Literature DB >> 28658871

Accuracy of Diffusion Weighted Images and MR Spectroscopy in Prostate Lesions - Our Experience with Endorectal Coil on 1.5 T MRI.

Devimeenal Jagannathan1, Venkatraman Indiran2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prostatic cancer is most commonly seen in individuals greater than 65 years of age. The incidence rates are constantly increasing. AIM: To assess the accuracy of the non-contrast sequences {Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS)} in the multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mp-MRI) in identifying and differentiating benign and malignant prostate lesions using endorectal coil on 1.5 T MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with clinical indications for prostate lesions were evaluated using endorectal coil on 1.5 T MRI. DWI and MRS were obtained in all the lesions. Signal change on T2 weighted images, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values and choline + creatinine to citrate ratios (Cho+Cr/Ci) of the lesions were obtained for all the patients. All the patients underwent Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy within one week of MRI study. Signal change on T2 weighted images, DWI and Cho+Cr/Ci ratios were correlated with the histopathological findings using appropriate statistical analysis (Wilson score).
RESULTS: Of the 26 patients, seven had benign pathology and 19 had malignant pathology on the histopathological examination. Sensitivity and specificity (89.5% and 85.7% respectively) of the diagnosis of malignancy based on DWI were quite good. Positive and negative predictive values were also very much acceptable (94.4% and 75% respectively). Though, MRS had good sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) (84.2% and 76.2% respectively), specificity and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were poor (28.6% and 40% respectively). Accuracy of imaging diagnosis based on combining T2, DWI and MRS was same as that of results based on T2 signal alone (80.8%) and had higher sensitivity and lower specificity than DWI alone (94.7% and 42.9% respectively). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for ADC values and Cho+Cr/Ci ratios. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for ADC is 0.74 and for Cho+Cr/Ci is 0.70.
CONCLUSION: Comparing the accuracy of the non-contrast sequences T2, DWI and MRS in identifying and differentiating benign and malignant lesions, giving weightage to the MRS in mp-MRI reduces the negative predictive value. The diagnosis of malignancy based on diffusion restriction was quite good and it can be the workhorse for prostate cancer detection as a shortened mp-MRI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benign; Cancer; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

Year:  2017        PMID: 28658871      PMCID: PMC5483773          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/27754.9825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  24 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging.

Authors:  Caroline M A Hoeks; Jelle O Barentsz; Thomas Hambrock; Derya Yakar; Diederik M Somford; Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Tom W J Scheenen; Pieter C Vos; Henkjan Huisman; Inge M van Oort; J Alfred Witjes; Arend Heerschap; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The value of diffusion-weighted MRI for prostate cancer detection and localization.

Authors:  Ahmet Baki Yağci; Nurgül Ozari; Zafer Aybek; Ender Düzcan
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging in the localization of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hiroo Kajihara; Yoshiko Hayashida; Ryuji Murakami; Kazuhiro Katahira; Ryuichi Nishimura; Yasuyuki Hamada; Kousuke Kitani; Mitsuhiko Kitaoka; Yasuko Suzuki; Mika Kitajima; Toshinori Hirai; Shoji Morishita; Kazuo Awai; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  A clinically relevant approach to imaging prostate cancer: review.

Authors:  Sadhna Verma; Arumugam Rajesh
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Performance comparison of 1.5-T endorectal coil MRI with 3.0-T nonendorectal coil MRI in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Zarine K Shah; Saba N Elias; Ronney Abaza; Debra L Zynger; Lawrence A DeRenne; Michael V Knopp; Beibei Guo; Ryan Schurr; Steven B Heymsfield; Guang Jia
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Diffusion-weighted MRI and PSA correlations in patients with prostate cancer treated with radiation and hormonal therapy.

Authors:  Yuko Iraha; Sadayuki Murayama; Ayano Kamiya; Shiro Iraha; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  MRI in the detection of prostate cancer: combined apparent diffusion coefficient, metabolite ratio, and vascular parameters.

Authors:  Sophie F Riches; Geoffrey S Payne; Veronica A Morgan; Samir Sandhu; Cyril Fisher; Michael Germuska; David J Collins; Alan Thompson; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Estimation of time trends of incidence of prostate cancer--an Indian scenario.

Authors:  Krishnappa Lalitha; Gadicherla Suman; Sreekantaiah Pruthvish; Aleyamma Mathew; Nandagudi S Murthy
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2012

Review 9.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of prostate cancer in patients with previous negative biopsies and elevated prostate-specific antigen levels: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zai-Xian Zhang; Jia Yang; Cheng-Zhong Zhang; Kang-An Li; Qi-Meng Quan; Xi-Fu Wang; Han Wang; Gui-Xiang Zhang
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sandeep S Hedgire; Tamara N Oei; Shaunagh McDermott; Kai Cao; Zena Patel M; Mukesh G Harisinghani
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2012-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging in diagnosis of suspicious prostate cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weiguo Cai; Dongyong Zhu; Sama Byanju; Jie Chen; Hanfei Zhang; Yanfang Wang; Meiyan Liao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing prostate Cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liang Zhen; Xiaoqiang Liu; Chen Yegang; Yang Yongjiao; Xu Yawei; Kang Jiaqi; Wang Xianhao; Song Yuxuan; Hu Rui; Zhang Wei; Ou Ningjing
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.