| Literature DB >> 28660008 |
Abdelali Agouni1,2, Hadj Ahmed Mostefai1, Anne-Hélène Lagrue1, Martina Sladkova1,3, Philippe Rouet4, Franck Desmoulin5, Olga Pechanova3, Maria Carmen Martínez1,6, Ramaroson Andriantsitohaina1,6.
Abstract
The aim of this work was to study the vascular effects of dietary supplementation of a nonalcoholic red wine polyphenol extract, Provinols, in Zucker fatty (ZF) obese rats. ZF or lean rats received diet supplemented or not with Provinols for 8 weeks. Vasoconstriction in response to phenylephrine (Phe) was then assessed in small mesenteric arteries (SMA) and the aorta with emphasis on the contribution of cyclooxygenases (COX). Although no difference in vasoconstriction was observed between ZF and lean rats both in SMA and the aorta, Provinols affected the contribution of COX-derived vasoconstrictor agents. The nonselective COX inhibitor, indomethacin, reduced vasoconstriction in vessels from both groups; however, lower efficacy was observed in Provinols-treated rats. This was associated with a reduction in thromboxane-A2 and 8-isoprostane release. The selective COX-2 inhibitor, NS398, reduced to the same extent vasoconstriction in aortas from ZF and Provinols-treated ZF rats. However, NS398 reduced response to Phe only in SMA from ZF rats. This was associated with a reduction in 8-isoprostane and prostaglandin-E release. Paradoxically, Provinols decreased COX-2 expression in the aorta, while it increased its expression in SMA. We provide here evidence of a subtle and paradoxical regulation of COX pathway by Provinols vessels from obese rats to maintain vascular tone within a physiological range.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28660008 PMCID: PMC5474272 DOI: 10.1155/2017/8536910
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1Provinols did not affect contractile response to Phe in aortas and SMA from obese ZF rats. Shown are concentration-response curves to phenylephrine (Phe) cumulative concentrations (M) of small mesenteric arteries (SMA, (a)) and rat aortic rings (b) from lean and ZF rats treated or not with Provinols. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of millinewtons (mN) per mm of vessel length. N = 6 in each group.
Figure 2Effect of NO inhibition on vasoreactivity in aortas and SMA from obese ZF rats. Shown are concentration-response curves to phenylephrine (Phe) cumulative concentrations (M) in the presence of NO-synthase nonselective inhibitor (L-NAME) of small mesenteric arteries (SMA) (a–c) and rat aortic rings (d–f) from ZF rats treated or not with Provinols. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of millinewtons (mN) per mm of vessel length. ∗∗∗P < 0.001 versus ZF rats.
Figure 3Provinols reduced the involvement of COX-derived vasoconstrictor metabolites in SMA from obese ZF rats. Concentration-response curves to phenylephrine (Phe) cumulative concentrations (M) in the presence of COX-2 inhibitor (NS398) or the nonselective COX inhibitor (indomethacin, INDO) of small mesenteric arteries (SMA) from ZF rats which received or not Provinols. N = 6 in each group. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of millinewtons (mN) per mm of vessel length. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001 versus ZF rats.
Figure 4Provinols reduced the involvement of COX-derived vasoconstrictor metabolites in the aorta from obese ZF rats. Concentration-response curves to phenylephrine (Phe) cumulative concentrations (M) in the presence of COX-2 inhibitor (NS398) or the nonselective COX inhibitor (indomethacin, INDO) of aorta rings from ZF rats which received or not Provinols. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of millinewtons (mN) per mm of vessel length. N = 6 in each group. ∗∗∗P < 0.001 versus ZF rats.
Figure 5Provinols reduced COX-derived vasoconstrictor metabolite release in aortas and SMA from obese ZF rats. Concentration of COX derivatives thromboxane A2, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), 8-isoprostane, and prostacyclin in the supernatants of the rat aorta and SMA from ZF rats treated or not with Provinols and stimulated with Phe (n = 6). The concentration of prostanoids is expressed as pg/mL/mg of dry weight (dw) tissue. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01 versus ZF rats.
Figure 6Provinols modulated the expression of COX isoforms and NF-κB in vessels from obese ZF rats. Western blots showing the expression of cyclooxygenase- (COX-) 1 (a, b) and COX-2 (c, d) in the aorta and SMA from ZF rats treated or not with Provinols. NF-κB expression in the rat aorta was assessed by confocal imaging (e) and western blot analysis (f). In (c) is shown NF-κB expression in SMA by western blot analysis. Quantification of immunoblots' signal was done by densitometric analysis; β-actin loading control was included. Data are representative of four separate blots, and the densitometry values are expressed in arbitrary units (A.U.) as mean ± SEM. ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001 versus ZF rats.
