| Literature DB >> 28666732 |
Ying Wang1, Hao-Yue Huang1, Guang-Liang Bian2, Yun-Sheng Yu1, Wen-Xue Ye1, Fei Hua1, Yi-Huan Chen1, Zhen-Ya Shen3.
Abstract
Recent studies indicate important roles for SMAD4 in SMCs proliferation, extracellular matrix maintenance, and blood vessel remodeling. However, the genetic effects of SMAD4 in the pathogenesis of thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection (TAAD) are still largely unknown. Here we identified a functional variant of SMAD4 which might be involved in the pathological progression of TAAD. Five tagging SNPs of SMAD4 were genotyped in 202 TAAD cases and 400 controls using MALDI-TOF. rs12455792 CT or TT variant genotypes was associated with an significantly elevated TAAD risk (adjusted OR=1.58, 95%CI=1.09-2.30) under a dominant genetic model. It was located in the 5'UTR and predicted to influence transcription activity and RNA folding of SMAD4. In luciferase reporter assay, rs12455792 T allele markedly decreased luciferase activities. Accordingly, SMAD4 expression in tissues was lower in patients with CT or TT genotypes, compared with CC. Movat's pentachrome showed that rs12455792 T allele enhanced SMCs loss and fibers accumulation. With angiotensin II induction, rate of Apoptotic SMCs was significantly higher while SMAD4 silenced. Moreover, rs12455792 T allele also increased Versican degradation via ADAMTS-4. In conclusion, this variant might promote SMCs apoptosis and proteoglycans degradation, and further facilitate the progress of TAAD. Our findings identified rs12455792 as a predictor for progression of vascular media pathological changes related thoracic aortic disorders.Entities:
Keywords: Apoptosis; Polymorphism; Proteoglycans degradation; SMAD4; SMCs; Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28666732 PMCID: PMC5514432 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.06.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EBioMedicine ISSN: 2352-3964 Impact factor: 8.143
Fig. 1Representative MALDI-TOF MS spectra of rs12455792 and linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis of the tagger SNPs in SMAD4 gene. (A) Genotypes of rs12455792 are determined by plotting peak intensity (y-axis) against mass (Da) (x-axis). (a) MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of a single peak at 8949.0 Da indicates homozygous genotype of CC. (b) MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of a single peak at 8932.5 Da indicates homozygous genotype of TT. (c) MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of 2 peaks at 8932.5 Da and 8949.0 Da represents heterozygous genotype of CT. (B) Pairwise LD among 5 tagger SNPs of SMAD4. The r2 value in each diamond indicates the pairwise correlation between SNPs. The color scale ranges from white to black reflects lower to higher r2 values.
Fig. 2rs12455792 affected SMAD4 gene expression. (A) In silico prediction of rs12455792 impact on RNA folding structures. The structures corresponding to rs12455792C (a) or T allele (c). Mountain plots related to rs12455792C (b) or T allele (d). y-axis: minimum free energy or entropy. x-axis: sequence position. (B) Reporter plasmids construction. The schematic diagram of pGL3-basic vector (a) and pGL3-SMAD4-TRS reporter (b). (C) Representative graph of relative luciferase activity of cells transfected with pGL-3 basic vector or pGL3-SMAD4-TRS reporter. Six replicates for each group and the experiment was repeated at least three times. *P < 0.05. (D) Western blot analysis for SMAD4 expression in aorta tissues from patients with different genotypes (a) and corresponding quantitative analysis (b).
Demographics and clinical features of the TAAD patients and healthy controls involved in this study.
| Items | Cases no. (%) | Controls no. (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 54.1 ± 14.2 | 52.4 ± 15.2 | 0.212 |
| Sex (male), n (%) | 152 (75.2) | 284 (71.0) | 0.271 |
| Smoking, n (%) | 105 (52.0) | 218 (54.5) | 0.558 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 29 (14.4) | / | / |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 81 (40.1) | 96 (24.0) | |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 23.93 ± 4.04 | 24.32 ± 4.22 | 0.124 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.16 ± 1.70 | 3.17 ± 1.46 | |
| HDL-c, mmol/L | 1.15 ± 0.29 | 1.28 ± 0.31 | |
| LDL-c, mmol/L | 2.45 ± 0.80 | 2.57 ± 0.97 | 0.141 |
The results were in bold, if the 95% CI excluded 1 and P < 0.05.
