Literature DB >> 28663603

Stemphylium revisited.

J H C Woudenberg1, B Hanse2, G C M van Leeuwen3, J Z Groenewald1, P W Crous1,4,5.   

Abstract

In 2007 a new Stemphylium leaf spot disease of Beta vulgaris (sugar beet) spread through the Netherlands. Attempts to identify this destructive Stemphylium sp. in sugar beet led to a phylogenetic revision of the genus. The name Stemphylium has been recommended for use over that of its sexual morph, Pleospora, which is polyphyletic. Stemphylium forms a well-defined monophyletic genus in the Pleosporaceae, Pleosporales (Dothideomycetes), but lacks an up-to-date phylogeny. To address this issue, the internal transcribed spacer 1 and 2 and intervening 5.8S nr DNA (ITS) of all available Stemphylium and Pleospora isolates from the CBS culture collection of the Westerdijk Institute (N = 418), and from 23 freshly collected isolates obtained from sugar beet and related hosts, were sequenced to construct an overview phylogeny (N = 350). Based on their phylogenetic informativeness, parts of the protein-coding genes calmodulin and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were also sequenced for a subset of isolates (N = 149). This resulted in a multi-gene phylogeny of the genus Stemphylium containing 28 species-clades, of which five were found to represent new species. The majority of the sugar beet isolates, including isolates from the Netherlands, Germany and the UK, clustered together in a species clade for which the name S. beticola was recently proposed. Morphological studies were performed to describe the new species. Twenty-two names were reduced to synonymy, and two new combinations proposed. Three epitypes, one lectotype and two neotypes were also designated in order to create a uniform taxonomy for Stemphylium.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternaria lancipes Ellis & Everh.; Morphology; Multi-gene phylogeny; Pleospora; Pleospora pomorum A.S. Horne; S. canadense Woudenb. & Crous; S. chrysanthemicola Woudenb. & Crous; S. halophilum (J. Webster) Woudenb. & Crous; S. lucomagnoense Woudenb. & Crous; S. novae-zelandiae Woudenb. & Crous; S. simmonsii Woudenb. & Crous; Stemphylium armeriae (Corda) Woudenb. & Crous; Stemphylium solani G.F. Weber; Thyrospora astragali Yoshii; Thyrospora lycopersici Enjoji

Year:  2017        PMID: 28663603      PMCID: PMC5480992          DOI: 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Mycol        ISSN: 0166-0616            Impact factor:   16.097


Introduction

In 2007 a new leaf spot disease associated with a Stemphylium sp. was first discovered on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) in the Netherlands, which subsequently spread rapidly throughout the country in the following years (Hanse 2013). The causal agent was recently formally named as Stemphylium beticola (Crous ), but the genus itself was not treated in that study. Stemphylium is a dematiaceous hyphomycete, which can be distinguished from other hyphomycetes forming phaeodictyospores based on the percurrent rejuvenation of its conidiophores, and apically swollen conidiogenous cells. Other closely related genera mostly display a geniculate, sympodial proliferation, e.g. Alternaria (Simmons 2007). Stemphylium, with S. botryosum as type species, forms a well-defined monophyletic genus in the family Pleosporaceae, Pleosporales (Câmara et al., 2002, Inderbitzin et al., 2009). However, the sexual morph to which Stemphylium is linked, Pleospora, is known to be polyphyletic. The type species of Pleospora, Pleospora herbarum, has Stemphylium herbarum as asexual morph (Simmons 1985), but several Pleospora spp. have been linked to a range of different asexual genera (e.g. Inderbitzin et al., 2006, De Gruyter et al., 2013, Ariyawansa et al., 2015, Crous and Groenewald, 2017). The latest comprehensive phylogenetic study on Pleospora species with Stemphylium asexual morphs was published in 2009 (Inderbitzin ), which left many unnamed and potentially new Stemphylium species. The Pleospora herbarum clade sensu Inderbitzin illustrated the problems with identification in the genus. Based on a multi-gene phylogeny five species should be synonymised, but RAPD fingerprints (Chaisrisook ), morphology and ecology studies supported them to be separate species. Some researchers therefore chose to retain all the species names (e.g. Inderbitzin ), while others again chose to synonymise them (e.g. Köhl ). With the uptake of the one fungus-one name initiative in the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants (ICN, McNeill et al., 2012), name changes in these genera became necessary. The use of Stemphylium over Pleospora has subsequently been recommended by the Working Group on Dothideomycetes of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Fungi (Rossman ). The aim of the present study was to construct a phylogenetic overview of the genus Stemphylium. All available Stemphylium and Pleospora isolates from the CBS collection, together with Stemphylium isolates collected from sugar beet from different parts of the Netherlands as well as from the UK and Germany, were included in the study. The internal transcribed spacer 1 and 2 and intervening 5.8S nr DNA (ITS) were sequenced to construct a draft overview phylogeny. Using a reduced set of isolates, the phylogenetic informativeness of six commonly used protein-coding genes, namely partial actin (actA), beta-tubulin (tub2), calmodulin (cmdA), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gapdh) and DNA-directed RNA polymerase second largest subunit (rpb2) were also evaluated. Based on these results, the two most promising genes were additionally sequenced for the genus Stemphylium, and used to construct a multi-gene phylogeny.

Materials and methods

Isolates

Four-hundred-and-forty-one isolates were included in this study, comprising of 418 Pleospora and Stemphylium isolates from the culture collection of the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (CBS), Utrecht, the Netherlands (Supplementary Table 1) and 23 isolates received from the IRS (the research and knowledge centre for sugar beet cultivation in The Netherlands), Bergen op Zoom, the Netherlands (Supplementary Table 2). The dataset includes 48 (ex-)type strains. Freeze-dried strains from the CBS culture collection were revived in 2 mL malt/peptone (50 %/50 %) and subsequently transferred to oatmeal agar (OA) (Crous ). Strains stored in liquid nitrogen were transferred to OA directly from the −185 °C storage. For the isolation methods of the IRS isolates see Hanse .

Morphology

Isolates were grown on potato carrot agar (PCA, Crous et al., 2009) and synthetic nutrient-poor agar (SNA, Nirenberg, 1976) at moderate temperatures under CoolWhite fluorescent light with an 8 h photoperiod. After 7 and 14 d the growth rates were measured and the colony characters noted. Colony colours were rated according to Rayner (1970). Morphological descriptions of asexual structures were made for isolates grown on SNA for 7 d. Slides were prepared with the cellotape technique (Schubert ) using Titan Ultra Clear Tape (Conglom Inc., Toronto, Canada) and Shear's medium as mounting fluid. Morphological descriptions of sexual structures were made for isolates grown on PCA for 14 d, with 85 % lactic acid as mounting fluid. The mean plus/minus standard deviation values were derived from measurements of 30 structures, with extremes given in parentheses. Photographs of characteristic structures were made with a Zeiss Axio Imager A2 microscope equipped with a Nikon DS-Ri2 high-definition colour camera using differential interference contrast (DIC) optics and the Nikon software NIS-elements D v. 4.50. Adobe Bridge CS5.1 and Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended, v. 12.1, were used for the final editing and photographic preparation. Nomenclatural data were deposited in MycoBank (Crous ).

DNA isolation, PCR and sequencing

DNA extraction was performed using the Wizard® Genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The ITS region, gapdh, tef1 and rpb2 gene regions were amplified and sequenced with respectively the primers V9G (De Hoog and Gerrits van den Ende, 1998)/ITS4 (White ), gpd1/gpd2 (Berbee ), EF1-728F/EF1-986R (Carbone & Kohn 1999), and RPB2-5F2 (Sung )/fRPB2-7cR (Liu ) as described in Woudenberg . The actA gene region was amplified and sequenced with ACT-512F/ACT-783R (Carbone & Kohn 1999) as described in De Gruyter . For the tub2 gene region several primer combinations and PCR programs were tested, but no PCR product could be obtained. The cmdA gene region was amplified and sequenced with the primers CALDF1/CALDR2 (Lawrence ). The PCR mixture consisted of 1 μl 50× diluted genomic DNA, 1× NH4+ reaction buffer (Bioline, Luckenwalde, Germany), 2 mM MgCl2, 20 μM of each dNTP, 0.2 μM of each primer and 0.25 U Taq DNA polymerase (Bioline). The PCR conditions consisted of an initial denaturation step of 5 min at 94 °C followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 59 °C and 1 min at 72 °C, and a final elongation step of 7 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were sequenced in both directions using a BigDye Terminator v. 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bleiswijk, the Netherlands) and analysed with an ABI Prism 3730xl DNA Analyser (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Consensus sequences were computed from forward and reverse sequences using the Bionumerics v. 4.61 software package (Applied Maths, St-Marthens-Latem, Belgium). Generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1, Supplementary Table 1).
Table 1

Collection details and GenBank accession numbers of the Stemphylium cultures included in the multi-gene phylogeny.

