Literature DB >> 28666004

A novel association between relaxin receptor polymorphism and hematopoietic stem cell yield after mobilization.

Saeam Shin1,2, Juwon Kim3, Soo-Zin Kim-Wanner4, Halvard Bönig4,5,6, Sung Ran Cho7, Sinyoung Kim1, Jong Rak Choi1, Kyung-A Lee1.   

Abstract

Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from the bone marrow to the peripheral blood is a complex mechanism that involves adhesive and chemotactic interactions of HSCs as well as their bone marrow microenvironment. In addition to a number of non-genetic factors, genetic susceptibilities also contribute to the mobilization outcome. Identification of genetic factors associated with HSC yield is important to better understand the mechanism behind HSC mobilization. In the present study, we enrolled 148 Korean participants (56 healthy donors and 92 patients) undergoing HSC mobilization for allogeneic or autologous HSC transplantation. Among a total of 53 polymorphisms in 33 candidate genes, one polymorphism (rs11264422) in relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 4 (RXFP4) gene was significantly associated with a higher HSC yield after mobilization in Koreans. However, in a set of 101 Europeans, no association was found between circulating CD34+ cell counts and rs11264422 genotype. Therefore, we suggest that the ethnic differences in subjects' genetic background may be related to HSC mobilization. In conclusion, the relaxin-relaxin receptor axis may play an important role in HSC mobilization. We believe that the results of the current study could provide new insights for therapies that use relaxin and HSC populations, as well as a better understanding of HSC regulation and mobilization at the molecular level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28666004      PMCID: PMC5493337          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization is a complex process that involves chemotactic factors, proteases, and adhesive molecules in bone marrow (BM) niches [1-3]. There is wide inter-individual variability in response to mobilization, and the outcome is hardly predictable despite several known demographic or clinical risk factors such as the following: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, diagnosis, and extent and duration of prior chemotherapy [4-8]. Inter-individual variation of HSC mobilization yield can be explained by a multifactorial model consisting of environmental and multiple genetic factors. Genetic contribution to mobilizing capacity is further supported by the fact that the second mobilization in the same donor typically yields similar results to those from the first mobilization [9,10]. Previous studies have reported genetic associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and HSC mobilization yield [11-15]. Most of these SNPs are located in gene encoding molecules with known functional significance in the mobilization pathway, including C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM1), CD44 (CD44), and colony stimulating factor 3 receptor (CSF3R) [11-15]. However, some of the results were not replicated in subsequent studies [11,16,17], and the responsible gene remains elusive. Recent genome-wide association studies have shown that various hematologic traits of white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells, platelets, and CD34+ cells are highly heritable [18,19]. Previous studies have also indicated that each WBC subtype shares some associations which are probably attributable to shared process of differentiation and maintenance in BM and peripheral blood (PB) [18,20]. Therefore, we hypothesized that genetic factors associated with WBC count, neutrophil count, and circulating CD34+ cell count could also contribute to the regulation and migration of HSCs in BM niches and in PB. The aim of this study was to identify genetic factors associated with HSC collection yield after mobilization in Korean population. We also attempted to determine whether our finding could be applied to other ethnic group of European ancestry.

Methods

Participants

A total of 148 Korean subjects, including 56 healthy donors for allogeneic HSC transplantation and 92 patients with hematologic disorders for autologous HSC transplantation, were prospectively recruited for this study. The European set was recruited to confirm the applicability of our findings, and consisted of 101 healthy donors of European ancestry from Germany. This study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of the Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine (IRB No. 4-2013-0145). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Mobilization and HSC collection

For healthy donors, standard mobilization protocol was used with G-CSF (filgrastim 10 μg/kg daily), and collection was initiated on the fifth day after G-CSF initiation. Mobilization for patients undergoing autologous HSC transplantation was performed using G-CSF only or chemotherapy followed by G-CSF. Apheresis started when the PB leukocyte count reached 3.0 x 109/L after leukocyte nadir, in the case of combination with chemotherapy. Peak circulating CD34+ cell count (/μL), collected just before apheresis, was assessed using a Stem-Kit (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA) for the Korean set and with a BD Stem Cell Enumeration kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) for the European set. The CD34+ cell content in the first apheresis product was enumerated in 122 participants in the Korean set, and two additional outcomes were evaluated: total CD34+ cell count per donor body weight (/kg) obtained from the first apheresis; and CD34+ cell count (/μL) from the first apheresis product.

