| Literature DB >> 28660022 |
Rana A Bilbeisi1, Thirumurugan Prakasam1, Matteo Lusi1, Roberto El Khoury1, Carlos Platas-Iglesias2, Loïc J Charbonnière3, John-Carl Olsen4, Mourad Elhabiri5, Ali Trabolsi1.
Abstract
Two synthetic approaches-temperature variation and anion templation-allowed for the selective formation of a [2]catenane ([2]C4+ ) or a trefoil knot (TK6+ ), or for the enhanced formation of a Solomon link (SL8+ ), all from a simple set of starting materials (Zn(ii) acetate, diformylpyridine (DFP) and a diamino-2,2'-bipyridine (DAB)) in mixed aqueous solutions. The catenane formed exclusively at 90 °C in a 1 : 1 mixed solvent of D2O and MeOD. In the presence of bromide ion as template, TK6+ formed exclusively at 50 °C in the same solvent. In the solid state, TK6+ hosts two bromide ions in its central cavity by forming six Csp2 -H hydrogen bonds. In D2O, TK6+ , which was originally prepared as a trifluoroacetate (TFA) salt, was found to exchange two TFA counterions for two monovalent anions of different sizes and shapes, which lodged within the knot's central cavity. In contrast to bromide, the larger triflate anion (CF3SO3-) promoted the formation of SL8+ , which was characterized by 1H NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. Two dimensional heteronuclear 19F-1H-HOSEY NMR experiments detected CH···F interactions inside the cavity of SL8+ . Thus, the product distribution of this dynamic link forming system is sensitive to temperature and the size and shape of the anion template, and one of the products, TK6+ , is capable of binding a variety of monovalent anions in D2O with high affinity (with log β2 values of 4 to 6 being typical).Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28660022 PMCID: PMC5477011 DOI: 10.1039/c5sc04246a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Fig. 1Single crystal structure of the Zn(ii)-based trefoil knot. (a) Molecular structure of TK. (b) Space-filling (top) and stick-figure (bottom) views of [TK(TFA). (c) Crystal packing of [TK(TFA) and the adduct [ZnBr(CF.
Fig. 3Measurement of the bromide ion binding constants of TK complexes by titration. (a) Computed B3LYP/6-31G(d) electrostatic potential of TK on the molecular surface defined by the 0.001 electrons bohr–3 contour of the electron density (b) schematic representation of bromide ion binding. (c) Stacked plots of 1H NMR (600 MHz, 298 K) spectra of 1.87 mM solutions of TK in D2O titrated with, bottom to top, increasing amounts of tetrabutylammonium bromide. (d) Binding isotherm obtained by plotting Hj signal shift versus bromide ion concentration. In most cases, addition of more than two equivalents of anion precipitated the knot and prevented further measurements.
Fig. 2Top and side views of PM6-optimized geometries of host guest complexes involving TK and, from left to right, SCN–, NO3– and BF4–.
Successive (K1 and K2) and global (log β2) binding constants determined from 1H titrations of TK with monovalent anions at room temperature in D2O. Binding constants were deduced from 1H chemical shifts measured as a function of anion concentration. Hj protons were monitored in all cases except the BF4– titration, for which the Hh protons were monitored. Standard deviations are shown in parentheses
| Anion |
|
| log |
|
| Br– | 4.4(0.5) × 102 | 2.3(0.3) × 103 | 6.0 | 5.2(0.8) |
| I– | 6.5(0.6) × 102 | 2.2(0.3) × 103 | 6.15 | 3.3(0.6) |
| N3– | 9.8(1.7) × 102 | 9.3(7.8) × 102 | 5.96 | 1.0(0.8) |
| SCN– | 1.5(0.3) × 102 | 3.4(2.0) × 103 | 5.72 | 22.5(2.5) |
| NO3– | 5.2(0.2) × 102 | 6.7(2.5) × 101 | 4.54 | 0.13(0.05) |
| BF4– | 1.0(0.2) × 103 | 2.2(0.7) × 102 | 5.34 | 0.21(0.08) |
Fig. 4NMR spectroscopic evidence for the formation of SL. (a) 1H NMR, (b) DOSY and (c) HOESY spectra of a solution (MeOD : D2O : CD3CN, 1 : 1 : 1) of [2]C, TK and [SL(OTf)] at 500 MHz and 298 K.