| Literature DB >> 28655161 |
Meiyi Li1,2,3, Chen Li1,2, Wei-Xin Liu1,4,5, Conghui Liu1,2,5, Jingru Cui1,2, Qingrun Li1,2, Hong Ni1,2, Yingcheng Yang6, Chaochao Wu1,2, Chunlei Chen1,2, Xing Zhen2, Tao Zeng1,2, Mujun Zhao2, Lei Chen6,7, Jiarui Wu1,2,4,8, Rong Zeng1,2,4, Luonan Chen1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Little is known about how chronic inflammation contributes to the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), especially the initiation of cancer. To uncover the critical transition from chronic inflammation to HCC and the molecular mechanisms at a network level, we analyzed the time-series proteomic data of woodchuck hepatitis virus/c-myc mice and age-matched wt-C57BL/6 mice using our dynamical network biomarker (DNB) model. DNB analysis indicated that the 5th month after birth of transgenic mice was the critical period of cancer initiation, just before the critical transition, which is consistent with clinical symptoms. Meanwhile, the DNB-associated network showed a drastic inversion of protein expression and coexpression levels before and after the critical transition. Two members of DNB, PLA2G6 and CYP2C44, along with their associated differentially expressed proteins, were found to induce dysfunction of arachidonic acid metabolism, further activate inflammatory responses through inflammatory mediator regulation of transient receptor potential channels, and finally lead to impairments of liver detoxification and malignant transition to cancer. As a c-Myc target, PLA2G6 positively correlated with c-Myc in expression, showing a trend from decreasing to increasing during carcinogenesis, with the minimal point at the critical transition or tipping point. Such trend of homologous PLA2G6 and c-Myc was also observed during human hepatocarcinogenesis, with the minimal point at high-grade dysplastic nodules (a stage just before the carcinogenesis). Our study implies that PLA2G6 might function as an oncogene like famous c-Myc during hepatocarcinogenesis, while downregulation of PLA2G6 and c-Myc could be a warning signal indicating imminent carcinogenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28655161 PMCID: PMC5907842 DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mjx021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Cell Biol ISSN: 1759-4685 Impact factor: 6.216
Figure 1The progression of hepatocellular carcinogenesis in WHV/c-myc transgenic mice and protein expression analyses. (A) A schematic diagram illustrates different pathophysiological symptoms of the liver during the progression of hepatocellular carcinogenesis in the WHV/c-myc transgenic mouse model. Liver tissue samples from 25 WHV/c-myc mice (cases) and 25 wt-C57BL/6 mice (controls), five mice per group at 2, 3, 5, 7, and 11 months after birth, respectively, were collected to measure protein expressions (Supplementary Figure S1). (B) PCA result shows sample clustering along disease progression based on 1465 DEPs. Each small spheroid represents the PC score along the top three principle components for each sample. Clearly, 25 case samples were clustered in three groups representing inflammation state, mixed state, and cancer state, respectively. Notably, T5 samples were not clustered together but scattered in two groups. One of T7 samples was also scattered in the inflammation state group. In contrast, 25 control samples were all clustered in the inflammation state group. (C) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering with PCC distance was performed to distinguish different stages based on 1465 DEPs. Similarly, T5 samples were not grouped together but scattered, implying that the 5th month after birth is different from other periods and is a key period from inflammation to HCC. C indicates a control sample (e.g. C2.3 is the 2-month-old control sample No.3) and T indicates a case sample (e.g. T7.4 is the 7-month-old case sample No.4).
