The binding of Zn(II) cations to a pentafoil (51) knotted ligand allows the synthesis of otherwise inaccessible metalated molecular pentafoil knots via transmetalation, affording the corresponding "first-sphere" coordination Co(II), Ni(II), and Cu(II) pentanuclear knots in good yields (≥85%). Each of the knot complexes was characterized by mass spectrometry, the diamagnetic (zinc) knot complex was characterized by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy, and the zinc, cobalt, and nickel pentafoil knots afforded single crystals whose structures were determined by X-ray crystallography. Lehn-type circular helicates generally only form with tris-bipy ligand strands and Fe(II) (and, in some cases, Ni(II) and Zn(II)) salts, so such architectures become accessible for other metal cations only through the use of knotted ligands. The different metalated knots all exhibit "second-sphere" coordination of a single chloride ion within the central cavity of the knot through CH···Cl- hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions. The chloride binding affinities were determined in MeCN by isothermal titration calorimetry, and the strength of binding was shown to vary over 3 orders of magnitude for the different metal-ion-knotted-ligand second-sphere coordination complexes.
The binding of Zn(II)cations to a pentafoil (51) knotted ligand allows the synthesis of otherwise inaccessible metalated molecular pentafoil knots via transmetalation, affording the corresponding "first-sphere" coordination Co(II), Ni(II), and Cu(II) pentanuclear knots in good yields (≥85%). Each of the knot complexes was characterized by mass spectrometry, the diamagnetic (zinc) knot complex was characterized by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy, and the zinc, cobalt, and nickel pentafoil knots afforded single crystals whose structures were determined by X-ray crystallography. Lehn-type circular helicates generally only form with tris-bipy ligand strands and Fe(II) (and, in some cases, Ni(II) and Zn(II))salts, so such architectures become accessible for other metalcations only through the use of knotted ligands. The different metalated knots all exhibit "second-sphere" coordination of a single chloride ion within the central cavity of the knot through CH···Cl- hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions. The chloride binding affinities were determined in MeCN by isothermal titration calorimetry, and the strength of binding was shown to vary over 3 orders of magnitude for the different metal-ion-knotted-ligand second-sphere coordination complexes.
Molecular knots and
entanglements occur in DNA,[1] some proteins,[2] and form spontaneously
in polymerchains[3] of sufficient length
and flexibility.[4] Synthetic routes to several
small-molecule knots have been developed,[5,6] or
serendipitously discovered,[7] and physical
and chemical consequences of knotting have been demonstrated,[4] including anion binding,[7h,8] asymmetric,[9] and allosteric regulation[10] of catalysis, and the securing of a threaded structure
by the increase in steric bulk that accompanies tying a knot in a
molecular strand.[11] However, despite metal
template synthesis being a common route to molecular knots,[4a,4c,4f,4h,5a,5c−5k,7d,8] effects
on metal-ion coordination induced by knotting of the ligand strand
have rarely[10,12] been described.We recently
reported that a pentafoil (51) knot could
be prepared by ring-closing olefin metathesis (RCM) of a pentamericcircular Fe(II)5-helicate.[10] The framework of this 51 knot contains only kinetically
robust covalent bonds, and so, unlike previous examples,[5e,5f] the metal ions can be removed from a molecular pentafoil knot without
destroying the knot topology. Direct remetalation of the knotted ligand
proved only possible with Zn(II)cations, presumably because the coordination
dynamics of other metal(II)cations is too slow to allow “mistakes”
regarding which bipyridine moieties coordinate to which metal ion
to be corrected. However, complexation of the five Zn(II)cations
holds the knotted ligand in the conformation necessary to bind to
five metal ions. We reasoned that this might enable sequential substitution
of other metal(II)cations[12] for Zn(II)
without permitting the knotted ligand to adopt conformations that
can bind to incoming metal ions through “wrong” combinations
of bipyridine units.[13] Here, we show that
this enables the efficient synthesis of the otherwise inaccessible
Co(II), Ni(II), and Cu(II)metalated knots, enabling the exploration
of the coordination chemistry of the knotted ligand. The unknotted
ligand monomer only forms circular helicates with Fe(II) and Zn(II),[10] and so the transmetalation strategy, and resulting
breadth of coordination chemistry, is only achievable with a knotted
ligand.