Selection of target polymorphisms in candidate genes

To determine whether previously reported genetic associations with HSC yield might be applied to Koreans, we selected four common polymorphisms (rs1801157, rs1041163, rs13347, and rs3917924) in the following four genes: CXCL12, VCAM1, CD44, and CSF3R [11-17]. One polymorphism (rs2680880) in CXCR4 was not included, as it was not found in East Asians (http://www.1000genomes.org/) [12]. To identify more candidate genes, we searched the literature for SNPs that are associated with WBC, neutrophil, or CD34+ cell counts [19-28] (Fig 1). Among the 64 additional SNPs, 15 with East Asian minor allele frequency of less than 0.05 were removed. Candidate genes were adopted from the literature or selected based on the functional relatedness to mobilization mechanism, such as cytokines, chemokines, proteases, and adhesion molecules (http://www.uniprot.org/) [2,3]. In total, 53 SNPs were selected for genotyping (Table 1).
Fig 1

Flow diagram of target polymorphism selection.

The diagram indicates inclusion and exclusion criteria for selection of target polymorphism.

Table 1

List of 53 polymorphisms in 33 genes included in this study.

rs IDChromosomeLocation (GRCh38.p2)Candidate geneDistance to geneProtein function
rs111212421p36.238846242RERE20 kb downstreamControl of cell survival
rs65775361p36.238850051RERE23 kb downstreamControl of cell survival
rs115906061p36.238857610RERE31 kb downstreamControl of cell survival
rs108643681p36.238858254RERE32 kb downstreamControl of cell survival
rs39179241p34.336480052CSF3RIntron2Cell adhesion and chemotaxis
rs10411631p21.2100718269VCAM11 kb upstreamCell adhesion and migration
rs67028831p21.1104700458intergenic
rs43119171p13.3107183121NTNG1Intron2Controlling axon growth
rs3452751p13.3107951181VAV3Intron1Regulation of cell adhesion
rs23656691p13.2111820023KCND3Intron2Subunit of potassium channel
rs75238391p13.2115630459VANGL111 kb upstreamMulticellular organism development
rs8506101p13.1116406090ATP1A1-AS1Exon 3Non-coding RNA
rs109239291p12119963373NOTCH2Intron11Stem cell population maintenance
rs112400891q21.1147588715BCL2Intron1Cell migration
rs46576161q23.1159001296ACKR1202 kb upstreamChemokine receptor
rs25185641q23.1159092646ACKR1111 kb upstreamChemokine receptor
rs120751q23.1159205564ACKR1Exon 2Chemokine receptor
rs127409691q21.3154514584TDRD10Intron4Nucleotide binding
rs112644221q22155938032RXFP43 kb upstreamRelaxin-3 receptor
rs19625081q23.3161975629DDR2655 kb upstreamCell migration and remodeling of the extracellular matrix
rs28064241q23.3162721669DDR2Intron4Cell migration and remodeling of the extracellular matrix
rs64268931q23.3165058105intergenic
rs9196791q24.1166287925intergenic
rs67342382q13113083453IL1F107 kb upstreamCytokine
rs109327652q35218234761ARPC2Intron5Cytoskeleton constituent
rs168504084q13.374067090CXCL229 kb upstreamChemokine
rs5468294q13.374090655CXCL26 kb upstreamChemokine
rs91314q13.374097332CXCL2Exon 4Chemokine
rs76673764q13.374102173CXCL22 kb downstreamChemokine
rs13717994q13.374112120CXCL212 kb downstreamChemokine
rs76868614q13.374132767CXCL233 kb downstreamChemokine
rs25175246p21.3331057936HCG22Intron3Non-coding RNA
rs28539466p21.3331279426HLA-B74 kb upstreamRegulation of immune response
rs28445036p21.3331474954HLA-B117 kb downstreamRegulation of immune response
rs69362046p21.3232249315intergenic
rs50209466p21.3232482312BTNL273 kb downstreamRegulation of T-cell proliferation
rs48954416q23.3135105435MYB75 kb upstreamControl of proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic progenitor cells
rs126607136q23.3135196858MYBIntron9Control of proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic progenitor cells
rs9767607p21.214234028DGKBIntron22Intracellular signal transduction
rs4457q21.292779056CDK6Intron2Hematopoietic stem cell differentiation and cell adhesion
rs21639508q24.21129585339CCDC26Intron 1Non-coding RNA
rs5794599q34.2133278724ABO3 kb downstreamBlood group system
rs180115710q11.2144372809CXCL12Exon 4Chemokine
rs1334711p1335231725CD44Exon 18Cell adhesion and migration
rs218338311p11.1250279041PTPRJ2 Mb downstreamRegulation of cell adhesion
rs1760924017q21.139954436GSDMA8 kb upstreamPyroptosis mediator
rs389419417q21.139965740GSDMAExon3Pyroptosis mediator
rs385919217q21.139972395GSDMAIntron6Pyroptosis mediator
rs406532117q21.139987295PSMD3Intron3Regulatory subunit of the 26 proteasome
rs479482217q21.140000459CSF314 kb upstreamCytokine that controls granulocyte production
rs807872317q21.140010626CSF34 kb upstreamCytokine that controls granulocyte production
rs806544317q21.140052687MED24Intron3Component of transcriptional coactivator complex
rs207291020p12.29384656PLCB4Intron13Intracellular signal transduction

