| Literature DB >> 28660091 |
Baran Komur1, Yener Akyuva2, Numan Karaslan3, Mehmet Isyar4, Seyit Ali Gumustas5, Ibrahim Yilmaz6, Semih Akkaya7, Duygu Yasar Sirin8, Cagri Ata Mutlu9, Ahmet Guray Batmaz10, Olcay Guler11, Mahir Mahirogullari10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Use of biodegradable and biocompatible materials in the orthopedic surgery is gaining popularity. In this research, the rate of controlled release of a bilayered prototype biomaterial designed to promote osteoblastic and tenoblastic activity was calculated using pharmacochemical methods.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28660091 PMCID: PMC5474233 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7457865
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm (Cairo) ISSN: 2090-9918
Figure 1(a) Coronal MRI view of shoulder. (b) Arthroscopic view of shoulder. (c) X-rays of patients that have grade-IV gonarthrosis. (d) A view of knee arthroplasty surgery.
Figure 2Illustration of biodegradation of bilayered drug delivery system.
Figure 3Illustration of representation BMPs application with hydrogel delivery system showing controlled released BMPs migrating from upper chamber to lower chamber through porous filter.
Figure 4(a) Swelling balance of hydrogel. (b) Expression of absorbance type into amount of released growth factors to loaded design against time. (c) Evaluation of the surface morphology of the hydrogel by ESEM. The images were recorded at a pressure of 219–231 Pa in ESEM vacuum mode, at 1000x–10.000x magnification and 82,9 μm resolution depths (HFW), at an operating voltage of 5.00 kV, and at a working distance of 9,4–10,7 mm.
Figure 5Inverted light microscope and microvisualization of ESEM with cell culture samples and pericellular structures. The images were recorded at a pressure of 219–231 Pa in ESEM vacuum mode, at 1000x–10.000x magnification and 82,9 μm resolution depths (HFW), at an operating voltage of 5.00 kV, and at a working distance of 9,4–10,7 mm.
Figure 6Level of ALP expressed of absorbance type against time.
Statistical analyses; Tukey pairwise comparisons for MTT cell viability, toxicity, and proliferation (OD. 540 nm absorbance).
| Time (day) | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0,368 (F) | 0,367 (F) | 0,276 (F) | 0,279 (F) | <0.01 |
| 7 | 0,412 (E) | 0,517 (D) | 0,396 (E) | 0,594 (D) | <0.01 |
| 14 | 0,615 (C) | 1,968 (A) | 0,589 (D) | 0,783 (B) | <0.01 |
| 21 | 0,917 (B) | 2,042 (A) | 0,675 (C) | 1,173 (A) | <0.01 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA); ¥: post hoc Tukey HSD test (Grouping information using the Tukey method and 95% confidence interval).