Literature DB >> 28657407

Comorbidity does not predict long-term mortality after total hip arthroplasty.

Erik Bülow1,2, Ola Rolfson1,2, Peter Cnudde1,2,3, Cecilia Rogmark1,4, Göran Garellick1,2, Szilárd Nemes1,2.   

Abstract

Background and purpose - In-hospital death following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is related to comorbidity. The long-term effect of comorbidity on all-cause mortality is, however, unknown for this group of patients and it was investigated in this study. Patients and methods - We used data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, linked to the National Patient Register from the National Board of Health and Welfare, for patients operated on with THA in 1999-2012. We identified 120,836 THAs that could be included in the study. We evaluated the predictive power of the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices on mortality, using concordance indices calculated after 5, 8, and 14 years after THA. Results - All comorbidity indices performed poorly as predictors, in fact worse than a base model with age and sex only. Elixhauser was, however, the least bad choice and it predicted mortality with concordance indices 0.59, 0.58, and 0.56 for 5, 8, and 14 years after THA. Interpretation - Comorbidity indices are poor predictors of long-term mortality after THA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28657407      PMCID: PMC5560207          DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1341243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


The use of comorbidity as a predictor of various clinical outcomes has increased exponentially during the last 20 years for patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA). The predictive power of comorbidity has been investigated for perioperative, in-hospital, and short-term mortality (Menendez et al. 2015), 90-day postoperative mortality (Bozic et al. 2012), pain level, functional abilities, hospital costs (Lavernia et al. 2009), periprosthetic joint infection (Bozic et al. 2012), reoperations (Gordon et al. 2013), and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) (Greene et al. 2015). Current methods for capturing comorbidity, such as the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices, were originally developed for in-hospital or short-term mortality occurring in a time frame close to when the comorbidities were recorded. The same indices are currently used for prediction of long-term mortality also, but this is in fact a different matter. Most studies have found no or little evidence that comorbidity influences any clinical outcome. It has nevertheless been suggested that mortality should be adjusted for comorbidity, but it is our belief that this recommendation is unjustified. Elective THA is offered mainly to healthy individuals. Mortality in these patients is lower than in the general population (Michet et al. 2017). Our hypothesis was therefore that risk factors for mortality in these patients might appear after—and not before—surgery. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the predictive power of comorbidity on long-term mortality for THA patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Patients and methods

Patients

We identified 120,836 patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR) who underwent THA in the period 1999–2012 and who matched our inclusion criteria (Figure 1). These patients were linked to the Swedish National Patient Register (NPR), which is under the administration of the National Board of Health and Welfare. ICD-10 codes were extracted from this registry if they were linked to hospital visits within 1 year before THA. The data set has been described in detail by Cnudde et al. (2016).
Figure 1.

Flow chart describing inclusion criteria for study population.

Flow chart describing inclusion criteria for study population. The predictive power of each comorbidity index summarized by the concordance index over time (upper panel). Absolute values are low and decreasing. Time-dependent ROC curves are shown below for 30, 90, and 365 days after THA. The relative order among the comorbidity indices was preserved throughout the entire period but their absolute differences were small.

Comorbidity indices

Individual ICD-10 codes were first identified as different comorbidities, which were then combined into 3 comorbidity indices for each patient: (1) the original Charlson comorbidity index, with 17 categories coded according to ICD-10 (Quan et al. 2005); (2) the updated Charlson comorbidity index, which is similar but simplified to 12 categories (Quan et al. 2011); and the Elixhauser (1998) comorbidity index, which is coded with ICD-10 codes (Quan et al. 2005) with an unweighted index (Moltó and Dougados 2014). Some comorbidities are included by both the Elixhauser and the Charlson classification, but with different inclusion criteria (Quan et al. 2005). For example, complications in patients with diabetes should be chronical according to Charlson, but not necessarily so according to Elixhauser. The 2 diabetes groups are therefore not directly comparable between the 2 classifications.

Survival analysis

We fitted 51 univariate Cox models to the data, 1 for each Elixhauser and Charlson category and 1 each for the 3 indices. We found, however, that the proportional-hazard assumption was not met for several models. We therefore used Schoenfeldt residual plots to identify common patterns among all models and found proportional hazards within subintervals of 0–5, 5–8 and 8–14 years after THA. We refitted an extended Cox model with stepwise time varying coefficient (Therneau and Crowson 2013) to these intervals. Each univariate model was accompanied by a corresponding model including age and sex. A base model with only age and sex was also fitted for reference.