Logistic regression analysis of associations between the genotypes of SMAD4 and TAAD risk.
| Variants | Genotypes | Cases no. (%) | Controls no. (%) | Crude OR (95%CI) | Adjusted OR (95%CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs12455792 | CC | 52 (25.7) | 142 (35.5) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
| (HWE = 0.936) | CT | 106 (52.5) | 192 (48.0) | 1.51 (1.01–2.24) | 1.51 (1.01–2.24) | ||
| TT | 44 (21.8) | 66 (16.5) | 1.82 (1.11–2.99) | 1.81 (1.11–2.99) | |||
| CT + TT | 150 (74.3) | 258 (64.5) | 1.59 (1.09–2.31) | 1.58 (1.09–2.30) | |||
| C allele | 210 (52.0) | 476 (59.5) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
| T allele | 194 (48.0) | 324 (40.5) | 1.36 (1.07–1.73) | 1.35 (1.07–1.72) | |||
| rs61751987 | GG | 153 (75.7) | 299 (74.8) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
| (HWE = 0.098) | GA | 41 (20.3) | 89 (22.3) | 0.88 (0.54–1.42) | 0.624 | 0.85 (0.51–1.39) | 0.685 |
| AA | 8 (4.0) | 12 (3.0) | 1.33 (0.45–3.92) | 0.787 | 1.31 (0.42–3.81) | 0.829 | |
| GA + AA | 49 (24.3) | 101 (25.3) | 0.99 (0.63–1.55) | 1.000 | 0.97 (0.59–1.52) | 1.000 | |
| G allele | 347 (85.9) | 687 (85.9) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
| A allele | 57 (14.1) | 113 (14.1) | 0.99 (0.49–2.00) | 1.000 | 0.97 (0.43–1.91) | 1.000 | |
| rs12456284 | AA | 93 (46.0) | 195 (48.8) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
| (HWE = 0.065) | AG | 79 (39.1) | 157 (39.2) | 0.98 (0.66–1.47) | 1.000 | 0.96 (0.65–1.45) | 1.000 |
| GG | 30 (14.9) | 48 (12.0) | 1.19 (0.71–1.98) | 0.625 | 1.15 (0.69–1.89) | 0.676 | |
| AG + GG | 109 (54.0) | 205 (51.2) | 1.12 (0.79–1.57) | 0.546 | 1.11 (0.78–1.56) | 0.592 | |
| A allele | 265 (65.6) | 547 (68.4) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
| G allele | 139 (34.4) | 253 (31.6) | 1.10 (0.75–1.49) | 0.472 | 1.09 (0.74–1.48) | 0.535 | |
| rs3819122 | AA | 68 (33.7) | 122 (30.5) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
| (HWE = 0.297) | AC | 101 (50.0) | 207 (51.8) | 0.88 (0.60–1.28) | 0.497 | 0.87 (0.59–1.28) | 0.560 |
| CC | 33 (16.3) | 71 (17.7) | 0.83 (0.50–1.39) | 0.522 | 0.81 (0.48–1.37) | 0.583 | |
| AC + CC | 134 (66.3) | 278 (69.5) | 0.87 (0.60–1.24) | 0.458 | 0.84 (0.55–1.20) | 0.517 | |
| A allele | 237 (58.7) | 451 (56.4) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
| C allele | 167 (41.3) | 349 (43.6) | 0.84 (0.56–1.27) | 0.462 | 0.83 (0.55–1.26) | 0.507 | |
| rs2282544 | GG | 148 (73.3) | 282 (70.5) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
| (HWE = 0.086) | GC | 47 (23.2) | 102 (25.5) | 0.88 (0.59–1.31) | 0.548 | 0.86 (0.58–1.30) | 0.617 |
| CC | 7 (3.5) | 16 (4.0) | 0.83 (0.34–2.07) | 0.823 | 0.77 (0.29–1.94) | 0.865 | |
| GC + CC | 54 (26.7) | 118 (29.5) | 0.87 (0.60–1.27) | 0.505 | 0.86 (0.59–1.26) | 0.542 | |
| G allele | 343 (84.9) | 666 (83.2) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
| C allele | 61 (15.1) | 134 (16.8) | 0.85 (0.47–1.59) | 0.627 | 0.82 (0.45–1.58) | 0.679 | |
| Combined effect of risk genotypes | |||||||
| 0 | 0 (0) | 1 (0.2) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
| 1 | 3 (1.5) | 15 (3.7) | 0.39 (0.11–1.37) | 0.202 | 0.37 (0.09–1.31) | 0.217 | |
| 2 | 29 (14.3) | 65 (16.2) | 0.87 (0.54–1.41) | 0.635 | 0.84 (0.52–1.38) | 0.642 | |
| 3 | 86 (42.6) | 169 (42.3) | 1.01 (0.72–1.42) | 1.000 | 1.03 (0.73–1.46) | 0.981 | |
| 4 | 67 (33.2) | 123 (30.8) | 1.11 (0.77–1.60) | 0.577 | 1.13 (0.77–1.63) | 0.569 | |
| 5 | 17 (8.4) | 27 (6.8) | 1.28 (0.68–2.42) | 0.507 | 1.26 (0.66–2.41) | 0.496 | |
| Trend | |||||||
| 0–3 | 84 (41.6) | 150 (37.5) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
| 4–5 | 118 (58.4) | 250 (62.5) | 1.18 (0.84–1.67) | 0.374 | 1.19 (0.84–1.69) | 0.362 | |
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Chi-square test for genotype distributions between cases and controls.
