Literature DB >> 24375300

Proposal to modify the International Union Against Cancer staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinomas.

T Ebata1, T Kosuge, S Hirano, M Unno, M Yamamoto, M Miyazaki, N Kokudo, S Miyagawa, T Takada, M Nagino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The International Union Against Cancer (UICC) staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma changed in 2009. The aim of this study was to validate and optimize the UICC system for these tumours.
METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in eight Japanese hospitals between 2001 and 2010. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma was defined as a cholangiocarcinoma that involves the hilar bile duct, independent of the presence or absence of a liver mass component. The stratification ability of the UICC tumour node metastasis (TNM) system was compared with that of a modified system.
RESULTS: Of 1352 patients, 35.9, 44.8 and 12.6 per cent had Bismuth type IV tumours, nodal metastasis (N1) and distant metastasis (M1) respectively. T4 tumours (43.2 per cent) and stage IVA (T4 Nany M0; 36.3 per cent) disease were most common. Survival was not significantly different between patients with T3 versus T4 tumours (P = 0.284). Survival for patients with stage IVA disease was comparable to that for patients with stage IIIB tumours (T1-3 N1 M0) (P = 0.426). Vascular invasion, pancreatic invasion, positive margin, N1 and M1 status were identified as independent predictors of survival. When Bismuth type IV tumours were removed from the T4 determinants and N1 tumours grouped together, the modified grouping had a higher linear trend χ2 and likelihood ratio χ2 compared with the original system (245.6 versus 170.3 respectively and 255.8 versus 209.3 respectively).
CONCLUSION: The present data suggest that minimal modification with removal of Bismuth type IV tumours from the T4 determinants and bundling of N1 disease may enhance the prognostic ability of the UICC system. However, this requires validation on an independent data set.
© 2013 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24375300     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  36 in total

Review 1.  Association between Helicobacter spp. infections and hepatobiliary malignancies: a review.

Authors:  Fany Karina Segura-López; Alfredo Güitrón-Cantú; Javier Torres
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  The Predictive Value of Indocyanine Green Clearance in Future Liver Remnant for Posthepatectomy Liver Failure Following Hepatectomy with Extrahepatic Bile Duct Resection.

Authors:  Yukihiro Yokoyama; Tomoki Ebata; Tsuyoshi Igami; Gen Sugawara; Takashi Mizuno; Junpei Yamaguchi; Masato Nagino
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a comparison of the 6th and 7th editions.

Authors:  Bas Groot Koerkamp; Jimme K Wiggers; Peter J Allen; Olivier R C Busch; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; Mithat Gonen; Dirk J Gouma; T Peter Kingham; Thomas M van Gulik; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Clinicopathological significance of mucin production in patients with papillary cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shunsuke Onoe; Yoshie Shimoyama; Tomoki Ebata; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Tsuyoshi Igami; Gen Sugawara; Takashi Mizuno; Shigeo Nakamura; Masato Nagino
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  The pathologic correlation between liver and portal vein invasion in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: evaluating the oncologic rationale for the American Joint Committee on Cancer definitions of T2 and T3 tumors.

Authors:  Takaaki Ito; Tomoki Ebata; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Tsuyoshi Igami; Gen Sugawara; Takashi Mizuno; Yoshie Shimoyama; Masato Nagino
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Curative-intent surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors for clinical decision making.

Authors:  Irinel Popescu; Traian Dumitrascu
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 7.  Surgical resection techniques for locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sanjay Govil; Mettu Srinivas Reddy; Mohamed Rela
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  A Comparison of Prognostic Schemes for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Stefan Buettner; Jeroen L A van Vugt; Faiz Gani; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Georgios Antonios Margonis; Cecilia G Ethun; George Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Shishir K Maithel; Alfredo Guglielmi; Jan N M IJzermans; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Preoperative biliary drainage in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: identifying patients who require percutaneous drainage after failed endoscopic drainage.

Authors:  Jimme K Wiggers; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Robert J Coelen; Erik A Rauws; Mark A Schattner; C Yung Nio; Karen T Brown; Mithat Gonen; Susan van Dieren; Krijn P van Lienden; Peter J Allen; Marc G H Besselink; Olivier R C Busch; Michael I D'Angelica; Robert P DeMatteo; Dirk J Gouma; T Peter Kingham; William R Jarnagin; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Impact of tumor localization on the outcomes of surgery for an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tatsuya Orimo; Toshiya Kamiyama; Tomoko Mitsuhashi; Hirofumi Kamachi; Hideki Yokoo; Kenji Wakayama; Shingo Shimada; Akihisa Nagatsu; Akinobu Taketomi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.