Concordance index

The predictive power of comorbidity on mortality was evaluated by a concordance index for survival data (Heagerty and Zheng 2005). All models were characterized by their sensitivity and specificity, combined into receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and summarized by their area under the curve (AUC). AUC values were calculated for each time point after THA, and a single summary measure for a whole period was calculated as a weighted index from time 0 to the end of each subinterval (5, 8, and 14 years after THA). Confidence intervals (95% CIs) were based on non-parametric bootstrap resampling, since no closed form expression has yet been proposed for the concordance index. The value of the concordance index ranges from 0.5 to 1. A value of 0.5 means that the exposure adds nothing more than chance when predicting the risk of dying, while a value of 1 would indicate that death could be completely predicted by the model. Interpretation of the absolute value is subjective, but it is often assumed for studies in medicine that a value less than 0.7 is poor while 0.7–0.8 is good and 0.8–0.9 is excellent (with 0.9–1.0 being almost unachievable).

Software

We used R version 3.2 (R Core team, Vienna, Austria) with packages survival, risksetROC, tidyverse, modelr, and foreach for statistical analysis.

Ethics, funding and potential conflicts of interest

Ethics approval was obtained from the Central Ethical Review Board in Gothenburg, Sweden (decision 271-14). There was no external fundings for the project and no competing interest to declare.

Results

Of the 120,836 patients who matched our inclusion criteria, 101,415 (84%) survived during the whole follow-up period of up to14 years, while 19,421 (16%) had died (Table 1). High age and male sex were, as expected, associated with earlier death, and most comorbidities occurred more frequently in those who later died.
Table 1.

Characteristics of patients who survived the whole follow-up period of 14 years (column “Alive”) and patients who died during this period (column “Deceased”). Death was associated with age and sex but also with most comorbidities (indicated by small p-values). Values in parenthesis are percentages unless otherwise specified

