Devesh Oberoi1, Victoria M White2, John F Seymour3,4, H Miles Prince3,4, Simon Harrison3,4, Michael Jefford3,4, Ingrid Winship5, David Hill1,3, Damien Bolton6, Anne Kay7, Jeremy Millar8, Nicole Wong Doo9, Graham Giles1,3. 1. Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. 2. Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. Vicki.White@cancervic.org.au. 3. The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia. 4. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. 5. Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. 6. Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia. 7. North Eastern Melbourne Integrated Cancer Service, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia. 8. Alfred Health, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. 9. Concord Hospital, Concord, NSW, 2139, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between patient-reported unmet needs and anxiety and depression for survivors of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: In a longitudinal study design, self-reported data were collected through telephone interviews at two time points approximately 7 (T1) and 15 (T2) months post-diagnosis. The sample was recruited through the population-based Victorian Cancer Registry. At T1 and T2, the study outcomes, anxiety and depression, were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and unmet needs were measured using the Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34). Questions related to social/family problems, relationship problems and financial problems were also asked. A three-step multivariable hierarchical logistic regression analysis examined the relative role of T1 anxiety and depression, T1 and T2 unmet needs and other psychosocial factors with T2 anxiety and depression. RESULTS: Both cross-sectional and longitudinal associations were observed between unmet needs and psychological distress. T2 anxiety was associated with T1 anxiety (OR 4.75, 95% CI 1.86-11.09), T2 psychological needs (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.34-2.11) and with T1 social problems (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.03-5.05) in multivariate analysis. T2 depression was associated with both T1 (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.06-1.57) and T2 psychological needs (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.06-1.70), T2 physical needs (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.27-2.81) and T1 depression (OR 4.52, 95% CI 1.88-10.86). CONCLUSIONS: Unmet needs that manifest following diagnosis and treatment may persist into early survivorship and contribute to psychological distress. Addressing these needs during treatment may diminish the risk of current and future anxiety and depression.
OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between patient-reported unmet needs and anxiety and depression for survivors of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: In a longitudinal study design, self-reported data were collected through telephone interviews at two time points approximately 7 (T1) and 15 (T2) months post-diagnosis. The sample was recruited through the population-based Victorian Cancer Registry. At T1 and T2, the study outcomes, anxiety and depression, were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and unmet needs were measured using the Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34). Questions related to social/family problems, relationship problems and financial problems were also asked. A three-step multivariable hierarchical logistic regression analysis examined the relative role of T1 anxiety and depression, T1 and T2 unmet needs and other psychosocial factors with T2 anxiety and depression. RESULTS: Both cross-sectional and longitudinal associations were observed between unmet needs and psychological distress. T2 anxiety was associated with T1 anxiety (OR 4.75, 95% CI 1.86-11.09), T2 psychological needs (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.34-2.11) and with T1 social problems (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.03-5.05) in multivariate analysis. T2 depression was associated with both T1 (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.06-1.57) and T2 psychological needs (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.06-1.70), T2 physical needs (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.27-2.81) and T1 depression (OR 4.52, 95% CI 1.88-10.86). CONCLUSIONS: Unmet needs that manifest following diagnosis and treatment may persist into early survivorship and contribute to psychological distress. Addressing these needs during treatment may diminish the risk of current and future anxiety and depression.
Authors: Noel Milpied; Eric Deconinck; Fanny Gaillard; Vincent Delwail; Charles Foussard; Christian Berthou; Remy Gressin; Virginie Lucas; Philippe Colombat; Jean-Luc Harousseau Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-03-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: H Sharon Campbell; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Donna Turner; Lynda Hayward; X Sunny Wang; Jill Taylor-Brown Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-01-23 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Alix E Hall; Rob W Sanson-Fisher; Mariko L Carey; Chris Paul; Anna Williamson; Ken Bradstock; H Sharon Campbell Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Das Priscilla; Awang Hamidin; M Zain Azhar; Khin Ohnmar Naing Noorjan; M Said Salmiah; Khalid Bahariah Journal: East Asian Arch Psychiatry Date: 2011-09
Authors: Melissa S Y Thong; Floortje Mols; Kevin D Stein; Tenbroeck Smith; Jan-Willem W Coebergh; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Cristiane Decat Bergerot; Karen Lynn Clark; Alexandre Nonino; Sarah Waliany; Marco Murilo Buso; Matthew Loscalzo Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2013-11-04
Authors: Michael Kusch; Hildegard Labouvie; Vera Schiewer; Natalie Talalaev; Jan C Cwik; Sonja Bussmann; Lusine Vaganian; Alexander L Gerlach; Antje Dresen; Natalia Cecon; Sandra Salm; Theresia Krieger; Holger Pfaff; Clarissa Lemmen; Lisa Derendorf; Stephanie Stock; Christina Samel; Anna Hagemeier; Martin Hellmich; Bernd Leicher; Gregor Hültenschmidt; Jessica Swoboda; Peter Haas; Anna Arning; Andrea Göttel; Kathrin Schwickerath; Ullrich Graeven; Stefanie Houwaart; Hedy Kerek-Bodden; Steffen Krebs; Christiana Muth; Christina Hecker; Marcel Reiser; Cornelia Mauch; Jennifer Benner; Gerdamarie Schmidt; Christiane Karlowsky; Gisela Vimalanandan; Lukas Matyschik; Lars Galonska; Annette Francke; Karin Osborne; Ursula Nestle; Markus Bäumer; Kordula Schmitz; Jürgen Wolf; Michael Hallek Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-04-22 Impact factor: 2.908
Authors: Linda Åkeflo; Gail Dunberger; Eva Elmerstig; Viktor Skokic; Gunnar Steineck; Karin Bergmark Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Tanaya Shree; Qian Li; Sally L Glaser; Ann Brunson; Holden T Maecker; Robert W Haile; Ronald Levy; Theresa H M Keegan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 50.717