Literature DB >> 10842105

Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery.

A D Shelly1, T E Southard, K A Southard, J S Casko, J R Jakobsen, K L Fridrich, J L Mergen.   

Abstract

Our purpose was to investigate the impact of mandibular advancement surgery on profile esthetics and to attempt to define guidelines that could be of value to the clinician in predicting profile esthetic change. The sample consisted of 34 patients who had been treated with a combination of orthodontics and mandibular advancement surgery without genioplasty. Initial (pretreatment) and final (posttreatment) cephalometric radiographs of each patient were used to produce silhouette images and to quantify skeletal changes that occurred with surgery. The images were displayed randomly to lay persons and orthodontic residents who were asked to score the esthetics of each profile. On average, after mandibular advancement surgery, B point moved forward 5.0 mm (SD = 2.6 mm) and downward 4.7 mm (SD = 3.1 mm), and the ANB angle decreased 3.0 degrees (SD = 1.6 degrees ) Graphical analysis and results of paired t tests revealed that for patients with an initial ANB angle >/= 6 degrees, a consistent improvement in profile esthetics was seen following surgery (P </=.001). This represented, on average, about a 45% improvement in esthetics. For patients with an initial ANB angle < 6 degrees, an improvement in profile esthetics after surgery was seen about half the time but poorer esthetics were equally likely. These results underscore the importance of using the ANB angle as a skeletal guideline when deciding whether to treat patients with mandibular advancement surgery. If improved profile esthetics are a desired outcome, an initial ANB angle of at least 6 degrees is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10842105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  10 in total

1.  Effect of orthognathic surgery on profile esthetics in Class II:1 malocclusions.

Authors:  Katharina Klaus; Christian Heumann; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Soft Tissue Esthetic Changes Following a Modified Twin Block Appliance Therapy: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Mohamadreza Shahamfar; Mohamad Hossein A Atashi; Niloofar Azima
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020 May-Jun

3.  Perceptions of Pre- to Postsurgical Profile Changes in Orthognathic Surgery Patients and Their Correlation with Photogrammetric Changes: A Panel Study.

Authors:  Aynur Sari-Rieger; Jan Rustemeyer
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-03-06

4.  The influence of sagittal position of the mandible in facial attractiveness and social perception.

Authors:  Lorena Marques Ferreira de Sena; Lislley Anne Lacerda Damasceno E Araújo; Arthur Costa Rodrigues Farias; Hallissa Simplício Gomes Pereira
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

5.  Effect of Class II functional treatment on facial attractiveness, as perceived by professionals and laypeople.

Authors:  Federica Santori; Francesco Masedu; Domenico Ciavarella; Edoardo Staderini; Claudio Chimenti; Michele Tepedino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  True vertical validation in facial orthognathic surgery planning.

Authors:  Eduardo Espinar-Escalona; Maria B Ruiz-Navarro; José M Barrera-Mora; José M Llamas-Carreras; Andreu Puigdollers-Pérez; Jorge Ayala-Puente
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2013-12-01

7.  Evaluation of 3-dimensional superimposition techniques on various skeletal structures of the head using surface models.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gkantidis; Michael Schauseil; Pawel Pazera; Berna Zorkun; Christos Katsaros; Björn Ludwig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of frontal facial type and sex on preferred chin projection.

Authors:  Jin-Young Choi; Taeyun Kim; Hyung-Mo Kim; Sang-Hoon Lee; Il-Sik Cho; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Effect of lower facial height and anteroposterior lip position on esthetic preference for Korean silhouette profiles.

Authors:  Kyung-Hyun Seo; Deuk-Hun So; Kyeong-Tae Song; Sung-Kwon Choi; Kyung-Hwa Kang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Implant assisted ortho-surgery in edentulous jaws: a clinical report.

Authors:  Arash Khojasteh; Leila Payaminia; Marzieh Alikhasi
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2015-09-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.