Literature DB >> 28657938

Anatomical Resections Improve Disease-free Survival in Patients With KRAS-mutated Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Georgios A Margonis1, Stefan Buettner, Nikolaos Andreatos, Kazunari Sasaki, Jan N M Ijzermans, Jeroen L A van Vugt, Timothy M Pawlik, Michael A Choti, John L Cameron, Jin He, Christopher L Wolfgang, Matthew J Weiss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential clinical advantage of anatomical resection versus nonanatomical resection for colorectal liver metastases, according to KRAS mutational status.
BACKGROUND: KRAS-mutated colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are known to be more aggressive than KRAS wild-type tumors. Although nonanatomical liver resections have been demonstrated as a viable approach for CRLM patients with similar oncologic outcomes to anatomical resections, this may not be the case for the subset of KRAS-mutated CRLM.
METHODS: 389 patients who underwent hepatic resection of CRLM with known KRAS mutational status were identified. Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.
RESULTS: In this study, 165 patients (42.4%) underwent nonanatomical resections and 140 (36.0%) presented with KRAS-mutated CRLM. Median disease-free survival (DFS) in the entire cohort was 21.3 months, whereas 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS was 67.3%, 34.9%, and 31.5% respectively. Although there was no difference in DFS between anatomical and nonanatomical resections in patients with KRAS wild-type tumors (P = 0.142), a significant difference in favor of anatomical resection was observed in patients with a KRAS mutation (10.5 vs. 33.8 months; P < 0.001). Five-year DFS was only 14.4% in the nonanatomically resected group, versus 46.4% in the anatomically resected group. This observation persisted in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio: 0.45; 95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.74; P = 0.002), when corrected for number of tumors, bilobar disease, and intraoperative ablations.
CONCLUSIONS: Nonanatomical tissue-sparing hepatectomies are associated with worse DFS in patients with KRAS-mutated tumors. Because of the aggressive nature of KRAS-mutated CRLM, more extensive anatomical hepatectomies may be warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28657938     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  21 in total

1.  Prediction of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF status in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis using a deep artificial neural network based on radiomics and semantic features.

Authors:  Ruichuan Shi; Weixing Chen; Bowen Yang; Jinglei Qu; Yu Cheng; Zhitu Zhu; Yu Gao; Qian Wang; Yunpeng Liu; Zhi Li; Xiujuan Qu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Surgery: KRAS mutations and hepatic recurrence after treatment of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Kristoffer Watten Brudvik; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  The Impact of Extent of Liver Resection Among Patients with Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis: an International Multi-institutional Study.

Authors:  Jonathan G Sham; Aslam Ejaz; Michele M Gage; Fabio Bagante; Bradley N Reames; Shishir Maithel; George A Poultsides; Todd W Bauer; Ryan C Fields; Matthew J Weiss; Hugo Pinto Marques; Luca Aldrighetti; Timothy M Pawlik; Jin He
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Impact and clinical usefulness of genetic data in the surgical management of colorectal cancer liver metastasis: a narrative review.

Authors:  Georgios Antonios Margonis; Martin E Kreis; Jaeyun Jane Wang; Carsten Kamphues; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 5.  Colorectal liver metastases: state-of-the-art management and surgical approaches.

Authors:  Timothy E Newhook; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Colorectal Liver Metastases: Does the Future of Precision Medicine Lie in Genetic Testing?

Authors:  Carlotta Barbon; Georgios Antonios Margonis; Nikolaos Andreatos; Neda Rezaee; Kazunari Sasaki; Stefan Buettner; Christos Damaskos; Timothy M Pawlik; Jin He; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Impact of primary cancer features on behaviour of colorectal liver metastases and survival after hepatectomy.

Authors:  A Cucchetti; N Russolillo; P Johnson; P Tarchi; A Ferrero; M Cucchi; M Serenari; M Ravaioli; N de Manzini; M Cescon; G Ercolani
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-09-03

8.  Robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair and pulmonary embolism: an institution-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Aanuoluwapo Obisesan; Vinay Singhal; Savni Satoskar
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-06-19

Review 9.  Molecular Determinants and Other Factors to Guide Selection of Patients for Hepatic Resection of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Thomas M Diehl; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-07-05

10.  Propensity score analysis of non-anatomical versus anatomical resection of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  K M Brown; M F Albania; J S Samra; P J Kelly; T J Hugh
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-03-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.