Literature DB >> 28662222

Use of Molecular Tools to Identify Patients With Indolent Breast Cancers With Ultralow Risk Over 2 Decades.

Laura J Esserman1, Christina Yau1,2, Carlie K Thompson1, Laura J van 't Veer1, Alexander D Borowsky3, Katherine A Hoadley4, Nicholas P Tobin5, Bo Nordenskjöld6,7, Tommy Fornander5, Olle Stål6,7, Christopher C Benz1,2, Linda S Lindström8.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The frequency of cancers with indolent behavior has increased with screening. Better tools to identify indolent tumors are needed to avoid overtreatment.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if a multigene classifier is associated with indolent behavior of invasive breast cancers in women followed for 2 decades. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of tamoxifen vs no systemic therapy, with more than 20-year follow-up. An indolent threshold (ultralow risk) of the US Food and Drug Administration-cleared MammaPrint 70-gene expression score was established above which no breast cancer deaths occurred after 15 years in the absence of systemic therapy. Immunohistochemical markers (n = 727 women) and Agilent microarrays, for MammaPrint risk scoring (n = 652 women), were performed from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumor blocks. Participants were postmenopausal women with clinically detected node-negative breast cancers treated with mastectomy or lumpectomy and radiation enrolled in the Stockholm tamoxifen (STO-3) trial, 1976 to 1990. EXPOSURES: After 2 years of tamoxifen vs no systemic therapy, regardless of hormone receptor status, patients without relapse who reconsented were further randomized to 3 additional years or none. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Breast cancer-specific survival assessed by Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox proportional hazard modeling, adjusted for treatment, patient age, year of diagnosis, tumor size, grade, hormone receptors, and ERBB2/HER2 and Ki67 status.
RESULTS: In this secondary analysis of node-negative postmenopausal women, conducted in the era before mammography screening, among the 652 women with MammaPrint scoring available (median age, 62.8 years of age), 377 (58%) and 275 (42%) were MammaPrint low and high risk, respectively, while 98 (15%) were ultralow risk. At 20 years, women with 70-gene high and low tumors but not ultralow tumors had a significantly higher risk of disease-specific death compared with ultralow-risk patients by Cox analysis (hazard ratios, 4.73 [95% CI, 1.38-16.22] and 4.54 [95% CI, 1.40-14.80], respectively). There were no deaths in the ultralow-risk tamoxifen-treated arm at 15 years, and these patients had a 20-year disease-specific survival rate of 97%, whereas for untreated patients the survival rate was 94%. Recursive partitioning identified ultralow risk as the most significant predictor of good outcome. In tumors "not ultralow risk," tumor size greater than 2 cm was the most predictive of outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The ultralow-risk threshold of the 70-gene MammaPrint assay can identify patients whose long-term systemic risk of death from breast cancer after surgery alone is exceedingly low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28662222      PMCID: PMC5710197          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  37 in total

1.  A diagnostic gene profile for molecular subtyping of breast cancer associated with treatment response.

Authors:  Oscar Krijgsman; Paul Roepman; Wilbert Zwart; Jason S Carroll; Sun Tian; Femke A de Snoo; Richard A Bender; Rene Bernards; Annuska M Glas
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Breast-conserving surgery with or without irradiation in women aged 65 years or older with early breast cancer (PRIME II): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ian H Kunkler; Linda J Williams; Wilma J L Jack; David A Cameron; J Michael Dixon
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Biologic markers determine both the risk and the timing of recurrence in breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman; Dan H Moore; Pamela J Tsing; Philip W Chu; Christina Yau; Elissa Ozanne; Robert E Chung; Vickram J Tandon; John W Park; Frederick L Baehner; Stig Kreps; Andrew N J Tutt; Cheryl E Gillett; Christopher C Benz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Impact of mammographic screening on the detection of good and poor prognosis breast cancers.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman; Yiwey Shieh; Emiel J T Rutgers; Michael Knauer; Valesca P Retèl; Stella Mook; Annuska M Glas; Dan H Moore; Sabine Linn; Flora E van Leeuwen; Laura J van 't Veer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Recurrence and mortality dynamics for breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy according to estrogen receptor status: different mortality but similar recurrence.

