BACKGROUND: This study has aimed to measure the patient dose in entire spine radiography by EOS system in comparison with the digital radiography. METHODS: EOS stereo-radiography was used for frontal and lateral view spine imaging in 41 patients in a prospective analytical study. A calibrated dose area product (DAP) meter was used for calibration of the DAP in EOS system. The accuracy and precision of the system was confirmed according to the acceptance testing. The same procedure was used for 18 patients referred for lumbar spine digital radiology (overall 36 images). RESULTS: Although radiation fields in the EOS were almost twice of that in digital radiology, and the average peak tube voltage (kVp), current supply to the tube (mA), and the average size and age of the patients referred for EOS imaging were greater than digital radiology, however, the average DAP in EOS was 1/5 of that in digital radiology system. Also, the average dose in the EOS was about 1/20 of that in digital radiology. CONCLUSION: The patient dose in EOS imaging system was lower in comparison with digital radiology (1/20).
BACKGROUND: This study has aimed to measure the patient dose in entire spine radiography by EOS system in comparison with the digital radiography. METHODS: EOS stereo-radiography was used for frontal and lateral view spine imaging in 41 patients in a prospective analytical study. A calibrated dose area product (DAP) meter was used for calibration of the DAP in EOS system. The accuracy and precision of the system was confirmed according to the acceptance testing. The same procedure was used for 18 patients referred for lumbar spine digital radiology (overall 36 images). RESULTS: Although radiation fields in the EOS were almost twice of that in digital radiology, and the average peak tube voltage (kVp), current supply to the tube (mA), and the average size and age of the patients referred for EOS imaging were greater than digital radiology, however, the average DAP in EOS was 1/5 of that in digital radiology system. Also, the average dose in the EOS was about 1/20 of that in digital radiology. CONCLUSION: The patient dose in EOS imaging system was lower in comparison with digital radiology (1/20).
Entities:
Keywords:
Digital radiography; Dose area product; Dosimetry; EOS; Stereo radiography
Authors: C McKenna; R Wade; R Faria; H Yang; L Stirk; N Gummerson; M Sculpher; N Woolacott Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2012 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Benjamin G Escott; Bheeshma Ravi; Adam C Weathermon; Jay Acharya; Christopher L Gordon; Paul S Babyn; Simon P Kelley; Unni G Narayanan Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 5.284