Literature DB >> 19500784

The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy.

Tao Gao1, George E Newman, Brian J Scholl.   

Abstract

Psychologists have long been captivated by the perception of animacy - the fact that even simple moving shapes may appear to engage in animate, intentional, and goal-directed movements. Here we report several new types of studies of a particularly salient form of perceived animacy: chasing, in which one shape (the 'wolf') pursues another shape ('the sheep'). We first demonstrate two new cues to perceived chasing -chasing subtlety (the degree to which the wolf deviates from perfectly 'heat-seeking' pursuit) and directionality (whether and how the shapes 'face' each other). We then use these cues to show how it is possible to assess the objective accuracy of such percepts, and to distinguish the immediate perception of chasing from those more subtle (but nevertheless real) types of 'stalking' that cannot be readily perceived. We also report several methodological advances. Previous studies of the perception of animacy have faced two major challenges: (a) it is difficult to measure perceived animacy with quantitative precision; and (b) task demands make it difficult to distinguish perception from higher-level inferences about animacy. We show how these challenges can be met, at least in our case study of perceived chasing, via tasks based on dynamic visual search (the Find-the-Chase task) and a new type of interactive display (the Don't-Get-Caught! task).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19500784     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  36 in total

1.  The automaticity of perceiving animacy: Goal-directed motion in simple shapes influences visuomotor behavior even when task-irrelevant.

Authors:  Benjamin van Buren; Stefan Uddenberg; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

2.  Moral kinematics: the role of physical factors in moral judgments.

Authors:  Rumen I Iliev; Sonya Sachdeva; Douglas L Medin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

3.  The roots of folk biology.

Authors:  Frank C Keil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The mentalistic basis of core social cognition: experiments in preverbal infants and a computational model.

Authors:  J Kiley Hamlin; Tomer Ullman; Josh Tenenbaum; Noah Goodman; Chris Baker
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2013-03

5.  What are the underlying units of perceived animacy? Chasing detection is intrinsically object-based.

Authors:  Benjamin van Buren; Tao Gao; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

6.  Dissociating the detection of intentionality from animacy in the right posterior superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  Tao Gao; Brian J Scholl; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Automatic attribution of social coordination information to chasing scenes: evidence from mu suppression.

Authors:  Jipeng Duan; Zhangxiang Yang; Xiaoyan He; Meixuan Shao; Jun Yin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The Ventral Visual Pathway Represents Animal Appearance over Animacy, Unlike Human Behavior and Deep Neural Networks.

Authors:  Stefania Bracci; J Brendan Ritchie; Ioannis Kalfas; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Good-enough language processing: evidence from sentence-video matching.

Authors:  Gaurav Kharkwal; Karin Stromswold
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-02

10.  Attributing intentions to random motion engages the posterior superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  Su Mei Lee; Tao Gao; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.