Adjusted for age, sex, smoking status in logistic regress models.
The frequency of inferred haplotypes of SMAD4 gene based on observed genotypes and their associations with TAAD risk.
| Haplotypes | Cases no. (%) | Controls no. (%) | Crude OR (95%CI) | Adjusted OR (95%CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGAAG | 92 (22.8) | 168 (21.0) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
| CGACG | 64 (15.8) | 118 (14.8) | 1.08 (0.71–1.66) | 0.745 | 1.06 (0.67–1.68) | 0.769 |
| CGGAG | 38 (9.4) | 96 (12.0) | 0.71 (0.44–1.15) | 0.179 | 0.65 (0.37–1.09) | 0.152 |
| CGGCG | 25 (6.2) | 39 (4.9) | 1.18 (0.60–2.33) | 0.730 | 1.15 (0.53–2.41) | 0.795 |
| CAAAG | 17 (4.2) | 52 (6.5) | 0.58 (0.30–1.11) | 0.105 | 0.72 (0.28–1.42) | 0.179 |
| CGAAC | 30 (7.4) | 51 (6.4) | 1.23 (0.57–1.96) | 1.000 | 1.25 (0.61–2.12) | 1.000 |
| CGGAC | 12 (3.0) | 18 (2.3) | 0.73 (0.25–2.16) | 0.599 | 0.79 (0.21–2.35) | 0.623 |
| CGACC | 11 (2.7) | 18 (2.3) | 1.12 (0.42–2.96) | 1.000 | 1.23 (0.57–4.21) | 1.000 |
| CAACG | 6 (1.5) | 52 (6.5) | 0.21 (0.09–0.53) | 0.20 (0.08–0.51) | ||
| CAGCG | 0 (0) | 6 (0.8) | 0.49 (0.44–0.54) | 0.45 (0.41–0.52) | ||
| TAAAG | 39 (9.7) | 54 (6.8) | 0.53 (0.90–2.62) | 0.138 | 0.56 (0.90–2.69) | 0.159 |
| TGACG | 16 (4.0) | 26 (3.3) | 1.29 (0.57–2.89) | 0.680 | 1.26 (0.54–2.97) | 0.716 |
| TGGCG | 14 (3.5) | 24 (3.0) | 1.17 (0.53–2.59) | 0.840 | 1.15 (0.47–2.52) | 0.876 |
| TGAAG | 29 (7.2) | 44 (5.5) | 1.36 (0.75–2.45) | 0.369 | 1.32 (0.69–2.32) | 0.423 |
| TGACC | 5 (1.2) | 28 (3.5) | 0.32 (0.10–0.99) | 0.35 (0.11–1.05) | 0.076 | |
| TGGAG | 6 (1.5) | 6 (0.8) | 2.01 (0.50–8.15) | 0.503 | 1.95 (0.45–7.59) | 0.582 |
The haplotypes order were rs12455792, rs61751987, rs12456284, rs3819122, and rs2282544.
Obtained in logistic regression models with adjustment for age, gender, and smoking status.
Fig. 3SMAD4 inhibited Versican and Decorin degradation via ADAMTS-4. Western blot analysis and quantitative analysis for Versican (A) or Decorin (B) degradation products in aortic tissues of patients. *P < 0.05, ns: not significant. (C) Western blot analysis for ADAMTS-1/4 protein levels in SMAD4-silenced cells or not. (D) Versican degradation products detection in medium of cells with different treatment.
Fig. 4SMAD4 inhibited the apoptosis of HASMCs. (A) Movat's pentachrome staining of normal aortic tissues or tissues from TAAD patients with different genotype. In each group, Scale bar = 50 μm (left)/100 μm (right). (B) Representative scatterplots of flow cytometry for apoptosis analysis. (a) FSC/SSC scatterplot for cells gating. Annexin V-FITC/PI scatterplots of parental (b), siRNA-NC (c), siRNA-SMAD4 (d) group. Quantitative analysis of SMCs (C) and fibers (D) (n = 5). *P < 0.05. (E) Percentages of early or late-stage apoptotic cells in different groups.*P < 0.05. All experiments were performed in triplicates. Data was presented as mean ± SD.
Fig. 5Schematic diagram for potential roles of the SMAD4 variant in pathological progression of TAAD. Variant T allele of rs12455792 might inhibit SMAD4 expression by affecting the affinity between transcription factors and 5′UTR of this gene, resulting in MSCs apoptosis and Versican degradation, and further facilitate the progress of TAAD.