NameOld name1Strain number2Other collection number2Host/SubstrateCountryGenBank accession numbers
ITSgapdhcmdA
Alternaria alternataGV14-634a1Chenopodium albumNetherlandsKU850502KU850649KU850790
Stemphylium amaranthiS. phaseolinaTCBS 124650HSAUP VI1538Phaseolus vulgarisChinaKU850503KU850650KU850791
CBS 124651HSAUP VI1682Phaseolus vulgarisChinaKU850504KU850651KU850792
CBS 124746THSAUPpyf1835Amaranthus retroflexusChinaKU850505KU850652KU850793
CBS 124750HSAUPpyf1902Malus sieversiiChileKU850506KU850653KU850794
S. microsporumTCBS 124753HSAUPpyf1904Malus sieversiiChinaKU850507KU850654KU850795
CBS 124984HSAUPpyf2018Raphanus sativusChinaKU850508KU850655KU850796
S. luffaeTCBS 124985HSAUPpyf2016Luffa cylindricaChinaKU850509KU850656KU850797
CBS 136589E.G.S. 48.098Lotus pendunculatusNew ZealandKU850510KU850657KU850798
Stemphylium armeriae comb. nov.P. armeriaeCBS 338.73Armeria maritimaUKKU850511KU850658KU850799
Stemphylium astragaliCBS 116583ETE.G.S. 08.174Astragalus sp.JapanKU850512KU850659KU850800
Stemphylium beticolaP. armeriaeCBS 378.54Lychnis sp.CanadaKU850513KU850660KU850801
CBS 116599UAMH 10489Herbaceous dicotCanadaKU850514KU850661KU850802
CBS 133512E.G.S. 30.152Pisum sativumCanadaKU850515KU850662KU850803
CBS 133892E.G.S. 38.090Lens culinarisUSAKU850516KU850663KU850804
CBS 136590E.G.S. 48.097Passiflora edulisNew ZealandKU850517KU850664KU850805
CBS 136699E.G.S. 48.126Panax sp.USAKU850518KU850665KU850806
CBS 137492E.G.S. 50.095Spinacia oleraceaUSAKU850519KU850666KU850807
CBS 141024TGV11-265aBeta vulgarisNetherlandsKU850520KU850667KU850808
CBS 141025GV12-288-2Beta vulgarisNetherlandsKU850521KU850668KU850809
CBS 141026GV12-474-a1Beta vulgarisNetherlandsKU850522KU850669KU850810
GV11-196a1-3Beta vulgarisNetherlandsKU850523KU850670KU850811
GV12-275a1Beta vulgarisNetherlandsKU850524KU850671KU850812
GV12-276a1Beta vulgarisNetherlandsKU850525KU850672KU850813
GV12-287a1Beta vulgarisNetherlandsKU850526KU850673KU850814
GV12-336a1Beta vulgarisNetherlandsKU850527KU850674KU850815
GV12-356a1Beta vulgarisNetherlandsKU850528KU850675KU850816
GV12-367a1Beta vulgarisNetherlandsKU850529KU850676KU850817
GV12-368a1Beta vulgarisNetherlandsKU850530KU850677KU850818
GV12-403a1Beta vulgarisNetherlandsKU850531KU850678KU850819
GV13-425a1Beta vulgarisNetherlandsKU850532KU850679KU850820
GV13-436c2Beta vulgarisNetherlandsKU850533KU850680KU850821
GV14-693a1Beta vulgarisUKKU850534KU850681KU850822
IFZ2013-024Beta vulgarisGermanyKU850535KU850682KU850823
IFZ2013-035Beta vulgarisGermanyKU850536KU850683KU850824
IFZ2014-020Beta vulgarisGermanyKU850537KU850684KU850825
Stemphylium botryosumCBS 714.68TE.G.S. 04.118c; IMI 135456; MUCL 11717; QM 1379Medicago sativaCanadaKC584238AF443881KU850826
CBS 116596E.G.S. 08.069; QM 7066Medicago sativaUSAKU850538KU850685KU850827
Stemphylium callistephiCBS 527.50TCallistephus chinensisUSAKU850539KU850686KU850828
Stemphylium canadense sp. nov.CBS 116602TUAMH 10491Salicornia sp.CanadaKU850641KU850782KU850932
CBS 118081UAMH 10491Salicornia sp.CanadaKU850642KU850783KU850933
Stemphylium chrysanthemicola sp. nov.CBS 117255TE.G.S. 31.008Chrysanthemum sp.New ZealandKU850640KU850781KU850931
Stemphylium drummondiiCBS 346.83TPhlox drummondiiGermanyGQ395365KU850687KU850829
Stemphylium eturmiunumS. vesicariumCBS 668.80Solanum lycopersicumGreeceKU850540KU850688KU850830
CBS 109845TE.G.S. 29.099; IMI 386969Solanum lycopersicumNew ZealandKU850541KU850689KU850831
CBS 122124Asphodelus aestivusGreeceKU850542KU850690KU850832
S. variabilisTCBS 122641HSAUPIVI1508Allium sativumFranceKU850543KU850691KU850833
CBS 124652HSAUP1559Solanum lycopersicumChinaKU850544KU850692KU850834
S. vesicariumCBS 133528E.G.S. 30.002Allium sativumIndiaKU850545KU850693KU850835
S. capsiciTCBS 138495E.G.S. 53.123Capsicum annuumChinaKU850546KU850694KU850836
Stemphylium gracilariaeP. lycopersiciCBS 308.36ATCC 10737Solanum lycopersicumUSAKU850547KU850695KU850837
P. herbarum f. lactucumTCBS 273.55Lactuca sp.UnknownKU850548KU850696KU850838
CBS 482.90TE.G.S. 37.073; ATCC 669721Gracilaria sp.IsraelKU850549AF443883KU850839
CBS 115179STE-U 5216; CPC 5216Leucospermum sp.SpainKU850550KU850697KU850840
CBS 115180STE-U 5217; CPC 5217Leucospermum sp.SpainKU850551KU850698KU850841
S. cucumisTCBS 125060HSAUPpyf2377Cucumis meloChinaKU850552KU850699KU850842
Stemphylium halophilum comb. nov.CBS 337.73TLimonium vulgareUKKU850553KU850700KU850843
CBS 410.73Armeria maritimaUKKU850554KU850701KU850844
Stemphylium ixeridisCBS 124748TIxeris denticulataChinaKU850590KU850737KU850881
Stemphylium lancipesCBS 101217Aquilegia sp.New ZealandKU850594KU850741KU850885
CBS 116584E.G.S. 46.182Aquilegia sp.New ZealandKU850595AF443886KU850886
CBS 133314ETE.G.S. 10.022Aquilegia canadensisUSAKU850596KU850742KU850887
Stemphylium lotiCBS 407.54TATCC 11718Lotus corniculatusUSAKU850597KU850743KU850888
Stemphylium lucomagnoense sp. nov.P. gigasporaCBS 116601TE.G.S. 37.017Minuartia hybridaSwitzerlandKU850629KU850770KU850920
Stemphylium lyciiCBS 115192STE-U 5223; CPC 5223Protea cynaroidesPortugalKU850598KU850744KU850889
CBS 116582E.G.S. 48.089Pistacia veraUSAKU850599KU850745KU850890
CBS 124982HSAUPpyf1828Apium graveolensChinaKU850600KU850746KU850891
CBS 125240HSAUP1826Cucurbita moschataChinaKU850601KU850747KU850892
CBS 125241THSAUP 1833Lycium chinenseChinaKU850602KU850748KU850893
Stemphylium lycopersiciS. lancipesCBS 333.73PD 72/1118Platycodon sp.NetherlandsKU850603KU850749KU850894
S. vesicariumCBS 436.76UnknownIndonesiaKU850604KU850750KU850895
S. lancipesCBS 463.78Solanum tuberosumPeruKU850605KU850751KU850896
CBS 321.87Solanum lycopersicumSenegalKU850606KU850752KU850897
S. xanthosomatisTCBS 116585E.G.S. 17.137Xanthosoma sagittifoliumNew CaledoniaKU850607AY317010KU850898
CBS 116587E.G.S. 46.001Solanum lycopersicumDominican RepublicKU850608KU850753KU850899
S. sophoraeTCBS 120325Sophora microphyllaChinaKU850609KU850754KU850900
S. oblongumTCBS 120326Gossypium hirsutumChinaKU850610KU850755KU850901
CBS 122639NTHSAUPV0893Solanum lycopersicumChinaKU850611KU850756KU850902
S. pyrinaTCBS 122803HSAUP wy0006Pyrus sinkiangensisChinaKU850612KU850757KU850903
CBS 123008HSAUP0475Brassica pekinensisChinaKU850613KU850758KU850904
S. pruniTCBS 124980HSAUPIII00159; E.G.S. 53.121Prunus persicaChinaKU850614KU850759KU850905
S. plantaginisTCBS 124981HSAUPIII00532Plantago majorChinaKU850615KU850760KU850906
CBS 124983HSAUPpyf1842(2)Clinopodium polycephalumChinaKU850616KU850761KU850907
CBS 135778E.G.S. 46.183Salvia officinalisNew ZealandKU850617AY317026KU850908
Stemphylium majusculumCBS 717.68TE.G.S. 29.094; ATCC 18520; IMI 135459; MUCL 11720; MUCL 18568; NRRL 5269; QM 8382Lathyrus maritimusUSAKU850618AF443891KU850909
CBS 133424E.G.S. 16.068; IMI 135459; QM 8382Lathyrus maritimusUSAKU850619AF443891KU850910
Stemphylium novae-zelandiae sp. nov.CBS 138157E.G.S. 52.147Avicennia resiniferaNew ZealandKU850630KU850771KU850921
CBS 138295TE.G.S. 52.148Avicennia resiniferaNew ZealandKU850631KU850772KU850922
Stemphylium paludiscirpiCBS 109842TE.G.S. 31.016; IMI 386966Scirpus sp.USAKU850620KU850762KU850911
Stemphylium sarciniformeCBS 335.33Trifolium pratenseUSAKU850621KU850763KU850912
CBS 364.49ATCC 10828Trifolium pratenseUSAKU850622KU850764KU850913
S. kaiseriCBS 110049E.G.S. 31.011Cicer arietinumIranKU850591KU850738KU850882
CBS 116579E.G.S. 38.121Trifolium pratenseUSAKU850623AF443892KU850914
CBS 116581E.G.S. 29.188Cicer arietinumIranKU850592KU850739KU850883
CBS 133723E.G.S. 36.006Trifolium pratenseUSAKU850624KU850765KU850915
CBS 136810E.G.S. 49.033Cicer arietinumIranKU850593KU850740KU850884
CBS 138345E.G.S. 53.018Trifolium pratenseNew ZealandKU850625KU850766KU850916
Stemphylium simmonsii sp. nov.S. globuliferumCBS 716.68ATCC 18518; IMI 135458; MUCL 11718; QM 8729Commelina sp.USAKU850632KU850773KU850923
CBS 116598UAMH 10487Phragmitis sp.CanadaKU850633KU850774KU850924
CBS 116603UAMH 10493Lactuca muralisCanadaKU850634KU850775KU850925
CBS 116604UAMH 10494Guem macrophyllumCanadaKU850635KU850776KU850926
CBS 133515E.G.S. 30.153Solanum lycopersicumCanadaKU850636KU850777KU850927
CBS 133518TE.G.S. 30.154Fragaria sp.CanadaKU850637KU850778KU850928
S. globuliferumCBS 133894E.G.S. 38.115Trifolium pratenseUSAKU850638KU850779KU850929
S. globuliferumCBS 134496E.G.S. 42.138Malus sylvestrisAustraliaKU850639KU850780KU850930
Stemphylium solaniCBS 408.54ATCC 11128Solanum lycopersicumUSAKU850626KU850767KU850917
CBS 116586ETE.G.S. 41.135Solanum lycopersicumUSAKU850627KU850768KU850918
CBS 118082E.G.S. 42.055; CBS 134293Euphorbia marginataUSAKU850628KU850769KU850919
Stemphylium symphytiCBS 115268TSymphytum uplandicumUSAKU850643KU850784KU850934
CBS 118796Symphytum uplandicumNew ZealandKU850644KU850785KU850935
CBS 138069E.G.S. 52.041Borago officinalisNew ZealandKU850645KU850786KU850936
CBS 138070E.G.S. 52.042Borago officinalisNew ZealandKU850646KU850787KU850937
Stemphylium trifoliiCBS 116580TE.G.S. 12.142Trifolium repensUSAKU850647KU850788KU850938
Stemphylium triglochinicolaCBS 718.68TATCC 18516; IMI 122774ii; IMI 135460; MUCL 11716; MUCL 18569; NRRL 5270; QM 8752Triglochin maritimaUKKU850648KU850789KU850939
Stemphylium vesicariumCBS 155.24Allium sp.UnknownKU850555KU850702KU850845
CBS 157.24Abies sp.UnknownKU850556KU850703KU850846
P. pomorumNTCBS 184.25Malus domesticaUKKU850557KU850704KU850847
CBS 273.31UnknownUnknownKU850558KU850705KU850848
CBS 274.31Phaseolus vulgarisUnknownKU850559KU850706KU850849
CBS 307.36Citrus sp.TunisiaKU850560KU850707KU850850
CBS 156.45Dianthus caryophyllusNetherlandsKU850561KU850708KU850851
CBS 322.49Lathyrus odoratusNetherlandsKU850562KU850709KU850852
CBS 370.51Trigonella foenum-graecumNetherlandsKU850563KU850710KU850853
CBS 368.59Linum usitatissimumDenmarkKU850564KU850711KU850854
S. vesicariumCBS 715.68E.G.S. 12.171; ATCC 18521; DAOM 48576a; IMI 135457; MUCL 11719; NRRL 5Pisum sativumCanadaKU850565KU850712KU850855
CBS 406.76Solanum lycopersicumGermanyKU850566KU850713KU850856
CBS 205.82Lunaria annuaNetherlandsKU850567KU850714KU850857
S. herbarumTCBS 191.86E.G.S. 36.138; IMI 276975Medicago sativaIndiaKC584239AF443884KU850858
S. alfalfaeTCBS 192.86E.G.S. 36.088; IMI 269683Medicago sativaAustraliaKU850568KU850715KU850859
S. vesicariumCBS 311.92Allium cepaNetherlandsKU850569KU850716KU850860
S. vesicariumCBS 486.92Allium cepaNetherlandsKU850570KU850717KU850861
P. sedicolaTCBS 109843E.G.S. 48.095; IMI 386967Sedum spectabileNew ZealandKU850571KU850718KU850862
P. tomatonisTCBS 109844E.G.S. 29.089; IMI 386968Solanum lycopersicumUSAKU850572KU850719KU850863
CBS 115182STE-U 5229; CPC 5229Leucadendron sp.South AfricaKU850573KU850720KU850864
CBS 115204STE-U 5224; CPC 5224Leucadendron sp.PortugalKU850574KU850721KU850865
S. maliTCBS 122640HSAUP VIwy1542Malus sieversiiChinaKU850575KU850722KU850866
CBS 123005HSAUPV 0366FabaceaeChinaKU850576KU850723KU850867
S. alfalfaeCBS 123803HSAUP 0366Allium sativumChinaKU850577KU850724KU850868
S. eturmiunumCBS 124279Malus domesticaDenmarkKU850578KU850725KU850869
S. cremanthodiiTCBS 124747HSAUPpyf1830(1)Cremanthodium discoideumChinaKU850579KU850726KU850870
S. brassicicolaTCBS 124749HSAUPpyf1858(2)Brassica pekinensisChinaKU850580KU850727KU850871
CBS 124751HSAUPpyf2328Pyrus sinkiangensisChinaKU850581KU850728KU850872
CBS 124752HSAUPpyf2371Populus tomentosaChinaKU850582KU850729KU850873
CBS 125242HSAUP 1914Dahlia pinnataChinaKU850583KU850730KU850874
S. tomatonisCBS 133474E.G.S. 29.089Solanum lycopersicumUSAKU850584KU850731KU850875
S. alfalfaeCBS 133737E.G.S. 36.088; IMI 269683Medicago sativaAustraliaKU850585KU850732KU850876
S. alfalfaeCBS 133905E.G.S. 39.127Medicago sativaUSAKU850586KU850733KU850877
S. alfalfaeCBS 133914E.G.S. 40.038Medicago sativaUSAKU850587KU850734KU850878
CBS 138138E.G.S. 52.113Lonicera sp.NetherlandsKU850588KU850735KU850879
GV11-355-a1-2Beta vulgarisNetherlandsKU850589KU850736KU850880