Results and Discussion
Direct Metalation of Knotted Ligand 1
The coordination chemistry of pentafoil knot 1 was investigated
by first probing the rate of metalation of 1 with different
zinc(II) salts (Scheme , steps a,b). The rate and efficiency of introduction of the zinc(II)
ions proved to be highly dependent on the salt used (Table ). Treatment of 1 with Zn(BF4)2 in MeOH/CH2Cl2 (most conveniently followed using deuterated solvents) generated
[Zn51·Cl](BF4)9 in 98% yield after 2 h at 40 °C followed by work-up with 1
equiv of Bu4NCl (Table , entry 1). Introducing the metal ions with Zn(CF3SO3)2 proved more sluggish, resulting
in a 44% yield of [Zn51·Cl](CF3SO3)9 after 16 h and work-up (Table , entry 2). However, treatment
of 1 with ZnCl2 afforded [Zn51·Cl](BF4)9 quantitatively in less
than 5 min at room temperature, followed by exchange of the nine noncavity
bound Cl– anions for BF4– for solubility reasons (Table , entry 3).
Scheme 1
Metallation of Knotted Ligand 1 To Generate the Corresponding
M(II)5–1 Knot Complexes
Reagents and conditions: (a)
ZnCl2, dichloromethane/methanol (1:1), room temperature,
<5 min; (b) saturated NH4BF4 (quantitative
yield over two steps); (c) M(BF4)2 (M = Fe(II),
Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II)), acetonitrile/methanol (10:1), 80 °C,
2–4 days; (d) NBu4Cl 1 equiv per metalated pentafoil
knot (94% [Fe51·Cl](BF4)9, 92% [Co51·Cl](BF4)9, 88% [Ni51·Cl](BF4)9, 85% [Cu51·Cl](BF4)9).
Table 1
Synthesis
of [Zn51·Cl]9+ from 1 with Various Zinc
Salts
entry
Zn salts
solvent
temp (°C)
time (h)
yield (%)
1
Zn(BF4)2
MeOH/CH2Cl2
40
2
98a
2
Zn(CF3SO3)2
MeOH/CH2Cl2
40
16
44a
3
ZnCl2
MeOH/CH2Cl2
rt
<5 min
quant.b
After workup with 1 equiv of Bu4NCl.
After anion exchange with KBF4.
Metallation of Knotted Ligand 1 To Generate the Corresponding
M(II)5–1 Knot Complexes
Reagents and conditions: (a)
ZnCl2, dichloromethane/methanol (1:1), room temperature,
<5 min; (b) saturated NH4BF4 (quantitative
yield over two steps); (c) M(BF4)2 (M = Fe(II),
Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II)), acetonitrile/methanol (10:1), 80 °C,
2–4 days; (d) NBu4Cl 1 equiv per metalated pentafoil
knot (94% [Fe51·Cl](BF4)9, 92% [Co51·Cl](BF4)9, 88% [Ni51·Cl](BF4)9, 85% [Cu51·Cl](BF4)9).After workup with 1 equiv of Bu4NCl.After anion exchange with KBF4.The X-ray crystal structure of [Zn51·Cl](PF6)9 features
a chloride anion tightly bound in the
central cavity as a consequence of electrostatic interactions and
10 CH···Cl– hydrogen bonds (Figure c and f).[10] Given the very different rates of metalation
with the different zinc salts, it seems likely that halide binding
in the central cavity plays a significant role in facilitating the
metalation of the knotted ligand, encouraging rapid rearrangement
of wrongly coordinated bipyridine residues. In the 1H NMR
spectrum of the titration of ZnCl2 into knot 1, free ligand and [Zn51·Cl]9+ signals dominate. Asymmetric species, that is, partially metalated
pentafoil knots [Zn1–41·Cl]1–7+, are only present in very minor amounts (Figure S13). Coordination of the first zinccations
to the knotted ligand appears to preorganize the remaining empty coordination
pockets, expediting the subsequent coordination events.
Figure 2
X-ray crystal structures of [Co51·Cl](BF4)9, [Ni51·Cl](BF4)9, and [Zn51·Cl](BF4)9. (a–c) Views from above
the central cavity,
(d–f) views in the plane of the metalated knots: (a,d) [Co51·Cl](BF4)9, (b,e)
[Ni51·Cl](BF4)9, and (c,f) [Zn51·Cl](BF4)9. In each structure, carbon atoms are light gray (except
for one building block strand in which the C atoms are colored turquoise);
N, blue; Co, teal; Ni, dark green; Zn, deep blue; the central chloride
ion is shown at 99% van der Waals radius as a green sphere. Other
anions, residual solvent molecules, and hydrogen atoms are omitted
for clarity.