Authors:  Romano Demicheli; Elia Biganzoli; Ilaria Ardoino; Patrizia Boracchi; Danila Coradini; Marco Greco; Angela Moliterni; Milvia Zambetti; Pinuccia Valagussa; Isaac D Gukas; Gianni Bonadonna
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 6.716

6.  Long-term follow-up of the randomized Stockholm trial on adjuvant tamoxifen among postmenopausal patients with early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Lars E Rutqvist; Hemming Johansson
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Population differences in breast cancer: survey in indigenous African women reveals over-representation of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Dezheng Huo; Francis Ikpatt; Andrey Khramtsov; Jean-Marie Dangou; Rita Nanda; James Dignam; Bifeng Zhang; Tatyana Grushko; Chunling Zhang; Olayiwola Oluwasola; David Malaka; Sani Malami; Abayomi Odetunde; Adewumi O Adeoye; Festus Iyare; Adeyinka Falusi; Charles M Perou; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes.

Authors:  Joel S Parker; Michael Mullins; Maggie C U Cheang; Samuel Leung; David Voduc; Tammi Vickery; Sherri Davies; Christiane Fauron; Xiaping He; Zhiyuan Hu; John F Quackenbush; Inge J Stijleman; Juan Palazzo; J S Marron; Andrew B Nobel; Elaine Mardis; Torsten O Nielsen; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou; Philip S Bernard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  A breast cancer gene signature for indolent disease.

Authors:  Leonie J M J Delahaye; Caroline A Drukker; Christa Dreezen; Anke Witteveen; Bob Chan; Mireille Snel; Inès J Beumer; Rene Bernards; M William Audeh; Laura J Van't Veer; Annuska M Glas
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  29 in total

1.  Breast cancer: Profiling of ultra-low-risk disease.

Authors:  David Killock
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  We need more evidence to answer questions about screening.

Authors:  Laura Esserman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Systems Biology and Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Jennifer A Schaub; Habib Hamidi; Lalita Subramanian; Matthias Kretzler
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  Luminal A Breast Cancer and Molecular Assays: A Review.

Authors:  Jennifer J Gao; Sandra M Swain
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-02-22

Review 5.  Cancer overdiagnosis: a biological challenge and clinical dilemma.

Authors:  Sudhir Srivastava; Eugene J Koay; Alexander D Borowsky; Angelo M De Marzo; Sharmistha Ghosh; Paul D Wagner; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Association of 70-Gene Signature Assay Findings With Physicians' Treatment Guidance for Patients With Early Breast Cancer Classified as Intermediate Risk by the 21-Gene Assay.

Authors:  Michaela Tsai; Shelly Lo; William Audeh; Rubina Qamar; Raye Budway; Ellis Levine; Pat Whitworth; Blanche Mavromatis; Robin Zon; Dwight Oldham; Sarah Untch; Tina Treece; Lisa Blumencranz; Hatem Soliman
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Error in Figure and Methods Section.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-03-06

9.  Proteomics provides individualized options of precision medicine for patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Wenwen Huang; Dongdong Zhan; Yazhuo Li; Nairen Zheng; Xin Wei; Bin Bai; Kecheng Zhang; Mingwei Liu; Xuefei Zhao; Xiaotian Ni; Xia Xia; Jinwen Shi; Cheng Zhang; Zhihao Lu; Jiafu Ji; Juan Wang; Shiqi Wang; Gang Ji; Jipeng Li; Yongzhan Nie; Wenquan Liang; Xiaosong Wu; Jianxin Cui; Yongsheng Meng; Feilin Cao; Tieliu Shi; Weimin Zhu; Yi Wang; Lin Chen; Qingchuan Zhao; Hongwei Wang; Lin Shen; Jun Qin
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 6.038

10.  Assessment of 25-Year Survival of Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive/ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer Treated With and Without Tamoxifen Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the Stockholm Tamoxifen Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Huma Dar; Annelie Johansson; Anna Nordenskjöld; Adina Iftimi; Christina Yau; Gizeh Perez-Tenorio; Christopher Benz; Bo Nordenskjöld; Olle Stål; Laura J Esserman; Tommy Fornander; Linda S Lindström
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.