Literature DB >> 28657030

Pseudo-anion gap acidosis.

Sankar D Navaneethan1, Robert Mooney2, James Sloand1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  acidosis; anion gap

Year:  2008        PMID: 28657030      PMCID: PMC5477902          DOI: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfm032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NDT Plus        ISSN: 1753-0784


× No keyword cloud information.

Case

A 74-year-old Caucasian male was referred to our clinic for low serum bicarbonate levels and a high anion gap (HAG). Past medical history included hypertension, hypothyroidism, iron deficiency anaemia secondary to gastrointestinal bleeding and hyperlipidaemia. He was on Bicitra 30 mL orally three times daily, levothyroxine 75 mcg daily, atorvastatin 10 mg daily, ferrous sulphate 324 mg daily and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg daily. He denied smoking, alcoholism or illegal drug abuse. Physical exam was unremarkable. His laboratory values obtained over the 18 months after our evaluation are outlined in Table 1. Arterial blood gas showed a pH of 7.37, PCO of 35 mmHg and PO of 87 mmHg when the serum HCO3- level was 12 mEq/L. Serum lactate levels on several occasions were <2.2 mmol/L. Serum ketones were negative and the beta-hydroxybutyrate level was mildly elevated at 3.60 mg/dL (normal 0–3.0 mg/dL). Salicylate level was <1 mg/dL. d-Lactate levels were immeasurable. Thiamine levels were normal. A serum and urine protein electrophoresis did not reveal any paraproteinaemia. Urinalysis revealed a specific gravity of 1.020, pH 6.0 with negative protein and blood by dipstick. Urine toxicology screens for ethanol, methanol, ethylene glycol and isopropanol were negative. His urine organic acid profile was normal and no 5-oxoproline was detected. He was started on various forms of bicarbonate supplementation and atorvastatin was stopped, but neither bicarbonate levels nor anion gap changed significantly (Table 1).
Table 1

Laboratory results of our patient over 18 months

Dates
VariablesNormal valuesJanuary 2006March 2006July 2006November 2006January 2007March 2007June 2007
Na (mmol/L)132–146141140142140140140138
K (mmol/L)3.5–5.54.44.44.34.64.14.34.9
Cl (mmol/L)99–109111106106104106106106
HCO3 (mmol/L)20–3210131210<1010<10
Anion gap7–1620222426>2424>22
Glucose (mg/dL)74–10694859294898286
BUN (mg/dL)9–2329202932262029
Cr (mg/dL)0.7–1.31.51.41.31.41.61.31.3
Phos (mg/dL)2.4–5.12.83.22.83.22.8
UA (mg/dL)3.7–9.29.07.6
Albumin (g/dL)3.2–4.84.14.34.54.14.04.3
Mg (mEq/L)1.1–2.21.91.9
Ca (mg/dL)8.6–10.28.18.68.68.88.99.1
Hb (g/dL)14–17.58.811.912.711.610.611.913.6
Hct (%)42–5227363834333642

Na = sodium, K = potassium, Cl = chloride, HCO3 = bicarbonate, BUN = blood urea nitrogen, Cr = creatinine, Phos = phosphorus, UA = uric acid, Mg = magnesium, Ca = calcium, Hb = haemoglobin, Hct = haematocrit.

Laboratory results of our patient over 18 months Na = sodium, K = potassium, Cl = chloride, HCO3 = bicarbonate, BUN = blood urea nitrogen, Cr = creatinine, Phos = phosphorus, UA = uric acid, Mg = magnesium, Ca = calcium, Hb = haemoglobin, Hct = haematocrit. In the absence of any apparent explanation for a decrease in serum bicarbonate with an HAG despite extensive work-up, we questioned the validity of the laboratory testing. As such, venous blood was drawn from the patient into a heparinized tube, with equal aliquots taken for enzymatic measurement of bicarbonate [1] and indirect measurement utilizing reference electrode assessment of pH and carbon dioxide, followed by logarithmic calculation of the bicarbonate level [2]. The HCO3- level by the former was 10 mEq/L. Blood gas technology provided a venous HCO3- measurement of 31 mEq/L with a pH of 7.43, PO of 78 mmHg and PCO of 46 mmHg. Multiple repeat measurements confirmed this finding. To assess the possibility of an endogenous inhibitor or interfering substance, a sample of the patient's serum (7.7 mEq/L bicarbonate by an enzymatic method) was sequentially diluted with either a normal serum (25.6 mEq/L bicarbonate) or a commercial bicarbonate solution (31.9 mEq/L). Bicarbonate values were determined by the enzymatic method and compared to the predicted content of bicarbonate in the admixtures. Recovery of bicarbonate was at least 85–90% at all dilutions (Figure 1). This does not support the presence of an excess soluble inhibitor, since the patient's serum did not significantly affect detection of bicarbonate in admixtures. Conversely, recoveries did not rise above 100%, indicating that suppression of the patient's bicarbonate measurement was not due to a weak or low concentration inhibitor that could be overcome with dilution.
Fig. 1

Admixtures of the affected patient serum with other bicarbonate sources yield predicted bicarbonate levels. Aliquots of affected serum (7.7 mEq/L) were mixed with either a bicarbonate solution (31.9 mEq/L) or a normal serum (25.6 mEq/L) at the indicated percentages. Measured bicarbonate levels in the admixtures were plotted together with the predicted bicarbonate values in the admixtures calculated from the sum of the individual component contributions.