In contrast
to the complexation of the knotted ligand with Zn(II),
direct metalation of 1 with some other first row transition
metal salts (Fe(II), Co(II), Ni(II), or Cu(II)) failed to generate
isolable quantities of fully metalated knots, even over extended reaction
times (up to 60 h) at elevated temperatures (up to 80 °C).[14] Rather than start from metal-free ligand 1, we reasoned that as the Zn(II)cations in [Zn51·Cl](BF4)9 organize the
binding sites of 1 in the correct arrangement, the labile
Zn(II) ions of that complex might be exchanged for a less labile metal
(introduced in large excess) in a stepwise process. Such stepwise
transmetalation could allow the knotted ligand to retain the relative
positions of its bipyridinechelating groups as the metals are successively
exchanged, and hence reduce the degree of ligand strand rearrangement
required.
Transmetalation of [Zn51·Cl](BF4)9
The Zn5-pentafoil knot complex
[Zn51·Cl](BF4)9 was treated with a 20-fold excess of Fe(BF4)2 in CH3CN:CH3OH (1:0.1), and heated to 80 °C
(Scheme , steps c,d).
After 24 h, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI–MS)
indicated almost complete conversion to a mixture of [Fe51·Cl](BF4)9 and [Fe51](BF4)10, with a small quantity
of [ZnFe41·Cl](BF4)9 and [ZnFe41](BF4)10 also present. To ensure full exchange of Zn(II) for Fe(II) in the
knot, a further 20-fold excess of Fe(BF4)2 was
added, and heating continued for another 24 h. After this time, the
addition of 1 equiv of NBu4Cl with respect to [Fe51]10+ (to avoid having a mixture of anions
in the knot coordination complex) afforded [Fe51·Cl](BF4)9 as a red-purple solid. High-resolution
(HR) ESI–MS (Figure S5) and 1H NMR spectroscopy (Figure S11)
confirmed the product composition.1H NMR (Figure S14) and ESI–MS (Table and Figures S15–18) monitoring of the transmetalation process were
consistent with the stepwise replacement of the Zn(II)cations in
the knot. 1H NMR shows the signals corresponding to [Zn51·Cl](BF4)9 broadening
after addition of Fe(BF4)2(H2O)6 and their intensity decreasing. Concomitantly, signals corresponding
to [Fe51·Cl](BF4)9 emerge.
Table 2
ESI–MS Characterization of
[Zn51](BF4)10 Treated
with 10 equiv of Fe(BF4)2
4+ charged
species
5+ charged species
6+ charged species
7+ charged species
pentafoil
knot intermediates
calcd
obsd
calcd
obsd
calcd
obsd
calcd
obsd
{[Zn4Fe11·Cl](BF4)9-nBF4}n+
1137.77
892.85
892.50
729.57
729.50
612.95
613.00
{[Zn3Fe21·Cl](BF4)9-nBF4}n+
1135.38
1136.08
890.94
890.92
727.98
728.00
611.59
610.92
{[Zn2Fe31·Cl](BF4)9-nBF4}n+
1133.00
889.04
888.80
726.40
726.61
610.22
610.71
{[Zn1Fe41·Cl](BF4)9-nBF4}n+
1130.62
1130.67
887.13
887.08
724.81
724.83
608.86
608.83
Upon addition of 10 equiv of Fe(BF4)2(H2O)6 to an acetonitrile solution of
[Zn51·Cl](BF4)9, aliquots were
analyzed every hour by ESI–MS (Table , Figures S15–18), and the evolution of hetero penta-metalated knots {[Zn4Fe1·Cl](BF4)9–}, {[Zn3Fe21·Cl](BF4)9–}, {[Zn2Fe31·Cl](BF4)9–}, and {[ZnFe41·Cl](BF4)9–} followed. No species featuring
four or less metal ions were detected. The results are consistent
with a stepwise transmetalation process where one zinccation is substituted
by an ironcenter at a time without the need for major reorganization
of the knotted ligand.[15]In analogous
fashion, knots [Co51·Cl](BF4)9, [Ni51·Cl](BF4)9, and [Cu51·Cl](BF4)9 were formed by the transmetalation of [Zn51·Cl](BF4)9 with the
respective metal tetrafluoroborate salts, followed by work-up with
1 equiv of Bu4NCl (Scheme , steps c,d). Longer reaction times were required for
the complete exchange with Zn(II) in the order: Co(BF4)2 (2 days) < Ni(BF4)2 ≈ Cu(BF4)2 (4 days). Reaction progress was monitored by
mass spectrometry until no heterometallic species were detected. The
paramagnetic nature of Co(II), Ni(II), and Cu(II) precluded obtaining
structural information for those pentametallic knots by NMR spectroscopy,
but ESI–MS confirmed the isolation of homometalliccoordination
complexes (e.g., Figure and Figures S4–10). The mass spectrometry
results show selective association of each metalated knot with a single
chloride anion. The UV–vis spectra of the Fe(II), Zn(II) Co(II),
Ni(II), and Cu(II) knot complexes are similar to those of the known
Fe(II), Zn(II), Co(II), Ni(II), and Cu(II) [M(5,5′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipy)3]2+ complexes (Figures S25–S29).
