Literature DB >> 27659370

Anatomical siting of the splenic flexure using computed tomography.

L Meecham1, A Brookes1, Caw Macano1, T Stone1, M Cheetham1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Often, left-sided colorectal surgery requires splenic flexure mobilisation (SFM) to allow a tension-free anastomosis to be carried out. This step is difficult and not without risk. We investigated a system of anatomical siting of the splenic flexure using computed tomography (CT). METHODS The Shrewsbury Splenic Flexure Siting (SSFS) system involves siting of the splenic flexure using the vertebral level (VL) as a reference point. We asked three surgical registrars (SRs) to analyse 20 CT scans of patients undergoing colonic resection to ascertain the anatomical site of the splenic flexure using the SSFS system. The distance from the centre of the vertebral body to the lateral edge (CVBL) of the splenic flexure was measured, as was the distance from the centre of the vertebral body to the inner abdominal wall (CVBI) along the same line, on axial images. RESULTS VL assessment demonstrated substantial inter-observer agreement with a kappa (κ) value of 0.742 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.463-0.890). CVBL and CVBI demonstrated very strong inter-observer agreement (CVBL: κ = 0.905 (95% CI, 0.785-0.961); CVBI: 0.951 (0.890-0.979) (p<0.001). Overall, there was strong correlation between assessments by all three SRs across the three variables measured. CONCLUSIONS The SSFS system is an accurate method to site the splenic flexure anatomically using CT. We can use the SSFS system to develop a validated scoring system to help colorectal surgeons assess the difficulty of SFM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal surgery; Computed tomography; Splenic flexure; Vertebral level

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27659370      PMCID: PMC5450272          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  6 in total

1.  Laparoscopic splenic flexure mobilization during low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a high-level component of surgeon's armamentarium.

Authors:  W-J Meng; Z-Q Wang; Z-G Zhou
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Factors affecting difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masatoshi Oya; Masashi Ueno; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is associated with a higher intraoperative complication rate than open surgery.

Authors:  Tarik Sammour; Arman Kahokehr; Sanket Srinivasa; Ian P Bissett; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Risk factors for splenic injury during colectomy: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Wang; Stefan D Holubar; Bruce G Wolff; Barbara Follestad; Megan M O'Byrne; Rui Qin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Comparison of iatrogenic splenectomy during open and laparoscopic colon resection.

Authors:  Marcus M Malek; Alexander J Greenstein; Edward H Chin; Scott Q Nguyen; Adam L Sandler; Ray K Wong; John C Byrn; Lester B Katz; Celia M Divino
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.719

6.  How much colonic redundancy could be obtained by splenic flexure mobilization in laparoscopic anterior or low anterior resection?

Authors:  Bong-Hyeon Kye; Hyung-Jin Kim; Hyun-Sil Kim; Jun-Gi Kim; Hyeon-Min Cho
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.738

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Sex differences in the splenic flexure.

Authors:  A F Brookes; Caw Macano; T Stone; M Cheetham; L Meecham
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.891

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.