Flow diagram of target polymorphism selection.

The diagram indicates inclusion and exclusion criteria for selection of target polymorphism.

SNP genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from PB leukocytes using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands). The primer sequences for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and sequencing were designed using Primer3 software [29]. PCR was performed on 100 ng of genomic DNA, and sequencing was carried out using the BrightDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Nimagen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) on ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The results were compared with reference sequences using Sequencher 5.1 software (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Quality of data was assessed using PHRED score for each base call [30]. The threshold for PHRED score was 20, based on the manufacturer’s instructions. In case of result with inadequate quality, sequencing was repeated and all genotype of tested locus were determined (no missing genotype data).

Statistical analysis

Following the Kolmogorov—Smirnov normality test, natural log transformation was applied on continuous outcome variables with skewed distribution for analysis. The association between continuous variables (age and BMI) and mobilization outcomes (CD34+ cell count in PB, total CD34+ cells/kg, and CD34+ cells in a product) were analyzed using Pearson correlation. The association between categorical variables (sex, diagnosis, BM involvement of disease, chemotherapy regimen history, mobilization protocol, and SNP genotype), and mobilization outcomes were analyzed using an independent two-sample t-test (for two categories) and analysis of variance (for three categories). Three subgroups were established for the genotype of each polymorphism: homozygous for the major allele, heterozygous and homozygous for the minor allele. We also tested three genetic models (dominant, recessive, and additive) using biallelic marker coding. SNPs with a raw P < 0.05 in analysis with all three mobilization outcomes were included in multivariate linear regression analysis. Additional variables related to patient demographics or clinical history with P < 0.05 shown in univariate analysis were included in multivariate analysis. Finally, the following variables were included in multivariate analysis according to each mobilization outcome: 1) CD34+ cell count in PB: sex, diagnosis, chemotherapy regimen history, and rs11264422 (RXFP4) genotype; 2) total CD34+ cells/kg: sex and RXFP4 genotype; and 3) CD34+ cell count in a product: sex, BMI, diagnosis, and RXFP4 genotype. False discovery rate (FDR) controlling procedure was used to adjust for multiple testing according to the genetic model [31]. P values < 0.05 were considered significant, and P values < 0.2 after FDR adjustment were considered to have a tendency [32]. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics version 23.0.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). FDR adjusted P values were calculated using Microsoft Exel 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA).

Results

Patient characteristics

Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 2. The group consisted of individuals who were diagnosed with acute leukemia (n = 8), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 50), multiple myeloma (n = 33), and sarcoma (n = 1). On the first day of apheresis, the median circulating CD34+ count was 44 cells/μL in the Korean set and 93 cells/μL in the European set (healthy donors only for the latter).
Table 2

Characteristics of the participants in this study.