Figure 1
(a) Low-resolution ESI–MS of pentafoil knot [Cu51·Cl](BF4)9. Calculated peaks
(m/z): 1138.1 [M – 4BF4]4+; 893.1 [M – 5BF4]5+; 729.7 [M – 6BF4]6+; 613.2 [M –
7BF4]7+; 525.4 [M – 8BF4]8+. The minor peaks observed at m/z = 532.1, 620.3, 738.4, 903.2, and 1150.5 are corresponding
to the {[Cu51](BF4)10-nBF4} species
and mainly originated from exchanges of cavity chloride and tetrafluoroborate
anions. (b) High-resolution ESI–MS of the [M – 7BF4]7+ peak of [Cu51·Cl](BF4)9. Experimental spectrum (top) and calculated
spectrum (bottom).
(a) Low-resolution ESI–MS of pentafoil knot [Cu51·Cl](BF4)9. Calculated peaks
(m/z): 1138.1 [M – 4BF4]4+; 893.1 [M – 5BF4]5+; 729.7 [M – 6BF4]6+; 613.2 [M –
7BF4]7+; 525.4 [M – 8BF4]8+. The minor peaks observed at m/z = 532.1, 620.3, 738.4, 903.2, and 1150.5 are corresponding
to the {[Cu51](BF4)10-nBF4} species
and mainly originated from exchanges of cavity chloride and tetrafluoroborate
anions. (b) High-resolution ESI–MS of the [M – 7BF4]7+ peak of [Cu51·Cl](BF4)9. Experimental spectrum (top) and calculated
spectrum (bottom).
X-ray Crystal Structures
of Metalated Pentafoil Knots
Slow diffusion of diisopropylether
or toluene into a concentrated
acetonitrile solution of [M51·Cl](BF4)9 (M = Co, Zn, or Ni) afforded crystals of suitable
quality for X-ray diffraction on beamline I19 at the Diamond light
Source (UK). The three crystal structures are broadly similar (Figure ) but with slightly different conformations of the knotted
ligand to accommodate the different sized metal ions. In each structure,
the 190-atom-long pentafoil knotted ligand wraps around each of the
metal ions in a closed loop double helicate. Five of the 15 bipyridine
groups form an inner cavity lined with 10 electron-poor hydrogen atoms
that form an array of hydrogen bonds with the chloride anion located
inside the cavity (CH···Cl– distances
given in Table ).
The cavity diameters vary depending on the metalcation: Fe(II), Zn(II),
and Ni(II), 3.3(1) Å cavities; Co(II), 3.5(1) Å. The cobalt
pentafoil knot dimensions are also more distorted from that of a regular
pentagon than the other metalated knots: standard deviations of the
metal–metal distances 0.6 Å for the cobalt knot as compared
to 0.1, 0.1, and 0.2 Å in the iron, nickel, and zinccomplexes,
respectively; standard deviations of the metal–metal–metal
angles (from the ideal 108° of a pentagon) 2.2° for the
cobalt knot as compared to 0.7° (iron), 1.5° (nickel), and
1.7° (zinc) pentafoil knots. The chloride anion is located at
different distances from the plane of the metal ions in the different
knot complexes, illustrating how the size, electrostatics, and shape
of the knotted ligand cavity change with coordination to the different
metalcations (Figure d–f).