WhatAlive
Deceased
p-value
 N101,41519,421
 Age, mean (SD)67.1(10.1)75.6(8.3)< 0.001
 Male sex43,400(42.8)9,179(47.3)< 0.001
Elixhauser index< 0.001
 064,972(64.1)11,739(60.4)
 122,590(22.3)4,127(21.3)
 29,314(9.2)2,129(11.0)
 3+4,539(4.5)1,426(7.3)
Original Charlson index< 0.001
 082,754(81.6)13,891(71.5)
 111,629(11.5)2,855(14.7)
 25,068(5.0)1,729(8.9)
 3+1,964(1.9)946(4.9)
Updated Charlson index< 0.001
 089,722(88.5)15,559(80.1)
 15,737(5.7)1,231(6.3)
 24,950(4.9)1,931(9.9)
 3+1,006(1.0)700(3.6)
Elixhauser
 Congestive heart failure1,752(1.7)1,143(5.9)< 0.001
 Cardiac arrhythmias5,114(5.0)1,760(9.1)< 0.001
 Valvular disease1,450(1.4)496(2.6)< 0.001
 Pulmonary circulation disorder292(0.3)90(0.5)< 0.001
 Peripheral vascular disorder710(0.7)267(1.4)< 0.001
 Hypertension uncomplicated21,790(21.5)3,083(15.9)< 0.001
 Hypertension complicated573(0.6)223(1.1)< 0.001
 Paralysis153(0.2)34(0.2)0.5
 Other neurological disorders865(0.9)276(1.4)< 0.001
 Chronic pulmonary disease3,522(3.5)857(4.4)< 0.001
 Diabetes uncomplicated5,040(5.0)1,185(6.1)< 0.001
 Diabetes complicated938(0.9)338(1.7)< 0.001
 Hypothyroidism2,435(2.4)364(1.9)< 0.001
 Renal failure526(0.5)235(1.2)< 0.001
 Liver disease384(0.4)107(0.6)0.001
 Peptic ulcer disease268(0.3)116(0.6)< 0.001
 AIDS/HIV16(0.0)1(0.0)0.4
 Lymphoma252(0.2)93(0.5)< 0.001
 Metastatic cancer142(0.1)148(0.8)< 0.001
 Solid tumor3,111(3.1)1,136(5.8)< 0.001
 Rheumatoid arthritis2,767(2.7)660(3.4)< 0.001
 Coagulopathy281(0.3)84(0.4)< 0.001
 Obesity1,753(1.7)120(0.6)< 0.001
 Weight loss42(0.0)13(0.1)0.2
 Fluid electrolyte disorders271(0.3)90(0.5)< 0.001
 Blood loss anemia51(0.1)28(0.1)< 0.001
 Deficiency anemia509(0.5)152(0.8)< 0.001
 Alcohol abuse327(0.3)114(0.6)< 0.001
 Drug abuse124(0.1)26(0.1)0.8
 Psychoses151(0.1)34(0.2)0.5
 Depression1,151(1.1)192(1.0)0.1
Charlson
 Myocardial infraction2,685(2.6)784(4.0)< 0.001
 Congestive heart failure1,657(1.6)1,124(5.8)< 0.001
 Peripheral vascular disease710(0.7)267(1.4)< 0.001
 Cerebrovascular disease1,456(1.4)597(3.1)< 0.001
 Dementia213(0.2)138(0.7)< 0.001
 Chronic pulmonary disease3,522(3.5)857(4.4)< 0.001
 Rheumatic disease2,253(2.2)566(2.9)< 0.001
 Peptic ulcer disease501(0.5)220(1.1)< 0.001
 Mild liver disease366(0.4)97(0.5)0.005
 Diabetes no complication5,179(5.1)1,231(6.3)< 0.001
 Diabetes complication665(0.7)243(1.3)< 0.001
 Hemiplegia or paraplegia153(0.2)34(0.2)0.5
 Renal disease540(0.5)237(1.2)< 0.001
 Malignancy3,444(3.4)1,265(6.5)< 0.001
 Moderate or severe liver disease34(0.0)21(0.1)< 0.001
 Metastatic solid tumor142(0.1)148(0.8)< 0.001
 AIDS/HIV16(0.0)1(0.0)0.4
Characteristics of patients who survived the whole follow-up period of 14 years (column “Alive”) and patients who died during this period (column “Deceased”). Death was associated with age and sex but also with most comorbidities (indicated by small p-values). Values in parenthesis are percentages unless otherwise specified Hazard ratios for individual comorbidities ranged from 0.7 for obesity to 13 for metastatic cancer. All concordance indices for individual comorbidities were close to 0.5 (Table 2, see Supplementary data). We omitted results for models with individual comorbidities combined with age and sex, since we felt that there was little added value in these models compared to the ones presented.

Hazard ratios

Confidence intervals for the hazard ratios indicated that all covariates evaluated, except obesity, weight loss, and AIDS/HIV, were associated with higher death rates within the first 5 years following THA. Less comorbidities were associated with death 5–8 years after THA, and even fewer 8–14 years after THA.

Concordance indices (Figure 2)

The highest concordance indices, for a univariate comorbidity index model, were observed for the Elixhauser comorbidity index (0.59, 0.58, and 0.56 at 5, 8, and 14 years after THA). Second best was the original Charlson comorbidity index (0.58, 0.56, and 0.54), while its updated and simplified version performed slightly worse (0.56, 0.55, and 0.53). As is apparent from Table 2 (see Supplementary data) and Figure 3, the base model, with age and sex alone, performed considerably better than all comorbidity indices (concordance indices 0.75, 0.74, and 0.74). Models including age and sex together with comorbidity indices were just marginally better than the base model (with concordance indices 0.76, 0.75, and 0.74 for all indices). These differences were most likely clinically irrelevant, although statistically significant for 5 and 8 years after THA (Figure 3).
Figure 3.

Concordance indices as a measure of predictive power for models with the 3 comorbidity indices, with and without inclusion of age and sex. A base model with age and sex alone was used as a reference. The confi dence intervals were based on non-parametric bootstrapping. They were all narrow, due to the large sample size.

Concordance indices as a measure of predictive power for models with the 3 comorbidity indices, with and without inclusion of age and sex. A base model with age and sex alone was used as a reference. The confi dence intervals were based on non-parametric bootstrapping. They were all narrow, due to the large sample size.

Discussion

We found that comorbidity indices were weak predictors of mortality for Swedish patients with THA. Concordance indices were close to 0.5; hence, the models predicted death just marginally better than pure chance. We conclude that age and sex were much better predictors, especially for long-term mortality up to 14 years after surgery.