n (%)/median (interquartile ranges)
CharacteristicsKorean setEuropean set
No.148101
Age (yr)46 (32–56)32 (26–42)
Sex
 Female63 (42.6)26 (25.7)
 Male85 (57.4)75 (74.3)
Body-mass index (kg/m2)24.4 (21.5–26.1)24.5 (22.4–28.0)
Diagnosis
 Healthy donor56 (37.8)101 (100)
 Acute leukemia8 (5.4)-
 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma50 (33.8)-
 Multiple myeloma33 (22.3)-
 Sarcoma1 (0.7)-
BM involvement of disease
 Present51 (34.5)-
 Absent97 (65.5)-
Chemotherapy regimen history
 Multiple regimens (three or more)9 (6.1)-
 One or two regimens139 (93.9)-
Mobilization
 Chemotherapy and G-CSF80 (54.1)-
 G-CSF only68 (45.9)101 (100)
CD34+ cell count (/μL) in PB44 (22–84)93 (67–116)
First apheresis product*
 CD34+ cell count (/μL)1,418 (591–2,330)-
 CD34+ cell count/kg donor (×106)3.54 (1.69–6.91)-

PB, peripheral blood

aCD34+ cell count in an apheresis product was measured in 122 participants.

PB, peripheral blood aCD34+ cell count in an apheresis product was measured in 122 participants.

Relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 4

Of the 53 SNPs, only one polymorphism (rs11264422) made a significant difference in the three HSC mobilization outcomes of the Korean set (Table 3). The rs11264422 genotype, located 3 kb upstream of the relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 4 (RXFP4) gene, was significantly associated with circulating CD34+ cells/μL (raw P = 0.03), total CD34+ cells/kg (raw P = 0.008), and product CD34+ cells/μL (raw P = 0.003) (Fig 2). Three patients (two with lymphoma and one with multiple myeloma) who were homozygous for a minor allele (AA genotype) showed remarkably higher mobilization outcomes compared to both the 25 patients who were heterozygous (TA genotype) and the 120 who were homozygous (TT genotype) for the major allele. Moreover, the presence of A allele (TA+AA genotypes) showed significant association with higher CD34+ cells/μL in a product (raw P = 0.02). Superior mobilizers (defined as > 200 circulating CD34+ cells/μL) had the highest frequency (66.7%) of the AA genotype, followed by TA (12.0%) and TT (5.8%) genotypes (Fig 3). In contrast, poor mobilizers (defined as < 20 circulating CD34+ cells/μL) had a higher frequency of the TT (25.0%) than TA (12.0%) genotype. However, for rs11264422 genotyping using the European set, the circulating CD34+ cell count did not differ between each genotype subgroup. SNP was at Hardy—Weinberg equilibrium in both Korean and European sets.
Table 3

Association of rs11264422 with mobilization outcomes.

GenotypeKorean setEuropean set
CD34+ cells/μL in PBCD34+ cells/kg (×106)CD34+ cells/μL in a productCD34+ cells/μL in PB
nMean ± SDRaw PFDR PnMean ± SDRaw PFDR PnMean ± SDRaw PFDR PnMean ± SDP
TT1203.60 ± 1.280.03b*0.808b981.11 ± 1.330.008b*0.424b987.10 ± 1.390.003b*0.159b***114.54 ± 0.310.5b
TA253.85 ± 1.17211.47 ± 1.25217.58 ± 1.31414.30 ± 0.68
AA35.51 ± 0.5133.44 ± 0.5139.72 ± 0.45494.41 ± 0.58
TT+TA1453.55 ± 1.410.01c*0.5c1191.20 ± 1.350.008c*0.4c1197.25 ± 1.420.003c*0.15c***524.44 ± 0.540.3c
AA35.51 ± 0.5133.44 ± 0.5139.72 ± 0.45494.30 ± 0.63
TT1203.60 ± 1.280.1c0.728c981.11 ± 1.330.05c**0.795c987.10 ± 1.390.02c*0.711c114.50 ±0.310.4c
TA+AA284.02 ± 1.23241.71 ± 1.35247.84 ± 1.43904.36 ± 0.63
TT+AA1233.65 ± 1.330.5c0.995c1011.23 ± 1.370.4c0.938c1017.22 ± 1.440.3c0.88c604.41 ± 0.580.5c
TA253.84 ± 1.17211.47 ± 1.25217.57 ± 1.31414.35 ± 0.63

PB, peripheral blood; SD, standard deviation; FDR, adjusted P value using false discovery rate controlling procedure

aNatural log transformation was applied to mobilization outcomes due to skewed distribution.

bAnalysis of variance

Independent two-sample t-test

*P< 0.05

**P = 0.05

***P< 0.2 after FDR adjustment

Fig 2

Correlations between rs11264422 genotype and continuous outcomes.