The T indicates the ex-type isolate of the synonymised species.

ATCC: American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA; CBS: Culture Collection of the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; CPC: Personal collection of P.W. Crous, Utrecht, the Netherlands; DAOM: Canadian Collection of Fungal Cultures, Ottawa, Canada; E.G.S.: Personal collection of Dr. E.G. Simmons; HSAUP: Department of Plant Pathology, Shandong Agricultural University, China; IMI: Culture Collection of CABI Europe-UK, Egham, UK; MUCL: (Agro)Industrial Fungi and Yeast Collection of the Belgian Co-ordinated Collections of Micro-organisms (BCCM), Louvain-la Neuve, Belgium; NRRL: ARS Culture Collection, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Peoria, IL, USA; PD: Plant Protection Service, Wageningen, the Netherlands; QM: Quarter Master Culture Collection, Amherst, MA, USA; STE-U: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa; UAMH: University of Toronto, UAMH Centre for Global Microfungal Biodiversity, Toronto, Canada; Ex-epitype, -type, and -neotype isolates are indicated with ET, T and NT, respectively.

Collection details and GenBank accession numbers of the Stemphylium cultures included in the multi-gene phylogeny. The T indicates the ex-type isolate of the synonymised species. ATCC: American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA; CBS: Culture Collection of the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; CPC: Personal collection of P.W. Crous, Utrecht, the Netherlands; DAOM: Canadian Collection of Fungal Cultures, Ottawa, Canada; E.G.S.: Personal collection of Dr. E.G. Simmons; HSAUP: Department of Plant Pathology, Shandong Agricultural University, China; IMI: Culture Collection of CABI Europe-UK, Egham, UK; MUCL: (Agro)Industrial Fungi and Yeast Collection of the Belgian Co-ordinated Collections of Micro-organisms (BCCM), Louvain-la Neuve, Belgium; NRRL: ARS Culture Collection, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Peoria, IL, USA; PD: Plant Protection Service, Wageningen, the Netherlands; QM: Quarter Master Culture Collection, Amherst, MA, USA; STE-U: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa; UAMH: University of Toronto, UAMH Centre for Global Microfungal Biodiversity, Toronto, Canada; Ex-epitype, -type, and -neotype isolates are indicated with ET, T and NT, respectively.

Identification of best loci

Based on the ITS sequence results and former sequence data (Inderbitzin ), seven isolates representing clade 10 (Fig. 1), namely CBS 378.54, CBS 116598, CBS 116599, CBS 134496, CBS 136590, GV11-196-a1-3 and IFZ2013-024, were selected to determine which gene would be the most informative in distinguishing species within this clade. In addition to ITS, the actA, cmdA, gapdh, rpb2 and tef1 gene regions were amplified and sequenced as described above. Unfortunately the beta-tubulin PCRs did not give any results, even when following previously published PCR primers and methods (Bt2a/Bt2b, Glass & Donaldson 1995) which are supposed to work on Stemphylium species (Lawrence ). A sequence comparison from the five additional gene regions of the seven selected isolates was made in Bionumerics v. 4.61 (Applied Maths) and by eye (Table 2).
Fig. 1

Maximum likelihood tree based on the ITS sequences of 357 isolates. The RAxML bootstrap support values > 75 % (BS) and Bayesian posterior probabilities > 0.95 (PP) are given at the nodes. Thickened lines indicate a BS of 100 % and a PP of 1.0. Ex-type strain numbers are in bold face and indicated with T (or NT or ET when respectively neo- or epi-typified in this study). Species names in bold face represent unconfirmed species names. The tree was rooted to A. alternata GV14-634a1.

Table 2

Gene test on selected isolates from clade 10 (see Fig. 1). The numbers in the body of the table represent the number of the sequence allele for the given locus.

Isolate numberOriginal nameHostLocationITS1actArpb2tef1cmdAgapdhtub22,3
CBS 116599Pleospora sp.Herbaceous dicotCanada111111np
GV11-196-a1-3Stemphylium sp.Beta vulgarisNetherlands111111np
CBS 378.54P. armeriaeLychnis sp.Canada111112np
IFZ2013-024Stemphylium sp.Beta vulgarisGermany111121np
CBS 136590Pleospora sp.Passiflora edulisNew Zealand111123np
CBS 116598Pleospora sp.Phragmitis sp.Canada222234np
CBS 134496S. globuliferumMalus sylvestrisAustralia22np3345np

ITS difference is only in two T-repeat regions.

tub2 gave no PCR products, despite of testing different primer combinations and PCR conditions.

np: no PCR product.

Gene test on selected isolates from clade 10 (see Fig. 1). The numbers in the body of the table represent the number of the sequence allele for the given locus. ITS difference is only in two T-repeat regions. tub2 gave no PCR products, despite of testing different primer combinations and PCR conditions. np: no PCR product.

Phylogenetic analyses

In Bionumerics v. 4.61 (Applied Maths), a quick UPGMA phylogeny was constructed from the ITS sequences of the 441 included isolates to assign them to clusters of closely related or identical isolates. For those isolates belonging to the Stemphylium clade, a multiple sequence alignment of the ITS sequences was generated with MAFFT v. 7.271 (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/index.html) using the FFT-NS-i method. With Findmodel (http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/content/sequence/findmodel/findmodel.html) the best nucleotide substitution model was determined. Bayesian analyses were performed with MrBayes v. 3.2.1 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001, Ronquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003). The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis used four chains and started from a random tree topology. The sample frequency was set at 1 000 and the temperature value of the heated chain was set at 0.1. The run stopped when the average standard deviation of split frequencies reached below 0.01. Burn-in was set to 25 % after which the likelihood values were stationary. Tracer v. 1.5.0 (Rambaut & Drummond 2009) was used to confirm the convergence of chains. A maximum-likelihood analysis including 500 bootstrap replicates using RAxML v. 7.2.6 (Stamatakis & Alachiotis 2010) was also run. Sequences of A. alternata (GV14-634-a1) were used as outgroup. The same steps were applied to generate the multi-gene phylogeny, on both the single gene alignments and the multi-gene alignment, with the only difference being that the L-INS-I method was used in MAFFT v. 7.271 for generating the multiple sequence alignment. The resulting trees were printed with TreeView v. 1.6.6 (Page 1996) and, together with the alignments, deposited into TreeBASE (http://www.treebase.org).

Results

The ITS, rpb2 and actA gene regions were the least informative, since only two sequence alleles were observed, all splitting the seven isolates in the same two allele groups (Table 2). For the ITS sequences the sequence difference between the two allele groups is in two T-repeats, which are not considered informative by standard phylogeny software. Differences in repeat regions are normally regarded as sequence errors, and are not included in calculations for phylogenetic trees. However, when these differences are compared with the results from the other gene information, the difference in number of T-repeats does seem to be relevant in this case. The tef1 gene region showed three different sequence alleles, additionally splitting CBS 134496 from the second allele group (Table 2). The cmdA and gapdh gene regions seem to have the highest potential of being most informative as respectively four and five different sequence alleles were observed (Table 2). Based on these results the cmdA and gapdh gene regions were sequenced for a selection of 150 isolates (including the outgroup isolate GV14-634-a1), representing all possible species in Stemphylium based on ITS sequence data and ecological data (Table 1).

ITS phylogeny

The initial UPGMA phylogeny constructed in Bionumerics v. 4.61 placed 356 isolates in the Stemphylium clade (data not shown). Together with the outgroup-isolate GV14-634-a1, an Alternaria alternata isolated from sugar beet, these 357 isolates form the dataset of the Stemphylium ITS phylogeny. The aligned sequences contained 545 nucleotides with 101 unique site patterns. The TrN model with a gamma-distributed rate variation was suggested as model for the Bayesian analysis. The average standard deviation of split frequencies never reached below 0.01 while running MrBayes at different temperature values. Therefore, the temperature value was lowered to 0.05, and the run was stopped after 5 M generations for which the convergence of chains was confirmed in Tracer. After discarding the burn-in phase trees, the runs resulted in 7 502 trees from which the majority rule consensus tree and posterior probabilities were calculated. The phylogeny based on the ITS sequences divides the 356 Stemphylium isolates into 22 clades (Fig. 1). In clade 10, 33 isolates were found, 18 sugar beet isolates and 15 isolates from the CBS collection. The three sugar beet isolates from Germany and the one from the UK cluster here amidst the Dutch sugar beet isolates. The phylogenetic tree shows a straight vertical line for this clade, implying that the sequences are phylogenetically identical. However, by eye two different sequences are observed with a T repeat of 7 nt starting on position 139 in the ITS alignment (deposited in TreeBASE) in combination with a T repeat of 6 nt starting on position 491, versus a T repeat of 6 nt starting on position 139 in combination with a T repeat of 7 nt starting on position 491 in the alignment. Although not phylogenetically recognised, this difference splits the CBS isolates in two subgroups, with seven isolates, CBS 378.54, CBS 116599, CBS 133512, CBS 133892, CBS 136590, CBS 136699 and CBS 137492, having an ITS sequence identical to the sugar beet isolates. Maximum likelihood tree based on the ITS sequences of 357 isolates. The RAxML bootstrap support values > 75 % (BS) and Bayesian posterior probabilities > 0.95 (PP) are given at the nodes. Thickened lines indicate a BS of 100 % and a PP of 1.0. Ex-type strain numbers are in bold face and indicated with T (or NT or ET when respectively neo- or epi-typified in this study). Species names in bold face represent unconfirmed species names. The tree was rooted to A. alternata GV14-634a1.

