Literature DB >> 28658870

Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: Evaluation with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Peeyush Kumar Dhagat1, Megha Jain2, Satyendra Narayan Singh3, Sumeet Arora3, Kasukarthi Leelakanth4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) is a generalized term used to describe varied spinal symptoms of patients who have had unsuccessful results after spinal surgery. The treatment of FBSS is challenging and varies from conservative management to reoperation. Imaging plays a crucial role in identifying the cause and helps to guide the appropriate therapy. Contrast enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with its superior resolution is the imaging modality of choice. AIM: To evaluate the spectrum of imaging findings on postoperative MRI in FBSS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 postoperative symptomatic patients of FBSS were included in this cross-sectional study. Of these, 26 had undergone surgery for degenerative disc disease and four had spinal fixation surgery for spondylolisthesis or trauma. Patients were subjected to detailed clinical examination. All patients underwent MRI which was done on 1.5 Tesla scanner with standard sequences in all planes. Contrast was administered in all cases. Non Contrast Computed Tomography (NCCT) scan was done in patients with metallic implants to better delineate the placement of the implant. Patients with contraindication to MRI scanning were excluded from the study.
RESULTS: Of the total 30 cases (23 males and seven females) of FBSS that were evaluated with contrast enhanced MRI of the spine, 16 patients had recurrent/residual disc herniation, six had epidural scar tissue, three patients had recurrent disc herniation and scar tissue, two had evidence of post surgery arachnoiditis, two patients had postoperative discitis and one patient had implant mal alignment. Eight patients underwent reoperation for recurrent disc herniation and one patient for implant malalignment after imaging.
CONCLUSION: MRI is the modality of choice for evaluating the postoperative spine. It helps to identify the cause and guide the appropriate treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Postoperative imaging; Residual back pain; Spinal surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 28658870      PMCID: PMC5483772          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24930.9817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  13 in total

Review 1.  Review article: MRI of the postoperative lumbar spine.

Authors:  J W M Van Goethem; P M Parizel; J R Jinkins
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2002-08-10       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Imaging features of postoperative complications after spinal surgery and instrumentation.

Authors:  Daichi Hayashi; Frank W Roemer; Asim Mian; Monther Gharaibeh; Bernhard Müller; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Complications of spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  Phillip M Young; Thomas H Berquist; Laura W Bancroft; Jeffrey J Peterson
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 4.  Multichannel CT: evaluating the spine in postoperative patients with orthopedic hardware.

Authors:  Annette C Douglas-Akinwande; Kenneth A Buckwalter; Jonas Rydberg; James L Rankin; Robert H Choplin
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion.

Authors:  M N Kumar; A Baklanov; D Chopin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Medical management of failed back surgery syndrome in Europe: evaluation modalities and treatment proposals.

Authors:  G Durand; J Girodon; F Debiais
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 1.553

7.  Etiology of long-term failures of lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Alexis Waguespack; Jerome Schofferman; Paul Slosar; James Reynolds
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.750

8.  Spontaneous resolution of postoperative lumbar pseudomeningoceles: A report of four cases.

Authors:  Prince Solomon; Vijay Sekharappa; Venkatesh Krishnan; Kenny Samuel David
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Etiologies of failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Curtis W Slipman; Carl H Shin; Rajeev K Patel; Zacharia Isaac; Chris W Huston; Jason S Lipetz; David A Lenrow; Debra L Braverman; Edward J Vresilovic
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 10.  Failed back surgery syndrome: current perspectives.

Authors:  Zafeer Baber; Michael A Erdek
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.133

View more
  4 in total

1.  The dimensions of "failed back surgery syndrome": what is behind a label?

Authors:  Ralf Weigel; Hans-Holger Capelle; Shadi Al-Afif; Joachim K Krauss
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 2.  The leptomeninges as a critical organ for normal CNS development and function: First patient and public involved systematic review of arachnoiditis (chronic meningitis).

Authors:  Carol S Palackdkharry; Stephanie Wottrich; Erin Dienes; Mohamad Bydon; Michael P Steinmetz; Vincent C Traynelis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  The current role and future directions of imaging in failed back surgery syndrome patients: an educational review.

Authors:  Richard L Witkam; Constantinus F Buckens; Johan W M van Goethem; Kris C P Vissers; Dylan J H A Henssen
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-07-15

4.  Neural Mobilization in a 54-Year-Old Woman With Postoperative Spinal Adhesive Arachnoiditis.

Authors:  Stacey M Cornelson; Edward D Johnnie; Norman W Kettner
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2019-01-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.