Literature DB >> 28657851

Curative Resection of Single Primary Hepatic Malignancy: Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Category LR-M Portends a Worse Prognosis.

Chansik An1, Sumi Park2, Yong Eun Chung1, Do-Young Kim3, Seung-Seob Kim1, Myeong-Jin Kim1, Jin-Young Choi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between preoperative Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categories and prognosis after curative resection of single hepatic malignancies in patients with chronic liver disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2010, 225 patients with chronic liver disease underwent resection of single hepatic malignant tumors (218 hepatocellular carcinomas, three cholangiocarcinomas, four biphenotypic carcinomas) after undergoing gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Two radiologists retrospectively categorized the tumors into LI-RADS categories. Differences in disease-free survival duration between categories were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test.
RESULTS: Reviewer 1 categorized two (0.9%) patients as having LR-3, 53 (23.6%) LR-4, 159 (70.7%) LR-5, and 11 (4.9%) LR-M lesions. The corresponding numbers for reviewer 2 were six (2.7%) LR-3, 30 (13.3%) LR-4, 178 (79.1%) LR-5, and 11 (4.9%) LR-M. The 2-year cumulative recurrence or death rates were 15.1% for lesions categorized LR-3 or LR-4 by reviewer 1, 31.7% for LR-5, and 60% for LR-M. For lesions categorized by reviewer 2 the corresponding rates were 20.6% for LR-3 or LR-4, 29% for LR-5, and 54.5% for LR-M. Disease-free survival was significantly worse among patients with lesions categorized as LR-M than for lesions categorized as LR-3 or LR-4 or as LR-5 (p < 0.01 for both reviewers). Disease-free survival did not significantly differ between patients with LR-3 or LR-4 and those with LR-5 lesions (reviewer 1, p = 0.301; reviewer 2, p = 0.291).
CONCLUSION: Patients with tumors preoperatively categorized as LR-M may have a worse prognosis than those with tumors categorized LR-3, LR-4, or LR-5 after curative resection of single hepatic malignancy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS); MRI; gadoxetic acid; hepatocellular carcinoma; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28657851     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.16.17478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

1.  Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: LI-RADS v2017 categorisation for differential diagnosis and prognostication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Sun Kyung Jeon; Ijin Joo; Dong Ho Lee; Sang Min Lee; Hyo-Jin Kang; Kyoung-Bun Lee; Jeong Min Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Pitfalls and problems to be solved in the diagnostic CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS).

Authors:  Yeun-Yoon Kim; Jin-Young Choi; Claude B Sirlin; Chansik An; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  LI-RADS and transplantation: challenges and controversies.

Authors:  Guilherme M Cunha; Dorathy E Tamayo-Murillo; Kathryn J Fowler
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-01

4.  How to utilize LR-M features of the LI-RADS to improve the diagnosis of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI?

Authors:  Hong Seon Lee; Myeong-Jin Kim; Chansik An
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Victoria Chernyak; Kathryn J Fowler; Aya Kamaya; Ania Z Kielar; Khaled M Elsayes; Mustafa R Bashir; Yuko Kono; Richard K Do; Donald G Mitchell; Amit G Singal; An Tang; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Irregular Rim-Like Arterial Phase Hyperenhancement: More Aggressive Pathologic Features.

Authors:  Hyungjin Rhee; Chansik An; Hye-Young Kim; Jeong Eun Yoo; Young Nyun Park; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 11.740

7.  The Role of Preoperative Dynamic Contrast-enhanced 3.0-T MR Imaging in Predicting Early Recurrence in Patients With Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinomas After Curative Resection.

Authors:  Linqi Zhang; Sichi Kuang; Jingbiao Chen; Yao Zhang; Binliang Zhao; Hao Peng; Yuanqiang Xiao; Kathryn Fowler; Jin Wang; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Imaging features of histological subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma: Implication for LI-RADS.

Authors:  Roberto Cannella; Marco Dioguardi Burgio; Aurélie Beaufrère; Loïc Trapani; Valérie Paradis; Christian Hobeika; Francois Cauchy; Mohamed Bouattour; Valérie Vilgrain; Riccardo Sartoris; Maxime Ronot
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2021-09-30

9.  Radiomics Analysis on Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI Predicts Response to Transarterial Embolization in Patients with HCC.

Authors:  Roberto Cannella; Carla Cammà; Francesco Matteini; Ciro Celsa; Paolo Giuffrida; Marco Enea; Albert Comelli; Alessandro Stefano; Calogero Cammà; Massimo Midiri; Roberto Lagalla; Giuseppe Brancatelli; Federica Vernuccio
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.