There were significant associations between rs11264422 genotype and (A) circulating CD34+ cells/μL (raw P = 0.03), (B) total CD34+ cells/kg (raw P = 0.008), and (C) product CD34+ cells/μL (raw P = 0.003) in the Korean set (gray-colored bar). However, no statistically significant association was found between rs11264422 genotype and circulating CD34+ cells/μL in the European set (solid-lined bar). Mobilization outcomes were applied natural log transformation, due to the skewed distribution.

Fig 3

The rs11264422 genotype distribution of participants in the Korean set, classified by circulating CD34+ cell count.

Superior mobilizers (> 200 cells/μL) had 66.7%, 12.0%, and 5.8% frequency rates in AA, TA, and TT genotypes, respectively. Poor mobilizers (< 20 cells/μL) had 25.0% and 12.0% frequency rates in TT and TA genotypes, respectively.

Correlations between rs11264422 genotype and continuous outcomes.

There were significant associations between rs11264422 genotype and (A) circulating CD34+ cells/μL (raw P = 0.03), (B) total CD34+ cells/kg (raw P = 0.008), and (C) product CD34+ cells/μL (raw P = 0.003) in the Korean set (gray-colored bar). However, no statistically significant association was found between rs11264422 genotype and circulating CD34+ cells/μL in the European set (solid-lined bar). Mobilization outcomes were applied natural log transformation, due to the skewed distribution.

The rs11264422 genotype distribution of participants in the Korean set, classified by circulating CD34+ cell count.

Superior mobilizers (> 200 cells/μL) had 66.7%, 12.0%, and 5.8% frequency rates in AA, TA, and TT genotypes, respectively. Poor mobilizers (< 20 cells/μL) had 25.0% and 12.0% frequency rates in TT and TA genotypes, respectively. PB, peripheral blood; SD, standard deviation; FDR, adjusted P value using false discovery rate controlling procedure aNatural log transformation was applied to mobilization outcomes due to skewed distribution. bAnalysis of variance Independent two-sample t-test *P< 0.05 **P = 0.05 ***P< 0.2 after FDR adjustment

Univariate and multivariate analyses of host factors and mobilization outcomes

In univariate analysis, the circulating CD34+ cell count after mobilization was associated with sex, diagnosis, history of multiple chemotherapy regimens, and RXFP4 genotype in the Korean population (Table 4). In the European set, only a low BMI showed significant correlation with a low circulating CD34+ cell count (P < 0.001). In the Korean set, the total CD34+ cell count/kg was associated with sex and RXFP4 genotype, while the CD34+ cell count in a product was associated with sex, BMI, diagnosis, and RXFP4 genotype.
Table 4

Factors associated with mobilization outcomes in the univariate analysis.

VariablesKorean setEuropean set
CD34+ cells/μL in PBCD34+ cells/kg (×106)CD34+ cells/μL in a productCD34+ cells/μL in PB
r, mean ± SDP valuer, mean ± SDP valuer, mean ± SDP valuer, mean ± SDP value
Age (yr)-0.0640.4b-0.0140.9b0.0960.3b0.0070.9b
Sex0.001c*0.002c*<0.001c*0.06c
 Male3.99 ± 1.201.87 ± 1.017.70 ± 1.424.47 ± 0.51
 Female3.34 ± 1.191.34 ± 0.776.65 ± 1.194.15 ± 0.78
Body-mass index (kg/m2)0.1550.06b0.1120.2b0.2040.02b*0.343<0.001b*
Diagnosis<0.001d*0.08d0.01d*-
 Healthy donor3.88 ± 0.571.74 ± 0.396.81 ± 0.58
 Acute leukemia2.07 ± 1.040.81 ± 0.556.16 ± 1.27
 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma/sarcomae3.73 ± 1.681.69 ± 1.227.61 ± 1.05
 Multiple myeloma3.87 ± 0.961.67 ± 0.957.61 ± 1.05
BM involvement of disease0.2c0.4c0.4c-
 Absent3.80 ± 1.171.69 ± 0.947.16 ± 1.43
 Present3.55 ± 1.351.56 ± 0.967.37 ± 1.40
Chemotherapy regimen history0.04c*0.09c0.3c-
 One or two regimens3.77 ± 1.221.68 ± 0.957.29 ± 1.41
 Multiple regimens (three or more)2.89 ± 1.271.14 ± 0.856.72 ± 1.52
Mobilization0.8c0.9c0.7c-
 G-CSF only3.69 ± 1.281.64 ± 0.977.30 ± 1.45
 Chemotherapy and G-CSF3.74 ± 1.201.64 ± 0.937.19 ± 1.40
RXFP4 genotype0.03d*0.008d*0.003d*0.5d
 TT3.60 ± 1.281.11 ± 1.337.10 ± 1.394.54 ± 0.31
 TA3.85 ± 1.171.47 ± 1.257.58 ± 1.314.30 ± 0.68
 AA5.51 ± 0.513.44 ± 0.519.72 ± 0.454.41 ± 0.58

