| Literature DB >> 28662728 |
Mariana de Oliveira Mauro1, Renata Matuo2, Natan de David2, Regiane Lauriano Batista Strapasson3, Rodrigo Juliano Oliveira4,5, Maria Élida Alves Stefanello3, Cândida Aparecida Leite Kassuya6, Maria de Fátima de Cepa Matos2, Fábio José Carvalho Faria7, Deiler Sampaio Costa1,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In order to obtain better clinical results in anticancer therapies, polychemotherapy or combination therapies are used. For this, the combinations are required to increase the efficacy and reduce the adverse reactions of the associated chemotherapies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic, apoptotic and (anti)proliferative potential of two sesquiterpene lactones isolated from Moquiniastrum polymorphum, 11,13-diidrozaluzanin C (1) and gochnatiolide C (2), and their associations with chemotherapeutic agents irinotecan, tamoxifen, cisplatin, 5-fluouracyl and doxorubicin in the tumoral lineage of MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma.Entities:
Keywords: Apoptosis; Breast cancer; Cytotoxicity; Moquiniastrum; Sesquiterpene lactones
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28662728 PMCID: PMC5492432 DOI: 10.1186/s40360-017-0156-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pharmacol Toxicol ISSN: 2050-6511 Impact factor: 2.483
Fig. 1Chemical structures of 11,13-dihydrozaluzanin C (1) and gochnatiolide C (2)
Fig. 2Determination of the IC50 of commercial chemotherapeutics in culture of MCF7 cells. Different concentrations of a doxorubicin (0.1; 0.3; 0.4; 0.5 μM); b cisplatin (2.5; 5.0; 10; 25; 50 μM); c 5-Fluouracyl (0.1; 1.0; 2.5; 5; 10 μM); d tamoxifen (2.5; 5; 7.5; 10 μM) and e irinotecan (10; 20; 40; 60 μM) were tested. Cell viability and affected fraction plots represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent replicates with five replicates
Fig. 3Effects of 1 on the cell viability of the MCF7 cell line. Different concentrations of 1 (40; 100; 200; 300 and 400 μM) were combined with the IC 50 of the chemotherapeutic agents a irinotecan, b tamoxifen, c cisplatin, d 5-Fluouracyl and e doxorubicin. Cell viability plots represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent replicates with five replicates
Fig. 4Effects of 2 on the cell viability of the MCF7 cell line. Different concentrations of 2 (0.5; 2; 3 and 4 μM) were combined with the IC50 of the chemotherapeutic agents a irinotecan, b tamoxifen, c cisplatin, d 5-Fluouracyl and e doxorubicin. Cell viability plots represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent replicates with five replicates
Fig. 5Effects of 1 on the Combination Index (CI) of drugs in MCF7 cell line. Compound 1 concentrations (40; 100; 200; 300 and 400 μM) were combined with the IC50 of the chemotherapeutic agents irinotecan a, tamoxifen b, cisplatin c, 5-Fluouracyl d and doxorubicin e. CI and the normalized isobolograms was calculated using the CompuSyn software, where: CI <1 synergism; CI = 1 additive effect; CI > 1 antagonistic effect
Fig. 6Effects of 2 on drug Combination Index (CI) of MCF7 cell line. The concentrations of 2 (0.5; 2; 3 and 4 μM) were combined with the IC 50 of the chemotherapeutic agents irinotecan a, tamoxifen b, cisplatin 5-Fluouracyl d and doxorubicin e. CI and the normalized isobolograms was calculated using the CompuSyn software, where: CI <1 synergism; CI = 1 additive effect; CI > 1 antagonistic effect
