Literature DB >> 28664768

A biomechanical comparison of the two- and four-hole side-plate dynamic hip screw in an osteoporotic composite femur model.

Dominik Rog1, Phillip Grigsby1, Zachary Hill1, William Pinette1, Serkan Inceoglu1, Lee Zuckerman1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were (1) to compare the axial and torsional stiffness of a dynamic hip screw with a two- and four-hole side-plate in a synthetic model of a healed and stable intertrochanteric femur fracture and (2) to evaluate the load to failure, as well as propensity to peri-implant fracture.
METHODS: Fourth-generation synthetic composite femur models, simulating osteoporotic bone, were implanted with 135° dynamic hip screws (DHS) with either a two- or four-hole side-plate with or without a stable intertrochanteric fracture. Specimens were cyclically loaded up to a nondestructive load to determine the axial and torsional stiffness. Constructs were then loaded to failure in axial compression emulating physiologic forces. Failure load and location of the peri-implant fractures were recorded.
RESULTS: Axial and torsional stiffness did not differ significantly between the two- and four-hole constructs in either model. Likewise, there was no significant difference in the load to failure. In the intact femurs, failure occurred either at the end of the plate at the distal screw or through the lag screw hole.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that DHS constructs with a two- or four-hole side-plate are biomechanically comparable with regard to axial and torsional stiffness and load to failure in an osteoporotic composite femur model. In a healed intertrochanteric fracture model, a two-hole construct did not appear to be more prone to peri-implant fracture. To date, a biomechanical comparison of these two implants with regard to torsional forces has not been reported.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanical; dynamic hip screw; hip fracture; intertrochanteric; sliding hip screw

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28664768     DOI: 10.1177/2309499017717199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)        ISSN: 1022-5536            Impact factor:   1.118


  5 in total

1.  Is there an increased risk for subtrochanteric stress fracture with the Femoral Neck System versus multiple cannulated screws fixation?

Authors:  Megan R Hsu; Henry T Shu; Kitchai Luksameearunothai; Adam Margalit; Andrew T Yu; Erik A Hasenboehler; Babar Shafiq
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-16

2.  A comparative Study of Novel Extramedullary Fixation and Dynamic Hip Screw in the Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Finite-Element Analysis.

Authors:  Kai Ding; Yanbin Zhu; Haicheng Wang; Yonglong Li; Weijie Yang; Xiaodong Cheng; Yingze Zhang; Wei Chen; Qi Zhang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  Novel Design of Minimal Incision Double Oblique Device for Osteosynthesis (DODO) of Hip: Results of an In-silico Study Based on the Femur Morphometrics of the Northeast (NE) Indian population.

Authors:  Pratik Nag; Bhaskar Borgohain; Souptick Chanda
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Biomechanical comparison of the femoral neck system and the dynamic hip screw in basicervical femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Jun-Ki Moon; Jung Il Lee; Kyu-Tae Hwang; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Ye-Soo Park; Ki-Chul Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Dynamic Hip Screw Plate Length in Stable Intertrochanteric Fracture Neck of Femur: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aditya Soni; Sandeep Munshi; Niranj G Radhamony; Rajiv Nair; Sachith Sreenivasan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.