and satisfaction with the process.
RESULTS: Of the 3134 individuals assessed by PREMM1,2,6 during the 6-month study period, 177 individuals (5.6%) had scores of 5% or higher. Of these, 146 individuals underwent genetic testing, along with 28 additional participants recruited nonconsecutively during the initiation period. Mutations associated with Lynch syndrome were detected in 3 of the 146 individuals (2.1%) with PREMM1,2,6 scores of 5% or higher who underwent germline testing, and 3 of the 28 patients (10.7%) recruited during study initiation with PREMM1,2,6 scores of 5% or higher. Of the participants who underwent genetic analysis, 98.6% stated that they understood the information provided to them. All of the surveyed providers stated that they were satisfied with the incorporation of PREMM1,2,6 into their clinical practice, and that they would continue using it to assess risk for Lynch syndrome.
CONCLUSIONS: A patient self-administered version of the PREMM1,2,6 Lynch syndrome risk assessment model can be used systematically in community-based gastroenterology and endoscopy practices.
Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial Cancer; Familial Colon Cancer; Genetics; Protocol Integration

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28668538      PMCID: PMC5734958          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  19 in total

Review 1.  ACG clinical guideline: Genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes.

Authors:  Sapna Syngal; Randall E Brand; James M Church; Francis M Giardiello; Heather L Hampel; Randall W Burt
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Francis M Giardiello; John I Allen; Jennifer E Axilbund; C Richard Boland; Carol A Burke; Randall W Burt; James M Church; Jason A Dominitz; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; Theodore R Levin; David A Lieberman; Douglas J Robertson; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: later age of onset.

Authors:  Heather Hampel; Julie A Stephens; Eero Pukkala; Risto Sankila; Lauri A Aaltonen; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Albert de la Chapelle
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutations in Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew B Yurgelun; Matthew H Kulke; Charles S Fuchs; Brian A Allen; Hajime Uno; Jason L Hornick; Chinedu I Ukaegbu; Lauren K Brais; Philip G McNamara; Robert J Mayer; Deborah Schrag; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Kimmie Ng; John Kidd; Nanda Singh; Anne-Renee Hartman; Richard J Wenstrup; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of primary genetic screening for Lynch syndrome in the general population.

Authors:  Tuan A Dinh; Benjamin I Rosner; James C Atwood; C Richard Boland; Sapna Syngal; Hans F A Vasen; Stephen B Gruber; Randall W Burt
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-11-18

6.  Prediction of MLH1 and MSH2 mutations in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Judith Balmaña; David H Stockwell; Ewout W Steyerberg; Elena M Stoffel; Amie M Deffenbaugh; Julia E Reid; Brian Ward; Thomas Scholl; Brant Hendrickson; John Tazelaar; Lynn Anne Burbidge; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Point: justification for Lynch syndrome screening among all patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Heather Hampel
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.908

8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic and Genomic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility.

Authors:  Mark E Robson; Angela R Bradbury; Banu Arun; Susan M Domchek; James M Ford; Heather L Hampel; Stephen M Lipkin; Sapna Syngal; Dana S Wollins; Noralane M Lindor
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Quality of cancer family history and referral for genetic counseling and testing among oncology practices: a pilot test of quality measures as part of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.

Authors:  Marie E Wood; Pamela Kadlubek; Trang H Pham; Dana S Wollins; Karen H Lu; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Michael N Neuss; Kevin S Hughes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: Assessment of the perspectives of patients with colorectal cancer regarding benefits and barriers.

Authors:  Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Jamilyn M Zepp; Mari J Gilmore; James V Davis; Elizabeth J Esterberg; Kristin R Muessig; Susan K Peterson; Sapna Syngal; Louise S Acheson; Georgia L Wiesner; Jacob A Reiss; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Leah H Biller; Sapna Syngal; Matthew B Yurgelun
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Germline Genetic Features of Young Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Elena M Stoffel; Erika Koeppe; Jessica Everett; Peter Ulintz; Mark Kiel; Jenae Osborne; Linford Williams; Kristen Hanson; Stephen B Gruber; Laura S Rozek
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Epidemiology and Mechanisms of the Increasing Incidence of Colon and Rectal Cancers in Young Adults.

Authors:  Elena M Stoffel; Caitlin C Murphy
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  Incorporating Colorectal Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment into Gastroenterology Practice.

Authors:  Benjamin Stern; Thomas McGarrity; Maria Baker
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12

Review 5.  Initiatives to Scale Up and Expand Reach of Cancer Genomic Services Outside of Specialty Clinical Settings: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yue Guan; Colleen M McBride; Hannah Rogers; Jingsong Zhao; Caitlin G Allen; Cam Escoffery
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Feasibility of Utilizing PREMM Score for Lynch Syndrome Identification in an Urban, Minority Patient Population.

Authors:  Brigid Adviento; Michael Conner; Alexander Sarkisian; Nicolette Walano; Hans Andersson; Jordan Karlitz
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

Review 7.  Patients in Whom to Consider Genetic Evaluation and Testing for Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes.

Authors:  Sonia S Kupfer; Carol A Burke
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 12.045

Review 8.  Recent advances in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Xi Li; Guodong Liu; Wei Wu
Journal:  Exp Hematol Oncol       Date:  2021-06-12

9.  Comparing models of delivery for cancer genetics services among patients receiving primary care who meet criteria for genetic evaluation in two healthcare systems: BRIDGE randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Wendy Kohlmann; Rachelle Lorenz Chambers; Melody S Goodman; Richard Bradshaw; Priscilla A Chan; Daniel Chavez-Yenter; Sarah V Colonna; Whitney F Espinel; Jessica N Everett; Amanda Gammon; Eric R Goldberg; Javier Gonzalez; Kelsi J Hagerty; Rachel Hess; Kelsey Kehoe; Cecilia Kessler; Kadyn E Kimball; Shane Loomis; Tiffany R Martinez; Rachel Monahan; Joshua D Schiffman; Dani Temares; Katie Tobik; David W Wetter; Devin M Mann; Kensaku Kawamoto; Guilherme Del Fiol; Saundra S Buys; Ophira Ginsburg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Adaptation and early implementation of the PREdiction model for gene mutations (PREMM5™) for lynch syndrome risk assessment in a diverse population.

Authors:  Kathleen F Mittendorf; Chinedu Ukaegbu; Marian J Gilmore; Nangel M Lindberg; Tia L Kauffman; Donna J Eubanks; Elizabeth Shuster; Jake Allen; Carmit McMullen; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Katherine P Anderson; Michael C Leo; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Sonia Okuyama Sasaki; Jamilyn M Zepp; Sapna Syngal; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.375

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.