Alexander E Volk1, Christian Kubisch. 1. Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The development of massively parallel sequencing (MPS) has revolutionized molecular genetic diagnostics in monogenic disorders. The present review gives a brief overview of different MPS-based approaches used in clinical diagnostics of neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) and highlights their advantages and limitations. RECENT FINDINGS: MPS-based approaches like gene panel sequencing, (whole) exome sequencing, (whole) genome sequencing, and RNA sequencing have been used to identify the genetic cause in NMDs. Although gene panel sequencing has evolved as a standard test for heterogeneous diseases, it is still debated, mainly because of financial issues and unsolved problems of variant interpretation, whether genome sequencing (and to a lesser extent also exome sequencing) of single patients can already be regarded as routine diagnostics. However, it has been shown that the inclusion of parents and additional family members often leads to a substantial increase in the diagnostic yield in exome-wide/genome-wide MPS approaches. In addition, MPS-based RNA sequencing just enters the research and diagnostic scene. SUMMARY: Next-generation sequencing increasingly enables the detection of the genetic cause in highly heterogeneous diseases like NMDs in an efficient and affordable way. Gene panel sequencing and family-based exome sequencing have been proven as potent and cost-efficient diagnostic tools. Although clinical validation and interpretation of genome sequencing is still challenging, diagnostic RNA sequencing represents a promising tool to bypass some hurdles of diagnostics using genomic DNA.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The development of massively parallel sequencing (MPS) has revolutionized molecular genetic diagnostics in monogenic disorders. The present review gives a brief overview of different MPS-based approaches used in clinical diagnostics of neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) and highlights their advantages and limitations. RECENT FINDINGS:MPS-based approaches like gene panel sequencing, (whole) exome sequencing, (whole) genome sequencing, and RNA sequencing have been used to identify the genetic cause in NMDs. Although gene panel sequencing has evolved as a standard test for heterogeneous diseases, it is still debated, mainly because of financial issues and unsolved problems of variant interpretation, whether genome sequencing (and to a lesser extent also exome sequencing) of single patients can already be regarded as routine diagnostics. However, it has been shown that the inclusion of parents and additional family members often leads to a substantial increase in the diagnostic yield in exome-wide/genome-wide MPS approaches. In addition, MPS-based RNA sequencing just enters the research and diagnostic scene. SUMMARY: Next-generation sequencing increasingly enables the detection of the genetic cause in highly heterogeneous diseases like NMDs in an efficient and affordable way. Gene panel sequencing and family-based exome sequencing have been proven as potent and cost-efficient diagnostic tools. Although clinical validation and interpretation of genome sequencing is still challenging, diagnostic RNA sequencing represents a promising tool to bypass some hurdles of diagnostics using genomic DNA.
Authors: Zhenhua Zhang; Freerk van Dijk; Niek de Klein; Mariëlle E van Gijn; Lude H Franke; Richard J Sinke; Morris A Swertz; K Joeri van der Velde Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Russell J Butterfield; Carina Imburgia; Katie Mayne; Tara Newcomb; Diane M Dunn; Brett Duval; Marcia L Feldkamp; Nicholas E Johnson; Robert B Weiss Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med Date: 2021-02-24 Impact factor: 2.183
Authors: Hernan D Gonorazky; Sergey Naumenko; Arun K Ramani; Viswateja Nelakuditi; Pouria Mashouri; Peiqui Wang; Dennis Kao; Krish Ohri; Senthuri Viththiyapaskaran; Mark A Tarnopolsky; Katherine D Mathews; Steven A Moore; Andres N Osorio; David Villanova; Dwi U Kemaladewi; Ronald D Cohn; Michael Brudno; James J Dowling Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: M Krenn; M Tomschik; J Rath; H Cetin; A Grisold; G Zulehner; I Milenkovic; E Stogmann; A Zimprich; T M Strom; T Meitinger; M Wagner; F Zimprich Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 6.089