Admixtures of the affected patient serum with other bicarbonate sources yield predicted bicarbonate levels. Aliquots of affected serum (7.7 mEq/L) were mixed with either a bicarbonate solution (31.9 mEq/L) or a normal serum (25.6 mEq/L) at the indicated percentages. Measured bicarbonate levels in the admixtures were plotted together with the predicted bicarbonate values in the admixtures calculated from the sum of the individual component contributions. It has been reported that the calculated bicarbonate method has a positive bias relative to the enzymatic method [3,4]. To determine the magnitude of this bias in our laboratory, 88 pairs of patient results for both calculated and enzymatic bicarbonate were compared. As shown in Figure 2, a positive bias of 1.7 mEq/L was observed. This is in close agreement with a positive bias of 1.6 mEq/L that was reported by Story et al. [3]. While a positive bias in the calculated bicarbonate is observed, it is very unlikely that our patient's observed difference of 21 mEq/L between the calculated and enzymatic methods is explained by this methodologic bias.
Fig. 2

Bland–Altman plot of the difference between calculated bicarbonate and enzymatic measurement of serum bicarbonate. Data represent a series of 88 paired patient data sets of calculated bicarbonate, derived from the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation applied to arterial blood gas parameters and a matched serum bicarbonate measurement. Units are mEq/L. Solid line represents the mean difference or bias of 1.7 mEq/L. Several data points are superimposed.

Bland–Altman plot of the difference between calculated bicarbonate and enzymatic measurement of serum bicarbonate. Data represent a series of 88 paired patient data sets of calculated bicarbonate, derived from the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation applied to arterial blood gas parameters and a matched serum bicarbonate measurement. Units are mEq/L. Solid line represents the mean difference or bias of 1.7 mEq/L. Several data points are superimposed. The underlying source of HAG acidosis is usually detected based on the clinical scenario and the basic laboratory test results [5]. Apart from the common causes of metabolic acidosis, several cases of HAG acidosis due to rhabdomyolysis, hyperphosphataemia, toluene poisoning, thiamine deficiency, statins, d-lactic acidosis, accumulation of Kreb cycle intermediates such as citrate and isocitrate, acetaminophen toxicity or 5-oxoprolinase deficiency and propylene glycol have been reported [5-9]. We excluded the above-mentioned possible causes of HAG metabolic acidosis, with appropriate blood and urine tests. Lowering of the serum bicarbonate level without any alteration in other elements of the chemistry profile will de facto result in an apparent widening of the normal anion gap by pure mathematical means. The resulting diagnosis of an HAG metabolic acidosis is contingent upon valid bicarbonate measurement. Factitious reduction in laboratory measures of serum bicarbonate levels due to interfering substances or serum-specific factors has, to our knowledge, never been reported. The inhibition of serum bicarbonate in this case does not appear to be due to an excess of a soluble inhibitor or interfering substance. The suppression of bicarbonate quantitation was neither reversed by dilution nor transferred to a mixture of patient serum with a second source of bicarbonate. The patient's bicarbonate appears to be at least partially inaccessible to the enzyme reactions in the bicarbonate assay, yet accountable in the indirect calculation using the Henderson–Hasselbach equation. At this time, the nature of the inhibition remains unknown. Clinicians depend upon the veracity of the assay for serum bicarbonate to make accurate assessment of acid–base disturbances. As demonstrated here, factitious reduction in serum HCO3- levels coupled with an HAG can occur and should be a consideration in an otherwise healthy-appearing individual in whom organic acids are not present in excess. Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
  9 in total

1.  Comparison of three methods to estimate plasma bicarbonate in critically ill patients: Henderson-Hasselbalch, enzymatic, and strong-ion-gap.

Authors:  D A Story; S Poustie; R Bellomo
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.669

2.  Agreement between two plasma bicarbonate assays in critically ill patients.

Authors:  D A Story; S Poustie
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.669

3.  Electrodes for blood pO2 and pCO2 determination.

Authors:  J W SEVERINGHAUS; A F BRADLEY
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1958-11       Impact factor: 3.531

4.  Colorimetric enzymatic determination of serum total carbon dioxide, as applied to the Vickers Multichannel 300 discrete analyzer.

Authors:  K A Norris; A R Atkinson; W G Smith
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Metabolic acidosis and thiamine deficiency.

Authors:  S A Romanski; M M McMahon
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 6.  Statin precipitated lactic acidosis?

Authors:  R Neale; T M Reynolds; W Saweirs
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Increased anion gap metabolic acidosis as a result of 5-oxoproline (pyroglutamic acid): a role for acetaminophen.

Authors:  Andrew Z Fenves; Haskell M Kirkpatrick; Viralkumar V Patel; Lawrence Sweetman; Michael Emmett
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 8.  Serum anion gap: its uses and limitations in clinical medicine.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kraut; Nicolaos E Madias
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Circulating anions usually associated with the Krebs cycle in patients with metabolic acidosis.

Authors:  Lui G Forni; William McKinnon; Gwyn A Lord; David F Treacher; Jean-Marie R Peron; Philip J Hilton
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.