Wei Perng1,2, Brandy M Ringham3, Deborah H Glueck3, Katherine A Sauder4, Anne P Starling5, Mandy B Belfort6, Dana Dabelea4,5. 1. Departments of Nutritional Sciences and perngwei@umich.edu dana.dabelea@ucdenver. 2. Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI. 3. Department of Biostatistics & Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO. 4. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO. 5. Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO; and. 6. Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Abstract
Background: Despite widespread use of weight- and length-based anthropometric indexes as proxies for adiposity, little is known regarding the extent to which they correspond with fat mass (FM) or fat-free mass (FFM) during infancy.Objective: This study aimed to examine associations of 3 derived indicators-weight-for-age z score (WFAZ), weight-for-length score (WFLZ), and body mass index z score (BMIZ)-with FM, percentage of FM, and FFM measured by air-displacement plethysmography during the first 5 mo of life.Design: Applying prospectively collected data from 1027 infants in a Colorado prebirth cohort, we used multivariate regression to evaluate associations between the derived indicators and body composition at birth and at 5 mo, and with change (Δ) during follow-up. Results: At birth, all 3 derived indicators were more strongly associated with FFM than with FM. Each unit of WFAZ corresponded with 0.342 kg FFM (95% CI: 0.331, 0.351 kg FFM), compared with 0.121 kg FM (95% CI: 0.114, 0.128 kg FM) (P < 0.0001); similar trends were observed for WFLZ and BMIZ. By 5 mo, WFLZ and BMIZ were more strongly associated with FM than with FFM, whereas WFAZ correlated similarly with the 2 components of body composition. ΔWFLZ and ΔBMIZ were both more strongly related to ΔFM than to ΔFFM; however, a direct comparison of the 2 indexes with respect to change in the percentage of FM indicated that ΔBMIZ was the optimal proxy of adiposity gain (P < 0.0001, pairwise difference).Conclusions: Weight- and length-based indexes are poor surrogates for newborn adiposity. However, at 5 mo, WFLZ and BMIZ are suitable proxies of FM. When assessing adiposity gain, ΔBMIZ is the best indicator of fat accrual during the first 5 postnatal months. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02273297.
Background: Despite widespread use of weight- and length-based anthropometric indexes as proxies for adiposity, little is known regarding the extent to which they correspond with fat mass (FM) or fat-free mass (FFM) during infancy.Objective: This study aimed to examine associations of 3 derived indicators-weight-for-age z score (WFAZ), weight-for-length score (WFLZ), and body mass index z score (BMIZ)-with FM, percentage of FM, and FFM measured by air-displacement plethysmography during the first 5 mo of life.Design: Applying prospectively collected data from 1027 infants in a Colorado prebirth cohort, we used multivariate regression to evaluate associations between the derived indicators and body composition at birth and at 5 mo, and with change (Δ) during follow-up. Results: At birth, all 3 derived indicators were more strongly associated with FFM than with FM. Each unit of WFAZ corresponded with 0.342 kg FFM (95% CI: 0.331, 0.351 kg FFM), compared with 0.121 kg FM (95% CI: 0.114, 0.128 kg FM) (P < 0.0001); similar trends were observed for WFLZ and BMIZ. By 5 mo, WFLZ and BMIZ were more strongly associated with FM than with FFM, whereas WFAZ correlated similarly with the 2 components of body composition. ΔWFLZ and ΔBMIZ were both more strongly related to ΔFM than to ΔFFM; however, a direct comparison of the 2 indexes with respect to change in the percentage of FM indicated that ΔBMIZ was the optimal proxy of adiposity gain (P < 0.0001, pairwise difference).Conclusions: Weight- and length-based indexes are poor surrogates for newborn adiposity. However, at 5 mo, WFLZ and BMIZ are suitable proxies of FM. When assessing adiposity gain, ΔBMIZ is the best indicator of fat accrual during the first 5 postnatal months. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02273297.
Authors: Kenneth J Ellis; Manjiang Yao; Roman J Shypailo; Alessandro Urlando; William W Wong; William C Heird Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Sara E Ramel; Heather L Gray; Katie L Ode; Noelle Younge; Michael K Georgieff; Ellen W Demerath Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Anne P Starling; John T Brinton; Deborah H Glueck; Allison L Shapiro; Curtis S Harrod; Anne M Lynch; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Dana Dabelea Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Yeyi Zhu; Sjurdur F Olsen; Pauline Mendola; Edwina H Yeung; Allan Vaag; Katherine Bowers; Aiyi Liu; Wei Bao; Shanshan Li; Camilla Madsen; Louise G Grunnet; Charlotta Granström; Susanne Hansen; Kelly Martin; Jorge E Chavarro; Frank B Hu; Jens Langhoff-Roos; Peter Damm; Cuilin Zhang Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: K A Sauder; A P Starling; A L Shapiro; J L Kaar; B M Ringham; D H Glueck; D Dabelea Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: T H Lipman; K D Hench; T Benyi; J Delaune; K A Gilluly; L Johnson; M G Johnson; H McKnight-Menci; D Shorkey; J Shults; F L Waite; C Weber Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: Sani M Roy; David A Fields; Jonathan A Mitchell; Colin P Hawkes; Andrea Kelly; Gary D Wu; Patricia A DeRusso; Michal A Elovitz; Eileen Ford; Danielle Drigo; Babette S Zemel; Shana E McCormack Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Shanlee M Davis; Jill L Kaar; Brandy M Ringham; Christine W Hockett; Deborah H Glueck; Dana Dabelea Journal: J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 1.634
Authors: Anne P Starling; John L Adgate; Richard F Hamman; Katerina Kechris; Antonia M Calafat; Dana Dabelea Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Wei Perng; Jonggyu Baek; Christina W Zhou; Alejandra Cantoral; Maria Martha Tellez-Rojo; Peter X K Song; Karen E Peterson Journal: Ann Hum Biol Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 1.533
Authors: Callie L Brown; Asheley C Skinner; Michael J Steiner; Tracy Truong; Cynthia L Green; Charles T Wood Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 2.993
Authors: Katherine A Bell; Carol L Wagner; Wei Perng; Henry A Feldman; Roman J Shypailo; Mandy B Belfort Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Johannah M Scheurer; Lei Zhang; Erin A Plummer; Solveig A Hultgren; Ellen W Demerath; Sara E Ramel Journal: Neonatology Date: 2018-06-13 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Peter R Baker; Zachary W Patinkin; Allison L B Shapiro; Becky A de la Houssaye; Rachel C Janssen; Lauren A Vanderlinden; Dana Dabelea; Jacob E Friedman Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 4.379