Literature DB >> 28660812

Sex differences in the splenic flexure.

A F Brookes1, Caw Macano1, T Stone2, M Cheetham2, L Meecham1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Anecdotally, surgeons claim splenic flexure mobilisation is more difficult in male patients. There have been no scientific studies to confirm or disprove this hypothesis. The implications in colorectal surgery could be profound. The aim of this study was to assess quantitatively whether there is an anatomical difference in the position of the splenic flexure between men and women using computed tomography (CT). METHODS Portal venous phase CT performed for preoperative assessment of colorectal malignancy was analysed using the hospital picture archiving and communication system. The splenic flexure was compared between men and women using two variables: anatomical height corresponding to the adjacent vertebral level (converted to ordinal values between 1 and 17) and distance from the midline. RESULTS In total, 100 CT images were analysed. Sex distribution was even. The mean ages of the male and female patients were 68.1 years and 66.7 years respectively (p=0.630). The mean vertebral level for men was 8.88, equating to the inferior half of the T11 vertebral body (range: 1-17 [superior half of T9 to inferior half of L2]), and 11.36 for women, equating to the inferior half of the T12 vertebral body (range: 4-16 [superior half of T10 to superior half of L2]). This difference was statistically significant (p=0.0001) and is equivalent to one whole vertebra. The mean distance from the midline was 160.8mm (range: 124-203mm) for men and 138.2mm (range: 107-185mm) for women (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The splenic flexure is both higher and further from the midline in men than in women. This provides one theory as to why mobilising the splenic flexure may be more difficult in male patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon; Spleen; Splenic flexure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28660812      PMCID: PMC5696973          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  10 in total

1.  Computed tomography of the abdomen: initial experience.

Authors:  J P Petasnick; J W Clark
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1976-11-30

2.  Laparoscopic splenic flexure mobilization during low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a high-level component of surgeon's armamentarium.

Authors:  W-J Meng; Z-Q Wang; Z-G Zhou
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Preoperative evaluation of renal artery anatomy using computed tomography angiography to guide the superselective clamping of renal arterial branches during a laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Xiangjun Meng; Qiwu Mi; Shaowei Fang; Weide Zhong
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  An analysis of the accuracy of computed tomography colonography when defining anatomy for novel full-thickness colonic excision techniques in early colonic neoplasia.

Authors:  A C Currie; D Burling; E Mainta; R Ilangovan; M Moorghen; P Lung; O Faiz; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Factors affecting difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masatoshi Oya; Masashi Ueno; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Anatomical siting of the splenic flexure using computed tomography.

Authors:  L Meecham; A Brookes; Caw Macano; T Stone; M Cheetham
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  The use of pre-operative computed tomography in the assessment of the acute abdomen.

Authors:  J Weir-McCall; A Shaw; A Arya; A Knight; D C Howlett
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Computed tomography of the abdomen.

Authors:  W A Rubenstein; Y H Auh; E Kazam
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  1984

Review 9.  Computed tomographic axial, coronal, and sagittal normal abdominal anatomy.

Authors:  J C Wandtke; D J Hamlin; F P Gibbs
Journal:  Crit Rev Diagn Imaging       Date:  1980

10.  Risk factors for splenic injury during colectomy: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Wang; Stefan D Holubar; Bruce G Wolff; Barbara Follestad; Megan M O'Byrne; Rui Qin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.352

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Solve study: a study to capture global variations in practices concerning laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Matta Kuzman; Khalid Munir Bhatti; Islam Omar; Hany Khalil; Wah Yang; Prem Thambi; Nader Helmy; Amir Botros; Thomas Kidd; Siobhan McKay; Altaf Awan; Mark Taylor; Kamal Mahawar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Classification of the colonic splenic flexure based on three-dimensional CT analysis.

Authors:  K Kawai; H Nozawa; K Hata; T Tanaka; T Nishikawa; K Sasaki; S Ishihara
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-01-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.