aNatural log transformation was applied to mobilization outcomes due to skewed distribution. Data were represented as correlation coefficient (r) or mean ± standard deviation.

bPearson correlation test

cIndependent two-sample t-test

dAnalysis of variance

e50 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and one with sarcoma were included.

*P < 0.05

aNatural log transformation was applied to mobilization outcomes due to skewed distribution. Data were represented as correlation coefficient (r) or mean ± standard deviation. bPearson correlation test cIndependent two-sample t-test dAnalysis of variance e50 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and one with sarcoma were included. *P < 0.05 Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that female sex, diagnosis of acute leukemia, history of multiple chemotherapy regimens, and RXFP4 genotype (TT and TA) remained independently associated with lower circulating CD34+ cell count after mobilization in the Korean set (Table 5). Female sex and RXFP4 genotype (TT and TA) showed consistent significance when analyzed with other outcome variables, i.e., total CD34+ cell count/kg and CD34+ cell count in a product.
Table 5

Factors associated with log-transformed mobilization outcomes in the multivariate linear regression analysis in the Korean set.

VariablesCD34+ cells/μL in PBCD34+ cells/kg (×106)CD34+ cells/μL in a product
β (95% CI)P valueβ (95% CI)P valueβ (95% CI)P value
Sex
 MaleReferenceReferenceReference
 Female-0.660 (-1.028, -0.292)0.001*-0.630 (-1.018, -0.242)0.002*-0.590 (-0.987, -0.193)0.004*
Body-mass index (kg/m2)0.025 (-0.031, 0.081)0.4
Diagnosis
 Healthy donorReferenceReference
 Acute leukemia-1.722 (-2.545, -0.898)<0.001*-1.737 (-2.574, -0.901)<0.001*
 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma/sarcomaa-0.259 (-0.701, 0.183)0.2-0.368 (-0.803, 0.068)0.09
 Multiple myeloma-0.057 (-0.551, 0.437)0.8-0.150 (-0.653, 0.353)0.6
Chemotherapy regimen history
 Multiple regimens (three or more)Reference
 One or two regimens0.877 (0.100, 1.654)0.03*
RXFP4 genotype
 TTReferenceReferenceReference
 TA0.091 (-0.405, 0.588)0.70.166 (-0.347, 0.678)0.50.122 (-0.382, 0.626)0.6
 AA1.735 (0.446, 3.024)0.009*1.809 (0.452, 3.166)0.009*1.830 (0.526, 3.135)0.006*

PB, peripheral blood; CI, confidence interval

a50 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and one with sarcoma were included.

*P < 0.05

PB, peripheral blood; CI, confidence interval a50 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and one with sarcoma were included. *P < 0.05