Comorbidities 1 year preoperatively

We used comorbidity data registered at hospital visits during the year before THA. We suspected that a shorter time frame might not capture all relevant comorbidities present at the time of THA. A much longer time frame, on the other hand, might lead to inclusion of old comorbidities that were no longer present by the time of THA. We ran the analysis with a 1-, 2-, and 5-year comorbidity period before THA. The predictive power increased with length of the period, but this was only minimal (Figure 4, see Supplementary data). The shorter time frame of 1 year was therefore preferred for the sake of simplicity.

Individual comorbidities

Obesity was the only comorbidity with a reduced risk of death. A similar, counterintuitive, observation has been made previously (Menendez et al. 2014). It has been suggested that surgeons may select overweight patients for surgery only if they are otherwise healthier than non-obese patients (Hawker et al. 2013), which makes it difficult to generalize our findings. It has also been found that obesity has been heavily under-reported in administrative registers in the USA (Bohl et al. 2016). Length and weight was captured from the SHAR for 94% of our patients with THA after 2007. 22% of them had BMI ≥30, and were therefore obese. This, compared to only 1.5% obesity identified from the National Patient Register, is more in line with the Swedish general population of 70-year-olds. Hypertension, lipid disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and other non-somatic conditions are also known to be under-reported in the National Patient Register (Ludvigsson et al. 2011). Depression was found in only 1% of our patients, but in one-third of all patients included in a Dutch study (Duivenvoorden et al. 2013). It is also known that diabetes might be under-reported in the National Patient Register (Rawshani et al. 2014). We had too few patients with weight loss and AIDS/HIV to observe hazard ratios different than 1. All other comorbidities were related to increased death risk, but with weak predictive power.

Hazard ratios vs. concordance index

Hazard ratios that are relatively high can still have low predictive power (Pepe et al. 2004). The hazard ratios themselves do not characterize the discriminatory capacity of the comorbidities. Patients with metastatic cancer, for example, have an almost 13-fold risk of dying during the first 5-year period, compared to those with cardiac arrhythmias with a hazard ratio less than 3. But mortality predictions apply to patients both with and without the conditions. There were 24 times as many patients with cardiac arrhythmias than metastatic cancer, and it is therefore no surprise that the former yielded a concordance index of 0.53, while the other had a lower value of 0.51. Also, most deaths from metastatic cancer occurred already within 2 years of diagnosis. These patients were then withdrawn from the cohort, which meant rapidly reduced hazard ratios in the periods 5–8 years and 8–14 years, reflecting that cancer patients who survived more than 5 years might have been considered “statistically cured”. A chronic condition such as uncomplicated diabetes, on the other hand, showed a more stable—2-fold—death risk during the whole period.

Inclusion of more covariates

We found that comorbidity adds little to age and sex when predicting long-term all-cause mortality after THA. We did not include any other possible predictors, since it is known that although concordance indices are commonly used to quantify predictability of working models, they are not sensitive for capturing overall added values from a new marker on top of conventional predictors (Uno et al. 2011). A consequence of this was illustrated by Mnatzaganian et al. (2014), who found large differences in 1- and 2-year postoperative mortality hazard ratios combined with small (although statistically significant) C-statistic differences.

Healthy patients

It has been proposed that comorbidities could be used for mortality prediction in patients with severe diseases, such as cancer. This discrepancy from our results suggests that patients selected for THA in Sweden are relatively healthy, so their time of death is difficult to predict. This might also be justified by comparing the Elixhauser comorbidity data from Table 1 to a similar table for the general population (Quail et al. 2011). Exact comparisons are difficult, due to different demographics and different sources of comorbidity data, but there are some indications that THA is avoided for patients with depression, psychiatric disorders, fluid and electrolyte disorders, coagulopathies, and metastatic cancer, whereas uncomplicated diabetes and alcohol abuse might be slightly more common in patients with THA. However, as mentioned above, some of these conditions are under-reported from the National Patient Register. Caution should therefore be used when comparing individual comorbidities. To further compare our sample to the general population would be of interest. An age- and sex-matched control group, without THA but with a comparable date for comparison, would make this possible. Unfortunately, we did not have access to such data, but this can be seen as a suggestion for further research. We are not sure whether the Swedish selection criteria for THA are equal to those in other countries. Predictive power of comorbidity on mortality might be stronger if THA is also offered to older or sicker patients than ours.

