Literature DB >> 28658017

Rethinking the Match: A Proposal for Modern Matchmaking.

Chris Ray1, Steven E Bishop, Alan W Dow.   

Abstract

Since the 1950s, the National Resident Matching Program, or "the Match," has governed the placement of medical students into residencies. The Match was created to protect students in an era when residency positions outnumbered applicants and hospitals pressured students early in their academic careers to commit to a residency position. Now, however, applicants outnumber positions, applicants are applying to increasing numbers of programs, and the costs of the Match for applicants and programs are high. Meanwhile, medical education is evolving toward a competency-based approach, a U.S. physician shortage is predicted, and some researchers describe a "July effect"-worse clinical outcomes correlated with the mass entry of new residents.Against this background, the authors argue for adopting a more modern, free-market approach to residency matchmaking that might better suit the needs of applicants, programs, and the public. They propose allowing students who have been identified by their medical schools as having achieved graduation-level competency to apply to residency programs at any point during the year. Residency programs would set their own application timetables and extend offers in an ongoing fashion. Students, counseled by their schools, would accept or decline offers as desired. The authors argue this approach would better support competency-based education while allowing applicants and programs more choice regarding how they engage and adapt within the selection process. The approach's staggered start times for new residents might attenuate the July effect and improve outcomes for patients. Medical students might also enter and thereby complete residency earlier, increasing the physician workforce.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28658017     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

Review 1.  Systems-Level Reforms to the US Resident Selection Process: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ryley K Zastrow; Jesse Burk-Rafel; Daniel A London
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-06-14

2.  Time and Financial Costs for Students Participating in the National Residency Matching Program (the Match©): 2015 to 2020.

Authors:  Kari M Nilsen; Anne Walling; Jill Grothusen; Gretchen Irwin; Mark Meyer; Greg Unruh
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2021-03-19

3.  Perspectives of Stakeholders About an Early Result Acceptance Program to Complement the Residency Match in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors:  Abigail Ford Winkel; Helen K Morgan; Oluwabukola Akingbola; Keli Santos-Parker; Erin Nelson; Erika Banks; Nadine T Katz; Jessica L Bienstock; David Marzano; Maya M Hammoud
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-10-01

Review 4.  Postinterview Communication in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Interviews: A Survey of Match Applicants.

Authors:  Alexandra M Arguello; Bridgette Love; Brent A Ponce; Gerald McGwin; Joshua C Patt; Michael D Johnson; S Elizabeth Ames; Raffi Avedian; Monica Kogan
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2022-03-04

5.  Comparison of Program-centric vs Student-centric National Resident Matching Algorithms.

Authors:  Briance Mascarenhas; Kartikeya S Puranam; Michael N Katehakis
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-06-01

6.  The Summer Match: A qualitative study exploring a two-stage residency match option.

Authors:  Michael Dacre; Laura R Hopson; Jeremy Branzetti; Linda Regan; Stefanie S Sebok-Syer; Michael A Gisondi
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-07-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.