Discussion

In this study, we found that rs11264422 genotype, located in the promoter flanking region of RXFP4, has a significant effect on HSC mobilization. The RXFP4 gene encodes relaxin-3 receptor 2, which is a receptor for relaxin-3 and is expressed in various tissues including BM [33]. Relaxin-3 is a member of the insulin/relaxin superfamily of peptide hormones [34]. Segal et al. revealed that the relaxin hormone mobilizes BM-derived CD34+ endothelial progenitor cells into circulation, and their effect is mediated by the relaxin receptor [35]. The role of relaxin and its receptor-mediated pathway in HSC mobilization, as well as their association with the inter-individual variation of mobilization yield, can be hypothesized based on such observation. The FDR-adjusted P-values for rs11264422 were above the significance threshold (P = 0.05). However, we considered P < 0.2 after FDR adjustment as having a tendency for association. Given that the sample size was inadequate compared with the number of genes, we sought to find a possible exploratory factor. We determined three different mobilization outcomes and found consistent genes in all three. We then decided that the P-value of rs11264422 showed a meaningful trend, and wanted to suggest a further study. Therefore, we would like to conduct a confirmatory study using a larger number of patients. The rs11264422 polymorphism has been associated with lower WBC counts in individuals of African, but not European, ancestry [28]. In our study, rs11264422 genotype was associated with HSC yield in Koreans but not in Europeans. Interestingly, the frequency of AA homozygote genotype is low in East Asians (1‒4% in Japanese and Chinese) and Africans (0.2%), but distinctly higher in Europeans (43%). Moreover, in a previous randomized controlled trial in Japan, a higher baseline WBC count was associated with a lower incidence of poor mobilization [36]. Therefore, we infer that the mechanism involved in HSC mobilization differs by ethnic groups, and rs11264422 genotype is associated with the HSC mobilization yield as well as the baseline WBC count in certain populations. Moreover, associations between the four polymorphisms in CXCL12, VCAM1, CD44, and CSF3R and mobilization outcome were not replicated in our study. Previous studies have already noted discrepancies in genetic associations, which were likely attributed to differences in ethnicity, diagnosis, number of study participants, and definition of outcome [13-17]. In particular, most of the previous studies had targeted those of European ancestry, whereas our study is the first to target the East Asian population. Therefore, our results suggest that there are significant differences in molecular mechanisms underlying HSC mobilization between different ethnic groups. Our preliminary data warrant further validation with larger cohorts of various population subgroups. The therapeutic effect of circulating CD34+ cells has been demonstrated in hematologic disorders and cardiovascular diseases [37,38]. In this context, the promotion of vasculogenesis is thought to be a mechanism for efficacy of CD34+ progenitor cells [19]. Notably, serelaxin, which is a recombinant human relaxin-2, has demonstrated significant treatment effects on acute heart failure in a recent clinical trial [39]. The potential mechanisms behind beneficial effects of serelaxin in acute heart failure include vasodilation, tissue healing from stimulation of angiogenesis and stem cell survival, and remodeling of the extracellular matrix [40]. Furthermore, a recent experimental study demonstrated that relaxin improves wound healing in diabetic mice [41]. In that study, the wound-healing effect of relaxin was disturbed by antibodies against vascular endothelial growth factor, CXCR4, and CXCR12 [41]. Our data support previous assumptions about the effects of relaxin on vasculogenic capacity and stem cell/progenitor cell regulation, and suggest a broader applicability of relaxin to other vascular disorders such as diabetes mellitus. In addition, our data also suggest that relaxin is a novel agent for the management of poor mobilizers. Among host risk factors, female sex, history of multiple chemotherapy regimens, and diagnosis of acute leukemia remained independently associated with low circulating CD34+ cell counts in Koreans. Female sex [4,42], prior treatment history [1], and diagnosis of acute leukemia [43] have all been known to be independent risk factors for poor mobilization. The mechanism behind association of sex and better mobilization potential can be explained by the stem cell regulation effect of sex steroids [44]. The contribution of an underlying hematologic disease on HSC mobilization can be explained by disease-related reduction of HSC reservoir, or chemotherapy-induced toxic effects on BM [43]. In the European set, only BMI correlated with circulating CD34+ cell counts. The mechanism behind association between higher BMI and better mobilization potential has been attributed to the effect of adipose tissue-containing HSCs, or a simple dose effect of G-CSF [8]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to indicate an association between relaxin receptor polymorphism and HSC yield after mobilization. A potential limitation of our study is that the discovered locus is located in the regulatory region of RXFP4, and not in the protein-coding region. Further investigation regarding the functional effect of relaxin-3, as well as its receptor axis on the mobilization process, are required. In conclusion, we found a novel association between relaxin receptor polymorphism and HSC yield after mobilization in ethnic Koreans. Our findings suggest an important functional role of relaxin axis during response of BM HSCs to the mobilizing agent. Results of our study give valuable insight to a potential therapeutic target—the relaxin—relaxin receptor axis—for the management of poor mobilizers, and for the treatment of various vascular diseases.