Comparison between neutral lipid molecular species from carotids in control and Provinols-treated rats.
| Neutral lipids | ZF | ZF + Provinols |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| TAG C49 | 4.7 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.6 |
| TAG C51 | 13.5 ± 0.8 | 12.1 ± 1.3 |
| TAG C53 | 32 ± 0.9 | 31.4 ± 1 |
| TAG C55 | 34.6 ± 1 | 35.77 ± 1.2 |
| TAG C57 | 13.3 ± 0.7 | 14.6 ± 1.2 |
| TAG C59 | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 2.4 ± 0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| DAG 14–16 | 16.9 ± 11.6 | 12 ± 2.5 |
| DAG 16-16 | 19.6 ± 6.7 | 14.4 ± 4.4 |
| DAG 16–18 | 34 ± 9.2 | 43 ± 5.3 |
| DAG 18-18 | 17 ± 14.7 | 19 ± 11.2 |
| DAG18–20 | 12 ± 2.5 | 14 ± 0.3 |
| DAG18–22 | Nd | Nd |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| C14 cholesteryl ester | Nd | Nd |
| C16 cholesteryl ester | 15.1 ± 1.7 | 17.3 ± 3.8 |
| C18 cholesteryl ester | 17.9 ± 6 | 17.6 ± 5.1 |
| C20:4 cholesteryl ester | 67 ± 6.1 | 65.1 ± 8.3 |
| C22 cholesteryl ester | Nd | Nd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data are means ± SEM. Nd: not detected. Concentrations are expressed as nanomoles per mg of tissue wet weight (nmol/mg). Triacylglycerides (TAG) and diacylglycerides (DAG) families were defined according to their total number of carbon atoms (as described in Materials and Methods).
Comparison between fatty acid (FA) molecular species from carotids in control and Provinols-treated rats.
| FA | ZF | ZF + Provinols |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| SAFA | 41.5 ± 2.4 | 40.9 ± 1.3 |
| MUFA | 38.1 ± 4.9 | 39.7 ± 1.4 |
| PUFA | 20.4 ± 2.6 | 19.4 ± 2.1 |
|
| ||
| 14 : 0 | 3.3 ± 0.7 | 3.4 ± 1.3 |
| 16 : 0 | 72.6 ± 5.9 | 72.5 ± 2.7 |
| 18 : 0 | 22 ± 4.4 | 22.9 ± 3.6 |
| 20 : 0 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 0.6 ± 0.2 |
| 24 : 0 | 1.1 ± 0.8 | 0.6 ± 0.2 |
|
| ||
| 16 : 1 n-7 | 17.8 ± 0.8 | 17 ± 2.4 |
| 18 : 1 n-9 | 78.5 ± 4.3 | 82 ± 2 |
| 20 : 1 n-9 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.2 |
| 22 : 1 n-9 | Nd | Nd |
| 24 : 1 n-9 | 3.3 ± 4.5 | 0.6 ± 0.3 |
|
| ||
| 18 : 2 n-6 | 53.1 ± 11.7 | 57.9 ± 9.3 |
| 18 : 3 n-6 | Nd | Nd |
| 18 : 3 n-6 | 2.1 ± 0.8 | 2.3 ± 0.6 |
| 20 : 2 n-6 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.4 |
| 20 : 3 n-6 | Nd | Nd |
| 20 : 3 n-6 | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 1.6 ± 0.4 |
| 20 : 4 n-6 | 38.5 ± 12 | 33.2 ± 9.2 |
| 20 : 5 n-3 | Nd | Nd |
| 22 : 5 n-3 | Nd | Nd |
| 22 : 2 n-6 | Nd | Nd |
| 22 : 6 n-3 | 3.3 ± 1 | 3.4 ± 1 |
Data are means ± SEM. Total fatty acids (FA) are expressed as nanomoles per mg of tissue wet weight. SAFA: saturated fatty acids; MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids; Nd: not detected.
Comparison between phospholipids (PL) from carotids in control and Provinols-treated rats.
| Percent distribution of PL | ZF | ZF + Provinols |
|---|---|---|
| PE | 41.6 ± 6.4 | 50 ± 2.7∗ |
| PC | 38 ± 5.7 | 33.9 ± 1.9 |
| SM | 13 ± 4.4 | 9.4 ± 1 |
| PS | 4.8 ± 1.2 | 4.3 ± 0.6 |
| PI | 2.6 ± 1.6 | 2.5 ± 0.4 |
| PG | Nd | Nd |
|
|
|
|
Data are means ± SEM. Total phospholipids (PL) are expressed as nanomoles per mg of tissue wet weight. ∗Difference between groups at P < 0.05 (n = 5). PE: phosphatidylethanolamine; PC: phosphatidylcholine; SM: sphigomyeline; PS: phosphatidylserine; PI: phosphatidylinositol, PG: phosphatidylglycerol; Nd: not detected.