Literature DB >> 28666168

Full cycle rapid scan EPR deconvolution algorithm.

Mark Tseytlin1.   

Abstract

Rapid scan electron paramagnetic resonance (RS EPR) is a continuous-wave (CW) method that combines narrowband excitation and broadband detection. Sinusoidal magnetic field scans that span the entire EPR spectrum cause electron spin excitations twice during the scan period. Periodic transient RS signals are digitized and time-averaged. Deconvolution of absorption spectrum from the measured full-cycle signal is an ill-posed problem that does not have a stable solution because the magnetic field passes the same EPR line twice per sinusoidal scan during up- and down-field passages. As a result, RS signals consist of two contributions that need to be separated and postprocessed individually. Deconvolution of either of the contributions is a well-posed problem that has a stable solution. The current version of the RS EPR algorithm solves the separation problem by cutting the full-scan signal into two half-period pieces. This imposes a constraint on the experiment; the EPR signal must completely decay by the end of each half-scan in order to not be truncated. The constraint limits the maximum scan frequency and, therefore, the RS signal-to-noise gain. Faster scans permit the use of higher excitation powers without saturating the spin system, translating into a higher EPR sensitivity. A stable, full-scan algorithm is described in this paper that does not require truncation of the periodic response. This algorithm utilizes the additive property of linear systems: the response to a sum of two inputs is equal the sum of responses to each of the inputs separately. Based on this property, the mathematical model for CW RS EPR can be replaced by that of a sum of two independent full-cycle pulsed field-modulated experiments. In each of these experiments, the excitation power equals to zero during either up- or down-field scan. The full-cycle algorithm permits approaching the upper theoretical scan frequency limit; the transient spin system response must decay within the scan period. Separation of the interfering up- and down-field scan responses remains a challenge for reaching the full potential of this new method. For this reason, only a factor of two increase in the scan rate was achieved, in comparison with the standard half-scan RS EPR algorithm. It is important for practical use that faster scans not necessarily increase the signal bandwidth because acceleration of the Larmor frequency driven by the changing magnetic field changes its sign after passing the inflection points on the scan. The half-scan and full-scan algorithms are compared using a LiNC-BuO spin probe of known line-shape, demonstrating that the new method produces stable solutions when RS signals do not completely decay by the end of each half-scan.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deconvolution algorithm; EPR imaging; Ill-posed problem; Linear systems; Rapid scan EPR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28666168      PMCID: PMC5568913          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2017.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  22 in total

1.  X-band rapid-scan EPR of nitroxyl radicals.

Authors:  Deborah G Mitchell; Richard W Quine; Mark Tseitlin; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Injectable LiNc-BuO loaded microspheres as in vivo EPR oxygen sensors after co-implantation with tumor cells.

Authors:  Juliane Frank; Daniel Gündel; Simon Drescher; Oliver Thews; Karsten Mäder
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 7.376

3.  Comparison of Continuous Wave, Spin Echo, and Rapid Scan EPR of Irradiated Fused Quartz.

Authors:  Deborah G Mitchell; Richard W Quine; Mark Tseitlin; Virginia Meyer; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.898

4.  Rapid Scan Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Opens New Avenues for Imaging Physiologically Important Parameters In Vivo.

Authors:  Joshua R Biller; Deborah G Mitchell; Mark Tseytlin; Hanan Elajaili; George A Rinard; Richard W Quine; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Quantitative rapid scan EPR spectroscopy at 258 MHz.

Authors:  Richard W Quine; George A Rinard; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Computationally Efficient Steady-State Solution of the Bloch Equations for Rapid Sinusoidal Scans Based on Fourier Expansion in Harmonics of the Scan Frequency.

Authors:  Mark Tseitlin; Gareth R Eaton; Sandra S Eaton
Journal:  Appl Magn Reson       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.831

7.  Rapid-scan EPR with triangular scans and fourier deconvolution to recover the slow-scan spectrum.

Authors:  Janhavi P Joshi; John R Ballard; George A Rinard; Richard W Quine; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Digitally generated excitation and near-baseband quadrature detection of rapid scan EPR signals.

Authors:  Mark Tseitlin; Zhelin Yu; Richard W Quine; George A Rinard; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Improved sensitivity for imaging spin trapped hydroxyl radical at 250 MHz.

Authors:  Joshua R Biller; Mark Tseitlin; Deborah G Mitchell; Zhelin Yu; Laura A Buchanan; Hanan Elajaili; Gerald M Rosen; Joseph P Y Kao; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.102

10.  Corrections for sinusoidal background and non-orthogonality of signal channels in sinusoidal rapid magnetic field scans.

Authors:  Mark Tseitlin; Deborah G Mitchell; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  6 in total

1.  Modular imaging system: Rapid scan EPR at 800 MHz.

Authors:  Oxana Tseytlin; Priyaankadevi Guggilapu; Andrey A Bobko; Hussien AlAhmad; Xuan Xu; Boris Epel; Ryan O'Connell; Emily H Hoblitzell; Timothy D Eubank; Valery V Khramtsov; Benoit Driesschaert; Eiad Kazkaz; Mark Tseytlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Rapid Scan EPR imaging as a Tool for Magnetic Field Mapping.

Authors:  Oxana Tseytlin; Andrey A Bobko; Mark Tseytlin
Journal:  Appl Magn Reson       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 0.831

3.  A combined positron emission tomography (PET)-electron paramagnetic resonance imaging (EPRI) system: initial evaluation of a prototype scanner.

Authors:  Mark Tseytlin; Alexander V Stolin; Priyaankadevi Guggilapu; Andrey A Bobko; Valery V Khramtsov; Oxana Tseytlin; Raymond R Raylman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Rapid Scan EPR Oxygen Imaging in Photoactivated Resin Used for Stereolithographic 3D Printing.

Authors:  Oxana Tseytlin; Ryan O'Connell; Vignesh Sivashankar; Andrey A Bobko; Mark Tseytlin
Journal:  3D Print Addit Manuf       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 5.449

5.  General solution for rapid scan EPR deconvolution problem.

Authors:  Mark Tseytlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  High fidelity triangular sweep of the magnetic field for millisecond scan EPR imaging.

Authors:  Denis A Komarov; Alexandre Samouilov; Hiroshi Hirata; Jay L Zweier
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.734

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.