Multi-gene phylogeny

From the ITS phylogeny 149 isolates were selected to represent the genus Stemphylium and the partial gapdh and cmdA gene sequences were added to the existing ITS sequence data (Table 1). The selection included all ex-type isolates, all isolates from potential new species, and at least one representative per clade of the ITS phylogeny. The aligned sequences of the ITS (545 characters), gapdh (595 characters) and cmdA (860 characters) gene regions of the 150 isolates (including the outgroup isolate) had a total length of 2 000 characters, with respectively 95, 199, and 317 unique site patterns. The HKY model with a gamma-distributed rate variation was suggested as model for the ITS and gapdh alignments and the GTR model with a gamma-distributed rate variation for the cmdA alignment. After discarding the burn-in phase trees, the multi-gene Bayesian analysis resulted in 6 978 trees from which the majority rule consensus tree and posterior probabilities were calculated. The multi-gene phylogeny divided the isolates in 28 species clades (Fig. 2). New species descriptions are provided in the taxonomy section below.
Fig. 2

Maximum likelihood tree based on the combined ITS, gapdh and cmdA sequence alignment of 150 isolates. The RAxML bootstrap support values > 75 % (BS) and Bayesian posterior probabilities > 0.95 (PP) are given at the nodes. Thickened lines indicate a BS of 100 % and a PP of 1.0. Species names between parentheses represent synonymised species names. Ex-type strains are in bold face and indicated with T (or NT or ET when respectively neo- or epi-typified in this study). The tree was rooted to A. alternata GV14-634a1.

Maximum likelihood tree based on the combined ITS, gapdh and cmdA sequence alignment of 150 isolates. The RAxML bootstrap support values > 75 % (BS) and Bayesian posterior probabilities > 0.95 (PP) are given at the nodes. Thickened lines indicate a BS of 100 % and a PP of 1.0. Species names between parentheses represent synonymised species names. Ex-type strains are in bold face and indicated with T (or NT or ET when respectively neo- or epi-typified in this study). The tree was rooted to A. alternata GV14-634a1.

Taxonomy

As a result of the multi-gene phylogenetic analysis, 22 species names are synonymised, and two new combinations and five new species proposed. Synonyms and descriptions of the new species and new combinations are provided below. Y.F. Pei & X.G. Zhang, Mycotaxon 109: 495. 2009. Synonyms: Stemphylium microsporum Y.F. Pei & X.G. Zhang, Mycotaxon 111: 171. 2010. Stemphylium phaseolina Yong Wang bis & X.G. Zhang, Mycologia 102: 709. 2010. Stemphylium luffae Y.F. Pei & X.G. Zhang, Mycol. Progr. 10: 166. 2011. Specimens examined: China, Hebei Province, Zhaoxian, from Phaseolus vulgaris leaves, Sep. 2006, Y. Wang (culture ex-type of S. phaseolina CBS 124650); Shandong Province, Tai'an, from Phaseolus vulgaris leaves, Oct. 2006, Y. Wang, CBS 124651; Sinkiang Province, Korla, from Amaranthus retroflexus leaves, 17 Oct. 2008, Y.F. Pei (culture ex-type CBS 124746); Sinkiang Province, Yili, from Luffa cylindrica leaves, collection date unknown, Y.F. Pei (culture ex-type of S. luffae CBS 124985); Sinkiang Province, Yili, from Malus sieverii leaves, 10 Aug. 2009, Y.F. Pei, (culture ex-type of S. microsporum CBS 124753). Notes: The species S. amaranthi and S. microsporum were described based on morphological data only (Pei et al., 2009, Pei et al., 2010), and no sequence data were available on GenBank. Their morphological descriptions differ, especially their spore sizes (22–35 × 10–19 for S. amaranthi versus 15–24 × 9–15 for S. microsporum). However, our measurements of the ex-type isolate of S. microsporum (CBS 124753) resulted in a spore size of (24.5–)27–35 (−42) × (12–)13.5–16(–18), which would fit the description of S. amaranthi. Both S. luffae and S. phaseolina are described based on morphological and molecular data, although in the later description of S. luffae, the sequences of S. phaseolina are not incorporated in the phylogenetic tree. The published ITS sequences of the ex-type isolate of S. luffae and S. phaseolina (GU182943 and GQ395369 respectively) are 100 % identical, but their gapdh sequences (GU182938 and GQ395374 respectively) are only 98 % identical. However, the gapdh sequence we obtained from the ex-type strain of S. luffae (KU850656) is only 99 % identical to the originally published sequence (GU182938), and also the gapdh sequence we obtained from the ex-type strain of S. phaseolina (KU850650) is only 99 % identical to the originally published sequence (GQ395374). This led to a 100 % identity of the gapdh sequences of the ex-type isolates of S. luffae and S. phaseolina. When looking at the described morphological characters, S. luffae and S. phaseolina also fit in the morphological species description of S. amaranthi. The only remark is that S. luffae and S. phaseolina are described with a conspicuously punctate conidial wall, although S. amaranthi was originally described with an inconspicuously micromaculate conidial wall. (Corda) Woudenb. & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank MB820657. Basionym: Sphaeria armeriae Corda, Icon. Fungorum hucusque Cogn. 4: 41, t. 8:119. 1840. Synonyms: Pleospora armeriae (Corda) Ces. & De Not., Comment. Soc. Crittog. Ital. 1: 218. 1863. Pleospora herbarum f. armeriae (Corda) Sacc., Syll. Fungorum (Abellini) 2: 247. 1883. Pyrenophora armeriae (Corda) Berl., Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital. 20: 242. 1888. Pleospora herbarum var. armeriae (Corda) J. Webster, Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 44: 418. 1961. Specimen examined: UK, England, Devon, Budleigh Salterton Salt Marsh, from Armeria maritima, 12 Aug. 1972, J. Webster, CBS 338.73. Notes: Sphaeria armeriae was described from flower stalks of Armeria vulgaris (= A. maritima) in Germany (Corda 1840). Later it was transferred to the genus Pleospora (Cesati & De Notaris 1863). Saccardo (1883) treated it as a form of P. herbarum, while others treated it as synonym of P. herbarum (Winter, 1887, Müller, 1951). Wehmeyer (1952) and Webster & Lucas (1961) both studied the holotype specimen (Herb A.C.I. Corda no. 155637), and concluded that it was immature; no fully mature ascospores could be found. A study comparing P. herbarum var. armeriae isolates from Armeria with cultures of P. herbarum from other hosts in culture, showed conidia similar to the Stemphylium type (Webster & Lucas 1961). However, they did observe a difference in the ascus width between the two species, with var. armeriae having wider asci. Isolate CBS 338.73 was deposited in the CBS collection as S. herbarum var. armeriae by J. Webster, the author of this variety. We therefore propose the new combination for Sphaeria armeriae as Stemphylium armeriae. (Yoshii) W. Yamam., Trans. Mycol. Soc. Japan 2: 92. 1960. Basionym: Thyrospora astragali Yoshii, J. Pl. Protect. 16: 536. 1929. Specimen and material examined: Japan, (lectotype designated here of T. astragali, Journal of Plant Protection, Tokyo 16: illustration on page 534, 1929, Yoshii H, MBT375877); Fukuoka, from Astragalus sp., collection date unknown, H. Yoshii, (epitype designated here of T. astragali CBS H-23050, MBT375505, culture ex-epitype CBS 116583 = E.G.S. 08.174). Notes: Stemphylium astragali, with Thyrospora astragali as basionym, does not refer to a holotype specimen in its original description (Yoshii 1929), nor could we locate one. However, in 1956 Yoshii sent an isolate (CBS 116583) named Thyrospora astragali to Emory G. Simmons, who recognised this as authentic isolate. Since no holotype specimen is known, we designated the original illustration on page 534 as lectotype, and propose CBS 116583 as ex-epitype culture of Thyrospora astragali here. Woudenb. & Hanse, Persoonia 36: 403. 2016. Fig. 3.
Fig. 3

Stemphylium beticola (CBS 141024). A, C. Conidiophores and conidia. B. Conidia. D–E. Ascoma. Scale bars: A–C = 10 μm; D–E = 100 μm.

Stemphylium beticola (CBS 141024). A, C. Conidiophores and conidia. B. Conidia. D–E. Ascoma. Scale bars: A–C = 10 μm; D–E = 100 μm. Conidiophores solitary, straight to flexuous, occasionally branched, septate, smooth, pale brown, (41–)45–72(–88) × 4–5 μm, bearing 1–3 darkened percurrent rejuvenation sites. Conidiogenous cells swollen at the apex, darkened, 5–6 μm wide. Conidia solitary, conidium body pale olive-brown, verrucose, ellipsoid to cylindrical, (21–)22–26(–30) × (13–)14–16(–18) μm, L/W = 1.6, with 2–4 transverse septa and 1–3 longitudinal and 0–2 oblique septa per transverse sector. Constricted at 1–2 darkened transverse septa. Occasionally with an apical secondary conidiophore. Immature ascomata of sexual morph observed on agar, pseudothecia globose, ellipsoid or irregular, single or aggregated, ranging from 100 to 300 μm tall (from Crous ). Culture characteristics: After 7 d cultures on SNA flat, fimbriate, colourless with abundant black ascomatal initials in the agar, aerial mycelium is sparse, white, colonies reaching 45–55 mm diam; cultures on PCA flat, entire to undulate, colourless with abundant black ascomata in the agar, aerial mycelium is sparse floccose, (greenish) olivaceous; colonies reaching 50–60 mm diam. Specimens examined: Netherlands, Noord-Brabant, Langenboom, on leaves of Beta vulgaris, 17 Aug. 2011, P. Wilting, (holotype CBS H-22486, culture ex-type CBS 141024 = GV11-265a); Groningen, Nieuwe Pekela, on leaves of Beta vulgaris, 17 July 2012, J. Lingbeek, GV12-288-2 = CBS 141025; Drenthe, Eerste Exloërmond, on leaves of Beta vulgaris, 11 Sept. 2012, B. Hanse, CBS 141026 = GV12-474a1. Notes: Stemphylium beticola causes a leaf spot disease on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) (Hanse ), which has been detected in multiple European countries (Crous ). Host range tests demonstrated that the species was not restricted to Beta vulgaris (Hanse ), which is confirmed in this study by the clustering of multiple isolates from different hosts in the S. beticola clade. This study further shows that S. beticola also occurs in the USA, Canada and New Zealand. Molecularly it is closely related to S. simmonsii, another species with a broad host range, but which does not include isolates from Europe. They can be separated morphologically by their ascomata, which have dark hyphal outgrows in S. simmonsii. Woudenb. & Crous, sp. nov. MycoBank MB820658. Fig. 4.
Fig. 4

Stemphylium canadense sp. nov. (CBS 116602). A–D. Conidiophores and conidia. E. Conidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.

Stemphylium canadense sp. nov. (CBS 116602). A–D. Conidiophores and conidia. E. Conidia. Scale bars = 10 μm. Etymology: Named after the country from which it was collected, Canada. Conidiophores solitary, straight to flexuous, occasionally branched, septate, smooth, light olive brown, (46–)62.5–107(–137.5) × (3–)4–5.5(–7) μm, bearing 1–2 thickened, darkened, percurrent rejuvenation sites. Conidiogenous cells swollen at the apex, darkened, (5.5–)6.5–8.5(–10.5) μm wide. Conidia solitary, conidium body pale olive brown, verrucose, ovoid with pointed apex, (37.5–)43.5–59(–71.5) × (13.5–)15–18(–20) μm, L/W = 3.1, with 5–8 transverse septa and 1–2(–3) longitudinal or oblique septa per transverse sector. Constricted at multiple darkened transverse septa. Sexual morph not observed. Culture characteristics: After 7 d cultures on SNA flat, entire, aerial mycelium is scarce, woolly, white, colonies colourless, with pale olivaceous grey centre, colonies 20–29 mm diam; cultures after 7 d on PCA effuse, entire, aerial mycelium scarce, fine felty to woolly, olivaceous grey, colonies colourless with greenish olivaceous zones, colonies reaching 20–31 mm diam. Specimens examined: Canada, British Colombia, near Roberts Bank Port, from Salicornia sp., 24 May 2001, A. & R. Bandoni (holotype F 14991, culture ex-type CBS 116602 = UAMH 10491); British Colombia, Hornby Island, beach of Cape Gurney, from Salicornia sp., collection date unknown, A. & R. Bandoni, CBS 118081 = UAMH 10492. Notes: Stemphylium canadense includes two cultures (CBS 116602 and CBS 118081) isolated from Salicornia spp. in Canada. In fig. 2 of Inderbitzin these two isolates were already mentioned as an unnamed species in Clade E1. A Pleospora sp. has already been described from Salicornia sp. in France, namely Pleospora salicorniae (Dangeard 1888). However no sexual morph was observed in our isolates of Stemphylium canadense, and therefore we could not confirm conspecificity. Woudenb. & Crous, sp. nov. MycoBank MB820659. Fig. 5.
Fig. 5

Stemphylium chrysanthemicola sp. nov. (CBS 117255). A–B. Conidiophores and conidia. C–D. Conidia. E. Hyphal plaques. Scale bars = 10 μm.