Mean and standard deviation of apoptotic MCF-7 cells after 4 and 24 h exposure at three concentrations of compound 1 (11,13-diidrozaluzanin C) and 2 (Gochnatiolide C) associated with doxorubicin
| Concentrations | Apoptosis Assay | Comparison between 4 and 24 h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean of apoptotic cells ± SD (4 h) | Mean of apoptotic cells ± SD (24 h) | ||
| Control | 4.00 ± 1.87a | 10.75 ± 2.86a |
|
| Doxorrubicin (D) - 0.3 μM | 33.25 ± 5.34b | 61.75 ± 10.82b | * |
| 11,13-diidrozaluzanin C (Compound 1) | |||
| Compound 1 – 14 μM | 16.00 ± 1.87c | 23.25 ± 3.83b | * |
| Compound 1–28 μM | 24.25 ± 5.71b,c | 33.5 ± 3.77c |
|
| Compound 1–56 μM | 21.5 ± 4.83b,c | 17.5 ± 2.95a |
|
| Compound 1–14 μM + D 0.3 μM | 47.00 ± 6.07b | 47.25 ± 5.21b |
|
| Compound1 - 28 μM+ D 0.3 μM | 39.75 ± 8.19b | 51.25 ± 10.2b |
|
| Compound1 - 56 μM + D 0.3 μM | 52.25 ± 9.8b | 31.5 ± 4.6c | * |
| Gochnatiolide C (Compound 2) | |||
| Compound 2–0.5 μM | 24.50 ± 2.69b | 40.00 ± 4.94c | * |
| Compound 2–1.0 μM | 41.75 ± 10.05b,c | 51.50 ± 7.69b |
|
| Compound 2–2.0 μM | 53.25 ± 6.13c | 60.25 ± 10.03b |
|
| Compound 2–0.5 μM + D 0.3 M | 31.25 ± 4.20b | 31.25 ± 5.76c |
|
| Compound 2–1.0 μM + D 0.3 μM | 40.00 ± 5.43b | 45.25 ± 4.14c |
|
| Compound 2–2.0 μM + D 0.3 μM | 46.25 ± 4.44b,c | 62.00 ± 7.51b | * |
Frequency of apoptotic cells after 4 and 24 h of test - free medium. SD: Standard Deviation. Compound 1 at concentrations of 14; 28 and 56 μM Compound 2 at concentrations of 0.5; 1.0 and 2.0 μM combined or not with doxorubicin IC 50 in MCF7 breast cancer cell line. We analyzed 100 cells, the data represent mean and standard deviation of the average of two independent replicates with two replicates. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences. The results were evaluated by NPAR1WAY/Wilkoxon. Significance * p <0.05
Effect of treatment with compound 1 (11,13-diidrozaluzanin C) and 2 (Gochnatiolide C) on the cell cycle in MCF-7 cells associated or not to Doxorubicin. Mean ± standard deviation and reduction ratio of mitotic activity of tested cells
| Concentrations | Frequency of cells in mitotic activity | MARR |
|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | ||
| Control | 77.5 ± 4.03a | - |
| Doxorrubicin (D) - 0.3 μM | 35.25 ± 4.5b | 2.19 |
| 11,13-diidrozaluzanin C (Compound 1) | ||
| Compound 1–28 μM | 47.5 ± 5.25c | 1.63 |
| Compound 1–28 μM+ D 0.3 μM | 42.5 ± 7.85b,c | 1.82 |
| Gochnatiolide C (Compound 2) | ||
| Compound 2–1.0 μM | 37.25 ± 3.09b | 2.08 |
| Compound 2–1.0 μM + D 0.3 μM | 28.5 ± 7.5b | 2.71 |
Frequency of cells in mitotic activity. Compound 1 at the concentration of 28 μM and compound 2 at the concentration of 1.0 μM combined or not with IC 50 of doxorubicin in MCF7 breast adenocarcinoma cells. SD: Standard Deviation. MARR - Mitotic Activity Reduction Ratio was obtained by calculating the ratio from the value of the control mean divided by the results obtained in the means of the tests. We analyzed 100 cells, the table represents mean and standard deviation of the mean of two independent replicates with two replicates. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences. The results were evaluated by NPAR1WAY/Wilkoxon. Significance * p <0.05