UNLABELLED: Background The number of CD34(+) cells mobilized from bone marrow to peripheral blood after administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor varies greatly among healthy donors. This fact might be explained, at least in part, by constitutional differences in genes involved in the interactions tethering CD34(+) cells to the bone marrow. DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed genetic characteristics associated with CD34(+) cell mobilization in 112 healthy individuals receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim; 10 μg/kg; 5 days). RESULTS: Genetic variants in VCAM1 and in CD44 were associated with the number of CD34(+) cells in peripheral blood after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively), with the quantity of CD34(+) cells ×10⁶/kg of donor (4.6 versus 6.3; P < 0.001 and 7 versus 5.6; P = 0.025, respectively), and with total CD34(+) cells ×10⁶ (355 versus 495; P = 0.002 and 522 versus 422; P = 0.012, respectively) in the first apheresis. Of note, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration was associated with complete disappearance of VCAM1 mRNA expression in peripheral blood. Moreover, genetic variants in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor (CSF3R) and in CXCL12 were associated with a lower and higher number of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized CD34(+) cells/μL in peripheral blood (81 versus 106; P = 0.002 and 165 versus 98; P=0.02, respectively) and a genetic variant in CXCR4 was associated with a lower quantity of CD34(+) cells ×10⁶/kg of donor and total CD34(+) cells ×10⁶ (5.3 versus 6.7; P = 0.02 and 399 versus 533; P = 0.01, respectively). Conclusions In conclusion, genetic variability in molecules involved in migration and homing of CD34(+) cells influences the degree of mobilization of these cells.
UNLABELLED: Background The number of CD34(+) cells mobilized from bone marrow to peripheral blood after administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor varies greatly among healthy donors. This fact might be explained, at least in part, by constitutional differences in genes involved in the interactions tethering CD34(+) cells to the bone marrow. DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed genetic characteristics associated with CD34(+) cell mobilization in 112 healthy individuals receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim; 10 μg/kg; 5 days). RESULTS: Genetic variants in VCAM1 and in CD44 were associated with the number of CD34(+) cells in peripheral blood after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively), with the quantity of CD34(+) cells ×10⁶/kg of donor (4.6 versus 6.3; P < 0.001 and 7 versus 5.6; P = 0.025, respectively), and with total CD34(+) cells ×10⁶ (355 versus 495; P = 0.002 and 522 versus 422; P = 0.012, respectively) in the first apheresis. Of note, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration was associated with complete disappearance of VCAM1 mRNA expression in peripheral blood. Moreover, genetic variants in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor (CSF3R) and in CXCL12 were associated with a lower and higher number of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized CD34(+) cells/μL in peripheral blood (81 versus 106; P = 0.002 and 165 versus 98; P=0.02, respectively) and a genetic variant in CXCR4 was associated with a lower quantity of CD34(+) cells ×10⁶/kg of donor and total CD34(+) cells ×10⁶ (5.3 versus 6.7; P = 0.02 and 399 versus 533; P = 0.01, respectively). Conclusions In conclusion, genetic variability in molecules involved in migration and homing of CD34(+) cells influences the degree of mobilization of these cells.
Authors: Tatiana Ulyanova; Linda M Scott; Gregory V Priestley; Yi Jiang; Betty Nakamoto; Pandelakis A Koni; Thalia Papayannopoulou Journal: Blood Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: C Winkler; W Modi; M W Smith; G W Nelson; X Wu; M Carrington; M Dean; T Honjo; K Tashiro; D Yabe; S Buchbinder; E Vittinghoff; J J Goedert; T R O'Brien; L P Jacobson; R Detels; S Donfield; A Willoughby; E Gomperts; D Vlahov; J Phair; S J O'Brien Journal: Science Date: 1998-01-16 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: B J Doranz; M J Orsini; J D Turner; T L Hoffman; J F Berson; J A Hoxie; S C Peiper; L F Brass; R W Doms Journal: J Virol Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Jean-Pierre Levesque; Fulu Liu; Paul J Simmons; Tomoko Betsuyaku; Robert M Senior; Christine Pham; Daniel C Link Journal: Blood Date: 2004-03-09 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jack W Hsu; John R Wingard; Brent R Logan; Pintip Chitphakdithai; Gorgun Akpek; Paolo Anderlini; Andrew S Artz; Chris Bredeson; Steven Goldstein; Gregory Hale; Peiman Hematti; Sarita Joshi; Rammurti T Kamble; Hillard M Lazarus; Paul V O'Donnell; Michael A Pulsipher; Bipin N Savani; Raquel M Schears; Bronwen E Shaw; Dennis L Confer Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2014-10-12 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: B Martin-Antonio; A Najjar; S N Robinson; C Chew; S Li; E Yvon; M W Thomas; I Mc Niece; R Orlowski; C Muñoz-Pinedo; C Bueno; P Menendez; C Fernández de Larrea; A Urbano-Ispizua; E J Shpall; N Shah Journal: Cell Death Differ Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 15.828
Authors: Sylvain Garciaz; Patrick Sfumato; Angela Granata; Anne-Marie Imbert; Claire Fournel; Boris Calmels; Claude Lemarie; Jacques Chiaroni; Didier Blaise; Jean-Marie Boher; Christophe Picard; Christian Chabannon; Julie di Cristofaro Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Maria K Angelopoulou; Pantelis Tsirkinidis; Georgios Boutsikas; Theodoros P Vassilakopoulos; Panayiotis Tsirigotis Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 3.411