Figure 2DNB analysis in the critical transition model identifies the critical period from inflammation to HCC based on proteomic data. (A−C) Schematic illustrations of DNB method. (A) DNB method can identify the pre-cancer state at the critical period, by observing dynamic signals of the corresponding molecules in the dominant group. (B) DNB as a network signals the emergence of the critical transition. When the system approaches the pre-cancer state, PCC of molecule-pairs in DNB or dominant group (PCC) increase, while PCC between molecules in this group and others (PCC) decrease. (C) When the system approaches the pre-cancer state, DNB members strongly fluctuate or have high SD near the critical transition, compared with other disease-associated molecules. (D and E) Results of DNB analysis based on label-free proteomic data of 50 samples. (D) This series of diagrams visually show the three key criteria of DNB over five different periods during disease progression. PCC, PCC, and SD are similarly calculated as the definitions of PCC, PCC, and SD, after comparing with the corresponding controls. (E) This series of networks graphically demonstrate the dynamic changes in the network structure and concentration variations of the identified DNB and DNB-coexpressed proteins. Clearly, DNB members are strongly correlated and fluctuated at the 5th month, which are recognized as the signals of the critical state. SD is the differential deviation defined as the ratio of SD between transgenic mice and control mice at the same time point. PCC is the differential correlation defined as the difference in absolute PCCs between transgenic mice and control mice at the same time point.
Figure 3Rewiring of the DNB-associated network with dynamic changes of DEPs or DCEs before and after the critical period. (A and B) Significant overlapping between nodes in the DNB-associated network and DEPs (A) or between links of the DNB-associated network and DCEs (B) during the whole period (2−11 months) and during 3−7 months (including 3 vs. 5, 5 vs. 7, and 3 vs. 7 months) implies functional relations between DNB members and DEPs or DCEs, especially during the critical period. (C and D) Dynamic changes of the DNB-associated network in expressions (C) and coregulations (D) before and after the critical period. The expressions of 75 DNB-associated DEPs (Supplementary Table S2) and correlations or regulations of 86 DNB-associated DCEs (Supplementary Table S3) significantly changed (or inversed) before and after the critical period in transgenic mice, implying key roles of DNB members in coordinating the critical transition from inflammation to HCC across the 5th month.
Figure 4Functional phenotyping of DNB, DEPs, and DCEs in the DNB-associated network. Four clusters were classified by Mfuzz clustering in R to represent the dynamic expression or coregulation patterns. The heatmap shows related KEGG pathways, which were clustered according to the enrichments of corresponding proteins in different dynamic patterns.
Figure 5Validation of DNB, DEPs, and DCEs by TMT proteomic data. (A) Comparison between label-free and TMT profiles. For xcxx and xxcx, c means ‘must be changed’ during 3−5 months or 5−7 months, and x means ‘not required to be changed’. (B) Density curves of PCC between label-free profile and TMT profile in WHV/c-myc transgenic mice (red), C57BL/6 control mice (blue), and both mice (black). (C) A heatmap shows the reproduced dynamic profiles with validated DNB, DEPs, and linked (second) nodes of DCE links (PCC > 0.8) in WHV/c-myc transgenic mice. More information of 136 nodes is listed in Supplementary Table S5, and second nodes of the DCEs in Supplementary Figure S10.
Figure 6PLA2G6 downregulation at the tipping point or during the critical period of liver cancer initiation. Relative protein expression levels of CYP2C44 (A), PLA2G6 (B), and c-Myc (C) in WHV/c-myc transgenic mice. Similar profiles were obtained from individual mouse (shadow-bar) and pooled samples (gray-bar). (D) Relative gene expression levels of PLA2G6 and c-Myc of patients with LGDN, HGDN, or early HCC.
Figure 7DNB-associated aberrant AA and xenobiotics metabolisms and abnormal inflammatory mediator regulation of TRP channels. (A) A schematic diagram shows that dysfunction of PLA2G6 and CYP2C44-associated AA metabolism activates inflammatory responses through inflammatory mediator regulation of TRP channels, which can lead to impairments of liver detoxification and further malignant transition to cancer. The dynamic expression profile of 136 proteins in this diagram derived from the comparison between label-free and TMT profiles was summarized in Supplementary Table S5. (B) A simplified diagram for A.