P P Morris1, N Lachman2, D F Black3, R A Carter3, J Port3, N Campeau3. 1. From the Departments of Radiology (P.P.M., D.F.B., R.A.C., J.P., N.C.) morris.ppearse@mayo.edu. 2. Anatomy (N.L.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. From the Departments of Radiology (P.P.M., D.F.B., R.A.C., J.P., N.C.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Transverse sinus effacement is detectable on MRV examinations in almost all patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. This effacement of the transverse sinus is presumed to be mediated by elevation of intracranial pressure, resulting in compression and inward collapse of the dural margins of the sinus. We sought to establish whether supratentorial broad-based downward deformity of the tentorium might explain transverse sinus effacement in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRV examinations of 53 adult patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension were reviewed retrospectively and compared with 58 contemporaneously acquired controls. The curvature of the tentorium with reference to a line connecting the transverse sinus laterally with the confluence of the tentorial leaves medially was calculated as a segment of a circle. The height and area of the segment and the angle subtended by the midpoint of the tentorium from the falx were calculated. RESULTS: The height and area of the segment described by the chord connecting the transverse sinus with the apex of the tentorial confluence and subtended midtentorial angle were greater in the idiopathic intracranial hypertension group; this finding supports the hypothesis that increased tentorial bowing is present in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Increased bowing of the tentorium in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension compared with controls is a new observation, lending itself to new hypotheses on the nature and localization of elevated intracranial pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Bowing of the tentorium may play a part in distorting the contour of the transverse sinuses, resulting, at least in part, in the effacement of the transverse sinuses in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Transverse sinus effacement is detectable on MRV examinations in almost all patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. This effacement of the transverse sinus is presumed to be mediated by elevation of intracranial pressure, resulting in compression and inward collapse of the dural margins of the sinus. We sought to establish whether supratentorial broad-based downward deformity of the tentorium might explain transverse sinus effacement in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRV examinations of 53 adult patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension were reviewed retrospectively and compared with 58 contemporaneously acquired controls. The curvature of the tentorium with reference to a line connecting the transverse sinus laterally with the confluence of the tentorial leaves medially was calculated as a segment of a circle. The height and area of the segment and the angle subtended by the midpoint of the tentorium from the falx were calculated. RESULTS: The height and area of the segment described by the chord connecting the transverse sinus with the apex of the tentorial confluence and subtended midtentorial angle were greater in the idiopathic intracranial hypertension group; this finding supports the hypothesis that increased tentorial bowing is present in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Increased bowing of the tentorium in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension compared with controls is a new observation, lending itself to new hypotheses on the nature and localization of elevated intracranial pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Bowing of the tentorium may play a part in distorting the contour of the transverse sinuses, resulting, at least in part, in the effacement of the transverse sinuses in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Authors: P J Maralani; M Hassanlou; C Torres; S Chakraborty; M Kingstone; V Patel; D Zackon; M Bussière Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2012-02-04 Impact factor: 2.350
Authors: A Traboulsee; J H Simon; L Stone; E Fisher; D E Jones; A Malhotra; S D Newsome; J Oh; D S Reich; N Richert; K Rammohan; O Khan; E-W Radue; C Ford; J Halper; D Li Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-11-12 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: A Hedjoudje; A Piveteau; C Gonzalez-Campo; A Moghekar; P Gailloud; D San Millán Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: H Haraldsson; J R Leach; E I Kao; A G Wright; S G Ammanuel; R S Khangura; M K Ballweber; C T Chin; V N Shah; K Meisel; D A Saloner; M R Amans Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Gamze Akkus; Sinan Sözütok; Fulya Odabaş; Bilen Onan; Mehtap Evran; Barış Karagun; Murat Sert; Tamer Tetiker Journal: Curr Med Imaging Date: 2021