Stemphylium chrysanthemicola sp. nov. (CBS 117255). A–B. Conidiophores and conidia. C–D. Conidia. E. Hyphal plaques. Scale bars = 10 μm. Etymology: Named after the host genus from which it was collected, Chrysanthemum. Conidiophores solitary, straight to curved, occasionally branched, septate, smooth, sub-hyaline, (71–)106–186(–282) × (3–)4–5 μm, bearing multiple darkened percurrent rejuvenation sites. Conidiogenous cells swollen at the apex, sub-hyaline, (5–)5.5–7(–7.5) μm wide. Conidia solitary, conidium body brown, verrucose, ellipsoid to cylindrical, (24.5–)26–29(–30.5) × (11–)13.5–15.5(–16.5) μm, L/W = 1.9, with 2–3 transverse septa and 1(–2) longitudinal or oblique septa per transverse sector. Constricted at 1–2 darkened transverse septa. Forms hyphal plaques at the bottom of PCA plates. Sexual morph not observed. Culture characteristics: After 7 d cultures on SNA flat, rhizoid, aerial mycelium is fine felty, grey olivaceous, colonies colourless, pale olivaceous grey coloured by aerial conidia, black hyphal plaques at the bottom of the plate, colonies reaching 42 mm diam; cultures on PCA flat, entire, aerial mycelium is floccose, pale olivaceous grey, colonies colourless with grey olivaceous rings, centre olivaceous, black hyphal plaques at the bottom of the plate; colonies reaching 46 mm diam. Specimen examined: New Zealand, from Chrysanthemum sp., before May 1973, K.S. Milne (holotype CBS H-23045, culture ex-type CBS 117255 = E.G.S. 31.008). Notes: Characteristic for the new species S. chrysanthemicola are the hyphal plaques which are formed at the bottom of the agar plates. These hyphal plaques are also observed in S. novae-zelandiae but after 14 d on PCA only. Nirenberg & Plate, Phytopathol. Z. 107: 365. 1983. Synonyms: Pleospora drummondii Nirenberg & Plate, Phytopathol. Z. 107: 365. 1983. Stemphylium spinaciae B.J. Li, Yan F. Zhou & Y.L. Guo, Mycosystema 30: 380. 2011. Notes: Comparison of the ITS (HQ622100) and gapdh (JF489118) sequence of the type of S. spinaciae (Zhou ) with the type of S. drummondii showed identical ITS sequences and nearly identical gapdh sequences (1 nt difference in 374 nt). Together with the matching spore size (S. spinaciae 20–40 × 17.5–25 μm, S. drummondii 33.8 × 22.6 μm), we propose to synonymise these species. The description of a smooth conidial wall in S. spinaciae, which is incongruent with the verrucose conidia in S. drummondii, is questioned, since in fig. 1D of the original description (Zhou ) verrucose conidia can be seen. E.G. Simmons, Harvard Pap. Bot. 6: 204. 2001. Synonyms: Pleospora eturmiuna E.G. Simmons, Harvard Pap. Bot. 6: 206. 2001. Stemphylium variabilis Yong Wang bis & X.G. Zhang, Mycologia 102: 711. 2010. Stemphylium capsici Yong Wang bis & X.G. Zhang, Mycotaxon 96: 80. 2006. Specimens examined: China, Yunnan Province, Dali, from Capsicum annuum leaves, 5 Aug. 2002, X.G. Zhang (culture ex-type of S. capsici CBS 138495 = E.G.S. 53.123). France, Angres, from Allium sativum leaves, Aug. 2006, X.G. Zhang (culture ex-type of S. variabilis CBS 122641). New Zealand, Levin, from Solanum lycopersicum fruit, 1969, G.F. Laundon (culture ex-type of P. eturmiuna CBS 109845 = E.G.S. 29.099). Notes: Morphological examination supports the synonymy of S. capsici and S. variabilis under S. eturmiunum (Fig. 6). Stemphylium capsici was described based on morphology only (Wang & Zhang 2006). Although the description of S. capsici describes smooth-walled conidia, our morphological examination of the ex-type isolate (CBS 138495) clearly shows densely verrucose conidia (Fig. 6B). Stemphylium variabilis was described based on morphological characters and molecular phylogenetic analyses (Wang ). However, some sequence differences between the published sequences of S. variabilis (ITS GQ395366, gapdh GQ395373) and our sequences (ITS KU850543, gapdh KU850691, 3 and 4 nt difference respectively) placed S. variabilis in synonymy with S. eturmiunum instead of the close phylogenetic relationship published originally. Morphologically the variable shape of conidia and abundant secondary conidiophores were mentioned as being unique for S. variabilis, and different from the broadly ovoid or ellipsoid conidia of S. eturmiunum (Wang ). However, our morphological examination did not show extensive secondary conidiophore formation or highly variable shaped conidia in the type isolate of S. variabilis (CBS 122641, Fig. 6C).
Fig. 6

Stemphylium eturmiunum conidiophores and conidia. A. CBS 109845. B. CBS 138495. C. CBS 122641. Scale bars = 10 μm.

Stemphylium eturmiunum conidiophores and conidia. A. CBS 109845. B. CBS 138495. C. CBS 122641. Scale bars = 10 μm. E.G. Simmons, Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 49: 305. 1989. Synonyms: Pleospora herbarum f. lactucum Padhi & Snyder, Phytopath. 44: 179. 1954. (nom. inval.) Pleospora gracilariae E.G. Simmons & S. Schatz, Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 49: 305. 1989. Stemphylium cucumis Y.F. Pei & X.G. Zhang, Mycol. Progr. 10: 167. 2011. Specimens examined: China, Sinkiang province, Korla, from Cucumis melo leaves, collection date unknown, Y.F. Pei (culture ex-type of S. cucumis CBS 125060). Israel, from Gracilaria sp., collection date unknown, S. Schatz (culture ex-type of S. gracilariae CBS 482.90 = E.G.S. 37.073). Spain, Tenerife, from Leucospermum sp. (Rigoletto), 1 Apr. 2000, S. Denman, CBS 115179; Tenerife, from Leucospermum sp. (Succession), 1 Apr. 2000, S. Denman, CBS 115180. USA, California, from Solanum lycopersicum fruit, collection date unknown, G.B. Ramsey, CBS 308.36 = ATCC 10737. Unknown, from leaf of Lactuca sp., collection date unknown, W.C. Snyder (culture ex-type P. herbarum f. lactucum CBS 273.55). Notes: In this study CBS 273.55 is recognised as ex-type culture of Pleospora herbarum f. lactucum based on the study of the original data deposited in the CBS culture collection archive. This correspondence showed that the isolate was deposited in the collection by the original author of the species (W.C. Snyder), after a request from the curator of the CBS collection to deposit the new species. Therefore P. herbarum f. lactucum will be synonymised with S. gracilariae instead of P. herbarum under which name it is currently synonymised. The description of S. cucumis was based on morphology and molecular phylogenetic analyses (Pei ). Although their phylogenetic tree places S. cucumis distant from S. gracilariae, their sequences published for S. gracilariae and S. cucumis are identical (S. cucumis GU182942, GU182939, S. gracilariae AF442784, AF443883, for ITS and gapdh respectively). In the tree, S. cucumis was probably exchanged with S. luffae which is placed in close phylogenetic relation with S. gracilariae in the tree. However, sequence comparisons between the ex-type isolate of S. luffae and S. gracilariae show multiple nucleotide differences. The morphological description of S. cucumis also fits the description of S. gracilariae and is therefore synonymised here. Culture CBS 308.36, isolated from tomato in California, USA, was stored as Pleospora lycopersici in the CBS collection. However, the original description of P. lycopersici was from Solanum lycopersicum in Belgium (Marchal & Marchal 1921). Therefore, based on this single strain, we choose not to synonymise P. lycopersici with S. gracilariae at this point pending the collection of more isolates. (J. Webster) Woudenb. & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank MB820660. Basionym: Pleospora halophila J. Webster, in Subramanian, Taxonomy of Fungi, (Proc. Int. Symp. Madras 1973) Part 2 (Madras): 349. 1984. Specimens examined: UK, England, Devon, Exeter, Dawlish Warren, from Limonium vulgare, coll. date unknown, J. Webster (holotype HME 3143, culture ex-type CBS 337.73); England, Devon, near Exeter, from Armeria maritima, 10 Aug. 1972, J. Webster, CBS 410.73. Note: The transfer of P. halophila to the genus Stemphylium is in congruence with an earlier study based on the large subunit 28S nr DNA (Kodsueb ). (Ellis & Everh.) E.G. Simmons, Mycologia 61: 21. 1969. Basionym: Alternaria lancipes Ellis & Everh., J. Mycol. 4: 45. 1888. Specimens examined: New Zealand, from Aquilegia sp., collection date and collector unknown, CBS 116584 = E.G.S. 46.182; from Aquilegia sp., Jul. 1998, HM Dance, CBS 101217. USA, Kansas, from Aquilegia canadensis, collection date and collector unknown (epitype designated here CBS H-23043, MBT375502, culture ex-epitype CBS 133314 = E.G.S. 10.022). Notes: The type material from Alternaria lancipes, basionym of Stemphylium lancipes, was originally described from Argemone sp. collected in Manhattan, Kansas, USA (Ellis & Everhart 1888). The holotype material, stored at the NY herbarium (ID 00830044), was studied by Emory G. Simmons, who subsequently transferred the species to the genus Stemphylium (Simmons 1969). However, two other collections from the same locality are on Aquilegia sp., which yielded the isolate Emory G. Simmons studied (Simmons 1969). Here we propose this isolate (CBS 133314), isolated from Aquilegia canadensis in Kansas, USA, as epitype of A. lancipes. Woudenb. & Crous, sp. nov. MycoBank MB820661. Fig. 7.
Fig. 7

Stemphylium lucomagnoense sp. nov. (CBS 116601). A–C. Conidiophores and conidia. D. Ascoma. E. Ascomatal wall. Scale bars: A–C, E = 10 μm; D = 100 μm.

