Literature DB >> 28656163

Responsiveness of Static and Dynamic Postural Balance Measures in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Following Physiotherapy Intervention.

Neda Mostafaee1, Mohammad J Shaterzadeh Yazdi1, Hossein Negahban1, Shahin Goharpey1, Mohammad Mehravar1, Nahid Pirayeh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The main goal of physiotherapy for patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is to improve postural control and retain knee function. Therefore, clinicians need to use evaluative tools that assess postural changes during physiotherapy. To maximize the clinical utility of the results of these tools, the extracted measures should have appropriate psychometric properties of reliability, validity and responsiveness. No study has yet addressed responsiveness of postural measures in these patients. This study was designed to investigate the responsiveness and determine the minimal clinically important changes (MCIC) of static and dynamic postural measures in patients with (ACL-R) following physiotherapy.
METHODS: Static and dynamic postural measures were evaluated at first occasion and again after four weeks physiotherapy. The static measures consisted of center of pressure (COP) parameters while dynamic measures included the stability indices. Correlation analysis and ROC curve were applied for assessing the responsiveness.
RESULTS: The meanand SD velocity of COP had acceptable responsiveness in both conditions of standing on injured leg with open-eyes and on uninjured leg with closed-eyes, both with nocognitive task. For dynamic measures, stability indices in double-leg standing with closed-eyes with cognitive task condition attained acceptable responsiveness. MCICs for mean and SD velocity in anteroposterior and mediolateral directions were 0.28cm/s, 0.008cm/s, 0.02cm/s, respectively in standing on injured leg with open-eyes; and 0.14cm/s, 0.07cm/s, 0.06cm/s, respectively in uninjured leg with closed-eyes condition. Also, MCICs for anteroposterior, mediolateral and total stability indices were 0.51°, 0.37°, 0.34°, respectively in DCT condition.
CONCLUSION: Our findings provide evidence for selection of appropriate static and dynamic postural measures for assessment of changes in these patients. MCICs for these measures were determined, which provide practical information for clinicians to make decision on clinical significance of changes in patients' status.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Physiotherapy; Postural balance measures; Responsiveness

Year:  2017        PMID: 28656163      PMCID: PMC5466860     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  26 in total

Review 1.  Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.

Authors:  J A Husted; R J Cook; V T Farewell; D D Gladman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Responsiveness to change of 10 physical tests used for patients with back pain.

Authors:  Liv Inger Strand; Bodil Anderson; Hildegunn Lygren; Jan Sture Skouen; Raymond Ostelo; Liv Heide Magnussen
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-01-27

Review 3.  Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Dennis Revicki; Ron D Hays; David Cella; Jeff Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Balance measures for discriminating between functionally unstable and stable ankles.

Authors:  Scott E Ross; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Michael T Gross; Bing Yu
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Reliability of center of pressure measures of postural stability in healthy older adults: effects of postural task difficulty and cognitive load.

Authors:  Mojgan Moghadam; Hassan Ashayeri; Mahyar Salavati; Javad Sarafzadeh; Keyvan Davatgaran Taghipoor; Ahmad Saeedi; Reza Salehi
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 6.  Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores.

Authors:  P W Stratford; J M Binkley; D L Riddle
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1996-10

7.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  R A Deyo; R M Centor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

8.  Attentional demands of postural control during single leg stance in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Hossein Negahban; Payam Ahmadi; Reza Salehi; Mohammad Mehravar; Shahin Goharpey
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  One-footed and externally disturbed two-footed postural control in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects. A controlled study with follow-up.

Authors:  S Luoto; H Aalto; S Taimela; H Hurri; I Pyykkö; H Alaranta
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The lower extremity functional scale has good clinimetric properties in people with ankle fracture.

Authors:  Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Anne M Moseley; Kathryn M Refshauge; Anita C Bundy
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-05-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendons Has no Deleterious Effect on Hip Extension Strength.

Authors:  Hosseinali Hadi; Abolfazl Bagherifar; Fereshte Tayebi; Majid Ansaria; Ali Shahsavaripour; Iman Qomashi; Mahmoud Jabalameli
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.