Literature DB >> 28655498

Mind Games: Game Engines as an Architecture for Intuitive Physics.

Tomer D Ullman1, Elizabeth Spelke2, Peter Battaglia3, Joshua B Tenenbaum4.   

Abstract

We explore the hypothesis that many intuitive physical inferences are based on a mental physics engine that is analogous in many ways to the machine physics engines used in building interactive video games. We describe the key features of game physics engines and their parallels in human mental representation, focusing especially on the intuitive physics of young infants where the hypothesis helps to unify many classic and otherwise puzzling phenomena, and may provide the basis for a computational account of how the physical knowledge of infants develops. This hypothesis also explains several 'physics illusions', and helps to inform the development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems with more human-like common sense.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28655498     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  18 in total

1.  Catastrophic individuation failures in infancy: A new model and predictions.

Authors:  Maayan Stavans; Yi Lin; Di Wu; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  Cognitive computational neuroscience.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Pamela K Douglas
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Invariant representation of physical stability in the human brain.

Authors:  R T Pramod; Michael A Cohen; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  The trajectory of counterfactual simulation in development.

Authors:  Jonathan F Kominsky; Tobias Gerstenberg; Madeline Pelz; Mark Sheskin; Henrik Singmann; Laura Schulz; Frank C Keil
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2021-02

5.  Preverbal infants expect agents exhibiting counterintuitive capacities to gain access to contested resources.

Authors:  Xianwei Meng; Yo Nakawake; Kazuhide Hashiya; Emily Burdett; Jonathan Jong; Harvey Whitehouse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  How do non-human primates represent others' awareness of where objects are hidden?

Authors:  Daniel J Horschler; Laurie R Santos; Evan L MacLean
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2021-03-24

7.  When it all falls down: the relationship between intuitive physics and spatial cognition.

Authors:  Alex Mitko; Jason Fischer
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-05-19

8.  The statistical shape of geometric reasoning.

Authors:  Yuval Hart; Moira R Dillon; Andrew Marantan; Anna L Cardenas; Elizabeth Spelke; L Mahadevan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Judgments of effort for magical violations of intuitive physics.

Authors:  John McCoy; Tomer Ullman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Speed Biases With Real-Life Video Clips.

Authors:  Federica Rossi; Elisa Montanaro; Claudio de'Sperati
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.