Stemphylium lucomagnoense sp. nov. (CBS 116601). A–C. Conidiophores and conidia. D. Ascoma. E. Ascomatal wall. Scale bars: A–C, E = 10 μm; D = 100 μm. Etymology: Named after the place of isolation, Lucomagno, the Lukmanier Pass in Switzerland. On PCA after 14 d: Conidiophores solitary, straight to flexuous, occasionally branched, septate, smooth, sub-hyaline, (34–)46–95(–119) × (2.5–)3–4(–4.5) μm, bearing multiple darkened percurrent rejuvenation sites. Conidiogenous cells swollen at the apex, darkened, (4–)5–6.5(–7.5) μm wide. Conidia solitary or in short chains of 2 conidia, conidium body is dark brown, inconspicuously verrucose, ellipsoid to broad ovoid, (18.5–)20–27(–31) × (9.5–)11–16(–18) μm, L/W = 1.8, with (2–)3 transverse septa and 1–2 longitudinal or oblique septa per transverse sector. Constricted at 1–3 darkened transverse septa. Immature ascomata of sexual morph observed in agar, pseudothecia globose or broad ovoid, single, covered with dark hyphal outgrows, ranging in size to 485 μm tall. Culture characteristics: After 7 d cultures on SNA flat, rhizoid, aerial mycelium is scarce, colonies colourless, no sporulation, colonies 5 mm diam; cultures after 7 d on PCA flat, entire, aerial mycelium woolly, pale olivaceous grey, colonies greenish olivaceous with two olivaceous rings, young colourless ascomata in agar which become black after 14 d, colonies reaching 28–30 mm diam. Specimen examined: Switzerland, Ticino, Lucomagno, from Minuartia hybrida, 19 Jun. 1981, P.G. Crivelli (holotype CBS H-23046, culture ex-type CBS 116601 = E.G.S. 37.017). Notes: Culture CBS 116601 was deposited as Pleospora gigaspora in the CBS collection, as diagnosed by Crivelli (Inderbitzin ). Pleospora gigaspora was originally described from dead shoots of “herbarum majorum” from the inlands of “Maris glacialis, Kildin”, Russia (Karsten 1884), with smooth ascomata of 300–400 μm and no description of the asexual morph. Since our species has dark hyphal outgrows on its ascomata and is obviously different, we provided this species with a new name. Pleospora minuartiae is described from dry leaves of Minuartia taurica from Mt. Babugan-Yayla, Tauria, Crimea, Ukraine (Gucevicz 1972). This species is described with small ascomata measuring 140–180 μm, which significantly differs from our species for which ascomata of up to 485 μm tall are observed. Since there is also a morphologically different Pleospora species named after the country of isolation, P. helvetica with small ascomata measuring 180–200 μm (Niessl 1867), we named our isolate after the place of isolation, Lucomagno, the Lukmanier Pass. (Enjoji) W. Yamam., Trans. Mycol. Soc. Japan 2: 93. 1960. Fig. 8.
Fig. 8

Stemphylium lycopersici conidiophores and conidia after 7 d on PCA. A–B. CBS 122639. C. CBS 120325. D. CBS 122803. E–F. CBS 124981. G. CBS 124980. Scale bars = 10 μm.

Stemphylium lycopersici conidiophores and conidia after 7 d on PCA. A–B. CBS 122639. C. CBS 120325. D. CBS 122803. E–F. CBS 124981. G. CBS 124980. Scale bars = 10 μm. Basionym: Thyrospora lycopersici Enjoji, J. Pl. Protect. 18: 52. 1931. Synonyms: Stemphylium xanthosomatis B. Huguenin, as “xanthosomae”, Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 81: 697. 1966. Stemphylium plantaginis Yong Wang bis & X.G. Zhang, Mycotaxon 96: 79. 2006. Stemphylium pruni Yong Wang bis & X.G. Zhang, Mycotaxon 96: 78. 2006. Stemphylium oblongum Yong Wang bis & X.G. Zhang, Nova Hedwigia 88: 201. 2009. Stemphylium pyrina Yong Wang bis & X.G. Zhang, Mycol. Progr. 8: 303. 2009. Stemphylium sophorae Yong Wang bis & X.G. Zhang, Nova Hedwigia 88: 200. 2009. Stemphylium platycodontis J.X. Deng & S.H. Yu, Mycol. Progr. 13: 479. 2014. Specimens examined: China, Guizhou Province, Guiyang, from Solanum lycopersicum leaves, collection date unknown, Y. Wang (neotype designated here of T. lycopersici CBS H-23051, MBT375506, culture ex-neotype CBS 122639); Guizhou Province, Guiyang, from Prunus persica leaves, 16 Aug. 2003, Y. Wang (culture ex-type of S. pruni CBS 124980); Shandong Province, Taian, from Gossypium hirsutum leaves, 3 Oct. 2004, X.G. Zhang (culture ex-type of S. oblongum CBS 120326); Shandong Province, Mountain Tai, from Plantago major leaves, 5 Oct. 2003, Y. Wang (culture ex-type of S. plantaginis CBS 124981); Shandong Province, Mountain Tai, from Sophora microphylla leaves, 3 Oct. 2004, Y. Wang (culture ex-type of S. sophorae CBS 120325); Sinkiang Province, Korla, from Pyrus sinkiangensis leaves, 9 Aug. 2006, Y. Wang (culture ex-type of S. pyrina CBS 122803). New Caledonia, Nouméa, from Xanthosoma sagittifolium, 1962, B. Huguenin (culture ex-type of S. xanthosomatis CBS 116585 = E.G.S. 17.137 = IMI 98083). Notes: Stemphylium lycopersici, with Thyrospora lycopersici as basionym, was originally described from Solanum lycopersicum in Japan, but lacks a holotype specimen (Enjoji 1931). The culture CBS 116587, isolated from Solanum lycopersicum in the Dominican Republic, was considered by Emory G. Simmons to fit the concept of this species (Inderbitzin ). Here we propose CBS 122639, isolated from Solanum lycopersicum in China, as ex-neotype of T. lycopersici, since this isolate is from a geographically closer location, and also clusters in the same phylogenetic species clade. The type-isolate of S. platycodontis (CNU 111092) is not included in this study, but another one is included, namely CBS 333.73, also isolated from Platycodon sp. and regarded as S. platycodontis (Deng ). Stemphylium platycodontis was described based on phylogenetic study of the ITS, gapdh and tef1 partial gene sequences in combination with morphology studies. When comparing the ITS, gapdh and cmdA sequence of isolate CBS 333.73, only the gapdh sequence is unique for the two isolates from Platycodon, with only 1 nt difference. Together with the minor morphological differences described, slightly larger spore size (S. platycodontis 33–80 × 12–22, S. lycopersici 21–60 × 12–24 μm) and no production of brown pigment in PDA of S. platycodontis, we propose to synonymise S. platycodontis under S. lycopersici. Five synonymised species under S. lycopersici were described based on morphology alone. Stemphylium oblongum, S. plantaginis, S. pruni, S. pyrina and S. sophorae were described as new species from China (Wang and Zhang, 2006, Wang et al., 2009, Wang and Zhang, 2009), with some even appearing in the same manuscript. However, the broad conidial size range (21–60 × 12–24 μm) and described shape of conidia (ellipsoidal, ovoid, short cylindrical or shortly obclavate) of S. lycopersici by Yamamoto (1960), results in the fact that all described species fit the concept of S. lycopersici. The only difference in the descriptions is the structure of the conidial wall. This ranges from smooth (S. plantaginis and S. pruni) to densely tuberculate (S. pyrina) including descriptions with both smooth and finely postulate/micromaculate conidia (S. oblongum and S. sophorae). The description of Stemphylium lycopersici mentions echinulate (with sharply pointed spines) conidia. Morphological examination showed that all studied isolates have roughened conidia (Fig. 8), including the ex-type isolates of S. plantaginis (CBS 124981, Fig. 8E–F) and S. pruni (CBS 124980, Fig. 8G). Stemphylium subglobuliferum was described based on a phylogenetic study of the ITS and gapdh partial gene sequences in combination with morphological studies (Xue ). The ITS sequence of S. subglobuliferum (AY751454) is 100 % identical with S. lycopersici, and the gapdh sequence (AY751459) only has 1 unique nt compared to our S. lycopersici gapdh sequences. However, S. subglobuliferum was described as a new species based on the smaller spore size (9–20 × 5–13) and smooth conidial wall. A re-examination of the type-isolate is needed to clarify if this is indeed another synonym of S. lycopersici. Based on our specimens examined, Stemphylium lycopersici has a broad host range infecting plant leaves from at least six different families (Araceae, Fabaceae, Malvaceae, Plantaginaceae, Rosaceae and Solanaceae). Woudenb. & Crous, sp. nov. MycoBank MB820662. Fig. 9.
Fig. 9

Stemphylium novae-zelandiae sp. nov. (CBS 138295). A, D. Conidiophores and conidia. B–C. Conidia. E. Hyphal plaques. Scale bars = 10 μm.

Stemphylium novae-zelandiae sp. nov. (CBS 138295). A, D. Conidiophores and conidia. B–C. Conidia. E. Hyphal plaques. Scale bars = 10 μm. Etymology: Named after the country where it was isolated, New Zealand. Conidiophores solitary, straight to flexuous, unbranched, septate, smooth, sub-hyaline, (46.5–)64.5–111(–144.5) × (2.5–)3–4.5(–5.5) μm, bearing 1–2 thickened percurrent rejuvenation sites. Conidiogenous cells swollen at the apex, darkened, (5–)6–7.5(–8.5) μm wide. Conidia solitary, conidium body is light olive brown, verrucose, cylindrical, (31–)34–40.5(–45.5) × (9–)11–13(–14.5) μm, L/W = 3.1, with 3–5(–7) transverse septa and 1–2 longitudinal or oblique septa per transverse sector. Constricted at 2–3 darkened transverse septa. Forms hyphal plaques at the bottom of PCA plates after 14 d. Sexual morph not observed. Culture characteristics: After 7 d cultures on SNA flat, entire, aerial mycelium is scarce, wooly, white, colonies colourless, with three pale olivaceous grey rings and centre, colonies 20–24 mm diam; cultures after 7 d on PCA flat, entire, aerial mycelium fine felty, pale olivaceous grey, colonies white to olivaceous buff with two grey olivaceous rings and a greenish olivaceous outer ring, colonies reaching 35 mm diam. Specimens examined: New Zealand, Waitakaruru, from dead leaf of Avicennia resinifera, 10 Sep. 2006, C.F. Hill (holotype CBS H-23047, culture ex-type CBS 138295 = E.G.S. 52.148 (06/5200B)); additional strain from the same source CBS 138157 = E.G.S. 52.147 (06/5200A). Notes: To avoid confusion with the species Pleospora avicenniae (Borse 1987), we named the species after the country where it was isolated, New Zealand, instead of the host of isolation. Recently Pleospora avicenniae was placed in the new genus Halojulella based on a morphological and molecular examination (Ariyawansa ). As in S. chrysanthemicola, S. novae-zelandiae forms hyphal plaques at the bottom of the PCA plate but these are only observed after 14 d. Woudenb. & Crous, sp. nov. MycoBank MB820663. Fig. 10.
Fig. 10

Stemphylium simmonsii sp. nov. (CBS 133518). A–C. Conidiophores and conidia. D. Conidia. E. Ascomata. Scale bars: A–D = 10 μm; E = 100 μm.