Distinct comorbidities vs. combined index

If one relies on comorbidity to predict mortality, a combined index is needed since no distinct comorbidity could predict death alone. This has also been justified mathematically (Austin et al. 2015). A combined index is also preferred due to ease of comparison between patients with different comorbidities (Moltó and Dougados 2014). Elixhauser et al. (1998) did, however, argue against such an index—although several indices have since then been proposed. It has also been suggested that the use of comorbidity indices is not well understood by surgeons and patients (Bozic et al. 2012), so individual comorbidities could be preferred for easier interpretation. Also, a composite comorbidity score does not model possible interaction effects, and it is known, for example, that diabetes mellitus increases the risk of postoperative myocardial infarction. This increased risk might be modeled better if controlling for diabetes specifically (Bohl et al. 2016), ideally by linking to the National Diabetes Register (which has a better degree of completeness of diabetes cases than the National Patient Register (Rawshani et al. 2014)). We found the highest concordance indices for the Elixhauser comorbidity index. This index is not ideal, but it was at least the best of the 3 investigated. This is consistent with previous studies on in-hospital mortality of THA patients (Menendez et al. 2014) and with a systematic review of 76 articles in general (Yurkovich et al. 2015). The absolute difference between the indices is, however, small—so the original Charlson comorbidity index might be preferred if relying on self-administrated questionnaires or other time-consuming methods (Moltó and Dougados 2014).

Strengths

The data that support this study are of high quality. The SHAR is a validated source with almost total completeness regarding both public and private THA producers in Sweden (Kärrholm 2010). The Swedish personal identity numbers also allowed us to uniquely identify and link data from the SHAR to the National Patient Register (Cnudde et al. 2016) with a validated completeness of 85–95% of most diagnoses classified by both Charlson and Elixhauser (Ludvigsson et al. 2011). The Swedish tax agency has an almost complete coverage of death dates for Swedish permanent residences. Unknown death dates occur more frequently for patients moving permanently to other countries, but emigration at high age is unlikely, and we did not see any systematic censoring pattern affecting the data. To our knowledge, our study is the first both to predict long-term all-cause mortality after THA based on comorbidity, and to use a concordance index specially designed to capture the specific nature of survival data (Heagerty and Zheng 2005) in the field of orthopedics, where it is otherwise common to rely on logistic regression.

Limitations

Comorbidity completeness through the National Patient Register is high for most comorbidities, but administrative registers might be an incomplete source of comorbidity data (Bohl et al. 2016). It is also clear that some individual comorbidities are under-reported. The National Patient Register does not cover primary healthcare visits and did not cover hospital-based outpatient data before 2001. The Elixhauser classification was in fact developed for inpatient data only, but addition of outpatient data has since been shown to be successful (Perkins et al. 2004). Completeness of outpatient data is, however, lower (80%), and this is an increasing problem—since more patients are treated as outpatients over time (Ludvigsson et al. 2011). Inclusion of data from primary healthcare would be theoretically possible but would be costly and time-consuming, since these records are decentralized among 21 Swedish counties. According to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 (Naghavi et al. 2015), 9 of the 10 most common causes of death in Sweden have good coverage by the comorbidities identified by both the Charlson and Elixhauser classification (heart disease, cancer, lung diseases, and Alzheimer’s disease). Suicide, the fifth most common cause of death in Sweden, is, however, difficult to predict from comorbidity. We used ICD-10 codes (as used in Sweden from 1997) for comorbidity, while ICD-9 is still widely used in this field. It has been shown, however, that both versions give similar results (Gordon et al. 2013), so this consideration can be safely ignored when comparing our results to those of others. Our concordance index is based on AUC values, a measure that has been the subject of some criticism. The AUC value gives equal importance to the sensitivity and specificity of a model. Weighting of these aspects differently might be relevant for further research.

Conclusion

The predictive power of comorbidity indices on mortality is weak for patients with THA—in fact, weaker than age and sex. The predictive power also decreases over time. If mortality after THA must be predicted from comorbidity, which we believe should be avoided, then the Elixhauser comorbidity index appears to be the best choice.

Supplementary data

Table 2 and Figure 4 are available as supplementary data in the online version of this article, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1341243 EB, OR, PC, CR, GG, and SN contributed to the conception and design of the study. Statistical analyses were run by EB, who also drafted the manuscript. All the authors interpreted the results, critically revised the manuscript, and approved the final version. Click here for additional data file.
  27 in total

1.  Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Bing Li; Chantal M Couris; Kiyohide Fushimi; Patrick Graham; Phil Hider; Jean-Marie Januel; Vijaya Sundararajan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Comorbidity indices.