Table A.

Association of 53 polymorphisms with mobilization outcomes. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  42 in total

Review 1.  How I treat patients who mobilize hematopoietic stem cells poorly.

Authors:  L Bik To; Jean-Pierre Levesque; Kirsten E Herbert
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities.

Authors:  B Ewing; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Intramyocardial, autologous CD34+ cell therapy for refractory angina.

Authors:  Douglas W Losordo; Timothy D Henry; Charles Davidson; Joon Sup Lee; Marco A Costa; Theodore Bass; Farrell Mendelsohn; F David Fortuin; Carl J Pepine; Jay H Traverse; David Amrani; Bruce M Ewenstein; Norbert Riedel; Kenneth Story; Kerry Barker; Thomas J Povsic; Robert A Harrington; Richard A Schatz
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  Serelaxin, recombinant human relaxin-2, for treatment of acute heart failure (RELAX-AHF): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  John R Teerlink; Gad Cotter; Beth A Davison; G Michael Felker; Gerasimos Filippatos; Barry H Greenberg; Piotr Ponikowski; Elaine Unemori; Adriaan A Voors; Kirkwood F Adams; Maria I Dorobantu; Liliana R Grinfeld; Guillaume Jondeau; Alon Marmor; Josep Masip; Peter S Pang; Karl Werdan; Sam L Teichman; Angelo Trapani; Christopher A Bush; Rajnish Saini; Christoph Schumacher; Thomas M Severin; Marco Metra
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Cell therapy for critical limb ischemia: moving forward one step at a time.

Authors:  Rajesh Gupta; Douglas W Losordo
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 6.546

6.  The role of diagnosis in patients failing peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization.

Authors:  Michael Koenigsmann; Kathleen Jentsch-Ullrich; Martin Mohren; Elke Becker; Marcell Heim; Astrid Franke
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Factors associated with successful mobilization of progenitor hematopoietic stem cells among patients with lymphoid malignancies.

Authors:  Reem M Ameen; Salem H Alshemmari; Dana Alqallaf
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma       Date:  2008-04

8.  Identification and characterisation of GPR100 as a novel human G-protein-coupled bradykinin receptor.

Authors:  Katrin Boels; H Chica Schaller
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Identification of nine novel loci associated with white blood cell subtypes in a Japanese population.

Authors:  Yukinori Okada; Tomomitsu Hirota; Yoichiro Kamatani; Atsushi Takahashi; Hiroko Ohmiya; Natsuhiko Kumasaka; Koichiro Higasa; Yumi Yamaguchi-Kabata; Naoya Hosono; Michael A Nalls; Ming Huei Chen; Frank J A van Rooij; Albert V Smith; Toshiko Tanaka; David J Couper; Neil A Zakai; Luigi Ferrucci; Dan L Longo; Dena G Hernandez; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Tamara B Harris; Christopher J O'Donnell; Santhi K Ganesh; Koichi Matsuda; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; Toshihiro Tanaka; Michiaki Kubo; Yusuke Nakamura; Mayumi Tamari; Kazuhiko Yamamoto; Naoyuki Kamatani
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Variant rs1801157 in the 3'UTR of SDF-1ß does not explain variability of healthy-donor G-CSF responsiveness.

Authors:  Miriam Schulz; Darja Karpova; Gabriele Spohn; Annette Damert; Erhard Seifried; Vera Binder; Halvard Bönig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Correction: A novel association between relaxin receptor polymorphism and hematopoietic stem cell yield after mobilization.

Authors:  Saeam Shin; Juwon Kim; Soo-Zin Kim-Wanner; Halvard Bönig; Sung Ran Cho; Sinyoung Kim; Jong Rak Choi; Kyung-A Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The Biological and Clinical Relevance of G Protein-Coupled Receptors to the Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematized Review.

Authors:  Hadrien Golay; Simona Jurkovic Mlakar; Vid Mlakar; Tiago Nava; Marc Ansari
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Getting blood out of a stone: Identification and management of patients with poor hematopoietic cell mobilization.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Hillard M Lazarus; Parastoo B Dahi; Scott Avecilla; Sergio A Giralt
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 10.626

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.