Stemphylium simmonsii sp. nov. (CBS 133518). A–C. Conidiophores and conidia. D. Conidia. E. Ascomata. Scale bars: A–D = 10 μm; E = 100 μm. Etymology: Named after Emory G. Simmons, who extensively studied Pleospora and Stemphylium species. Conidiophores solitary, straight to flexuous, occasionally branched, septate, smooth, sub-hyaline, (18–)30–93(–159) × (2–)3–4(–5) μm, bearing multiple darkened percurrent rejuvenation sites. Conidiogenous cells swollen at the apex, darkened, (4.5–)5–6.5(–7.5) μm wide. Conidia solitary, conidium body is pale olive brown, verrucose, ellipsoid to broad ovoid, (18–)20.5–24.5(–28) × (11–)13–16(–18.5) μm, L/W = 1.6, with (2–)3 transverse septa and (1–)2(–3) longitudinal or oblique septa per transverse sector. Often constricted at the middle, darkened transverse septum. Immature ascomata of sexual morph observed in and on agar, pseudothecia subglobose or broad ovoid, single, covered with dark hyphal outgrows, ranging from 175 to 365 μm tall. Culture characteristics: After 7 d cultures on SNA flat, rhizoid, aerial mycelium is fine felty, pale olivaceous grey, colonies colourless, pale olivaceous grey coloured by aerial conidia in rhizoid shape, colonies 45–55 mm diam; cultures on PCA flat, entire, aerial mycelium scarce, woolly, pale olivaceous grey, colonies colourless with three grey olivaceous rings, and centre olivaceous to iron-grey with ascomata in and on agar, colonies reaching 60 mm diam. Specimens examined: Australia, from Malus sylvestris fruit, 1 Apr. 1976, C. Robertson, CBS 134496 = E.G.S. 42.138. Canada, from Fragaria sp., before 1971, C.O. Gourlay (holotype CBS H-23048, culture ex-type CBS 133518 = E.G.S. 30.154); from Solanum lycopersicum leaf, before 1971, C.O. Gourlay, CBS 133515 = E.G.S. 30.153; British Colombia, Ladner, from Phragmites sp. leaves, 7 Feb. 1999, A. & R. Bandoni & S. landvik & P. Inderbitzin, CBS 116598 = UAMH 104876; British Colombia, Sidney, from Lactuca muralis, 22 May 2001, M.E. Barr, CBS 116603; British Colombia, Sidney, from Geum macrophyllum, 22 May 2001, M.E. Barr, CBS 116604. USA, Maryland, Laurel, from Commelina sp. leaf, 14 Aug. 1966, E.G. Simmons, CBS 716.68. = E.G.S. 17.151 = ATCC 18518 = IMI 135458 = MUCL 11718; Massachusetts, Hadley, from Trifolium pratense leaf, 20 Jun. 1985, E.G. Simmons, CBS 133894 = E.G.S. 38.115. Notes: Three examined isolates were named S. globuliferum by E.G. Simmons (CBS 716.68, CBS 133894, CBS 134496). Since the original description of M. globuliferum was from Lotus corniculatus (Fabaceae) from Gotland, Sweden (Vestergren 1896), we did not follow this identification but introduced the new name S. simmonsii. Morphologically S. simmonsii resembles S. botryosum, which is phylogenetically only distantly related. Phylogenetically it is closely related to S. beticola, which can easily be distinguished from S. simmonsii by its glabrous ascomata (Fig. 3D–E; S. simmonsii has ascomata with dark hyphal outgrows, Fig. 10E). See the general discussion below for additional information. G.F. Weber, Phytopathol. 20: 516. 1930. Synonym: Thyrospora solani (G.F. Weber) Sawada, Rep. Dept. Agric. Gov. Res. Inst. Formosa 51: 115. 1931. Specimens examined: USA, Indiana, Darlington, from Solanum lycopersicum, Sep. 1993, E.G. Simmons (epitype designated here CBS H-23049, MBT375504, culture ex-epitype CBS 116586 = E.G.S. 41.135); Kansas, Riley County, from Euphorbia marginata leaf, 6 Nov. 1994, D. Stuterille, CBS 118082 = E.G.S. 42.055; South Carolina, Charleston, from Solanum lycopersicum, 1952, C.F. Andrus, CBS 408.54 = ATCC 11128. Notes: Stemphylium solani was originally described from diseased tomato plants collected in Florida, USA (Weber 1930). The holotype material is stored in the Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Herbarium, now named University of Florida Herbarium, under the specimen number FLAS-F-13571. According to Emory G. Simmons, CBS 116586, isolated from Solanum lycopersicum from Indiana, USA, was a good representative of the species after examination of the type material (Inderbitzin ). We follow his suggestion and designate CBS 116586 as ex-epitype culture of S. solani. (Wallr.) E.G. Simmons, Mycologia 61: 9. 1969. Fig. 11.
Fig. 11

Stemphylium vesicarium. A–D. (CPC 29939). Asci, pseudoparaphyses, and ascospores. E–I. (CBS 123005). Conidiophores and conidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.

Stemphylium vesicarium. A–D. (CPC 29939). Asci, pseudoparaphyses, and ascospores. E–I. (CBS 123005). Conidiophores and conidia. Scale bars = 10 μm. Basionym: Helminthosporium vesicarium Wallr. [as ‘Helmisporium’], Fl. Cryptog. German. 2: 166. 1833. Synonyms: Macrosporium vesicarium (Wallr.) Sacc., Syll. Fungorum 4: 537. 1886. Sphaeria herbarum Pers.: Fr, Syn. Meth. Fungorum 1: 78. 1801. Pleospora herbarum (Pers.: Fr) Rabenh. ex Ces. & De Not.: Fr Comment. Soc. Crittog. Ital. 1:217. 1863. Pleospora pomorum A.S. Horne, J. Bot. 58: 239. 1920. Stemphylium herbarum E.G. Simmons, Sydowia 38: 291. 1986. Pleospora alfalfae E.G. Simmons, Sydowia 38: 292. 1986. Stemphylium alfalfae E.G. Simmons, Sydowia 38: 292. 1986. Pleospora sedicola E.G. Simmons, Harvard Pap. Bot. 6: 202. 2001. Stemphylium sedicola E.G. Simmons, Harvard Pap. Bot. 6: 202. 2001. Pleospora tomatonis E.G. Simmons, Harvard Pap. Bot. 6: 204. 2001. Stemphylium tomatonis E.G. Simmons, Harvard Pap. Bot. 6: 204. 2001. Stemphylium cremanthodii Y.F. Pei & X.G. Zhang, Mycotaxon 109: 494. 2009. Stemphylium mali Yong Wang bis & X.G. Zhang, Mycol. Progr. 8: 303. 2009. Stemphylium brassicicola Y.F. Pei & X.G. Zhang, Mycotaxon 111: 169. 2010. See Index Fungorum for additional synonyms. Specimens examined: Australia, Western Australia, Harvey, from Medicago sativa, 30 Jul. 1982, collector unknown (culture ex-type of P. alfalfae CBS 192.86 = E.G.S. 36.088 = IMI 269683). China, Sinkiang province, Korla, from Cremanthodium discoideum leaves, 16 Oct. 2008, Y.F. Pei (culture ex-type of S. cremanthodii CBS 124747); Sinkiang province, Korla, from Brassica pekinensis leaves, 7 Aug. 2009, Y.F. Pei (culture ex-type of S. brassicicola CBS 124749); Sinkiang Province, Yili, from Malus sieversii leaves, 19 Jul. 2005, Y. Wang (culture ex-type of S. mali CBS 122640). India, Uttar Pradesh, Jhansi, from Medicago sativa, 1983, H.K. Joshi (culture ex-type of S. herbarum CBS 191.86 = E.G.S. 36.138 = IMI 276975). New Zealand, Auckland, from Sedum spectabile leaf lesion, Mar. 2000, E.G. Simmons (culture ex-type of P. sedicola CBS 109843 = E.G.S. 48.095 = IMI 386967). UK, England, from Malus domestica fruit, collection date unknown, M.N. Kidd (neotype of P. pomorum designated here CBS H-23044, MBT375503, culture ex-neotype CBS 184.25). USA, California, Central Valley, from Solanum lycopersicum fruit, Oct. 1968, E.G. Simmons (culture ex-type of P. tomatonis CBS 109844 = E.G.S. 29.089 = IMI 386968). Notes: Pleospora pomorum was originally described from spotted apples in Britain, without the designation of a holotype specimen (Horne 1920). A second publication on the species was done by Kidd & Beaumont (1924), who deposited isolate CBS 184.25, from apple fruit in England in the CBS collection. Since no holotype specimen is known, we propose CBS 184.25 as ex-neotype culture of Pleospora pomorum. Therefore, P. pomorum will be synonymised with S. vesicarium. The first molecular study of Stemphylium species showed that S. alfalfae, S. herbarum, and S. vesicarium were identical based on their ITS and gapdh sequences (Câmara ). A more extensive phylogenetic analysis on DNA sequences from four loci ITS, gapdh, tef1 and the intergenic spacer between vmaA and vpsA (Inderbitzin ) showed the same clustering, and added the species P. sedicola and P. tomatonis to the species clade. However, small morphological differences have been used to distinguish among the species now synonymised under S. vesicarium (summarised in Table 3). Although the described differences seem sometimes considerable, they are not always obvious when performing morphological studies (illustrated by pictures 1–5 in fig. 4 of Inderbitzin ). See the general discussion below for additional information on the synonymies proposed here for S. vesicarium. Only the synonyms of S. vesicarium proposed in this research are listed, for the full list of synonyms see Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org).
Table 3

Conidial characteristics of Stemphylium species synonymised under S. vesicarium.

SpeciesConidial shapeConidial size (μm)L/B ratio1Transverse septaLongitudinal septaWall ornamentationReference
S. alfalfaeOblong30–40(–45) × 12–15(–18)ND6–71–2Minutely verrucoseSimmons (1985)
Spherical or ovoid32–35 × 16–19ND3–4variableMinutely verrucoseSimmons (1985)
S. brassicicolaSubdoliiform, cylindrical to oblong cylindrical32–45 × 12–192–3.11–4(–5)3–5(–6)Conspicuously punctulate to punctatePei et al. (2010)
S. cremathodiiOblong to oblong-ellipsoid18–31 × 9–191.5–2.61–30–3MicromaculatePei et al. (2009)
S. herbarumBroadly ovoid or broadly ellipsoid, sometimes inequilateral35–45 × 20–27ND6–71–3Conspicuously and densely verrucoseSimmons (1985)
S. maliOblong18–22 × 13–161.3–1.61–33–5Conspicuoulsy punctateWang et al. (2009)
Subspherical14–16.5 (diam)ND1(–3)2–4Conspicuoulsy punctateWang et al. (2009)
S. sedicolaBroadly ellipsoid or oblong30–35 × 18–20ND2–31–3Smooth or usually punctateSimmons (2001)
S. tomatonisOblong, broadly ellipsoid (or subglobose)46–48 × 13–162.4–3 (or 1–1.5)4–71–2PunctulateSimmons (2001)
S. vesicariumOblong or broadly oval, sometimes inequilateral25–42(–48) × 12–221.5–2.71–5(–6)1–2(–3)Conspicuously and densely verrucoseSimmons (1969)

ND: not determined.

Conidial characteristics of Stemphylium species synonymised under S. vesicarium. ND: not determined.

