Literature DB >> 28659418

Perception of animacy in dogs and humans.

Judit Abdai1, Bence Ferdinandy2,3, Cristina Baño Terencio4,5, Ákos Pogány4, Ádám Miklósi4,3.   

Abstract

Humans have a tendency to perceive inanimate objects as animate based on simple motion cues. Although animacy is considered as a complex cognitive property, this recognition seems to be spontaneous. Researchers have found that young human infants discriminate between dependent and independent movement patterns. However, quick visual perception of animate entities may be crucial to non-human species as well. Based on general mammalian homology, dogs may possess similar skills to humans. Here, we investigated whether dogs and humans discriminate similarly between dependent and independent motion patterns performed by geometric shapes. We projected a side-by-side video display of the two patterns and measured looking times towards each side, in two trials. We found that in Trial 1, both dogs and humans were equally interested in the two patterns, but in Trial 2 of both species, looking times towards the dependent pattern decreased, whereas they increased towards the independent pattern. We argue that dogs and humans spontaneously recognized the specific pattern and habituated to it rapidly, but continued to show interest in the 'puzzling' pattern. This suggests that both species tend to recognize inanimate agents as animate relying solely on their motions.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  chasing; comparative perception; perceptual animacy; social perception

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28659418      PMCID: PMC5493738          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  8 in total

1.  Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object.

Authors:  P D Tremoulet; J Feldman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Perceptual causality and animacy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Discrimination of intentional and random motion paths by pigeons.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Goto; Stephen E G Lea; Winand H Dittrich
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2002-08-13       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy.

Authors:  Tao Gao; George E Newman; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Perception of chasing in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).

Authors:  Takeshi Atsumi; Yasuo Nagasaka
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Chasing vs. stalking: interrupting the perception of animacy.

Authors:  Tao Gao; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Linking perceptual animacy to attention: evidence from the chasing detection paradigm.

Authors:  Hauke S Meyerhoff; Markus Huff; Stephan Schwan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Interobject spacing explains the attentional bias toward interacting objects.

Authors:  Hauke S Meyerhoff; Stephan Schwan; Markus Huff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04
  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Chasing perception in domestic cats and dogs.

Authors:  Judit Abdai; Stefania Uccheddu; Márta Gácsi; Ádám Miklósi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 2.  The evolutionary origins of syntax: Event cognition in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Vanessa A D Wilson; Klaus Zuberbühler; Balthasar Bickel
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 14.957

3.  Wild jackdaws are wary of objects that violate expectations of animacy.

Authors:  Alison L Greggor; Guillam E McIvor; Nicola S Clayton; Alex Thornton
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Exploratory study of introducing HPC to non-ICT researchers: institutional strategy is possibly needed for widespread adaption.

Authors:  Bence Ferdinandy; Ángel Manuel Guerrero-Higueras; Éva Verderber; Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Lera; Ádám Miklósi
Journal:  J Supercomput       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.474

5.  Selection for specific behavioural traits does not influence preference of chasing motion and visual strategy in dogs.

Authors:  Judit Abdai; Ádám Miklósi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Neuronal Circuits for Social Decision-Making and Their Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Raymundo Báez-Mendoza; Yuriria Vázquez; Emma P Mastrobattista; Ziv M Williams
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Pupil size changes reveal dogs' sensitivity to motion cues.

Authors:  Christoph J Völter; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-07-20

8.  Dogs accurately track a moving object on a screen and anticipate its destination.

Authors:  Christoph J Völter; Sabrina Karl; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.