Table 3
X-ray Crystal
Structure Parameters
of Pentametalated Knotsa
cation
M–N distance
(Å)
M–M distance (Å)
M–M–M angles (deg)
cavity size
(Å)
CH···Cl distance (Å)
FeII
2.0(1)
8.3(1)
108.8, 108.3, 108.8, 107.9,
106.7
3.3(1)
2.8(1)
CoII
2.1(1)
8.6(6)
105.3, 105.5, 106.5,
110.2,
110.5
3.5(1)
2.8(1)
NiII
2.1(1)
8.4(1)
106.3, 107.0, 107.1,
109.4,
110.2
3.4(1)
2.8(1)
ZnII
2.2(1)
8.5(2)
106.7, 107.1, 107.1,
107.8,
111.3
3.3(1)
2.7(1)
Distances
are averages; standard
deviations shown in parentheses.
X-ray crystal structures of [Co51·Cl](BF4)9, [Ni51·Cl](BF4)9, and [Zn51·Cl](BF4)9. (a–c) Views from above
the central cavity,
(d–f) views in the plane of the metalated knots: (a,d) [Co51·Cl](BF4)9, (b,e)
[Ni51·Cl](BF4)9, and (c,f) [Zn51·Cl](BF4)9. In each structure, carbon atoms are light gray (except
for one building block strand in which the C atoms are colored turquoise);
N, blue; Co, teal; Ni, dark green; Zn, deep blue; the central chloride
ion is shown at 99% van der Waals radius as a green sphere. Other
anions, residual solvent molecules, and hydrogen atoms are omitted
for clarity.Distances
are averages; standard
deviations shown in parentheses.The packing of the zinc pentafoil knot [Zn51·Cl](BF4)9 differs from that of the other
pentafoil knot coordination complexes. The crystal structure of [Zn51·Cl](BF4)9 features
pairs of knots close-packed through π-stacking of phenyl rings
of each ligand (shown in turquoise in Figure ), with the knots separated by a layer of
six tetrafluoroborate anions (shown in space-filling representation
in Figure ). Five
of the anions are located between the metalcenters, forming an array
of CH1···F bonds with the electron-poor
CH1 atoms of the coordinated bipy ligands, with the sixth
BF4– anion directly between the two chloride
anions. The sandwiched complexes stack in the unit cell, forming cationic
pillars with anioniccores.
Figure 3
Packing of two [Zn51·Cl](BF4)9 complexes in the X-ray crystal
structure, one shown
with carbon atoms in gray, one with carbon atoms in red. Anions (chloride
and tetrafluoroborate) depicted in space-filling representations.
The phenyl rings shown in turquoise are involved in π-stacking
between the two Zn5-pentafoil knots.
Packing of two [Zn51·Cl](BF4)9complexes in the X-ray crystal
structure, one shown
with carbon atoms in gray, one with carbon atoms in red. Anions (chloride
and tetrafluoroborate) depicted in space-filling representations.
The phenyl rings shown in turquoise are involved in π-stacking
between the two Zn5-pentafoil knots.
Chloride Binding Affinity of Metalated Pentafoil Knots
Isothermal
titration calorimetry (ITC) was used to compare the chloride
binding properties of the various metalated pentafoil knots (Table ). Tetrabutylammonium
chloride (Bu4NCl) was titrated into solutions of each chloride-free
knot, [M51](BF4)10,
in dry acetonitrile. Each of the different metalated knots was found
by ITC to strongly bind chloride ions (Figures S30 and 31). The knot:chloride stoichiometry in each case is
1:1, although the number of chloride binding sites determined for
each knot (N values, Table ) was slightly lower than 1.0, probably as
a result of scavenging of traces of chloride ions from glassware/solvents
by the “empty” knots prior to the ITC measurements.
In all cases, the chloride binding was both enthalpically and entropically
favorable. The chloride affinities were high and similar for the iron(II),
cobalt(II), and nickel(II) pentafoil knots (Ka (2.3–3.3) × 107 M–1), an order of magnitude lower for the zinc(II) knot (Ka 5 × 106 M–1), and
significantly lower for the copper(II) knot (Ka 8 × 104 M–1).