Discussion

This manuscript presents a molecular phylogenetic overview of species in the genus Stemphylium known from culture, initiated due to our inability to unequivocally identify a Stemphylium sp. causing yellow leaf spot in sugar beet. To be able to characterise the species, all currently known (and available) species of the genus had to be considered. However, the lack of (ex-)type material often makes it difficult to determine species names of fungi, described on morphology only, onto the modern DNA-based phylogenetic trees. To strengthen and stabilise the taxonomy of Stemphylium, three epitypes, one lectotype and two neotypes are proposed in the present study. However, some isolates represent names for which no ex-type isolate is present or for which it was difficult to designate an appropriate ex-epitype culture (highlighted with bold species names in Fig. 1). Seven isolates were named Stemphylium globuliferum by Emory G. Simmons based on morphology. Stemphylium globuliferum was originally described as Macrosporium globuliferum from Lotus corniculatus (Fabaceae) from Gotland, Sweden (Vestergren 1896). Emory G. Simmons studied the holotype material (in UPS) and placed this species in Stemphylium (Simmons 1969). He described it as a common species, and isolated it from Trifolium pratense (Fabaceae). Four of the included isolates fall within the S. botryosum clade, and three within Stemphylium simmonsii sp. nov. Since none of these isolates originate from Lotus corniculatus, or are from Sweden (or even Europe), we choose not to use the name Stemphylium globuliferum for the new species, but rather provide it with a new name (S. simmonsii sp. nov.). Stemphylium vesicarium, with Helminthosporium vesicarium as basionym, was originally described from Allium sativum in Germany (Wallroth 1833). Our dataset includes 25 isolates named S. vesicarium of which 20 were named, based on morphology, by Emory G. Simmons, who also studied the holotype specimen at STR. One isolate, not studied by him, clusters with S. lycopersici (CBS 436.76), two isolates (one identified by him) cluster with S. eturmiunum, and the other 22 all cluster within the Stemphylium vesicarium clade (based on ITS, Fig. 1). Since none of the isolates originate from Allium sativum in Germany (or from a geographically close location), no ex-epitype culture is proposed for the species. As already mentioned in the introduction, the Pleospora herbarum clade sensu Inderbitzin illustrated the problems with identification in the genus Stemphylium. Molecular studies demonstrated the phylogenetic identity of the species S. alfalfae, S. herbarum, S. sedicola, S. tomatonis, and S. vesicarium (e.g. Câmara et al., 2002, Inderbitzin et al., 2009). However, differences in RAPD fingerprints (Chaisrisook ) and morphology (Simmons, 1969, Simmons, 1985, Simmons, 1989, Simmons, 2001), seemed to support them to be separate species. It should be noted that the RAPD studies were only based on a small number of isolates, (including only two S. herbarum isolates and one S. vesicarium isolate) and morphologically only small differences have been used to make a distinction among these species although they also share many characters (Câmara , table 2 of Kurose ). As a result, some researchers chose to retain all the species names (e.g. Inderbitzin ), while others chose to synonymise them (e.g. Köhl , as S. vesicarium). To be able to construct a stable phylogenetic species concept in Stemphylium we proposed to synonymise these phylogenetically identical species under S. vesicarium. The conidial descriptions of the species now synonymised under S. vesicarium are summarised in Table 3. The species S. sarciniforme (Fig. 2, clade 19) is divided in two well-supported subclades. Five isolates from Trifolium pratense form one branch, and three isolates from Cicer arietinum, Iran, all isolated by W. J. Kaiser, form a separate branch. Isolate CBS 110049, from the Cicer arietinum clade, was submitted to the CBS collection in 2002 as ex-holotype of “S. kaiseri”, but this name was never published. Emory Simmons morphologically identified all isolates from this clade as S. sarciniforme, and also chemically the isolates from both clades are similar (B. Andersen, pers. comm.). Until more isolates become available, we choose to treat them here as S. sarciniforme. After revision of the species identity and names, 28 species can be distinguished in the genus Stemphylium based on (parts) of the ITS, gapdh and cmdA gene regions (Fig. 2). From these 28 species, five new species are described, two new name combinations are introduced and 22 names are synonymised. Of the 22 synonymised names, seven are placed in synonymy with S. lycopersici, seven with S. vesicarium, three with S. amaranthi, two with S. gracilariae and S. eturmiunum, and one with S. drummondii. Stemphylium subglobuliferum might also be a synonym of S. lycopersici (see notes of S. lycopersici). The majority of the synonymised species (16 out of 22) were described from China based mostly on morphology and host-specificity. Clearly in the genus Stemphylium, identification on morphology and host-specificity alone is insufficient for correct species identification. Several other “new” species are described from China based solely on morphology, e.g S. allii-cepae, S. basellae, S. descurainiae, S. gossypii, S. hydrangeae, S. lactucae, S. momordicae, S. pisi and S. turriforme (Zhang and Zhang, 2002, Zhang et al., 2003, Zhang and Zhang, 2007, Zhou et al., 2012). Until molecular data of the ex-type isolates become available, the status of these species names remains unclear. Based only on ITS sequences, 22 species can be identified to species level (Fig. 1). Only four clades (clade 1, 7, 10, and 22), containing in total 10 species names, have multiple species names associated with them. This means that for accurate species identification, an additional gene to the standard ITS barcode sequence is required in the case of these 10 species. This study will therefore be useful to other plant pathologists in the field trying to identify their Stemphylium species, not only by providing them with the correct name(s), but also in helping them choose appropriate loci that will ensure correct identification.

Conclusions

In the genus Stemphylium 28 species can be distinguished based on (parts) of the ITS, gapdh and cmdA gene regions. From these 28 species, five are described as new species and a further two new combinations are proposed. Twenty-two names are reduced to synonymy. To create a stable taxonomy for Stemphylium, three epitypes, one lectotype and two neotypes are designated. Morphological examination alone is not suited for species identification in Stemphylium. For an accurate species identification, morphological studies should be combined with molecular data.
  21 in total

1.  Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit.

Authors:  Y J Liu; S Whelen; B D Hall
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Molecular phylogeny of Phoma and allied anamorph genera: towards a reclassification of the Phoma complex.

Authors:  Johannes de Gruyter; Maikel M Aveskamp; Joyce H C Woudenberg; Gerard J M Verkley; Johannes Z Groenewald; Pedro W Crous
Journal:  Mycol Res       Date:  2009-01-18

4.  The sections of Alternaria: formalizing species-group concepts.

Authors:  Daniel P Lawrence; Philipp B Gannibal; Tobin L Peever; Barry M Pryor
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Molecular and morphological description of two new species of Stemphylium from China and France.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Yun Geng; Yun-Fei Pei; Xiu-Guo Zhang
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  Perfect states of Stemphylium.

Authors:  E G Simmons
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  1969 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.696

7.  Phylogeny of Stemphylium spp. based on ITS and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene sequences.

Authors:  Marcos P S Câmara; Nichole R O'Neill; Peter van Berkum
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.696

8.  The family Pleosporaceae: intergeneric relationships and phylogenetic perspectives based on sequence analyses of partial 28S rDNA.

Authors:  Rampai Kodsueb; Vijaykrishna Dhanasekaran; André Aptroot; Saisamorn Lumyong; Eric H C McKenzie; Kevin D Hyde; Rajesh Jeewon
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.696

9.  Pleospora species with Stemphylium anamorphs: a four locus phylogeny resolves new lineages yet does not distinguish among species in the Pleospora herbarum clade.

Authors:  Patrik Inderbitzin; Yeshwant R Mehta; Mary L Berbee
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.696

10.  Fungal Planet description sheets: 400-468.

Authors:  P W Crous; M J Wingfield; D M Richardson; J J Le Roux; D Strasberg; J Edwards; F Roets; V Hubka; P W J Taylor; M Heykoop; M P Martín; G Moreno; D A Sutton; N P Wiederhold; C W Barnes; J R Carlavilla; J Gené; A Giraldo; V Guarnaccia; J Guarro; M Hernández-Restrepo; M Kolařík; J L Manjón; I G Pascoe; E S Popov; M Sandoval-Denis; J H C Woudenberg; K Acharya; A V Alexandrova; P Alvarado; R N Barbosa; I G Baseia; R A Blanchette; T Boekhout; T I Burgess; J F Cano-Lira; A Čmoková; R A Dimitrov; M Yu Dyakov; M Dueñas; A K Dutta; F Esteve-Raventós; A G Fedosova; J Fournier; P Gamboa; D E Gouliamova; T Grebenc; M Groenewald; B Hanse; G E St J Hardy; B W Held; Ž Jurjević; T Kaewgrajang; K P D Latha; L Lombard; J J Luangsa-Ard; P Lysková; N Mallátová; P Manimohan; A N Miller; M Mirabolfathy; O V Morozova; M Obodai; N T Oliveira; M E Ordóñez; E C Otto; S Paloi; S W Peterson; C Phosri; J Roux; W A Salazar; A Sánchez; G A Sarria; H-D Shin; B D B Silva; G A Silva; M Th Smith; C M Souza-Motta; A M Stchigel; M M Stoilova-Disheva; M A Sulzbacher; M T Telleria; C Toapanta; J M Traba; N Valenzuela-Lopez; R Watling; J Z Groenewald
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 11.051

View more
  14 in total

1.  Phylogenetic revision of Camarosporium (Pleosporineae, Dothideomycetes) and allied genera.

Authors:  D N Wanasinghe; K D Hyde; R Jeewon; P W Crous; N N Wijayawardene; E B G Jones; D J Bhat; A J L Phillips; J Z Groenewald; M C Dayarathne; C Phukhamsakda; K M Thambugala; T S Bulgakov; E Camporesi; Y S Gafforov; P E Mortimer; S C Karunarathna
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 16.097

2.  Floral and Foliar Source Affect the Bee Nest Microbial Community.

Authors:  Jason A Rothman; Corey Andrikopoulos; Diana Cox-Foster; Quinn S McFrederick
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 3.

Authors:  Y Marin-Felix; M Hernández-Restrepo; I Iturrieta-González; D García; J Gené; J Z Groenewald; L Cai; Q Chen; W Quaedvlieg; R K Schumacher; P W J Taylor; C Ambers; G Bonthond; J Edwards; S A Krueger-Hadfield; J J Luangsa-Ard; L Morton; A Moslemi; M Sandoval-Denis; Y P Tan; R Thangavel; N Vaghefi; R Cheewangkoon; P W Crous
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 16.097

4.  Unambiguous identification of fungi: where do we stand and how accurate and precise is fungal DNA barcoding?

Authors:  Robert Lücking; M Catherine Aime; Barbara Robbertse; Andrew N Miller; Hiran A Ariyawansa; Takayuki Aoki; Gianluigi Cardinali; Pedro W Crous; Irina S Druzhinina; David M Geiser; David L Hawksworth; Kevin D Hyde; Laszlo Irinyi; Rajesh Jeewon; Peter R Johnston; Paul M Kirk; Elaine Malosso; Tom W May; Wieland Meyer; Maarja Öpik; Vincent Robert; Marc Stadler; Marco Thines; Duong Vu; Andrey M Yurkov; Ning Zhang; Conrad L Schoch
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.515

5.  Dynamic Fluctuation and Niche Differentiation of Fungal Pathogens Infecting Bell Pepper Plants.

Authors:  Lixue Liu; Luyao Ma; Jinsong Feng; Xiaonan Lu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 5.005

6.  Marine endophytic fungi associated with Halopteris scoparia (Linnaeus) Sauvageau as producers of bioactive secondary metabolites with potential dermocosmetic application.

Authors:  Maria da Luz Calado; Joana Silva; Celso Alves; Patrícia Susano; Débora Santos; Joana Alves; Alice Martins; Helena Gaspar; Rui Pedrosa; Maria Jorge Campos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Closing the Yield Gap of Sugar Beet in the Netherlands-A Joint Effort.

Authors:  Bram Hanse; Frans G J Tijink; Jurgen Maassen; Noud van Swaaij
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Unambiguous identification of fungi: where do we stand and how accurate and precise is fungal DNA barcoding?

Authors:  Robert Lücking; M Catherine Aime; Barbara Robbertse; Andrew N Miller; Hiran A Ariyawansa; Takayuki Aoki; Gianluigi Cardinali; Pedro W Crous; Irina S Druzhinina; David M Geiser; David L Hawksworth; Kevin D Hyde; Laszlo Irinyi; Rajesh Jeewon; Peter R Johnston; Paul M Kirk; Elaine Malosso; Tom W May; Wieland Meyer; Maarja Öpik; Vincent Robert; Marc Stadler; Marco Thines; Duong Vu; Andrey M Yurkov; Ning Zhang; Conrad L Schoch
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.515

9.  Reconsideration of species boundaries and proposed DNA barcodes for Calonectria.

Authors:  Q L Liu; J Q Li; M J Wingfield; T A Duong; B D Wingfield; P W Crous; S F Chen
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 16.097

10.  Tenuazonic acid from Stemphylium loti inhibits the plant plasma membrane H+ -ATPase by a mechanism involving the C-terminal regulatory domain.

Authors:  Peter K Bjørk; Silas A Rasmussen; Sisse K Gjetting; Nanna W Havshøi; Thomas Isbrandt Petersen; Johan Ø Ipsen; Thomas O Larsen; Anja T Fuglsang
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 10.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.