Literature DB >> 28662244

Association of Insurance and Community-Level Socioeconomic Status With Treatment and Outcome of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Pharynx.

Jacob Y Shin1, Ja Kyoung Yoon1, Aaron K Shin2, Philip Blumenfeld1, Miranda Mai1, Aidnag Z Diaz1.   

Abstract

Importance: Community-level socioeconomic status, particularly insurance status, is increasingly becoming important as a possible determinant in patient outcomes. Objective: To determine the association of insurance and community-level socioeconomic status with outcome for patients with pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Design, Setting, and Participants: This study extracted data from more than 1500 Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities collected in the National Cancer Database. A total of 35 559 patients diagnosed with SCC of the pharynx from 2004 through 2013 were identified. The χ2 test, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression models were used to analyze data from April 1, 2016, through April 16, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival was defined as time to death from the date of diagnosis.
Results: Among the 35 559 patients identified (75.6% men and 24.4% women; median age, 61 years [range, 18-90 years]), 15 146 (42.6%) had Medicare coverage; 13 061 (36.7%), private insurance; 4881 (13.7%), Medicaid coverage; and 2471 (6.9%), no insurance. Uninsured patients and Medicaid recipients were more likely to be younger, black, or Hispanic; to have lower median household income and lower educational attainment; to present with higher TNM stages of disease; and to start primary treatment at a later time from diagnosis. Those with private insurance (reference group) had significantly better overall survival than uninsured patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.59-1.87), Medicaid recipients (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.88-2.12), or Medicare recipients (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.99-2.16), as did those with median household income of at least $63 000 (reference) vs $48 000 to $62 999 (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.13-1.26), $38 000 to $47 999 (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.24-1.38), and less than $38 000 (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.43-1.59). On multivariable analysis, insurance status and median household income remained independent prognostic factors for overall survival even after accounting for educational attainment, race, Charlson/Deyo comorbidity score, disease site, and TNM stage of disease. Conclusions and Relevance: Insurance status and household income level are associated with outcome in patients with SCC of the pharynx. Those without insurance and with lower household income may significantly benefit from improving access to adequate, timely medical care. Additional investigations are necessary to develop targeted interventions to optimize access to standard medical treatments, adherence to physician management recommendations, and subsequently, prognosis in these patients at risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28662244      PMCID: PMC5710281          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  43 in total

1.  The interrelationship between income, health and employment status.

Authors:  K Stronks; H van de Mheen; J van den Bos; J P Mackenbach
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Adherence of low-income women to cancer screening recommendations.

Authors:  Ann S O'Malley; Christopher B Forrest; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Having Medicaid insurance negatively impacts outcomes in patients with head and neck malignancies.

Authors:  Arash O Naghavi; Michelle I Echevarria; G Daniel Grass; Tobin J Strom; Yazan A Abuodeh; Kamran A Ahmed; Youngchul Kim; Andy M Trotti; Louis B Harrison; Kosj Yamoah; Jimmy J Caudell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Health Insurance Affects Head and Neck Cancer Treatment Patterns and Outcomes.

Authors:  Gino Inverso; Brandon A Mahal; Ayal A Aizer; R Bruce Donoff; Sung-Kiang Chuang
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Socioeconomic indicators, tobacco and alcohol in the aetiology of digestive tract neoplasms.

Authors:  M Ferraroni; E Negri; C La Vecchia; B D'Avanzo; S Franceschi
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Socioeconomic status and comorbidity among newly diagnosed cancer patients.

Authors:  C T Schrijvers; J W Coebergh; J P Mackenbach
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The impact of health insurance status on the survival of patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Joseph Kwok; Scott M Langevin; Athanassios Argiris; Jennifer R Grandis; William E Gooding; Emanuela Taioli
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The effect of comorbidity on 3-year survival of women with primary breast cancer.

Authors:  W A Satariano; D R Ragland
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Alcohol, smoking, social and occupational factors in the aetiology of cancer of the oral cavity, pharynx and larynx.

Authors:  J M Elwood; J C Pearson; D H Skippen; S M Jackson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1984-11-15       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Effect of insurance status on the stage of breast and colorectal cancers in a safety-net hospital.

Authors:  Daniel T Farkas; Arieh Greenbaum; Vinay Singhal; John M Cosgrove
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Patterns and disparities of care in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Emily V Dressler; Meng Liu; Catherine R Garcia; Therese A Dolecek; Thomas Pittman; Bin Huang; John L Villano
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2018-05-22

2.  It's more than just cancer biology: Health disparities in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Patrick W Underwood; Andrea N Riner; Dan Neal; Miles E Cameron; Anastasiya Yakovenko; Sushanth Reddy; John Bart Rose; Steven J Hughes; Jose G Trevino
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 2.885

3.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Socioeconomic factors affect treatment delivery for patients with low grade glioma: a Swedish population-based study.

Authors:  Louise Carstam; Isabelle Rydén; Sasha Gulati; Bertil Rydenhag; Roger Henriksson; Øyvind Salvesen; Anja Smits; Asgeir Store Jakola
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.130

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.