Table 4
Determination of Cl– + [M51]10+ → [M51·Cl]9+ Binding by Isothermal Titration
Calorimetry in MeCN
[[M51](BF4)10] (mol L–1)
[NBu4Cl] (mol L–1)
N (sites)
Ka (L mol–1)
ΔG (kJ mol–1)
ΔH (kJ mol–1)
–ΤΔS (kJ mol–1)
[Fe51](BF4)10
2.5 × 10–5
2.0 × 10–4
0.79
3.3(9) × 107
–43.0
–33.0(5)
10.1
[Co51](BF4)10
2.5 × 10–5
2.0 × 10–4
0.59
2.3(6) × 107
–42.1
–25.6(4)
16.5
[Ni51](BF4)10
1.0 × 10–4
1.0 × 10–3
0.86
3(3) × 107
–42.9
–28.1(6)
14.8
[Cu51](BF4)10
1.0 × 10–4
1.0 × 10–3
0.72
8(2) × 104
–28.1
–22(2)
5.8
[Zn51](BF4)10
2.5 × 10–5
2.0 × 10–4
0.75
5(1) × 106
–38.4
–36.8(8)
1.6
The different Cl– affinities of the various metalated
pentafoil knots presumably result from several factors, including
(but not restricted to): how coordination to the different size and
electronic geometries of the cations affects the conformation of the
cavity, the strength of coordination bonds influencing the polarization
of the H1 atoms, the strength of the long-range M(II)···Cl– electrostatic attraction, and the tolerance of distortion
of six-coordinate geometries by the different metal ions. In the absence
of definitive structural data from X-ray crystallography, we cannot
be sure as to the reasons why the Cu(II) pentafoil knot complex is
a much more modest binder of chloride ions than the other metalated
pentafoil knots. It may be that accommodating the size and shape of
the five Cu(II) ions distorts the folded geometry of the pentafoil
knotted ligand to such an extent that the cavity is no longer of appropriate
size or shape (e.g., no longer directs all of the polarized H1 protons toward a single point in space) to bind Cl–.
Conclusions
A pentafoil knotted ligand 1, containing 15 bipyridinechelate residues in a 190-atom-long closed loop, forms “first-sphere”
pentanuclear coordination complexes with a range of first row transition
metal dications. The resulting complexes exhibit strong second-sphere
coordination to a single chloride anion. Zn(II) ions,[14] but not Fe(II), Co(II), Ni(II), or Cu(II), can be introduced
directly into the knotted ligand, but the Zn(II)can be smoothly transmetalated
with other metal(II) tetrafluoroborate salts to the pentanuclear Fe(II),
Co(II), Ni(II), and Cu(II) knot complexes. The stepwise metal-ion-for-metal-ion
substitution mechanism prevents the ligand from ever having sufficient
vacant metal binding sites for incorrect binding modes to be adopted.
The knotted ligands wrap around the five metal ions in a circular
double helicate motif. Lehn-type circular helicates only form with
tris-bipy strands and Fe(II) ions (and, in some cases, Ni(II)[16] and Zn(II)[10]), and
so this motif is only accessible with other metal(II)cations through
such a knotted ligand. The X-ray crystal structures of the different
pentanuclear knot complexes show conformational changes in the entangled
ligand to accommodate the different sized metals. This results in
a range of second-sphere coordination binding affinities for chloride
ions that varies according to the metal ion over nearly 3 orders of
magnitude, from Ka = 8 × 104 M–1 (Cu51) to Ka = 3.3 × 107 M–1 (Fe51) in acetonitrile. Knotting ligand
strands imparts coordination chemistry that is inaccessible with constitutionally
similar but unknotted ligands, a significant example[4a,8−11] of the potential chemical consequences of molecular topology.
Authors: Kelly S Chichak; Stuart J Cantrill; Anthony R Pease; Sheng-Hsien Chiu; Gareth W V Cave; Jerry L Atwood; J Fraser Stoddart Journal: Science Date: 2004-05-28 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Martin Feigel; Rüdiger Ladberg; Simon Engels; Regine Herbst-Irmer; Roland Fröhlich Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2006-08-25 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Perdita E Barran; Harriet L Cole; Stephen M Goldup; David A Leigh; Paul R McGonigal; Mark D Symes; Jhenyi Wu; Michael Zengerle Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Jonathon E Beves; Barry A Blight; Christopher J Campbell; David A Leigh; Roy T McBurney Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Zoe Ashbridge; Stephen D P Fielden; David A Leigh; Lucian Pirvu; Fredrik Schaufelberger; Liang Zhang Journal: Chem Soc Rev Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 60.615
Authors: Selena J Lockyer; Selina Nawaz; Adam Brookfield; Alistair J Fielding; Inigo J Vitorica-Yrezabal; Grigore A Timco; Neil A Burton; Alice M Bowen; Richard E P Winpenny; Eric J L McInnes Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: David P August; Stefan Borsley; Scott L Cockroft; Flavio Della Sala; David A Leigh; Simon J Webb Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 15.419