Yusuke Yamamoto1, Teiichi Sugiura2, Yukiyasu Okamura2, Takaaki Ito2, Ryo Ashida2, Takeshi Aramaki3, Katsuhiko Uesaka2. 1. Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-Nagakubo, Sunto-Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, 4118777, Japan. yusu.yamamoto@scchr.jp. 2. Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-Nagakubo, Sunto-Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, 4118777, Japan. 3. Division of Radiology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS: Some patients have P6a running on the ventral side (Ventral-P6a), relative to the right hepatic vein (RHV). STUDY DESIGN: Forty-one patients who underwent left trisectionectomy or central bisectionectomy for biliary cancer were enrolled. We compared the anatomical features using 3D images and surgical outcomes between patients with Ventral-P6a (n = 17) and those with P6a running on the dorsal side relative to the RHV (Dorsal-P6a; n = 25). Moreover, the liver volume by hand-tracing 2D axial images was compared to the volume calculated using the 3D images. RESULTS: The frequency of complete exposure of RHV on the transection plane was less in Ventral-P6a (12 vs. 76%; p < 0.001), and the frequency of supraportal type of right posterior hepatic artery (RPHA, 29 vs. 4%, p = 0.020), the presence of inferior RHV (47 vs. 12%, p = 0.011), and the angle between the transection plane of segment VI and VII (S6-S7angle, 29.0° vs. 4.9°; p < 0.001) were greater in Ventral-P6a than in Dorsal-P6a. In Dorsal-P6a, the volume of posterior section calculated using 2D images was greater than that calculated using 3D images (404 vs. 370 mL; p = 0.004). The incidence of daily diuretic administration in Dorsal-P6a was greater than in Ventral-P6a (88 vs. 54%, p = 0.035). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In Ventral-P6a, the complete exposure of RHV was rare in left trisectionectomy or central bisectionectomy. Surgeons should preoperatively recognize the course of RPHA, the presence of inferior RHV, and the S6-S7angle. In Dorsal-P6a, the volume of posterior section, which tended to be overestimated using 2D images, was smaller than that in Ventral-P6a.
BACKGROUNDS: Some patients have P6a running on the ventral side (Ventral-P6a), relative to the right hepatic vein (RHV). STUDY DESIGN: Forty-one patients who underwent left trisectionectomy or central bisectionectomy for biliary cancer were enrolled. We compared the anatomical features using 3D images and surgical outcomes between patients with Ventral-P6a (n = 17) and those with P6a running on the dorsal side relative to the RHV (Dorsal-P6a; n = 25). Moreover, the liver volume by hand-tracing 2D axial images was compared to the volume calculated using the 3D images. RESULTS: The frequency of complete exposure of RHV on the transection plane was less in Ventral-P6a (12 vs. 76%; p < 0.001), and the frequency of supraportal type of right posterior hepatic artery (RPHA, 29 vs. 4%, p = 0.020), the presence of inferior RHV (47 vs. 12%, p = 0.011), and the angle between the transection plane of segment VI and VII (S6-S7angle, 29.0° vs. 4.9°; p < 0.001) were greater in Ventral-P6a than in Dorsal-P6a. In Dorsal-P6a, the volume of posterior section calculated using 2D images was greater than that calculated using 3D images (404 vs. 370 mL; p = 0.004). The incidence of daily diuretic administration in Dorsal-P6a was greater than in Ventral-P6a (88 vs. 54%, p = 0.035). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In Ventral-P6a, the complete exposure of RHV was rare in left trisectionectomy or central bisectionectomy. Surgeons should preoperatively recognize the course of RPHA, the presence of inferior RHV, and the S6-S7angle. In Dorsal-P6a, the volume of posterior section, which tended to be overestimated using 2D images, was smaller than that in Ventral-P6a.
Entities:
Keywords:
3D images; Central bisectionectomy; Left trisectionectomy; Right hepatic vein; Right posterior hepatic artery; Ventral branches of segment VI portal vein
Authors: J N Vauthey; A Chaoui; K A Do; M M Bilimoria; M J Fenstermacher; C Charnsangavej; M Hicks; G Alsfasser; G Lauwers; I F Hawkins; J Caridi Journal: Surgery Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Hauke Lang; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Eirini I Brokalaki; Arnold Radtke; Andrea Frilling; Ernesto P Molmenti; Massimo Malagó; Christoph E Broelsch Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2006-07-13 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Hideki Nishio; Ernest Hidalgo; Zaed Z R Hamady; Kadiyala V Ravindra; Anil Kotru; Dowmitra Dasgupta; Ahmed Al-Mukhtar; K Rajendra Prasad; Giles J Toogood; J Peter A Lodge Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: T Ebata; T Kosuge; S Hirano; M Unno; M Yamamoto; M Miyazaki; N Kokudo; S Miyagawa; T Takada; M Nagino Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 6.939