Authors:  A Moltó; M Dougados
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 4.473

3.  Standard Comorbidity Measures Do Not Predict Patient-reported Outcomes 1 Year After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Meridith E Greene; Ola Rolfson; Max Gordon; Göran Garellick; Szilard Nemes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Cause-Specific Mortality Trends Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Clement J Michet; Cathy D Schleck; Dirk R Larson; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Daniel J Berry; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Inpatient mortality after orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Mariano E Menendez; Valentin Neuhaus; David Ring
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Why Summary Comorbidity Measures Such As the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Elixhauser Score Work.

Authors:  Steven R Austin; Yu-Ning Wong; Robert G Uzzo; J Robert Beck; Brian L Egleston
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Does Co-morbidity provide significant improvement on age adjustment when predicting medical outcomes?

Authors:  G Mnatzaganian; P Ryan; J E Hiller
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.176

8.  Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register.

Authors:  Jonas F Ludvigsson; Eva Andersson; Anders Ekbom; Maria Feychting; Jeong-Lim Kim; Christina Reuterwall; Mona Heurgren; Petra Otterblad Olausson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Linking Swedish health data registers to establish a research database and a shared decision-making tool in hip replacement.

Authors:  Peter Cnudde; Ola Rolfson; Szilard Nemes; Johan Kärrholm; Clas Rehnberg; Cecilia Rogmark; John Timperley; Göran Garellick
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  15 in total

1.  Is Parkinson's Disease Associated with Increased Mortality, Poorer Outcomes Scores, and Revision Risk After THA? Findings from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Alex Leigh Wojtowicz; Maziar Mohaddes; Daniel Odin; Erik Bülow; Szilard Nemes; Peter Cnudde
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  How Does Mortality Risk Change Over Time After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ian A Harris; Alesha Hatton; Nicole Pratt; Michelle Lorimer; Justine M Naylor; Richard de Steiger; Peter Lewis; Stephen E Graves
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The ability of comorbidity indices to predict mortality in an orthopedic setting: a systematic review.

Authors:  Per Hviid Gundtoft; Mari Jørstad; Julie Ladeby Erichsen; Hagen Schmal; Bjarke Viberg
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-18

4.  Do Patients Live Longer After THA and Is the Relative Survival Diagnosis-specific?

Authors:  Peter Cnudde; Ola Rolfson; A John Timperley; Anne Garland; Johan Kärrholm; Göran Garellick; Szilard Nemes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Is Preoperative Patient-Reported Health Status Associated with Mortality after Total Hip Replacement?

Authors:  Peter Cnudde; Szilard Nemes; Maziar Mohaddes; John Timperley; Göran Garellick; Kristina Burström; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Impact of comorbidity on the short- and medium-term risk of revision in total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jorge Arias-de la Torre; Kayla Smith; Alexandru Dregan; Jose M Valderas; Jonathan P Evans; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Luis Lozano; Antonio J Molina; Vicente Martín; Laia Domingo; Laura Muñoz; Mireia Espallargues
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Prevalence and treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis in people aged 60 years or older in Germany: an analysis based on health insurance claims data.

Authors:  Anne Postler; Andres Luque Ramos; Jens Goronzy; Klaus-Peter Günther; Toni Lange; Jochen Schmitt; Angela Zink; Falk Hoffmann
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  Risk of further surgery on the same or opposite side and mortality after primary total hip arthroplasty: A multi-state analysis of 133,654 patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Peter H J Cnudde; Szilard Nemes; Erik Bülow; A John Timperley; Sarah L Whitehouse; Johan Kärrholm; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 9.  The Update on Instruments Used for Evaluation of Comorbidities in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Łukasz Pulik; Michał Podgajny; Wiktor Kaczyński; Sylwia Sarzyńska; Paweł Łęgosz
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Five years' trajectories of functionality and pain in patients after hip or knee replacement and association with long-term patient survival.

Authors:  Stefan Repky; Gisela Büchele; Klaus-Peter Günther; Klaus Huch; Hermann Brenner; Til Stürmer; Jan Beyersmann; Rolf E Brenner; Dietrich Rothenbacher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.