Gino Inverso1, Brandon A Mahal2, Ayal A Aizer3, R Bruce Donoff4, Sung-Kiang Chuang5. 1. Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: gino.inverso@uphs.upenn.edu. 2. Resident, Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, MA. 3. Instructor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA. 4. Dean, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, and Walter C. Guralnick Distinguished Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. 5. Associate Professor, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, and Director, Center for Applied Clinical Investigation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of insurance coverage on stage of presentation, treatment, and survival of head and neck cancer (HNC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program to identify patients diagnosed with HNC. The primary variable of interest was insurance analyzed as a dichotomous variable: Patients were considered uninsured if they were classified as "uninsured" by SEER, whereas patients were considered insured if they were defined by SEER as "any Medicaid," "insured," or "insured/no specifics." The outcomes of interest were cancer stage at presentation (M0 vs M1), receipt of definitive treatment, and HNC-specific mortality (HNCSM). Multivariable logistic regression modeled the association between insurance status and stage at presentation, as well as between insurance status and receipt of definitive treatment, whereas HNCSM was modeled using Fine and Gray competing risks. Sensitivity logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether observed interactions remained significant by insurance type (privately insured, Medicaid, and uninsured). RESULTS: Patients without medical insurance were more likely to present with metastatic cancer (adjusted odds ratio, 1.60; P < .001), were more likely to not receive definitive treatment (adjusted odds ratio, 1.64; P < .001), and had a higher risk of HNCSM (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.20; P = .002). Sensitivity analyses showed that when results were stratified by insurance type, significant interactions remained for uninsured patients and patients with Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: Uninsured patients and patients with Medicaid are more likely to present with metastatic disease, are more likely to not be treated definitively, and are at a higher risk of HNCSM. The treatment gap between Medicaid and private insurance observed in this study should serve as an immediate policy target for health care reform.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of insurance coverage on stage of presentation, treatment, and survival of head and neck cancer (HNC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program to identify patients diagnosed with HNC. The primary variable of interest was insurance analyzed as a dichotomous variable: Patients were considered uninsured if they were classified as "uninsured" by SEER, whereas patients were considered insured if they were defined by SEER as "any Medicaid," "insured," or "insured/no specifics." The outcomes of interest were cancer stage at presentation (M0 vs M1), receipt of definitive treatment, and HNC-specific mortality (HNCSM). Multivariable logistic regression modeled the association between insurance status and stage at presentation, as well as between insurance status and receipt of definitive treatment, whereas HNCSM was modeled using Fine and Gray competing risks. Sensitivity logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether observed interactions remained significant by insurance type (privately insured, Medicaid, and uninsured). RESULTS:Patients without medical insurance were more likely to present with metastatic cancer (adjusted odds ratio, 1.60; P < .001), were more likely to not receive definitive treatment (adjusted odds ratio, 1.64; P < .001), and had a higher risk of HNCSM (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.20; P = .002). Sensitivity analyses showed that when results were stratified by insurance type, significant interactions remained for uninsured patients and patients with Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: Uninsured patients and patients with Medicaid are more likely to present with metastatic disease, are more likely to not be treated definitively, and are at a higher risk of HNCSM. The treatment gap between Medicaid and private insurance observed in this study should serve as an immediate policy target for health care reform.
Authors: Felix V Chen; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Feng Miao; Joshua S Jue; Mahmoud Alameddine; Devina J Dave; Sanoj Punnen; Dipen J Parekh; Chad R Ritch; Mark L Gonzalgo Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Jacob Y Shin; Ja Kyoung Yoon; Aaron K Shin; Philip Blumenfeld; Miranda Mai; Aidnag Z Diaz Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Ki-Tae Hwang; Young Wook Ju; Young A Kim; Jongjin Kim; Sohee Oh; Jiwoong Jung; Young Jun Chai; In Sil Choi; So Won Oh Journal: Ann Surg Treat Res Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 1.859
Authors: Eric Adjei Boakye; Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters; Betty Chen; Miao Cai; Betelihem B Tobo; Sai D Challapalli; Paula Buchanan; Jay F Piccirillo Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Richard B Cannon; Hailey M Shepherd; Hilary McCrary; Patrick S Carpenter; Luke O Buchmann; Jason P Hunt; Jeffrey J Houlton; Marcus M Monroe Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Helmneh M Sineshaw; Mark A Ellis; K Robin Yabroff; Xuesong Han; Ahmedin Jemal; Terry A Day; Evan M Graboyes Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Sean T Massa; Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters; Eric Adjei Boakye; Ronald J Walker; Gregory M Ward Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Wen-Wei Sung; Yong-Chen Hsu; Chen Dong; Ying-Ching Chen; Yu-Chi Chao; Chih-Jung Chen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 3.390